ADVERTISEMENT

FOX News Joins Mainstream Media in Boycotting Coverage of “2000 Mules” Documentary on Nation-wide Ballot Trafficking Conspiracy to Steal 2020 Election

TigerGrowls

Woodrush
Gold Member
Dec 21, 2001
30,194
20,529
113
FOX equals controlled opposition. FOX has some personalities that would love to cover election fraud but they are muzzled at this time.

We already know from our sources that the evidence from Georgia will ROCK the corrupt Democrat Party to its core.


THEY’RE ON THE OTHER SIDE: FOX News Joins Mainstream Media in Boycotting Coverage of “2000 Mules” Documentary on Nation-wide Ballot Trafficking Conspiracy to Steal 2020 Election​

By Jim Hoft
Published May 4, 2022 at 7:30am
2000-mules-poster-long.jpg

The movie ‘2000 Mules’ is set for release this week in over 200 theaters across the country.
In the film, Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote provide answers and evidence of the stolen 2020 Election in this documentary released on Tuesday at select theaters across the nation.

Here is a list of theaters where you can see the movie tonight if there are still seats available.
The movie proves through geo-tracking and video confirmation that Democrats used ballot trafficking to steal the 2020 election in a conspiracy that involved every single battleground state.
TRENDING: Dave Chappelle Attacked on Stage at Hollywood Bowl (Video)
We also know from our sources that Democrat PACs were involved in every state in the ballot trafficking operations. This was a planned, organized, and well-coordinated conspiracy in battleground states.
And we know from investigators Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips that roughly 7% of mail-in ballots in each state were trafficked. Without those stolen votes, Joe Biden would have lost the election.
Democrats got caught. The election was stolen. Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.
For weeks now The Gateway Pundit team has been wondering how the Democrat Party would respond to this devastating news. So far the party of villains has been silent. They really don’t have a way out of this. They’ve been caught and there is evidence of their illicit acts.
Now we know the Democrat plan.
The far left mainstream media boycotted ANY coverage of the historic documentary.
NOT ONE SINGLE major news agency reported on the historic project “2000 Mules”.
boycott-2000-mules-msm-.jpg

The Associated Press published ONE “rebuttal” to the movie despite the video footage of ballot traffickers and the geo-tracking evidence reported in the movie. AP hack Ali Swenson was assigned by her editors to take down the movie and failed in her politicized attempt. Maybe she’s a recent college grad. Her arguments are certainly not impressive. The AP disregards video evidence that ballot traffickers were making their “rounds” to the different drop boxes in the urban center.
It will be interesting when the AP is forced to explain all of the voter hubs discussed in the major metropolitan areas.
We already know from our sources that the evidence from Georgia will ROCK the corrupt Democrat Party to its core.
Sadly, FOX News failed to post ONE SINGLE REPORT on “2000 Mules.” Not one.
fox-news-2000-mules-zero-articles.jpg

This is a huge disappointment. FOX News is too weak to air ANY coverage on the movie. Their brilliant personalities can talk about all issues except the most importan issue — fraudulent elections. And without free and fair elections Republicans will always take a backseat on the bus. Just how Democrats like it.
True the Vote announced they will release their data later this month for crowd-sourcing so that ALL Americans can analyze their findings. This is how honest reporting works.
 
FOX equals controlled opposition. FOX has some personalities that would love to cover election fraud but they are muzzled at this time.

We already know from our sources that the evidence from Georgia will ROCK the corrupt Democrat Party to its core.


THEY’RE ON THE OTHER SIDE: FOX News Joins Mainstream Media in Boycotting Coverage of “2000 Mules” Documentary on Nation-wide Ballot Trafficking Conspiracy to Steal 2020 Election​

By Jim Hoft
Published May 4, 2022 at 7:30am
2000-mules-poster-long.jpg

The movie ‘2000 Mules’ is set for release this week in over 200 theaters across the country.
In the film, Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote provide answers and evidence of the stolen 2020 Election in this documentary released on Tuesday at select theaters across the nation.

Here is a list of theaters where you can see the movie tonight if there are still seats available.
The movie proves through geo-tracking and video confirmation that Democrats used ballot trafficking to steal the 2020 election in a conspiracy that involved every single battleground state.
TRENDING: Dave Chappelle Attacked on Stage at Hollywood Bowl (Video)
We also know from our sources that Democrat PACs were involved in every state in the ballot trafficking operations. This was a planned, organized, and well-coordinated conspiracy in battleground states.
And we know from investigators Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips that roughly 7% of mail-in ballots in each state were trafficked. Without those stolen votes, Joe Biden would have lost the election.
Democrats got caught. The election was stolen. Joe Biden is an illegitimate president.
For weeks now The Gateway Pundit team has been wondering how the Democrat Party would respond to this devastating news. So far the party of villains has been silent. They really don’t have a way out of this. They’ve been caught and there is evidence of their illicit acts.
Now we know the Democrat plan.
The far left mainstream media boycotted ANY coverage of the historic documentary.
NOT ONE SINGLE major news agency reported on the historic project “2000 Mules”.
boycott-2000-mules-msm-.jpg

The Associated Press published ONE “rebuttal” to the movie despite the video footage of ballot traffickers and the geo-tracking evidence reported in the movie. AP hack Ali Swenson was assigned by her editors to take down the movie and failed in her politicized attempt. Maybe she’s a recent college grad. Her arguments are certainly not impressive. The AP disregards video evidence that ballot traffickers were making their “rounds” to the different drop boxes in the urban center.
It will be interesting when the AP is forced to explain all of the voter hubs discussed in the major metropolitan areas.
We already know from our sources that the evidence from Georgia will ROCK the corrupt Democrat Party to its core.
Sadly, FOX News failed to post ONE SINGLE REPORT on “2000 Mules.” Not one.
fox-news-2000-mules-zero-articles.jpg

This is a huge disappointment. FOX News is too weak to air ANY coverage on the movie. Their brilliant personalities can talk about all issues except the most importan issue — fraudulent elections. And without free and fair elections Republicans will always take a backseat on the bus. Just how Democrats like it.
True the Vote announced they will release their data later this month for crowd-sourcing so that ALL Americans can analyze their findings. This is how honest reporting works.

This guy? the one who was already convicted of fraud?

5b855db5830e7.image.png
 
TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEWED CATHERINE ENGLEBRECHT TONIGHT ON HIS NUMBER ONE RATED SHOW!!!!

ITS HAPPENING!!!! ITS NOT OVER!!!!
 

And let's not forget that "True the Vote" is aiding and protecting someone who has openly confessed to the crime of ballot harvesting.

And they don't allege that the ballots trafficked are illegal.

And their logic has gaping holes, and doesn't actually prove anything.

It's almost definitely like they are pushing a false narrative...
 
And let's not forget that "True the Vote" is aiding and protecting someone who has openly confessed to the crime of ballot harvesting.

And they don't allege that the ballots trafficked are illegal.

And their logic has gaping holes, and doesn't actually prove anything.

It's almost definitely like they are pushing a false narrative...
Incorrect bro but I applaud you for fighting for your team.
 
Ok...if you say so. You a lawyer?

Nope. But let's review my statements:

1) "True the Vote" is aiding and protecting someone who has openly confessed to the crime of ballot harvesting. - You agreed that this one is accurate, so not sure why you'd dispute it now.

2) They don't allege that the ballots trafficked are illegal. - I think this one is well-established. The leader of True the Vote, whose data is the very core of this "documentary" that you & Trump want everyone to see, said during testimony "I want to make very clear that we’re not suggesting that the ballots that were cast were illegal ballots." Her. Freaking. Words.


3) Their logic has gaping holes, and doesn't actually prove anything. - This is my new favorite, as this film belongs right beside the AZ "audit" and claims about Antrim county in MI in the annals of far-reaching election bullshit that's easily proven as such.

True the Vote has said it found some 2,000 ballot harvesters by purchasing $2 million worth of anonymized cellphone geolocation data — the “pings” that track a person’s location based on app activity — in various swing counties across five states. Then, by drawing a virtual boundary around a county’s ballot drop boxes and various unnamed nonprofits, it identified cellphones that repeatedly went near both ahead of the 2020 election. If a cellphone went near a drop box more than 10 times and a nonprofit more than five times from Oct. 1 to Election Day, True the Vote assumed its owner was a “mule” — its name for someone engaged in an illegal ballot collection scheme in cahoots with a nonprofit.

The group’s claims of a paid ballot harvesting scheme are supported in the film only by one unidentified whistleblower said to be from San Luis, Arizona, who said she saw people picking up what she “assumed” to be payments for ballot collection. The film contains no evidence of such payments in other states in 2020.

Plus, experts say cellphone location data, even at its most advanced, can only reliably track a smartphone within a few meters — not close enough to know whether someone actually dropped off a ballot or just walked or drove nearby. “You could use cellular evidence to say this person was in that area, but to say they were at the ballot box, you’re stretching it a lot,” said Aaron Striegel, a professor of computer science and engineering at the University of Notre Dame. “There’s always a pretty healthy amount of uncertainty that comes with this.” What’s more, ballot drop boxes are often intentionally placed in busy areas, such as college campuses, libraries, government buildings and apartment complexes — increasing the likelihood that innocent citizens got caught in the group’s dragnet, Striegel said. Similarly, there are plenty of legitimate reasons why someone might be visiting both a nonprofit’s office and one of those busy areas. Delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials all have legitimate reasons to cross paths with numerous drop boxes or nonprofits in a given day.

True the Vote has said it filtered out people whose “pattern of life” before the election season included frequenting nonprofit and drop box locations. But that strategy wouldn't filter out election workers who spend more time at drop boxes during the election season, cab drivers whose daily paths don't follow a pattern, or people whose routines recently changed. In some states, in an attempt to bolster its claims, True the Vote also highlighted drop box surveillance footage that showed voters depositing multiple ballots into the boxes. However, there was no way to tell whether those voters were the same people as the ones whose cellphones were anonymously tracked. A video of a voter dropping off a stack of ballots at a drop box is not itself proof of any wrongdoing, since most states have legal exceptions that let people drop off ballots on behalf of family members and household members. For example, Larry Campbell, a voter in Michigan who was not featured in the film, told The Associated Press he legally dropped off six ballots in a local drop box in 2020 — one for himself, his wife, and his four adult children.


