Is it just that o th er schools lose so many to the portal that they have room to take substantially more recruits than clemson?
are the rankings bs by rivals?
Clemson gets a consistent nice feedback on essentially every recruit that visits but other schools are getting kids to commit at a pace way above ours and they appear to be getting largely some 5-and more common 4- 3 stars as a norm. I like who we get and it continue to improve but we’re way off on the numbers game it seems, Help me understand how we take 1/2 the kids and are supposed to compete?
are the rankings bs by rivals?
Clemson gets a consistent nice feedback on essentially every recruit that visits but other schools are getting kids to commit at a pace way above ours and they appear to be getting largely some 5-and more common 4- 3 stars as a norm. I like who we get and it continue to improve but we’re way off on the numbers game it seems, Help me understand how we take 1/2 the kids and are supposed to compete?
