Unless you are eating or drinking.
I'm going to have a straw so I can constantly drink my bourbon and coke and just have my mask hanging from my ear. Loopholes...gotta find the loopholes.
About tomorrow's game...
- Thread starter duboserm
- Start date
Unless you are eating or drinking.
I'm going to have a straw so I can constantly drink my bourbon and coke and just have my mask hanging from my ear. Loopholes...gotta find the loopholes.
Football above politics. Sadly, I won’t be at the game. Cheer extra loud for me @duboserm! The players are going to be so excited to play in front of fans. I hope the small crowd tomorrow is crazy loud!
Then the question is where you choose to fight that battle. Not to put words in OP's mouth, but my sense is that he is saying that the Clemson home games aren't the place to fight that battle. I think you fight it at the voting booth and in your choices of where you choose to do business. But the net result of a bunch of people violating the rules at the Clemson/Citadel game on Saturday is a win only in the minds of the people doing it. There is no other gain to anyone, and the violators will not have won anything other than a feeling of self-satisfaction and probably some Facebook posts where they show themselves flaunting the rules, fishing for Likes from people who are already agree with them anyway.
nailed it. just follow the rules at the game. If you want to flaunt societal rules, or make a statement, join the asshats marching into target without masks and posting on SM.
I dont agree with this but I did laugh (not be sarcastic)! See, we can all get along even if we differ on this gosh forbid situation.
We need to start a petition to have your username changed to karennhop
Why are people such assholes that they can’t just follow the rules so we have football. Props to OP.
The eagerness to be divisive these days is pretty disturbing. That goes for both sides of the aisle.
The eagerness to be divisive these days is pretty disturbing. That goes for both sides of the aisle.
I wish I could like this 1000000 times
I wear a mask when out, but I noticed Nancy Pelosi doesn’t wear one at her Spa.
Someone PLEASE take a picture and post it of Amh being escorted out of the stadium for not wearing a mask.
Yep, move it to the round table now that the racist crap has started.
And why haven’t the scientists created a specific set of “mask wearing rules” regarding the scientifically proven and verified safe frequency of using the same mask over a established number of consecutive uses? This mask wearing rule book should also include what to do if one is experiencing elevated mucus levels due to allergies for example. Also, this rule book must include subsections where rules/guidelines are outlined for neck gaiters, face shields, and all types of masks that are most likely to be in circulation for use....Also, the government could create teams of pseudoscientists or even scientists to randomly sample the population to ensure proper safe interval usage of masks. I mean if we’re going to do masks, let’s do it right and go ALL IN!!! Right??
Congratulations on that entry into the Virtue Signaling Hall of Fame OP.
If it were possible to Retroactively Ball you from Sigma Nu, I would be a yes vote.
Just shut your ****ing sanctimonious pie hole; go the game; and try not to let Charlie Whitehurst plow your wife.
If it were possible to Retroactively Ball you from Sigma Nu, I would be a yes vote.
Just shut your ****ing sanctimonious pie hole; go the game; and try not to let Charlie Whitehurst plow your wife.
If I ever win a multi-million dollar lottery jackpot, I would give Cris a blank check to ban the 3rd poster in this thread for life....literally, I would give him more than a million dollars....Y'all can thank me later.
People like the OP make me not want to wear masks.
I always do and will on Saturday, but good lord what a douche sounding post.
I always do and will on Saturday, but good lord what a douche sounding post.
How about just follow the rules so we can have fans at games following the Citadel and not question the rules!!
There are plenty of rules I don’t like that I follow anyway. If I don’t like the rule I stay home. It’s so simple.
We have hoped and prayed for a football season to actually happen and now that it’s actually happening we’re going to bitch about inconveniences? The time for deciding if the rules are necessary or not is over. Go, wear your mask, or stay home.
We have hoped and prayed for a football season to actually happen and now that it’s actually happening we’re going to bitch about inconveniences? The time for deciding if the rules are necessary or not is over. Go, wear your mask, or stay home.
I think it’s ridiculous folks can’t smoke marijuana in their homes if they so please. I don’t, because it’s against the law.
I agree that masks outside seems ridiculous. Unfortunately, that’s the rule that’s been passed down and in order to continue to enjoy football it is simply a burden that must be borne. It is such a simple and easy sacrifice to make for a payoff that far exceeds the sacrifice.
Not wearing a Mask will not change the legislation. It will just identify you as a selfish American who refuses to participate in their civic duty.
edit to say: I’m conservative for the record.
I can assure you that I am not trolling! I do hope that you are trolling about wearing a full body suit!
The stupidity of people who think that wearing a mask around 20k people, even outside, isn’t safer than NOT wearing a mask will never cease to amaze me.
But but but that’s not what my ultra partisan news channel/twitter feed/Facebook epidemiologist friend said!!!
There is a lot out there, but I like this from UCSF because it breaks it down in words I can understand:
Still Confused About Masks? Here’s the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus
We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.www.ucsf.edu
No offense but this is circumstantial evidence. The data showing a reduction in 15 states doesn’t consider other measures that were implemented to reduce exposure. How do you quantify a reduction when you also had social distancing, closures and isolations? This is a logical argument but there is no scientific data to supports its conclusion.
Then they use a wet cloth as one example. Who wears a wet cloth around their face?
I agree about following rules. It’s too bad that lawless democrat Marxist are being paid and encouraged to riot, loot, and murder. Then Biden and Harris have people on their staff bail out these criminals. The left has become the party of domestic terrorist
