Dept. of Government Efficiency - Elon/Vivek leading DOGE

[dpic73]

Because you are always worried about stuff that never comes to fruition. You fall for the clickbait headline every time.


First you were worried about Russian Collusion and Trump was a Putin asset. Remember when YOU were ADAMANT about that and tried to sell us that for a couple of years?

Remember when you said that Trump was going to cut Social Security?

Remember when Trumps Tariffs were going to cause inflation to sky rocket?

You continually fail to parse information correctly. All of your main concerns never come to fruition. You really need to do some self-reflecting. You are just selling fear and there are no buyers left.

Love how you just make up shit because someone else said it so it must be true for everyone on the left....but are you denying Trump is a Putin asset? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

The other two claims have yet to play out so you are a fool to claim a premature victory.

 

[fatpiggy]

Love how you just make up shit because someone else said it so it must be true for everyone on the left....but are you denying Trump is a Putin asset? LOLOLOLOLOLOL

The other two claims have yet to play out so you are a fool to claim a premature victory.

Oh no Trump is totally a Putin asset. I think you and the left should continue with that narrative.

JD Vance will be checking out the shitter in the Oval office in no time.

 

[dpic73]

And LOL at posting something from "Comitte for responsible federal spending". Where have they been the last 100 years? GTFOH

Chaired by Leon Panetta



LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOO

It wouldn't matter what source I used -everything not from some Russian bot on Twitshit is fake news to maga, so you can GTFOH when we discuss sources.

 

[fatpiggy]

It wouldn't matter what source I used -everything not from some Russian bot on Twitshit is fake news to maga, so you can GTFOH when we discuss sources.

How about using a source from someone who has not lied directly to the face of the American people?

Panetta is a spy who lied. We all know it and see right through it. He has less than zero credibility.

 

[dpic73]

How about using a source from someone who has not lied directly to the face of the American people?

Panetta is a spy who lied. We all know it and see right through it. He has less than zero credibility.

It won't matter - you've got a maga talking point for every source except catturd.

"As a result, the Trump plan increases the federal deficit over the next decade by $10 trillion or $12 trillion, according to several estimates that do not include macroeconomic changes in GDP, investment and employment. Of course, these so-called “static” estimates do not reflect the potential tax revenue from the economic growth resulting from lower tax rates. However, even under “dynamic” scoring, which takes into account a broad range of macroeconomic effects of tax proposals, his tax cuts would still expand the federal deficit over the next decade by $10 trillion — on top of the $10 trillion increase in the federal deficit already projected under current law."

Donald Trump's tax plan could land America $10 trillion deeper in debt

As voters in Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi and Hawaii heads to the polls on Tuesday for the GOP primary, they should take a closer look at the frontrunner’s tax plan and what that could mean for their wallets.

www.brookings.edu

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-tax-spending-plans-would-add-twice-much-debt-harris-budget-group-says-2024-10-07/

 

[fatpiggy]

It won't matter - you've got a maga talking point for every source except catturd.

"As a result, the Trump plan increases the federal deficit over the next decade by $10 trillion or $12 trillion, according to several estimates that do not include macroeconomic changes in GDP, investment and employment. Of course, these so-called “static” estimates do not reflect the potential tax revenue from the economic growth resulting from lower tax rates. However, even under “dynamic” scoring, which takes into account a broad range of macroeconomic effects of tax proposals, his tax cuts would still expand the federal deficit over the next decade by $10 trillion — on top of the $10 trillion increase in the federal deficit already projected under current law."

Donald Trump's tax plan could land America $10 trillion deeper in debt

As voters in Idaho, Michigan, Mississippi and Hawaii heads to the polls on Tuesday for the GOP primary, they should take a closer look at the frontrunner’s tax plan and what that could mean for their wallets.

www.brookings.edu

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-tax-spending-plans-would-add-twice-much-debt-harris-budget-group-says-2024-10-07/

The brookings institute? The most liberal think tank possible.

Im starting to understand why you fall for so much misinformation.

 

[dpic73]

The brookings institute? The most liberal think tank possible.

Im starting to understand why you fall for so much misinformation.

Loser's excuse to avoid the subject. Convinced NOW??

 

[scotchtiger]

Not a bit of this matters if they're going to add another 5 to 11 trillion to the debt in the next ten years with their multiple tax give-aways - none of it. Why aren't you more focused on that?

All this fake outrage to hide their true hidden agenda is laughable.

Trump Tax Priorities Total $5 to $11 Trillion | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

2025-02-06-In a closed-door meeting with House Leadership today President Trump reportedly outlined his tax priorities.

www.crfb.org

Entitlements and government checks and free shit are handouts. Maintaining current tax rates (for the most part) are not handouts. As in, the government is still taking a shitload of money from these people. People benefiting from Trump-era tax policy are still the primary financial support for this country. A "thank you" would be more appropriate than complaining about handouts that aren't handouts.

 

[fatpiggy]

Everyone knows we needed cuts. It’s not really debatable.

The left is upset because Elon found their slush fund.