Defend this:
- Thread starter iceheart08
- Start date
well ... the apartment fit his giant head and ego soooooooooooo therefore it had to be at least 30,000 sq ft, right? Easy mistake to make
are we sure the apartment isn't deep state?
I have a couple of comments. The first is who makes loans to people based on what they tell you their assets are worth? Is cnbc stating multiple loans were given based solely on Trump's word of what his assets value were at the time of the loan? That just seems ridiculous to me. I hope they reveal that info bc I would like to apply for a loan with that organization- assuming it is still solvent.
Second, I would think things like the size of apartments would be easily checked as most of this information is part of public record. How else would the state/city assess taxes if they have no clue what they are taxing?
It just doesn't sound right to me. Maybe other places are different than where I live, but no one who loans against, insures, or taxes assets does so based on the owners stated value of said property. @iceheart08, does this happen in CO?
Second, I would think things like the size of apartments would be easily checked as most of this information is part of public record. How else would the state/city assess taxes if they have no clue what they are taxing?
It just doesn't sound right to me. Maybe other places are different than where I live, but no one who loans against, insures, or taxes assets does so based on the owners stated value of said property. @iceheart08, does this happen in CO?
It's a tweet so it's got to be true.
Gee, you don't think the bank appraised the apartment before lending money against it?
Looks like exactly zero of you read the article. Just couldn't stop yourself from typing out an argument before you read it huh?
It's a tweet so it's got to be true.
Gee, you don't think the bank appraised the apartment before lending money against it?
Gee. Maybe read the article?
Oh Boyyee...more, Look at Trump so you don't look at Biden, BS.
Trump BAD, his policies GOOD.
Oh Boyyee...more Russian collusion. Haven't we been down this road before?
Funny how flippantly you Trumpublicans dismiss treasonous behavior. Can we at least admit that "America First" is bvllshit? Can we also squash that ridiculous narrative that "he fights for America?"
What is it about that that you claim to be treasonous?
You don't think asking a foreign power, who happens to be our enemy, to release damaging information on "America's" President to be a problem? You people have gotten so numb to his corruption that it doesn't even phase you. Just Trump being Trump, am I right?
I read the entire article. I still have the same questions. If you get a loan, do people just take your word for the value of your collateral? If you are being insured, does the insurance company not examine what is to be insured? If you pay taxes, particularly state/local taxes, does the govt do it based on what you tell them it is worth? Who did he overstate or understate the value of anything he has to that made any sort of financial decision based solely on what he told them?
Most likely not. That's not a yes or no, but gun to my head, i'd say No.
your turn
edit: just fyi, I did not vote for him when he did become president.
I am not debating if it is a "problem". I am asking you what is treasonous about it. What isn that action is tantamount to treason? Also, why would you be against the release of any information about Biden- no matter where it comes from, if true?
Would I vote for him? LOL
I'd rather schedule a proctology appointment with Edward Scissorhands if that answers your question.
Dear God...you're like leading a line of kindergarten kids with a rope!
I asked you a question ...IS Trump our president?
Why would you want damaging information to be broadcast about your OWN COUNTRY's President? What would the value be in that?
People also ask
What are examples of treason?
treason, the crime of betraying a nation or a sovereign by acts considered dangerous to security. In English law, treason includes the levying of war against the government and the giving of aid and comfort to the monarch's enemies.
He's trying to be so this still matters. He is also the leader of your party and there are hordes of you that will do what he tells you - no matter if it's right or wrong.
Now enough with hijacking Ice's thread. Back to the real estate defense!
You are so brainwashed you can't even answer a simple freakin' question, because you are so afraid of what someone might say to you.
...and that's already been answered by @CUT93, and if I had a guess in the matter, it would be that the market value of said condo is that high because of its hideousness!
Afraid of what someone might say to me WUT? It's not like you shower me with lovely sentiments but I still mock your bs. 😂
So you are telling me you wanted no damaging information about Trump to be broadcast while he was potus? Yeah, right. Sell that somewhere else.
Also, I understand what treason is, I was not asking you for a definition of treason. I was asking you what was treasonous about Trumps action.
If Putin or anyone else had proof that, for example, Biden knew full well that Hunter was selling influence to his dad( which would be much closer to treason, imo) why would the country not want to know about it?
You're asking if I think it was correct for the media to report the news that Trump made every friggin day? The dude went out of his way to make negative news on the regular and there was no avoiding his awful-ness.
How does that compare with a corrupt ex-President asking a foreign enemy to dig up damaging information on his past and possible future opponent (that he corruptly wants to steal the seat back from)? A current President who has NEVER been implicated in a crime by the way.
It's because you want to own the libs and get revenge - that's all that amounts to.
You'd be better off just forgetting about that sociopath who earned the criticism he got. In the end he was worse than they said he was. Move the **** on dude.
Last edited:
Do you read what you post? You are telling me to move on while you are the one still posting about Trump, really?
Also, I just want to make sure I understand your position. If Trump had been hiding some wrongdoing, you would not want that brought to light, only what he openly said/did in public? It seems to me that article is not about something he said or did "every friggin day". It is evidently about non public financial records some one would have to "dig up" as you put it. Seems like you are contradicting yourself.
Do you think the democrat party and HRC are "treasonous" for trying to dig up information from foreign agents(including Russian sources) and spreading what has been proven to be false info for years before and while Trump was president for the sole purpose damaging a political opponent?
Do you believe that Uncle Joe will be on the block for impeachment before 2024?
If Republicans win back the house it wouldn't surprise me to see them try. Obviously he won't be removed from office, you won't win enough Senate seats to get the votes.
You sir are a liberal tool of the highest order. I bet you have an electric car.
Funny how you democrat lovers hate trump but can not admit Biden will be the worst president since Jimmy Carter and Obama. I bet you loved their incompetent ar$es.
Well I never! You have owned me so hard! But you're wrong about my car - no coexist bumper sticker and I don't even have purple hair, so I'm just a tool in the middle of the order. I do have an electric ball scratcher though - is that so wrong?
It is not about owning you. It is your whole ideology of liberalism is a circular argument. So please tell me how 2 million illegals is looking after America since Biden took office. And why is the federal govt paying for them to have lawyers? Democrats are anti American. I bet you hate pronouns too.
Similar threads
