Well, I cant say I feel really sorry for him. He admitted that he made that shit up about them in an actual court document, not some speech from the courthouse steps.
Now he's STILL ranting and raving after the fact that they were actually doing this stuff.
Well, we know that Rudy was actually in D.C. at the Whitehouse on election night. So he wasn't there looking at them. So in the real world, he should have had some pretty clear cut evidence of cheating before accusing them right? You know, video, eye witness accounts, some sort of accounting proof... in other words, ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
Now to be fair, Rudy claims to have this. So my question would be. If there WAS cheating AND you had evidence of this, wouldn't it have been a GREAT time to present that while the recounts and audits were going on in Ga? OR MAYBE when Trump's hand picked Federal Prosecutor came to Atlanta to check things out?
So while I do think the award for Rudy was too high, it pretty hard for me to believe him when he says he has the evidence.
But I'm not a lawyer, so maybe there was some reason not to do that. But again, if you had said evidence, wouldn't a GREAT time to present that have been while you were getting sued for millions and millions of dollars by the very people you have that evidence against?