ADVERTISEMENT

Durham Drops Bomb: Lying Adam Schiff Was Involved in Russia Collusion Sham Way Back in July 2016

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
28,334
17,664
113

By Joe Hoft
Published April 26, 2022 at 12:49pm
ADAM-SCHIFF-MUELLER-INVESTIGATION-009-01-800x416-600x312.jpg

Adam Schiff was knee-deep in the Trump Russia collusion sham. He was involved way back in July 2016. John Durham just confirmed it.
John Durham released some documents yesterday related to the Trump – Russia collusion sham created by the Hillary Clinton gang. We reported on this earlier.
There is much in this latest release but one item, in particular, is that Adam Schiff was involved in this lie from the beginning. Redstate reports:
TRENDING: Swamp Rat Mitch McConnell Said He Was "Exhilarated" on Jan 6 that President Trump "Had Finally Tarnished His Reputation"
Durham also derides the claim that Fusion was hired for legal work — calling that a “novel” way to cover up opposition research and the derogatory information that they then spread against President Donald Trump and his team. He says that despite efforts, the parties have failed to provide “meaningful, substantive explanations to support these continuing broad assertions of privilege and/or work product protections.”
A number of emails have been released in Durham’s latest. One email showed that pencil-neck Adam Schiff was involved in the Russia collusion lie as early as July 2016.


Schiff later released a report on Russia collusion that was all lies. He received no penalties for doing so.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: CUTiger1977
I see... Just a few quick questions. Wasn't Durham appointed a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of this very thing? Wasn't this the "Crime of the Century" according to Trump himself? Didn't Durham and his large staff spend YEARS building his case and the evidence need to bring these folks to justice? And yet he only got one guilty plea for altering an email and went 0-2 with the two people he did bring to trial. I can't help but notice that he never even mentioned Schiff while he was actually doing the job of investigating this, much less charge him (or even bring him before a Grand Jury).

Look, I've got no special love for Schiff. If he broke the law, charge him, bring him to trial, and lock him up. The guy accusing him now was in a unique position to do that very thing and yet he didn't. And worse, he didn't even try. Again, he didn't even bring this up to the Grand Jury.

So years later, he's telling us this? Whatever...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
I see... Just a few quick questions. Wasn't Durham appointed a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of this very thing? Wasn't this the "Crime of the Century" according to Trump himself? Didn't Durham and his large staff spend YEARS building his case and the evidence need to bring these folks to justice? And yet he only got one guilty plea for altering an email and went 0-2 with the two people he did bring to trial. I can't help but notice that he never even mentioned Schiff while he was actually doing the job of investigating this, much less charge him (or even bring him before a Grand Jury).

Look, I've got no special love for Schiff. If he broke the law, charge him, bring him to trial, and lock him up. The guy accusing him now was in a unique position to do that very thing and yet he didn't. And worse, he didn't even try. Again, he didn't even bring this up to the Grand Jury.

So years later, he's telling us this? Whatever...
Schiff is a dishonest actor. Period.
 
Schiff is a dishonest actor. Period.
I don't disagree with that, but that applies to most politicians.

Remember right after Trump was elected in 2016 and folks were asking him about his connections to the Russians? He said he had nothing to do with Russia and that he'd sold a house to a Russian before but that was it... And yet somehow he was negotiating for a Trump Tower in Moscow and that doesn't count? Not that there's anything wrong with Trump doing that or even offering Putin a Penthouse suit to sweeten the deal. But he lied about it. That makes him a dishonest actor too right?
 
I don't disagree with that, but that applies to most politicians.

Remember right after Trump was elected in 2016 and folks were asking him about his connections to the Russians? He said he had nothing to do with Russia and that he'd sold a house to a Russian before but that was it... And yet somehow he was negotiating for a Trump Tower in Moscow and that doesn't count? Not that there's anything wrong with Trump doing that or even offering Putin a Penthouse suit to sweeten the deal. But he lied about it. That makes him a dishonest actor too right?
No, Schiff is dishonest in a way that other politicians are not. He is deliberately deceitful. He belongs in jail, and it’s possible but not probable, that he ends up there. What he did was really bad, perhaps treasonous.

There are rational actors and irrational actors. He is irrational because he is intentionally dishonest.
 
No, Schiff is dishonest in a way that other politicians are not. He is deliberately deceitful. He belongs in jail, and it’s possible but not probable, that he ends up there. What he did was really bad, perhaps treasonous.

There are rational actors and irrational actors. He is irrational because he is intentionally dishonest.
If Trump escaped justice for all his treasonous actions, no way in hell any other politician should end up in jail.
 
If Trump escaped justice for all his treasonous actions, no way in hell any other politician should end up in jail.
Well, we are going to try. Hope old schiffty is ready to spend his money on a lawyer.

Intentional deception on the American people and you are defending him. The guy is a grade A piece of sh!t and you are defending him. No surprise.
 
Last edited:
Well, we are going to try. Hope old schiffty is ready to spend his money on a liar.

Intentional deception on the American people and you are defending him. The guy is a grade A piece of sh!t and you are defending him. No surprise.
Can you quote my defense of him? If they do go after him or anyone else on the Committee, it will just give them another opportunity to remind everyone about the details of Donald's sedition so Kash better do it at his own risk.

And you don't have the moral authority to talk about "Grade A pieces of shit" or "intentional deception" dude...

Sit this one out
 
Can you quote my defense of him? If they do go after him or anyone else on the Committee, it will just give them another opportunity to remind everyone about the details of Donald's sedition so Kash better do it at his own risk.

And you don't have the moral authority to talk about "Grade A pieces of shit" or "intentional deception" dude...

Sit this one out
We voted. Your team lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hopefultiger13
Well, we are going to try. Hope old schiffty is ready to spend his money on a lawyer.

Intentional deception on the American people and you are defending him. The guy is a grade A piece of sh!t and you are defending him. No surprise.
Just to be clear, I'm NOT defending him. Like I said above... If he's guilty of something, charge him, give him a trial, and if found guilty, lock him up.

Furthermore, if this happens, you won't hear any complaints out of me. I believe in the justice system. Not that I think it's perfect, but it does a pretty good job.

That's VERY MUCH UNLIKE the Trumpians on here. If Trump is found guilty of something by a jury, GOD KNOWS he couldn't have actually been guilty. It was the Deep State setting him up... or the Justice Dept... or he couldn't get a fair trial or <insert excuse here>. Because, in the eyes of Trumpians, anything that helps Trump is automatically good and above board. Anything against him is wrong and rigged.
 
We voted. Your team lost.
Absolutely... We had a free and fair election under the supervision of the Biden Administration. And Harris lost and Trump won. You aren't going to hear anything different from me about that. Just like we had a free and fair election in 2020 under the supervision of the Trump Administration and Biden won and Trump lost.

EXCEPT Trump COULDN'T have lost right? Because anything that doesn't support Trump MUST be rigged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Just to be clear, I'm NOT defending him. Like I said above... If he's guilty of something, charge him, give him a trial, and if found guilty, lock him up.

Furthermore, if this happens, you won't hear any complaints out of me. I believe in the justice system. Not that I think it's perfect, but it does a pretty good job.

That's VERY MUCH UNLIKE the Trumpians on here. If Trump is found guilty of something by a jury, GOD KNOWS he couldn't have actually been guilty. It was the Deep State setting him up... or the Justice Dept... or he couldn't get a fair trial or <insert excuse here>. Because, in the eyes of Trumpians, anything that helps Trump is automatically good and above board. Anything against him is wrong and rigged.
But you ignore the actual deep state plots against him. Those did happen. Russian Collusion says hello. Once they were busted lying, they lost all credibility going forward. It was an admin built on deception and the People stopped buying it. Free speech sniffed out the deception and voted it out with the swiftness.
 
But you ignore the actual deep state plots against him. Those did happen. Russian Collusion says hello. Once they were busted lying, they lost all credibility going forward. It was an admin built on deception and the People stopped buying it. Free speech sniffed out the deception and voted it out with the swiftness.

"The report is the culmination of a bipartisan probe that produced what the committee called “the most comprehensive description to date of Russia’s activities and the threat they posed.” The investigation spanned more than three years as the panel’s leaders said they wanted to thoroughly document the unprecedented attack on U.S. elections.

The findings, including unflinching characterizations of furtive interactions between Trump associates and Russian operatives, echo to a large degree those of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and appear to repudiate the Republican president’s claims that the FBI had no basis to investigate whether his campaign was conspiring with Russia."
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TigerGrowls
But you ignore the actual deep state plots against him. Those did happen. Russian Collusion says hello. Once they were busted lying, they lost all credibility going forward. It was an admin built on deception and the People stopped buying it. Free speech sniffed out the deception and voted it out with the swiftness.
No dude... just no. There's no Deep State. Never has been. As for Russian Collusion, that investigation by Mueller found no reason to prosecute Trump, NOT b/c there was no evidence, but because a sitting President can't be prosecuted.

And again, it is certainly interesting that you say when someone is busted for lying they lose all credibility. Have you ever met Trump? The dude lies ALL THE TIME, yet you seem to believe every word he says.
 
No dude... just no. There's no Deep State. Never has been. As for Russian Collusion, that investigation by Mueller found no reason to prosecute Trump, NOT b/c there was no evidence, but because a sitting President can't be prosecuted.

And again, it is certainly interesting that you say when someone is busted for lying they lose all credibility. Have you ever met Trump? The dude lies ALL THE TIME, yet you seem to believe every word he says.
There is no deep state? lol
 
No dude... just no. There's no Deep State. Never has been. As for Russian Collusion, that investigation by Mueller found no reason to prosecute Trump, NOT b/c there was no evidence, but because a sitting President can't be prosecuted.

And again, it is certainly interesting that you say when someone is busted for lying they lose all credibility. Have you ever met Trump? The dude lies ALL THE TIME, yet you seem to believe every word he says.
You sound like Jill Biden after the first debate. "But Trump lies"

That's all she could muster up after that ass whoopin
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT