ADVERTISEMENT

BREAKING: Maricopa County Did not Have ‘Admin’ Access to the 2020 Election – They Ceded Ownership of Election to Their Outside System Provider

Bias and agenda are not based in fact. The news should be based on fact, ie factual reporting. You are right here, but it’s not alright to allow the wealthy elites to push agendas through the “news”. Same as social media, it’s ok to have free speech and opinions, but let’s not label them as facts. Worldwide media outlets should not be pushing agendas. Their jobs are to accurately report news. Period.

What you are describing is literally impossible. There is bias in every decision a human makes. Not just how to report stories, but which to cover? How do you decide which story is highlighted at the beginning of the show, or on the front page? These are human decisions that require independent thought, and it's literally impossible to keep bias out of it in some way or another.

And you are just wrong about your first statement. What articles an outlet reports on is a good example. The editorial department decides to report on story x instead of story y. That's a decision that likely involved a fair bit of bias. But it doesn't mean that the story isn't fact-based and accurate.
 
Clearly, you know nothing about IT or systems in general. We have tons of servers at ISU that handle everything from research, to finances, to employee and student information. Do you actually think FOR A SECOND, that the President of the University or any of the Deans or Admin types have admin access to any of these servers? Of course not, b/c they don't know the first damn thing about administrating a Red Hat server or an Oracle database. Them having admin access would be the IT version of handing a toddler a baseball bat, and sending him into a china shop.
However, all the above folks have access to all the information that is on these boxes WITHOUT the power to make changes in the way the system operates at a base level. How smart would it be to give people with no idea how to read or write computer code the access to change it? THAT'S why you hire systems admins in the first place instead of doing it yourself.
No difference here.

Sure but the same company as admin that made the software? Nah, a 3rd party consultant would be best. The problem is that the Maricopa election officials made claims that they would have trained admin experts within the county. Therein lies the problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
What you are describing is literally impossible. There is bias in every decision a human makes. Not just how to report stories, but which to cover? How do you decide which story is highlighted at the beginning of the show, or on the front page? These are human decisions that require independent thought, and it's literally impossible to keep bias out of it in some way or another.

And you are just wrong about your first statement. What articles an outlet reports on is a good example. The editorial department decides to report on story x instead of story y. That's a decision that likely involved a fair bit of bias. But it doesn't mean that the story isn't fact-based and accurate.

So it’s ok to report on the facts and just twist them a little bit to reinforce the bias or just to make it a good read?

Yes we can see bias in the editorial or opinion sections, although fact based content should always have sources that can be checked, visa vi the scientific method, should one want to do so. Anonymous sources run rampant now and too many times are taken as fact, only to be rebutted after damage is done.

My personal opinion is that reporters/newspapers should produce only fact based content. If Rachel Madcow or Sensational Sean Hannity want good ratings or tailor their broadcasts to do so fine, but there should be huge disclaimers when they are stating opinions instead of facts. All the way around... editorial standards today are crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Sure but the same company as admin that made the software? Nah, a 3rd party consultant would be best. The problem is that the Maricopa election officials made claims that they would have trained admin experts within the county. Therein lies the problems.
No. If you have software that you own and you make a profit from, you DO NOT give code level access to anyone. How many people can have admin access to iphones outside of Apple? Microsoft does hand out it's code to anyone. Even as an oracle admin with the "admin" access to base servers, I can't see their code as anything but binaries.
 
So it’s ok to report on the facts and just twist them a little bit to reinforce the bias or just to make it a good read?

Yes we can see bias in the editorial or opinion sections, although fact based content should always have sources that can be checked, visa vi the scientific method, should one want to do so. Anonymous sources run rampant now and too many times are taken as fact, only to be rebutted after damage is done.

My personal opinion is that reporters/newspapers should produce only fact based content. If Rachel Madcow or Sensational Sean Hannity want good ratings or tailor their broadcasts to do so fine, but there should be huge disclaimers when they are stating opinions instead of facts. All the way around... editorial standards today are crap.

So I guess the problem here is that you don't know what bias means?
 
i am happy to let them investigate fraud. bring in bi-partisan credible professional audit teams and let them audit the shit out of it. if there was fraud, overturn it and hang the perpetrators in the street.

where i do have a problem is when you bring in a hack team that has no credibility in this field to try and drum up support from their already brainwashed base. this will only serve to further divide this us and drive us further towards the end of the country we once knew

Based on what information from what source do you base this opinion of yours?
 
Clearly, you know nothing about IT or systems in general. We have tons of servers at ISU that handle everything from research, to finances, to employee and student information. Do you actually think FOR A SECOND, that the President of the University or any of the Deans or Admin types have admin access to any of these servers? Of course not, b/c they don't know the first damn thing about administrating a Red Hat server or an Oracle database. Them having admin access would be the IT version of handing a toddler a baseball bat, and sending him into a china shop.
However, all the above folks have access to all the information that is on these boxes WITHOUT the power to make changes in the way the system operates at a base level. How smart would it be to give people with no idea how to read or write computer code the access to change it? THAT'S why you hire systems admins in the first place instead of doing it yourself.
No difference here.

Take your pompous attitude and stick it dude. I work in IT also and login to customer servers all over the world on a nightly basis and know full well what all that entails. It has been specificially stated that State of AZ IT staff also have no admin access to those servers. Dominion employees defacto ran and controlled the election from an admin level and I do not give an F what you do or think you know but thats a fact Jack! If that was a planned decision to not have any of their staff get the training to do the admin stuff then thats a decision they should own and defend.
 
Clearly, you know nothing about IT or systems in general. We have tons of servers at ISU that handle everything from research, to finances, to employee and student information. Do you actually think FOR A SECOND, that the President of the University or any of the Deans or Admin types have admin access to any of these servers? Of course not, b/c they don't know the first damn thing about administrating a Red Hat server or an Oracle database. Them having admin access would be the IT version of handing a toddler a baseball bat, and sending him into a china shop.
However, all the above folks have access to all the information that is on these boxes WITHOUT the power to make changes in the way the system operates at a base level. How smart would it be to give people with no idea how to read or write computer code the access to change it? THAT'S why you hire systems admins in the first place instead of doing it yourself.
No difference here.

Here is another IT expert giving an opinion on what happened and why. Cliffnote - its not good for the govt officers of Maricopa County AZ.

 
i am happy to let them investigate fraud. bring in bi-partisan credible professional audit teams and let them audit the shit out of it. if there was fraud, overturn it and hang the perpetrators in the street.

where i do have a problem is when you bring in a hack team that has no credibility in this field to try and drum up support from their already brainwashed base. this will only serve to further divide this us and drive us further towards the end of the country we once knew

Well look at this. The firms initially brought in by Maricopa County to do audits were claimed to be certified and that was not true. They also never touched one ballot. How can you certify an election in that manner?

 

“They Sent Everyone Home – Rebooted the System on Election Day” – Arizona Elections Witness Jan Bryant Joins Steve Bannon to Talk About Maricopa County Election​

By Jim Hoft
Published May 10, 2021 at 10:57am
jan-bannon.jpg

Back on November 30, 2020, Maricopa County elections witness Jan Bryant testified before the Arizona legislature.
Jan has a strong project management background. She could not believe what she witnessed during the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona.
jan-bryant-witness-AZ.jpg

Jan said back on November 30, 2020, that Maricopa County officials DID NOT RUN THE ELECTION! Dominion employees John and Bruce did.
TRENDING:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Gets Involved After Plano Police Officer Allows BLM-Antifa to Illegally Block Traffic, Brandish Weapon
Jan’s testimony might explain why Maricopa County officials do not have Admin passwords or access to the Dominion voting machines.
They never had them!

Jan also testified under oath that county staff, not even IT staff were allowed access to the voting machines and that she witnessed Dominon employees with a laptop computer in the counting room.

Jan worked 6 days at MCTEC, has an MBA, and project management background in technology.
Jan joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning following our story over the weekend.
Jan told Steve the county continued to bring in ballots for several days following the election.
Jan also told Steve she was most concerned that on election day Dominion operatives told the staff they had to reboot the system and sent everyone home for the day!
This is highly suspect and unusual.

Listen to Jan's interview at below link since Rivals will not allow Rumble videos to be embedded.

 
Take your pompous attitude and stick it dude. I work in IT also and login to customer servers all over the world on a nightly basis and know full well what all that entails. It has been specificially stated that State of AZ IT staff also have no admin access to those servers. Dominion employees defacto ran and controlled the election from an admin level and I do not give an F what you do or think you know but thats a fact Jack! If that was a planned decision to not have any of their staff get the training to do the admin stuff then thats a decision they should own and defend.
Then you should know the answer is correct then. When a for profit company with copyrighted software is contracted to perform a task, the folks that they are working for don't get access to the copyrighted software. For instance if your group has data "in the cloud", you don't have admin access to the servers your data is on. You have access to that data only... even if the server contains only your data.

Again, in spite of all the recounts and audits that have been run, there's still no evidence that Dominion has done anything wrong. In fact the hand recounts done in Ga tend to show the opposite. Weren't you posting all those stories about how the Clintons were on the Dominion board and owned part of the company? And that Dominion has a server seized in Europe that "proved" that the election was rigged? All that turned out to be crap. Remember that postal truck carrying ballots into Pennsylvania from out of state? What ever happened with that?

But as I've said, ANYTHING no matter how unlikely or crazy that even hints at something wrong with the election, you seize on and post away. This is just the latest straw you are grasping at...
 

“They Sent Everyone Home – Rebooted the System on Election Day” – Arizona Elections Witness Jan Bryant Joins Steve Bannon to Talk About Maricopa County Election​

By Jim Hoft
Published May 10, 2021 at 10:57am
jan-bannon.jpg

Back on November 30, 2020, Maricopa County elections witness Jan Bryant testified before the Arizona legislature.
Jan has a strong project management background. She could not believe what she witnessed during the 2020 election in Maricopa County, Arizona.
jan-bryant-witness-AZ.jpg

Jan said back on November 30, 2020, that Maricopa County officials DID NOT RUN THE ELECTION! Dominion employees John and Bruce did.
TRENDING:
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Gets Involved After Plano Police Officer Allows BLM-Antifa to Illegally Block Traffic, Brandish Weapon
Jan’s testimony might explain why Maricopa County officials do not have Admin passwords or access to the Dominion voting machines.
They never had them!

Jan also testified under oath that county staff, not even IT staff were allowed access to the voting machines and that she witnessed Dominon employees with a laptop computer in the counting room.

Jan worked 6 days at MCTEC, has an MBA, and project management background in technology.
Jan joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning following our story over the weekend.
Jan told Steve the county continued to bring in ballots for several days following the election.
Jan also told Steve she was most concerned that on election day Dominion operatives told the staff they had to reboot the system and sent everyone home for the day!
This is highly suspect and unusual.

Listen to Jan's interview at below link since Rivals will not allow Rumble videos to be embedded.

Isn't this the same source you used when you gave us that "bombshell" about Republican observers being locked out of the Pennsylvania counting place? Kind of the same thing, EXCEPT that when the case went to court, Trump's lawyers said that they actually WERE present. I think the quote was... "There were a nonzero number of Republican Observers in the room". Could this be similar?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
No. If you have software that you own and you make a profit from, you DO NOT give code level access to anyone. How many people can have admin access to iphones outside of Apple? Microsoft does hand out it's code to anyone. Even as an oracle admin with the "admin" access to base servers, I can't see their code as anything but binaries.

The admin we are talking about is the same type “super user” access I have over my system. Not code level proprietary access. This allows a master user to run the county system, Maricopa does not have their credentials for this... they turned it back over for Dominion to manage
 
So I guess the problem here is that you don't know what bias means?

Or whatever... I’ve lost a ton of respect for you lately

the action of supporting or opposing a particular person or thing in an unfair way, because of allowing personal opinions to influence your judgment: The senator has accused the media of bias
 
 
The router story so far:

Dominion allegedly ran the election in Maricopa county. [1] Maricopa county allegedly never had the admin credentials and effectively ceded the ownership of the election to an OUTSIDE VENDOR. [2]

Jack Sellers, Chairman of Maricopa County Supervisors, said in a press release that the network routers used by the elections department are shared across 50 different county departments. The routers contain confidential information and info about classified law enforcement activities. He notes that WHOEVER has access to this router could potentially INTERCEPT SENSITIVE DATA.

In a last ditch effort, Maricopa County Supervisors hold an emergency meeting to find a way to deflect the router subpoena.

The geniuses decide they will ask George Soros’ puppet, Maricopa County Sheriff Penzone, to release a statement claiming that THE ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT ROUTER IS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT. In said letter, Sheriff Penzone clarifies that ANY PRIVATE VENDOR who has access to the router would be able to expose vulnerable classified data, regardless of any steps taken by said private vendor who may say otherwise.

Now we have a conundrum. It’s alleged that Dominion ran the election and had control of the routers, since Maricopa county never even had the admin password to the machines. Sheriff Penzone confirmed that any outside vendor who has had access to the routers will be able to expose classified law enforcement data, regardless of what the vendor says or promises to do.

Did Dominion, a private vendor allegedly with access to the elections router, have access to the law enforcement networks via the router?
Did George Soros have access to the elections network via his puppet who runs the law enforcement network?
What are the other 49 networks also on that router?
Why do election servers need to be connected to 50 different unrelated networks?
Was election data modified by other networks sharing the same router?
Was HAMMER AND SCORECARD deployed in Maricopa County?

DEMAND THAT ROUTER AUDIT.
 
AN HONEST ELECTION

1. Deleted databases
2. No chain of custody
3. Nobody knows the admin password
4. Election officials panicking
5. Huge amounts of digitally adjudicated ballots
6. Not allowed to look at the router
7. Router shared with at least 50 other networks
8. Election run by a private vendor
9. A hundred lawyers defending election officials
10. Soros’ Sheriff running interference
11. Ignored subpoenas
12. Missing ballots
13. Hammer and scorecard?
14. Secretary of state taking campaign gifts from foreign countries
15. County voter files hacked then covered up
16. SQL server back door
17. Not allowed to discuss any of this on socialist media.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dmk and TigerGrowls
Maricopa county supervisors are taking the strategy of “We hired a professional vendor to hold the elections in good faith, we didn’t even have the passwords to the machines”.
The vendor strategy so far is to claim the auditors have no experience and to stonewall any data or information requests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
What we now know:

Runbeck printed mail-in ballots.
Runbeck gave mail-in ballots to USPS to deliver.
Runbeck received mail-in ballots.
Runbeck sorted received ballots - 40k per hour.
Runbeck has been partnered with Dominion.
Runbeck has been partnered with Maricopa County.
Runbeck was allegedly caught sending pallets of fake ballots to Fulton County, Georgia.
Runbeck was allegedly caught printing ballots with a ~30% error rate for Tarrant County, Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
What we don’t know:

1. Who received the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER?

2. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER sorted away from the mail-in ballots which were filled out normally?

3. Were the mail-in ballots marked RETURN TO SENDER eventually filled out by the sender then dropped into the anonymous ballot drop boxes with no chain of custody?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
How to steal your vote using a mail-in ballot:

1. Mail-in ballot sent to you by vendor.
2. You arent home, or ballot sent to wrong address, and the ballot is RETURNED TO SENDER (vendor).
3. Vendor fills in ballot on your behalf.
4. Vendor puts your now-filled-in ballot into anonymous ballot drop-box that it also operates.
5. Congratulations, you voted for whoever the vendor of your ballot wants.
 
 

Not impressed. We know there are plenty of never trumper rino repubs running around willing to trash Trump. Furthermore Trump has absolutely nothing to do with this audit, so this is an immaterial comment, but feel free to continue sharing.
 

They come in all shapes and sizes and I certainly believe we will uncover some R states with R incumbents found to be cheating also. Likely state and lower levels. I do feel the Ds cheated more heavily in the presidential election, but time and an open mind all around with tell
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
They come in all shapes and sizes and I certainly believe we will uncover some R states with R incumbents found to be cheating also. Likely state and lower levels. I do feel the Ds cheated more heavily in the presidential election, but time and an open mind all around with tell

Your feelings don't matter. According to you rubes, hundreds of thousands of Dems cheated but you can't come up with any names. Meanwhile on the other side...
 
Your feelings don't matter. According to you rubes, hundreds of thousands of Dems cheated but you can't come up with any names. Meanwhile on the other side...

You think posting an article about one murdering ass hat qualifies? The entire board of elections in Maricopa county will be going to jail it seems. I don’t care if they are dem or rep if they cheat they need to go to jail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
You think posting an article about one murdering ass hat qualifies? The entire board of elections in Maricopa county will be going to jail it seems. I don’t care if they are dem or rep if they cheat they need to go to jail.

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT