Concise Description of Mass Election Fraud

[iceheart08]

Well how about now, in Maricopa County? Let’s see you spin this one.

Lololol.

Kari filed a lawsuit. The judge dismissed 8 of the 10 counts in the lawsuit and significantly narrowed the scope of the remaining 2 claims to require that Kari and her team PROVE intentional conduct. She got absolutely obliterated on summary judgement, and yet your news outlets proclaim it to he a historic victory. And you repeat it. It's the lake people frantically spinning a massive loss into a "historic victory".

 

[TigerGrowls]

San Joaquin Sheriff Discloses Massive Voter Roll Anomalies in California County | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

Last week, The Gateway Pundit reported on a press conference about the arrest of a Lodi city councilmember named Shakir Khan. The San Joaquin Sheriff discovered the election crimes while serving a search warrant for non-election related findings regarding Khan’s businesses in the city.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

KCRA reported:

[Khan] is accused of stashing 41 ballots at his home. Investigators also say he registered 23 people to vote at his home and that his email and phone number were used to register 47 others. Body camera footage showed voters telling detectives how Khan allegedly pressured them to vote for him and how he allegedly falsified voter registration documents.

Towards the end of the press conference, before taking questions from the media, Captain Hardy addresses some discrepancies in the voter rolls they discovered during their investigation:

• 93 people registered w/ birthdate of 1850
• 232 registered at local prisons
• 4,144 voters registered over the age of 90 (there’s only 10.3k residents over 80 in that county…this number would drop off significantly at 90)
• 125 registered to a non-profit, NGO or business
• ~300 voters with no first name
• 110 potential double voters – same name, DOB, and address but different Voter ID numbers
• people registered at various homeless sheltershttps://twitter.com/CannConActual/status/1627760425839337472?s=20
• and one voter registered named… “Jesus Christ”

Two of these issues have been scrutinized when found in other jurisdictions across the country: the 1850 birthdate (various other birthdates used) and the 90+ voter population.

This is the San Joaquin Sheriff conducting this investigation and disclosing this information to the public, so if there were an explanation for the 1850 birthdate relating to privacy protection, protected individuals, etc., it is likely they would have found this during their investigation. They did claim at the end they are working with the local registrar of voters.

 

[hopefultiger13]

San Joaquin Sheriff Discloses Massive Voter Roll Anomalies in California County | The Gateway Pundit | by Brian Lupo

Last week, The Gateway Pundit reported on a press conference about the arrest of a Lodi city councilmember named Shakir Khan. The San Joaquin Sheriff discovered the election crimes while serving a search warrant for non-election related findings regarding Khan’s businesses in the city.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

KCRA reported:


Towards the end of the press conference, before taking questions from the media, Captain Hardy addresses some discrepancies in the voter rolls they discovered during their investigation:

• 93 people registered w/ birthdate of 1850
• 232 registered at local prisons
• 4,144 voters registered over the age of 90 (there’s only 10.3k residents over 80 in that county…this number would drop off significantly at 90)
• 125 registered to a non-profit, NGO or business
• ~300 voters with no first name
• 110 potential double voters – same name, DOB, and address but different Voter ID numbers
• people registered at various homeless sheltershttps://twitter.com/CannConActual/status/1627760425839337472?s=20
• and one voter registered named… “Jesus Christ”

Two of these issues have been scrutinized when found in other jurisdictions across the country: the 1850 birthdate (various other birthdates used) and the 90+ voter population.

This is the San Joaquin Sheriff conducting this investigation and disclosing this information to the public, so if there were an explanation for the 1850 birthdate relating to privacy protection, protected individuals, etc., it is likely they would have found this during their investigation. They did claim at the end they are working with the local registrar of voters.

You know, I heard from my brother, who heard from my 2nd cousin that the sheriff of my home county said that there was MASSIVE fraud too... he heard that 10 people had birthdates of 1850 also. That could NEVER happen by accident being that 8 and 9 are are so far apart on the keyboard.

Plus, if you were registering people illegally to vote (which I assume is the point), wouldn't you pick a birthdate that WASN'T 173 years ago? Asking for a friend...

One more question... IF every one of those cases above were true (and we can safely say they aren't... This IS TGP after all) and the population of the county is about 800,000. That's just over 1/2 of 1% fraud. Is that massive fraud? Or perhaps a very tiny amount of fraud?