ADVERTISEMENT

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress

Cris_Ard

Owner - Publisher of Tigerillustrated.com
Staff
May 29, 2001
131,038
324,646
113
51
tigerillustrated.com
-------

Guys, we're going to try to keep this on this board, at least for now. Please work with us on not taking this thread over the top due to politics.

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress

By: Ross Dellenger - Sports Illustrated

Two U.S. senators at the center of the college athlete compensation debate on Capitol Hill are reintroducing a sweeping bill that would give college players the right to transfer an unlimited amount, return to school after entering a professional draft and access to lifetime scholarships.

Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and three other Democratic senators are filing the newest version of the 2020 College Athlete Bill of Rights this week in Congress. Their office released an early copy of the bill to Sports Illustrated as well as a summary.

The bill is substantively identical to the version that was introduced in December of 2020 except that it does not feature a revenue-sharing concept. However, Booker plans to introduce a separate, standalone bill regarding revenue sharing, a Booker staff member says.

The reintroduction of the College Athlete Bill of Rights comes at a time of seismic change within college athletics, as name, image and likeness (NIL) enters its second year. The 2022 version of the bill provides athletes with little-to-no restrictions on NIL deals and allows for group licensing. In the only real limitation for athletes, states and schools can prohibit endorsement contracts with entities from particular industries, such as alcohol and drug companies, as long as the same restriction applies to the school or if the deal violates rules that all students are subject to. Schools are prohibited from arranging NIL deals for athletes, the bill says.

Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai’i), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Alex Padilla (D-Ca.) are other sponsors of a bill that, for now, does not include any Republican support. College athletes rights and NIL have evolved into a partisan topic on Capitol Hill. Since 2019, at least eight such bills have been introduced in Congress and none have advanced to even the first step in the legislative process despite more than a half-dozen hearings on the topic.

While the removal of the revenue-sharing provision makes Booker’s bill more digestible for Republicans, the bill is broad in scope and does not include antitrust protections for the NCAA. In the past, Republicans have supported a more narrow bill that gives NCAA protections.

“Being a college football player opened so many doors for me and provided me with invaluable skills that I still use to this day,” Booker, who played tight end at Stanford, said in a statement. “At the same time, I also saw the injustices that college athletes experience as the NCAA exploits them for financial gain, and woefully fails to protect their health, well-being, and safety—especially Black athletes, who are over-represented in revenue-generating sports.

“The time has come for change—and this bill moves us closer to doing right by and for college athletes.”

The Bill of Rights encompasses sections about health and safety, scholarships, school accountability and gender equity. It charges the Secretary of Healthy and Human Services to develop health and safety standards. The bill also creates a medical trust fund to cover costs of out-of-pocket medical expenses for athletes to use up to five years after their eligibility expires and requires those schools with a $50 million-or-more budget to finance athlete medical costs and medical insurance for at least four years after graduation.

Long-term athlete healthcare was a primary sticking point last summer, when the two sides came the closest to a compromise. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the chair of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee, and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) worked on bipartisan legislation that ultimately failed, most notably because of language regarding post-graduate healthcare benefits.

Book and Blumenthal’s bill allows athletes the freedom to transfer an unlimited amount of times without sitting a year out, a right the NCAA currently grants to athletes only one time. Athletes would be required to give seven days notice and cannot transfer during the season or 45 days preceding the start of the season.

According to the bill, athletes can enter a pro draft and return to school if they did not receive compensation and if they notify the athletic director within seven days of being drafted. The bill requires schools to provide athletes with scholarships until they complete their undergraduate studies, something often referred to as a “lifetime scholarship.”

The bill establishes a nine-member regulatory commission to ensure schools and conferences are following the law. The commission, which must include at least five former athletes, will be charged with enforcement. The bill also requires schools to provide annual public reporting of their total revenues and expenditures, including compensation for athletic department personnel and booster donations as well as reporting on the number of hours athletes commit to athletic activities.

The announcement Wednesday comes on the same day that former football coach-turned senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told SI that he and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va) are in the process of acquiring feedback with intent to draft an NIL bill of their own.
 
-------

Guys, we're going to try to keep this on this board, at least for now. Please work with us on not taking this thread over the top due to politics.

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress

By: Ross Dellenger - Sports Illustrated

Two U.S. senators at the center of the college athlete compensation debate on Capitol Hill are reintroducing a sweeping bill that would give college players the right to transfer an unlimited amount, return to school after entering a professional draft and access to lifetime scholarships.

Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and three other Democratic senators are filing the newest version of the 2020 College Athlete Bill of Rights this week in Congress. Their office released an early copy of the bill to Sports Illustrated as well as a summary.

The bill is substantively identical to the version that was introduced in December of 2020 except that it does not feature a revenue-sharing concept. However, Booker plans to introduce a separate, standalone bill regarding revenue sharing, a Booker staff member says.

The reintroduction of the College Athlete Bill of Rights comes at a time of seismic change within college athletics, as name, image and likeness (NIL) enters its second year. The 2022 version of the bill provides athletes with little-to-no restrictions on NIL deals and allows for group licensing. In the only real limitation for athletes, states and schools can prohibit endorsement contracts with entities from particular industries, such as alcohol and drug companies, as long as the same restriction applies to the school or if the deal violates rules that all students are subject to. Schools are prohibited from arranging NIL deals for athletes, the bill says.

Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai’i), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Alex Padilla (D-Ca.) are other sponsors of a bill that, for now, does not include any Republican support. College athletes rights and NIL have evolved into a partisan topic on Capitol Hill. Since 2019, at least eight such bills have been introduced in Congress and none have advanced to even the first step in the legislative process despite more than a half-dozen hearings on the topic.

While the removal of the revenue-sharing provision makes Booker’s bill more digestible for Republicans, the bill is broad in scope and does not include antitrust protections for the NCAA. In the past, Republicans have supported a more narrow bill that gives NCAA protections.

“Being a college football player opened so many doors for me and provided me with invaluable skills that I still use to this day,” Booker, who played tight end at Stanford, said in a statement. “At the same time, I also saw the injustices that college athletes experience as the NCAA exploits them for financial gain, and woefully fails to protect their health, well-being, and safety—especially Black athletes, who are over-represented in revenue-generating sports.

“The time has come for change—and this bill moves us closer to doing right by and for college athletes.”

The Bill of Rights encompasses sections about health and safety, scholarships, school accountability and gender equity. It charges the Secretary of Healthy and Human Services to develop health and safety standards. The bill also creates a medical trust fund to cover costs of out-of-pocket medical expenses for athletes to use up to five years after their eligibility expires and requires those schools with a $50 million-or-more budget to finance athlete medical costs and medical insurance for at least four years after graduation.

Long-term athlete healthcare was a primary sticking point last summer, when the two sides came the closest to a compromise. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the chair of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee, and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) worked on bipartisan legislation that ultimately failed, most notably because of language regarding post-graduate healthcare benefits.

Book and Blumenthal’s bill allows athletes the freedom to transfer an unlimited amount of times without sitting a year out, a right the NCAA currently grants to athletes only one time. Athletes would be required to give seven days notice and cannot transfer during the season or 45 days preceding the start of the season.

According to the bill, athletes can enter a pro draft and return to school if they did not receive compensation and if they notify the athletic director within seven days of being drafted. The bill requires schools to provide athletes with scholarships until they complete their undergraduate studies, something often referred to as a “lifetime scholarship.”

The bill establishes a nine-member regulatory commission to ensure schools and conferences are following the law. The commission, which must include at least five former athletes, will be charged with enforcement. The bill also requires schools to provide annual public reporting of their total revenues and expenditures, including compensation for athletic department personnel and booster donations as well as reporting on the number of hours athletes commit to athletic activities.

The announcement Wednesday comes on the same day that former football coach-turned senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told SI that he and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va) are in the process of acquiring feedback with intent to draft an NIL bill of their own.
Stopped reading at Corey Booker and Blumenthal.
 
oh-boy-here-we-go-again.gif
 

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress...​

charlie-brown-good-grief.gif

“Everybody wants to talk about their rights and privileges. Twenty-five years ago, people talked about their obligations and responsibilities”. - as spoken by Lou Holtz, former Notre Dame Coach
 
Last edited:
The bill also creates a medical trust fund to cover costs of out-of-pocket medical expenses for athletes to use up to five years after their eligibility expires and requires those schools with a $50 million-or-more budget to finance athlete medical costs and medical insurance for at least four years after graduation.

This is good. I'd like to see this become a reality for athletes who don't become pros but live with the very real consequences of injuries. NFL players are taken care of, players who don't make it at the next level aren't.

Overall, though, I'm not sure this is something for Congress to handle. I'd like to think it's the NCAA's duty, but they fought tooth and nail and spent millions of dollars doing nothing that I'm not sure the current leadership (which is on the way out) should be in charge, anyway.
 
In what world is it in the best interest of a student athlete to attend more than 2 schools over a span of 4 years?

The real reason for NIL reporting requirements is so the IRS can get their hands on the booster money.

Hopefully Tuberville and Manchin have something better in the works.
 
I was hoping Congress would get involved, but this is obviously going in the wrong direction. If they can't see that unlimited transfers & Pay for Play is ruining the game, then they have no clue how to fix it. Hopefully Tuberville can make sense of it.
 
Last edited:
If I were a College President I would ask for all of the stock trading secrets for politicians. All money made from those stocks will be used to help all student athletes. Lets make this an even playing field
 
  • Like
Reactions: DieHard4Clemson
Something needs to be done, but it needs to be done by the sports governing bodies. Unfortunately, there are none at the present time except conferences which are trying to gobble up or stomp down competitors. We are hearing a lot from SEC and BIG10 commissioners thumping their chests about how aggressive they are, but nothing from university ADs and presidents about reducing chaos in college sports.
 
Leave it to these democrat hacks, they have already ruined this country and now on the way to ruining college football. It’s never enough, they will never be satisfied. The more you give the more is expected. I think you do what the NBA has done, set up a G League in Football and let these kids who have no interest in a paid college education but want to get paid to play, give them that option. These idiots in Washington think money grows on trees but all of you young people on this site better hang on because I am afraid your quality of life in this country will not be what your parents enjoyed. I am a old fart and I pray each day for my kids and grandkids because of what is ahead. It will get real ugly when the money runs out. All of this is just a part of the reset. As they say, never let a crisis go to waste.
 
Why not just give them two million dollar$ each and tell them to have a good life and go back to club football??? 🤨
 
  • Like
Reactions: beachtiger2
If I were a College President I would ask for all of the stock trading secrets for politicians. All money made from those stocks will be used to help all student athletes. Lets make this an even playing field
The "secret" is pretty simple. Know about legislation that affects certain industries. Then buy or sell. Ask Mr. Pelosi
 
  • Like
Reactions: DieHard4Clemson
Observations maybe? Go sometime and see yourself. Might be "enlightening ".
I shop at Ingles weekly. Never had an enlightening experience.

I’ve had quite a few in this thread though. Apparently every single problem in this country can be blamed on the guy across the street. Amazing really
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
-------

Guys, we're going to try to keep this on this board, at least for now. Please work with us on not taking this thread over the top due to politics.

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress

By: Ross Dellenger - Sports Illustrated

Two U.S. senators at the center of the college athlete compensation debate on Capitol Hill are reintroducing a sweeping bill that would give college players the right to transfer an unlimited amount, return to school after entering a professional draft and access to lifetime scholarships.

Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and three other Democratic senators are filing the newest version of the 2020 College Athlete Bill of Rights this week in Congress. Their office released an early copy of the bill to Sports Illustrated as well as a summary.

The bill is substantively identical to the version that was introduced in December of 2020 except that it does not feature a revenue-sharing concept. However, Booker plans to introduce a separate, standalone bill regarding revenue sharing, a Booker staff member says.

The reintroduction of the College Athlete Bill of Rights comes at a time of seismic change within college athletics, as name, image and likeness (NIL) enters its second year. The 2022 version of the bill provides athletes with little-to-no restrictions on NIL deals and allows for group licensing. In the only real limitation for athletes, states and schools can prohibit endorsement contracts with entities from particular industries, such as alcohol and drug companies, as long as the same restriction applies to the school or if the deal violates rules that all students are subject to. Schools are prohibited from arranging NIL deals for athletes, the bill says.

Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai’i), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Alex Padilla (D-Ca.) are other sponsors of a bill that, for now, does not include any Republican support. College athletes rights and NIL have evolved into a partisan topic on Capitol Hill. Since 2019, at least eight such bills have been introduced in Congress and none have advanced to even the first step in the legislative process despite more than a half-dozen hearings on the topic.

While the removal of the revenue-sharing provision makes Booker’s bill more digestible for Republicans, the bill is broad in scope and does not include antitrust protections for the NCAA. In the past, Republicans have supported a more narrow bill that gives NCAA protections.

“Being a college football player opened so many doors for me and provided me with invaluable skills that I still use to this day,” Booker, who played tight end at Stanford, said in a statement. “At the same time, I also saw the injustices that college athletes experience as the NCAA exploits them for financial gain, and woefully fails to protect their health, well-being, and safety—especially Black athletes, who are over-represented in revenue-generating sports.

“The time has come for change—and this bill moves us closer to doing right by and for college athletes.”

The Bill of Rights encompasses sections about health and safety, scholarships, school accountability and gender equity. It charges the Secretary of Healthy and Human Services to develop health and safety standards. The bill also creates a medical trust fund to cover costs of out-of-pocket medical expenses for athletes to use up to five years after their eligibility expires and requires those schools with a $50 million-or-more budget to finance athlete medical costs and medical insurance for at least four years after graduation.

Long-term athlete healthcare was a primary sticking point last summer, when the two sides came the closest to a compromise. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the chair of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee, and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) worked on bipartisan legislation that ultimately failed, most notably because of language regarding post-graduate healthcare benefits.

Book and Blumenthal’s bill allows athletes the freedom to transfer an unlimited amount of times without sitting a year out, a right the NCAA currently grants to athletes only one time. Athletes would be required to give seven days notice and cannot transfer during the season or 45 days preceding the start of the season.

According to the bill, athletes can enter a pro draft and return to school if they did not receive compensation and if they notify the athletic director within seven days of being drafted. The bill requires schools to provide athletes with scholarships until they complete their undergraduate studies, something often referred to as a “lifetime scholarship.”

The bill establishes a nine-member regulatory commission to ensure schools and conferences are following the law. The commission, which must include at least five former athletes, will be charged with enforcement. The bill also requires schools to provide annual public reporting of their total revenues and expenditures, including compensation for athletic department personnel and booster donations as well as reporting on the number of hours athletes commit to athletic activities.

The announcement Wednesday comes on the same day that former football coach-turned senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told SI that he and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va) are in the process of acquiring feedback with intent to draft an NIL bill of their own.
jesus, the dems would fvck up a wet dream. They prob think govmt can help your sex life too. Want to legislate evgerything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loveoysters
-------

Guys, we're going to try to keep this on this board, at least for now. Please work with us on not taking this thread over the top due to politics.

Five Senators to Reintroduce Sweeping College Athlete Bill of Rights in Congress

By: Ross Dellenger - Sports Illustrated

Two U.S. senators at the center of the college athlete compensation debate on Capitol Hill are reintroducing a sweeping bill that would give college players the right to transfer an unlimited amount, return to school after entering a professional draft and access to lifetime scholarships.

Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and three other Democratic senators are filing the newest version of the 2020 College Athlete Bill of Rights this week in Congress. Their office released an early copy of the bill to Sports Illustrated as well as a summary.

The bill is substantively identical to the version that was introduced in December of 2020 except that it does not feature a revenue-sharing concept. However, Booker plans to introduce a separate, standalone bill regarding revenue sharing, a Booker staff member says.

The reintroduction of the College Athlete Bill of Rights comes at a time of seismic change within college athletics, as name, image and likeness (NIL) enters its second year. The 2022 version of the bill provides athletes with little-to-no restrictions on NIL deals and allows for group licensing. In the only real limitation for athletes, states and schools can prohibit endorsement contracts with entities from particular industries, such as alcohol and drug companies, as long as the same restriction applies to the school or if the deal violates rules that all students are subject to. Schools are prohibited from arranging NIL deals for athletes, the bill says.

Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawai’i), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Alex Padilla (D-Ca.) are other sponsors of a bill that, for now, does not include any Republican support. College athletes rights and NIL have evolved into a partisan topic on Capitol Hill. Since 2019, at least eight such bills have been introduced in Congress and none have advanced to even the first step in the legislative process despite more than a half-dozen hearings on the topic.

While the removal of the revenue-sharing provision makes Booker’s bill more digestible for Republicans, the bill is broad in scope and does not include antitrust protections for the NCAA. In the past, Republicans have supported a more narrow bill that gives NCAA protections.

“Being a college football player opened so many doors for me and provided me with invaluable skills that I still use to this day,” Booker, who played tight end at Stanford, said in a statement. “At the same time, I also saw the injustices that college athletes experience as the NCAA exploits them for financial gain, and woefully fails to protect their health, well-being, and safety—especially Black athletes, who are over-represented in revenue-generating sports.

“The time has come for change—and this bill moves us closer to doing right by and for college athletes.”

The Bill of Rights encompasses sections about health and safety, scholarships, school accountability and gender equity. It charges the Secretary of Healthy and Human Services to develop health and safety standards. The bill also creates a medical trust fund to cover costs of out-of-pocket medical expenses for athletes to use up to five years after their eligibility expires and requires those schools with a $50 million-or-more budget to finance athlete medical costs and medical insurance for at least four years after graduation.

Long-term athlete healthcare was a primary sticking point last summer, when the two sides came the closest to a compromise. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), the chair of the powerful Senate Commerce Committee, and Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) worked on bipartisan legislation that ultimately failed, most notably because of language regarding post-graduate healthcare benefits.

Book and Blumenthal’s bill allows athletes the freedom to transfer an unlimited amount of times without sitting a year out, a right the NCAA currently grants to athletes only one time. Athletes would be required to give seven days notice and cannot transfer during the season or 45 days preceding the start of the season.

According to the bill, athletes can enter a pro draft and return to school if they did not receive compensation and if they notify the athletic director within seven days of being drafted. The bill requires schools to provide athletes with scholarships until they complete their undergraduate studies, something often referred to as a “lifetime scholarship.”

The bill establishes a nine-member regulatory commission to ensure schools and conferences are following the law. The commission, which must include at least five former athletes, will be charged with enforcement. The bill also requires schools to provide annual public reporting of their total revenues and expenditures, including compensation for athletic department personnel and booster donations as well as reporting on the number of hours athletes commit to athletic activities.

The announcement Wednesday comes on the same day that former football coach-turned senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) told SI that he and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va) are in the process of acquiring feedback with intent to draft an NIL bill of their own.
almost made it to half way through the first post before it became political. that's a new record.
 
I shop at Ingles weekly. Never had an enlightening experience.

I’ve had quite a few in this thread though. Apparently every single problem in this country can be blamed on the guy across the street. Amazing really

selfishness and a feeling of entitlement

thats what is killing america

everyone wants the life of a politician
 
girl that works at ingles in the grocery line

not first hand like CNN or the NYT but I might believe her

ask for yourself next time you go thru.
The high school girl checking out your groceries huh? Interesting sample size. I don't mean to be an ass, but come on man....you can't be serious.

So here are the qualifications according to the South Carolina Department of Social Services and Benefits.gov (C&P)

You may qualify for expedited SNAP benefits (commonly referred to as emergency SNAP benefits) if your household’s gross monthly income is less than $150 and liquid resources (money in the bank; cash on hand) do not exceed $100; OR your household’s monthly gross income plus any cash that you have on hand or in the bank is less than your rent/mortgage and utilities; OR your SNAP household contains a migrant or seasonal farm worker who is considered destitute and the household’s liquid resources (money in the bank; cash on hand) do not exceed $100.

To be eligible for this benefit program, you must be a resident of the state of South Carolina and meet one of the following requirements:

You have a current bank balance (savings and checking combined) under $2,001, or

  • You have a current bank balance (savings and checking combined) under $3,001 who share their household with one of the following:
    • A person or persons age 60 and over or
    • A person with a disability (a child, your spouse, a parent, or yourself).

I'm sorry for you if you live in an area that have so many people that fit this criteria. Very sad indeed. Fortunately, that simply isn't consistent with overall living standards throughout the state.
 
Last edited:
Looks to me like the powers to be didn't quite finish the job of destroying college football, so now the politicans are doing what they do best, finishing the job (destruction).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT