Continued Mass Election Fraud

[TigerGrowls]

📍 Milwaukee, WI - Rigged… Never fixed

(R) Senate Candidate Eric Hovde was winning his Senate Race…. Until… 4am

• at 4am, Milwaukee reported a 108,000 absentee ballot dump, where his democrat opponent received over 90% of those votes.

• Various voting precincts recorded a voter turnout of 150% and 200%
—— that means more people voted than there were registered voters.

• Despite the fact that Kamala Harris received 10 million less votes than Biden did, but somehow she received 1,000 less votes.

• In addition, Democrats organized a phony America First candidate, designed to siphon votes from him.

While Wisconsin law allowed him to request a recount due to the close margin, he would have had to pay for it himself… he ended up conceding..

 

[johnhugh]

The presidential election was rigged

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

Thank you THEY!

 

[CUTiger1977]

View embedded media

📍 Milwaukee, WI - Rigged… Never fixed

(R) Senate Candidate Eric Hovde was winning his Senate Race…. Until… 4am

• at 4am, Milwaukee reported a 108,000 absentee ballot dump, where his democrat opponent received over 90% of those votes.

• Various voting precincts recorded a voter turnout of 150% and 200%
—— that means more people voted than there were registered voters.

• Despite the fact that Kamala Harris received 10 million less votes than Biden did, but somehow she received 1,000 less votes.

• In addition, Democrats organized a phony America First candidate, designed to siphon votes from him.

While Wisconsin law allowed him to request a recount due to the close margin, he would have had to pay for it himself… he ended up conceding..

TikTok

 

[TigerGrowls]

Thank you THEY!

Here we have it confirmed that dpic condones and supports mass election fraud and is probably a full blown communist.

 

[MTTiger19]

Here we have it confirmed that dpic condones and supports mass election fraud and is probably a full blown communist.

Probably?

 

[dpic73]

Here we have it confirmed that dpic condones and supports mass election fraud and is probably a full blown communist.

 

[TigerGrowls]

And this is,

Trump’s Deputy National Security Advisor K.T. McFarland:

“We now have black and white evidence.” BEYOND THE SHADOW Of A DOUBT

that the FBI attempted the overthrow of the United States government on
behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2016,

And,

the CIA toppled the United States government on behalf of Joe Biden in 2020,

Now, issue the warrants, the arrests and the subpoenas.

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[Allornothing]

View embedded media

If we the people do not prevent election fraud in the next two years, Trump winning will have been for naught.

 

[Cabotiger]

The presidential election was rigged

Much like your birth

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[Allornothing]

View embedded media

If they don't investigate then no illegal activity ever took place. They just let it happen. No foul. See how that works.

 

[dpic73]

If they don't investigate then no illegal activity ever took place. They just let it happen. No foul. See how that works.

You know Growls' track record but you're still going to accept the claim that "allegedly illegal" voter registrations were found because you read a tweet?

 

[SGTiger]

You know Growl's track record but you're still going to accept the claim that "allegedly illegal" voter registrations were found because you read a tweet?

#1 - TigerGrowls did not tweet that.

#2 - The tweet says allegedly. I know you bolded it, but the fact "allegedly" was there gives the tweet even more credibility. There will never be agreement by the left that any illegal voter registrations exist. That fact is why the left is rarely taken seriously and also why "allegedly" always has to be added.

#3 - There is not a community note disputing it.

#4 - Both Chatgpt and Grok say the statement is true.

Attack the messengers, silence dissenting voices, and constantly attempt to get people banned are plays straight out of the communist playbook. Don't bother posting rebuttals from liberal sources. I won't read them as all of them have been thoroughly discredited.

 

[Allornothing]

You know Growls' track record but you're still going to accept the claim that "allegedly illegal" voter registrations were found because you read a tweet?

A claim and allegedly are the same thing. You will never find illegal voting because you debunk it from the get go. You are perfectly happy with the status quo because you know it is happening, and it benefits your side.

 

[UrHuckleberry]

View embedded media

Would agree anyone committing fraud like this should go to jail. Have they charged anyone yet?

 

[dpic73]

1) Doesn't matter, Growls has a long history of posting trash conspiracies that are easily debunked.

2) "Allegedly" should tell you to be skeptical of the report because it may not be factual. You will never accept a democrat won an election fairly despite overwhelming evidence that actual voter fraud is miniscule. You just accept that it's real because the right-wing war machine pumps you full of so much misinformation, it leads you to believe it must be true due to the sheer volume of propaganda -not because there is real evidence to support your side.

3 & 4) How can they claim an allegation is true if it's only an allegation? If you dug into this issue more you would know that they only researched the largest democratic county in the state while ignoring the rural areas. This was purposeful so that you would believe that cheating is rampant in democratic areas in order to cast doubt on the upcoming Supreme Court election there if the Democratic candidate wins. The reason why allegedly applies here is because they used things like a database from the USPS that shows that a voter moved but that doesn't take into account the reason why a voter's mailing address might be different than their actual address, such as a student going to college or someone with a vacation home.

In this case, the messenger and the dissenting voices have consistently proven to be false alarmists about non-existent or unproven voter fraud.

It's sad that you consider the truth you don't like to be communist but here we are...

 

[dpic73]

A claim and allegedly are the same thing. You will never find illegal voting because you debunk it from the get go. You are perfectly happy with the status quo because you know it is happening, and it benefits your side.

Can you give me a case where mass voting fraud has ever been the reason someone won an election?

 

[SGTiger]

1) Doesn't matter, Growls has a long history of posting trash conspiracies that are easily debunked.

2) "Allegedly" should tell you to be skeptical of the report because it may not be factual. You will never accept a democrat won an election fairly despite overwhelming evidence that actual voter fraud is miniscule. You just accept that it's real because the right-wing war machine pumps you full of so much misinformation, it leads you to believe it must be true due to the sheer volume of propaganda -not because there is real evidence to support your side.

3 & 4) How can they claim an allegation is true if it's only an allegation? If you dug into this issue more you would know that they only researched the largest democratic county in the state while ignoring the rural areas. This was purposeful so that you would believe that cheating is rampant in democratic areas in order to cast doubt on the upcoming Supreme Court election there if the Democratic candidate wins. The reason why allegedly applies here is because they used things like a database from the USPS that shows that a voter moved but that doesn't take into account the reason why a voter's mailing address might be different than their actual address, such as a student going to college or someone with a vacation home.

In this case, the messenger and the dissenting voices have consistently proven to be false alarmists about non-existent or unproven voter fraud.

It's sad that you consider the truth you don't like to be communist but here we are...

#1 Debunk this one

#2 Unable to follow your logic here. The tweet has the word "allegedly", thus you have no argument the tweet is wrong.

#3&#4 The AI says the tweet is true because of #2. That tweet is a true statement because it has the word "alleged". Only after the investigation and court verdict can the word alleged be removed. You want to decide whether something can be posted or not based on whether it has already been proven in court? How many of your posts fit that criteria?

Stop trying to silence dissent and I will stop telling you that your stragegy is part of the communist handbook.

 

[SGTiger]

Can you give me a case where mass voting fraud has ever been the reason someone won an election?

If a detective cannot prove how someone has died, does that mean it wasn't murder. Why does voting fraud keep happening if it has not been successful? Let me guess. Because voting fraud doesn't occur, amirite?

 

[Allornothing]

Can you give me a case where mass voting fraud has ever been the reason someone won an election?

Kinda hard to do so when such cases are never investigated. 2020 was a perfect example of lies and fraud, but since your party won, you stuck your head in the sand.

 

[dpic73]

If a detective cannot prove how someone has died, does that mean it wasn't murder. Why does voting fraud keep happening if it has not been successful? Let me guess. Because voting fraud doesn't occur, amirite?

It's more like a thousand people died and there was no evidence of foul play but you believed it anyway because you saw a Catturd tweet.

Explain keep happening....there has always been a miniscule amount of voter fraud and it's almost always detected because we have so many layers of checks to catch it. But if you want to talk about verifiable cases, you would know that many more Republicans have been caught cheating than Democrats and let's not forget about the fake elector scheme that your man-god got away with due to his re-elction.

Successful? LMAO

 

[dpic73]

Kinda hard to do so when such cases are never investigated. 2020 was a perfect example of lies and fraud, but since your party won, you stuck your head in the sand.

Got it! All you have to do is say it happened and that makes it true! Trump's own Chief of Staff told him it wasn't true, as did every election official in the country but you believe it anyway just because he said so. Sad!

 

[SGTiger]

It's more like a thousand people died and there was no evidence of foul play but you believed it anyway because you saw a Catturd tweet.

Explain keep happening....there has always been a miniscule amount of voter fraud and it's almost always detected because we have so many layers of checks to catch it. But if you want to talk about verifiable cases, you would know that many more Republicans have been caught cheating than Democrats and let's not forget about the fake elector scheme that your man-god got away with due to his re-elction.

Successful? LMAO

What Catturd tweet? When you say stuff like this, I have learned to quit reading because whatever follows after that is always tin foil hat stuff.

 

[dpic73]

What Catturd tweet? When you say stuff like this, I have learned to quit reading because whatever follows after that is always tin foil hat stuff.

This isn't hard. It's a metaphorical way of saying you will believe anything a cartoonish right-wing influencer states, despite the facts, if it aligns with what you want to believe.

 

[SGTiger]

This isn't hard. It's a metaphorical way of saying you will believe anything a cartoonish right-wing influencer states, despite the facts, if it aligns with what you want to believe.

So if I believe there has been a lot of voting fraud, that means I only believe what aligns with what I want to believe. Do you have any proof of that, or are you just talking in circles?

You tried to shut down @TigerGrowls post that was simply a link to a tweet giving details about an allegation. You then attempted to criticize his credibility. I asked you to debunk the tweet that claims there is an allegation. I see that you cannot, but instead, you've decided to deflect.

 

[Allornothing]

So if I believe there has been a lot of voting fraud, that means I only believe what aligns with what I want to believe. Do you have any proof of that, or are you just talking in circles?

You tried to shut down @TigerGrowls post that was simply a link to a tweet giving details about an allegation. You then attempted to criticize his credibility. I asked you to debunk the tweet that claims there is an allegation. I see that you cannot, but instead, you've decided to deflect.

That's all IT does. Deflect, deflect, deflect.

 

[dpic73]

So if I believe there has been a lot of voting fraud, that means I only believe what aligns with what I want to believe. Do you have any proof of that, or are you just talking in circles?

You tried to shut down @TigerGrowls post that was simply a link to a tweet giving details about an allegation. You then attempted to criticize his credibility. I asked you to debunk the tweet that claims there is an allegation. I see that you cannot, but instead, you've decided to deflect.

So if I believe there has been a lot of voting fraud, that means I only believe what aligns with what I want to believe. Do you have any proof of that, or are you just talking in circles?

Correct because your side has been claiming it for 4.5 years now though you've never been able to prove it and you ignore the overwhelming mountain of evidence that disproves it. You even had the Cyber Ninjas investigating the results in Arizona for 6 months, including taking all the ballots to another state while they pored over them in secret and they came back with MORE votes for Biden. And for all the court cases that Trump instigated, none of them even alleged fraud, so if you still believe it at this point, it's simply because you want to.

You tried to shut down @TigerGrowls post that was simply a link to a tweet giving details about an allegation. You then attempted to criticize his credibility.

I didn't even respond to Growls' tweet, I pointed out that AllorNothing blindly accepted it as truth, just like he does with all of his propaganda tweets. FYI - everyone knows Growls' has no credibility as I've personally busted him hundreds of times. You don't have any either if this is the hill you've decided to die on.

 

[SGTiger]

Correct because your side has been claiming it for 4.5 years now though you've never been able to prove it and you ignore the overwhelming mountain of evidence that disproves it. You even had the Cyber Ninjas investigating the results in Arizona for 6 months, including taking all the ballots to another state while they pored over them in secret and they came back with MORE votes for Biden. And for all the court cases that Trump instigated, none of them even alleged fraud, so if you still believe it at this point, it's simply because you want to.

I didn't even respond to Growls' tweet, I pointed out that AllorNothing blindly accepted it as truth, just like he does with all of his propaganda tweets. FYI - everyone knows Growls' has no credibility as I've personally busted him hundreds of times. You don't have any either if this is the hill you've decided to die on.

What hill that I am dying on? You're a fvcking mess with your talking in circles and not thinking anything through regarding who and what you are responding to. I'm only in this thread because you said the tweet was inaccurate. It was not. If you had an iota of character, you would admit to that OR DEBUNK IT. Thanks for the reminder that it is impossible to be civil to you and expect a reasonable discussion. Lmao, talking about other people's credibility....

 

[Allornothing]

What hill that I am dying on? You're a fvcking mess with your talking in circles and not thinking anything through regarding who and what you are responding to. I'm only in this thread because you said the tweet was inaccurate. It was not. If you had an iota of character, you would admit to that OR DEBUNK IT. Thanks for the reminder that it is impossible to be civil to you and expect a reasonable discussion. Lmao, talking about other people's credibility....

It's what IT does. That's all IT has. IT doesn't know reality.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Correct because your side has been claiming it for 4.5 years now though you've never been able to prove it and you ignore the overwhelming mountain of evidence that disproves it. You even had the Cyber Ninjas investigating the results in Arizona for 6 months, including taking all the ballots to another state while they pored over them in secret and they came back with MORE votes for Biden. And for all the court cases that Trump instigated, none of them even alleged fraud, so if you still believe it at this point, it's simply because you want to.

I didn't even respond to Growls' tweet, I pointed out that AllorNothing blindly accepted it as truth, just like he does with all of his propaganda tweets. FYI - everyone knows Growls' has no credibility as I've personally busted him hundreds of times. You don't have any either if this is the hill you've decided to die on.

Dpic living in the lib fantasy world.

 

[dpic73]

What hill that I am dying on? You're a fvcking mess with your talking in circles and not thinking anything through regarding who and what you are responding to. I'm only in this thread because you said the tweet was inaccurate. It was not. If you had an iota of character, you would admit to that OR DEBUNK IT. Thanks for the reminder that it is impossible to be civil to you and expect a reasonable discussion. Lmao, talking about other people's credibility....

First of all, no one here thinks you're the civil guy on the block as you and Hambone are in the top three of least friendly posters overall. You're more the neighbor that would have a booby-trapped shotgun on your front porch programmed to shoot any liberal that stepped on your landing than one we could borrow a cup of sugar from lol.

And talk about talking in circles:

I started this weird conversation by pointing out to Hambone that he should pay attention to the word "allegedly" before believing that there were actual illegal registrations. I didn't allege that the tweet or the report were fake only that he shouldn't take the report at face value so who knows what tf you're going on about and I really don't care anymore. If you want to claim some kind of victory, have at it.

 

[Allornothing]

First of all, no one here thinks you're the civil guy on the block as you and Hambone are in the top three of least friendly posters overall. You're more the neighbor that would have a booby-trapped shotgun on your front porch programmed to shoot any liberal that stepped on your landing than one we could borrow a cup of sugar from lol.

And talk about talking in circles:

I started this weird conversation by pointing out to Hambone that he should pay attention to the word "allegedly" before believing that there were actual illegal registrations. I didn't allege that the tweet or the report were fake only that he shouldn't take the report at face value so who knows what tf you're going on about and I really don't care anymore. If you want to claim some kind of victory, have at it.

You don't even have the guts to call me out Tinkerbell. That's what's wrong with your whole party. None of you have any balls.

Obama--Big Mike has all those balls.
Waltz--he can't even see his balls.
Kumallah--they are still resting on her chin, Willie Brown style.
Killary-- she'll just kill your a$$.
Seth Rich--We still need to talk about this.

These are just a few. There are many more.

 

[SGTiger]

First of all, no one here thinks you're the civil guy on the block as you and Hambone are in the top three of least friendly posters overall.

I explained why so many people CAN'T be civil to you. I've seen dozens if not hundreds at wits end with you that ended with an uncivil outcome. But you're like, "it's everyone else's fault that they aren't civil to me. I'm going to report them to Chris." You're always the victim and always unwilling to take responsibility for your actions just like all of the far left.