ADVERTISEMENT

CrowdStrike walking back claim that Russia hacked DNC server?

TL;DR but I don't believe the known perjurers.
What will come from this?

We''ll find out, I believe. Assange is being extradited back here in a couple months, if he lives long enough to make it back. There is more info about Comey nixing a deal to bring him back during Crossfire Hurricane that hasn't been talked about much, yet.
 
This is long and goes through much history of events, etc. I would suggest that if you still believe the known perjurers, Clapper and Brennan, give this a read.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...m-russias-link-to-wikileaks-huge-development/
Your title is blatantly false, the article is fake news. I read it. Crowd-Strike says they didn't investigate the RELEASE of the information. The article mentions nothing about the actual hacking and acquisition of the information which is what they were paid to investigate.

Let me clarify further, Cloud Strike investigated the hacking of the DNC server. This article is about the hand-off of that information to Wiki-leaks.
 
Your title is blatantly false, the article is fake news. I read it. Crowd-Strike says they didn't investigate the RELEASE of the information. The article mentions nothing about the actual hacking and acquisition of the information which is what they were paid to investigate.

Let me clarify further, Cloud Strike investigated the hacking of the DNC server. This article is about the hand-off of that information to Wiki-leaks.

Well, there is plenty in the article regarding the holes, fallacies, and outright head scratching logic that defies the reported acquisition of the hacking info.
It's true that the PR firm is only covering CrowdStrike's ass concerning the hand-off of the info to WL. So, where did Andrew Weismann, (the real author of the Mueller report), come up with the idea that Russia gave the info to WL? Would it not make sense for the actual hacker to also be the entity that would pass the info along to WL? Why is CrowdStrike concerned enough about this to hire a PR firm to back away now?
Again, the Intel Assesment that supposedly "proves" all of this was ramrodded through the Intel Community by Clapper and Brennan. Adm. Rogers did not go along with it.
Let me remind you that Clapper and Brennan are both known perjurers, and Comey has been recommended for criminal prosecution by a democrat IG, appointed by Obama.
 
Well, there is plenty in the article regarding the holes, fallacies, and outright head scratching logic that defies the reported acquisition of the hacking info.

Not relevant to your fake news headline.

It's true that the PR firm is only covering CrowdStrike's ass concerning the hand-off of the info to WL.

Admitting your headline is fake news.

So, where did Andrew Weismann, (the real author of the Mueller report), come up with the idea that Russia gave the info to WL?

Not relevant to your fake news headline.

Would it not make sense for the actual hacker to also be the entity that would pass the info along to WL? Why is CrowdStrike concerned enough about this to hire a PR firm to back away now?

Not relevant to your fake news headline.

Again, the Intel Assesment that supposedly "proves" all of this was ramrodded through the Intel Community by Clapper and Brennan. Adm. Rogers did not go along with it.

Not relevant to your fake news headline.

Let me remind you that Clapper and Brennan are both known perjurers, and Comey has been recommended for criminal prosecution by a democrat IG, appointed by Obama.

Not relevant to your fake news headline.

Congrats, @orangelvis you gave us great evidence of the kind of people putting fake news out there. You.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClemsonReign
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT