Republicans are in no mood to simplify the tax code. Neither are many Dems.Instead of hiring 80,000 IRS agents, I would much rather, 100 times over, make the tax code less complex. That would be a much more efficient solution.
It's not
I assume it's for entertainment only.Anyone else automatically discount the opinions of anyone embedding bluesky shit? Pretty much a guarantee they’re a completely dipshit with an IQ of <63.
How is that any different than people flooding the board with posts from Insurrection Barbie, DC Draino, LibsofTikTok and Catturd? Those posts have more credibility just because they came from X? Bluesky is just posters who fled X because of the rank stupidity of those who value the opinion of the above.Anyone else automatically discount the opinions of anyone embedding bluesky shit? Pretty much a guarantee they’re a complete dipshit with an IQ of <63.
They have more credibility from X for the simple fact that speech is not censored. Bluesky censors speech and, therefore, its users do not have the complete information on which to base discussions.How is that any different than people flooding the board with posts from Insurrection Barbie, DC Draino, LibsofTikTok and Catturd? Those posts have more credibility just because they came from X? Bluesky is just posters who fled X because of the rank stupidity of those who value the opinion of the above.
It’s not different…How is that any different than people flooding the board with posts from Insurrection Barbie, DC Draino, LibsofTikTok and Catturd? Those posts have more credibility just because they came from X? Bluesky is just posters who fled X because of the rank stupidity of those who value the opinion of the above.
Are you telling me that you valued the voices of people who used to oppose the Catturd's of the world? Those people mostly left X, not because they're stupid as Bionic implied, but because there was so much stupidity on X and you couldn't breakthrough unless you paid $8 a month, so there's really no difference. The opposition voices are squashed on X but that's not how it works on Bluesky - you don't have to pay to be heard and you have more control to filter out the haters.They have more credibility from X for the simple fact that speech is not censored. Bluesky censors speech and, therefore, its users do not have the complete information on which to base discussions.
Yes, i discount anything that comes from a place that censors.
X is the largest uncensored platform.
Catturd knows shit dpic. Listen to him and get smarter. Insurrection Barbie is a queen....bow to her.Are you telling me that you valued the voices of people who used to oppose the Catturd's of the world? Those people mostly left X, not because they're stupid as Bionic implied, but because there was so much stupidity on X and you couldn't breakthrough unless you paid $8 a month, so there's really no difference. The opposition voices are squashed on X but that's not how it works on Bluesky - you don't have to pay to be heard and you have more control to filter out the haters.
When you say there is "so much stupidity on X" what you really mean is that you are too stupid to filter through it. You prefer someone else (bluesky) to do the filtering for you.Are you telling me that you valued the voices of people who used to oppose the Catturd's of the world? Those people mostly left X, not because they're stupid as Bionic implied, but because there was so much stupidity on X and you couldn't breakthrough unless you paid $8 a month, so there's really no difference. The opposition voices are squashed on X but that's not how it works on Bluesky - you don't have to pay to be heard and you have more control to filter out the haters.
Not true, I understand how to filter out the stupidity with the Following setting but if I do decide to look at posts from the other side, which I do to see what they're saying, when I respond nobody sees it. I was filtered out simply because I don't pay but that's not how old Twitter used to work.When you say there is "so much stupidity on X" what you really mean is that you are too stupid to filter through it. You prefer someone else (bluesky) to do the filtering for you.
Think about it.
Not true, I understand how to filter out the stupidity with the Following setting but if I do decide to look at posts from the other side, which I do to see what they're saying, when I respond nobody sees it. I was filtered out simply because I don't pay but that's not how old Twitter used to work.
You might want to check how many posts I've addded here from Xitter before you claim I don't use it. But you're right about Elon's dangerous politics - they aren't healthy for our country or democracy worldwide.Oh, you wanted to grift off the people paying. You want to pay higher taxes but don't want to pay $8 to amplify your voice.
Like I said I get it. Doing the same against Zuck cost me a bunch of money.
But let's not act like you get better info on blue sky or threads or whatever. If Elon sold X tomorrow you would be back on it. Just be honest, your politics don't align with Elons, and you don't want to use his platform. That is OK. You will gain more respect by being honest.