Well then you must be really shitty at your job. You are not non-partisan
Well that's not very nice. I'm perfectly capable of having partisan views and not allowing those views to impact what I do at my office.
Well then you must be really shitty at your job. You are not non-partisan
Dont forget house and senate investigations into partisan bullshit, wasting time and money.You all are likely to win the house and Senate. And then McCarthy and McConnell are going to struggle to contain the freedom caucus folks and your going to squander your chances to propose (even if it wouldnt pass due to vetos or filibusters) legislation that improves the lives of Americans. Americans will see what letting MTG and Boebert et al govern will look like and it's not going to be pretty.
My 2 cents at least.
You should hire @nytigerfan , as he’s Captain Independent‼️Well that's not very nice. I'm perfectly capable of having partisan views and not allowing those views to impact what I do at my office.
Oh god this is all too good hahahahaNo, this is the part where I claim you're too dumb to understand the treason stuff because you don't care if he's guilty or not.
"Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller emphasized on Wednesday he had not exonerated Donald Trump of obstruction of justice, as the president has claimed"
"Questioned by Democrat Val Demings, Mueller said he “generally” agreed that Trump’s written answers to his investigators were not always truthful after the president refused to submit to a face-to-face interview. Mueller also said his team decided not to exercise its subpoena powers against Trump to force an interview last year because of “the necessity of expediting the end of the investigation.”
Asked about Trump’s past comments praising WikiLeaks - the website that published stolen Democratic emails the inquiry found were hacked by Russians to harm Trump’s election opponent, Hillary Clinton - Mueller said: “‘Problematic’ is an understatement.”
“Let me say one more thing,” Mueller said. “Over the course of my career, I have seen a number of challenges to our democracy. The Russian government’s effort to interfere with our election is among the most serious.”
Under questioning, Mueller said his report detailed “multiple acts by the president that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian interference and obstruction investigations.”
He added: “The finding indicates ... that the president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed.”
Mueller’s investigation led to criminal charges against 34 people and three Russian entities. People who were convicted at trial or pleaded guilty included Trump’s former campaign chairman, deputy chairman and other aides."
![]()
Mueller says Trump was not exonerated; Trump declares victory
Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller emphasized on Wednesday he had not exonerated Donald Trump of obstruction of justice, as the president has claimed, but his long-awaited congressional testimony did little to add momentum to any Democratic impeachment ambitions and Trump...www.reuters.com
“I’m reasonable”Everyone is biased. It's nonsense to suggest people aren't. I'm just, obviously, far more reasonable than you are.
Still believe the Trump Russia hoax I see.They had a responsibility to look into the allegations against Papadopoulos and the Russian hacking of the DNC server. There was a lot of smoke and just to remind you for the 100th time, Trump refused to sit for a deposition so we didn't hear from the star witness. Mueller also didn't exonerate him.
This also doesn't exonerate you from self-reflection on your complicity.
"The hacking and the revelation that a member of the Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving factors that led the F.B.I. to open an investigation in July 2016 into Russia’s attempts to disrupt the election and whether any of President Trump’s associates conspired.
If Mr. Papadopoulos, who pleaded guilty to lying to the F.B.I. and is now a cooperating witness, was the improbable match that set off a blaze that has consumed the first year of the Trump administration, his saga is also a tale of the Trump campaign in miniature. He was brash, boastful and underqualified, yet he exceeded expectations. And, like the campaign itself, he proved to be a tantalizing target for a Russian influence operation."
![]()
How the Russia Inquiry Began: A Campaign Aide, Drinks and Talk of Political Dirt (Published 2017)
George Papadopoulos, a Trump foreign policy adviser, was the improbable match that set off a blaze that has consumed the first year of the Trump administration.www.nytimes.com
Are you referring to wording of this statement or are you stating that Trump did collude with Russia for the record?People who say insane shit like this are
always wrong and usually the dumb ones.
An inability to understand your oppositions perspective is, objectively, ****ign stupid.
Sorry, was probably too much constructive criticism there, I withdraw the statement.Well that's not very nice. I'm perfectly capable of having partisan views and not allowing those views to impact what I do at my office.
Oh god this is all too good hahahaha
“We can’t prove anything, but trust us, it’s all really bad. All your dead relatives? Yeah, Trump murdered them all personally. Global warming? Yeah that’s on Trump. Trump is actually responsible for AIDS. Why did Dale Earnhardt die? Well, Donald J Trump of course”
Source: Trust me bro
Don't apologize for being right.Sorry, was probably too much constructive criticism there, I withdraw the statement.
No clue what you do but I hope I don't have to leverage any of your non-partisan services, just based on your message board rhetoric. While you are semi reasonable at times, you are indeed not non-partisan.
Insurrection candidates? Where did you come up with that one? Anti-American? Yeah I'm sure General Bolduc who literally was a General in our army is Anti-American. What an absolute buffoon of a post. Stick to west zoneHave you seen the large number of insurrection unqualified candidates the MAGA Anti American party put has forth or no?
Of course not because you support them.