ADVERTISEMENT

Daniel Penny - NYC Subway Hero

Done

Also thinking maybe the warriors of good need to start riding the subway

make the perps start paying a price for threatening people

in the future it may be better to break legs so the perp is unable to flee

baseball bats do a fine job of offering protection

NOT ADVOCATING FOR VIOLENCE

ADVOCATING FOR PEOPLE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AS NEEDED
 
2nd degree manslaughter is not an egregious charge - it's literally in place for this exact event. He choked out and accidentally killed a non-violent (NYPD's own words) passenger. Being unruly does not justify a death penalty, and as such this guy is being charged with the appropriate crime.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Clemson Goat
Maybe if the Marine had waited until several people were injured before acting he would be in the clear

That might be deemed as racist as the people in fear were mostly black elderly and of course he is young white typical white supremicist material

I find it hard to believe that he would protect elderly black ladies from a crazy black guy with a record of over 40 cases including those involving assault

Why didn’t he just let the black guy beat up the elderly black ladies.

Tongue in cheek for you hard to understand folks
 
2nd degree manslaughter is not an egregious charge - it's literally in place for this exact event. He choked out and accidentally killed a non-violent (NYPD's own words) passenger. Being unruly does not justify a death penalty, and as such this guy is being charged with the appropriate crime.
Wrong again.

Your worldview has collapsed the last year
 
Wrong again.

Your worldview has collapsed the last year
Because the jury didn't rule that he was guilty does not mean it was an egregious charge. It was a tough case to be a juror on - he clearly accidentally killed the guy, and it's unfortunate he was placed in that position. I'll respect this verdict, just like I'll respect any others that come out that I may not personally agree with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy
Because the jury didn't rule that he was guilty does not mean it was an egregious charge. It was a tough case to be a juror on - he clearly accidentally killed the guy, and it's unfortunate he was placed in that position. I'll respect this verdict, just like I'll respect any others that come out that I may not personally agree with.
So you're replying here so everyone knows you disagree with the verdict. Why is that?
 
I'm responding to someone who quoted me yesterday, you dullard.
Because the jury didn't rule that he was guilty does not mean it was an egregious charge. It was a tough case to be a juror on - he clearly accidentally killed the guy, and it's unfortunate he was placed in that position. I'll respect this verdict, just like I'll respect any others that come out that I may not personally agree with.
Chill...so you do or do not agree with the decision?
 
Actually, you did not say this, but yes it can be inferred.

So, your daughter is on that train, along with elderly people. I man on this train is yelling obscenities and is obviously not in the right frame of mind. Then he continues to yell out that he is going to kill someone and doesn't care if he goes to jail.

Another man takes it upon himself to de-escalate the situation, so that no one feels in danger for their life.

In your mind, how is this the wrong verdict? I'm just trying to understand the logic.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT