Covid Scandal and Coverup

[dpic73]

View embedded media

"Posts on X and various websites have recirculated the 2020 clip, especially after Zuckerberg’s 2024 comments criticizing Biden administration pressure as inappropriate to censor COVID-19 content, framing it as evidence of hypocrisy. These posts often misdate the video to August 2021 and exaggerate Zuckerberg’s remarks as a direct warning. However, the full context shows he was discussing uncertainties during vaccine development, not advising against vaccination once vaccines were approved."

The narrative that Zuckerberg warned against vaccines while censoring similar warnings on Facebook is misleading. His early caution reflected the uncertainty of mid-2020, but his public actions and statements from late 2020 onward consistently supported vaccination efforts. Always cross-check viral claims with primary sources, as social media posts can distort context for sensationalism."

https://x.com/i/grok/share/WFSTlx5ckIUL4T3e12NSq6ca0

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

Liz Churchill’s credibility on COVID-19 is highly questionable. She is frequently cited in sources like Vaxopedia for spreading misinformation, particularly claims about COVID vaccines causing infertility or being part of conspiracies involving population control. These claims, such as misinterpreting studies on sperm motility, have been debunked by researchers who point to lifestyle changes and COVID infections as more likely factors. Her posts on X further show a pattern of rejecting mainstream science, calling lockdowns devastating and vaccines harmful without evidence, while promoting unverified narratives like Ukrainian bioweapons labs.

On the other hand, some might argue she’s credible to those skeptical of institutional narratives, as she amplifies concerns about vaccine safety and government overreach that resonate with a distrustful audience. However, her lack of scientific credentials, reliance on unverified claims, and dismissal of peer-reviewed data undermine this. Credible voices on COVID-19, like infectious disease experts or peer-reviewed studies, consistently contradict her assertions. For trustworthy information, sources like the CDC or WHO are better grounded in evidence.

https://x.com/i/grok/share/N4EIRfWUpFsXjvmHvPgtecBfN

 

[dpic73]

View embedded media

"No concrete evidence supports the claim that COVID-19 vaccines killed 500,000 people. This claim, often linked to sources like the McCullough Foundation and amplified by figures like Liz Churchill on X, primarily stems from misinterpretations of VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) data. VAERS is a passive reporting system where anyone can submit unverified reports of adverse events, and it explicitly states that reports do not confirm causality. As of December 2022, VAERS recorded around 18,007 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S., but extensive reviews by the CDC and FDA, including death certificates and autopsies, found no causal link in most cases, except for rare instances like three confirmed deaths from blood clots linked to the Janssen vaccine.


The claim of 500,000 deaths appears to rely on flawed extrapolations, such as assuming underreporting in VAERS by a factor of 5 or more, without robust evidence. For example, a 2021 claim by attorney Thomas Renz about 45,000 deaths used similar logic, which was debunked due to unverified data and lack of causal proof. Studies, like one in The Lancet, estimate COVID-19 vaccines prevented 14.4 million deaths globally in their first year, with models showing 19.8 million lives saved by reducing severe outcomes. Excess deaths in 2021-2022, often cited as evidence, correlate more strongly with COVID-19 surges than vaccination rollouts, driven by factors like unvaccinated deaths, drug overdoses, and healthcare disruptions.



Rare vaccine side effects, such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) or myocarditis, have caused deaths (e.g., 32 VITT cases in a 2021 review), but these are orders of magnitude below 500,000. Claims of mass vaccine-related deaths lack peer-reviewed support and are contradicted by global data showing lower mortality in vaccinated populations. Posts on X citing 500,000 deaths reflect sentiment but lack substantiation and are not credible evidence. For accurate information, peer-reviewed studies and health authorities like the CDC or WHO are more reliable than unverified claims."

https://x.com/i/grok/share/1UqWF5t1nqE8WwwcLpvT7GINj

 

[TigerGrowls]

FLASHBACK: RFK Jr. explains how peculiar it was that Bill Gates knew to buy over a million shares of BioNTech stock before COVID happened:

"The same week Bill Gates, who was overseeing the [Event 201] simulation, bought 1.1 Million shares of BioNTech vaccine which later became the Pfizer vaccine. He then sold almost all that stock two years later at a $242,000,000 profit. And a week after that he announced the vaccine didn't work. That's what you call a 'pump-and-dump' scheme."