So, to answer your initial question again, no, I am not a lawyer. But I know that things like facts, truth and evidence are pretty important in a court of law. And I know that something is not really evidence if there is a perfectly logical alternative explanation.

That's why these claims are NOT BEING MADE IN COURT, but on right-wing media, and in fake documentary propaganda designed to get people to believe a lie.

Do you see how I used actual evidence to support my position? That's how you know they're factual. You don't have to be a lawyer to figure that out, you just have to be an honest person who can understand reality.

But you do you and keep pushing that lie.
 
Not suggesting the outcome of the movie is indicative of a wide scale crime or not but prosecutors are using cell phone data as evidence against the Jan 6th mostly peaceful protesters........not sure why it would be totally discounted here for inaccuracy.
Did you read the article?
 
Not suggesting the outcome of the movie is indicative of a wide scale crime or not but prosecutors are using cell phone data as evidence against the Jan 6th mostly peaceful protesters........not sure why it would be totally discounted here for inaccuracy.

Because of the level of accuracy available. The range is accurate within a few meters at best. So using the data to indicate that a defendant was in the area of the capitol on the day in question is quite different than using it to say that they walked through a particular door of the building (or that they put something in a box inside the building, simply based on the cell phone data).

You've always struck me as a bright guy, so I'm pretty sure you get this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Because of the level of accuracy available. The range is accurate within a few meters at best. So using the data to indicate that a defendant was in the area of the capitol on the day in question is quite different than using it to say that they walked through a particular door of the building (or that they put something in a box inside the building, simply based on the cell phone data).

You've always struck me as a bright guy, so I'm pretty sure you get this.
But their point was that they triangulated the traffic to both a drop box and a non-profit, which would be enough to at least suggest involvement in harvesting. Again, not indicative of a crime just that they were harvesting which isn't always illegal.

Also, the cell phone data is accurate to within 16 feet on average. That's relatively close. Again, doesn't mean that person isn't just walking their regular commute path or visiting their favorite starbucks but a good way to prove the theory would be to analyze the same cell phone data today and see if the same numbers ping to the same location.

Also, appreciate the indication that I'm not bright. We actually buy the cell phone data along with public search data to build analysis to create economic indicators and signals. The cell phone data proves valuable for foot traffic at places like malls, car dealerships, food courts, etc. The public search data then helps prove the thesis on sentiment.
 
But their point was that they triangulated the traffic to both a drop box and a non-profit, which would be enough to at least suggest involvement in harvesting. Again, not indicative of a crime just that they were harvesting which isn't always illegal.

Also, the cell phone data is accurate to within 16 feet on average. That's relatively close. Again, doesn't mean that person isn't just walking their regular commute path or visiting their favorite starbucks but a good way to prove the theory would be to analyze the same cell phone data today and see if the same numbers ping to the same location.

Also, appreciate the indication that I'm not bright. We actually buy the cell phone data along with public search data to build analysis to create economic indicators and signals. The cell phone data proves valuable for foot traffic at places like malls, car dealerships, food courts, etc. The public search data then helps prove the thesis on sentiment.

Would analyzing where someone walks indicate in any way that they put something in a box?

And I said that I have always found you to be bright, but whatever.
 
Would analyzing where someone walks indicate in any way that they put something in a box?

And I said that I have always found you to be bright, but whatever.
I said that several times in my post.......doesn't indicate any wrong doing but could potentially warrant more investigation.
 
Not suggesting the outcome of the movie is indicative of a wide scale crime or not but prosecutors are using cell phone data as evidence against the Jan 6th mostly peaceful protesters........not sure why it would be totally discounted here for inaccuracy.
Jake.....a high quality video showing a truckload of fake ballots being delivered into the voting precinct in the wee morning of 11/4 would not convince our resident lib yokels. Gotta love em.
 
Jake.....a high quality video showing a truckload of fake ballots being delivered into the voting precinct in the wee morning of 11/4 would not convince our resident lib yokels. Gotta love em.
If that happened it would be pretty damning. You should take that evidence to a court of law so we can charge the election officials with their crimes. If they’re guilty I say hang them in the town square on TV.
 
If that happened it would be pretty damning. You should take that evidence to a court of law so we can charge the election officials with their crimes. If they’re guilty I say hang them in the town square on TV.
Go back and look at the video produced in Detroit showing said van pulling up and delivering ballots around 330am on 11/4. Its not my job to hold your hands. The video is available to watch.

There is also a high quality video in Fulton County showing the dirty dems stuffing the box and counting hidden fake ballots multiple times after they evicted everyone from the facility shortly after midnight on election night and do not give me that weak BS from Fulton County that its debunked. That would be like John Wilkes Booth telling the crowd that he didnt shoot Abe Lincoln.
 
Go back and look at the video produced in Detroit showing said van pulling up and delivering ballots around 330am on 11/4. Its not my job to hold your hands. The video is available to watch.

There is also a high quality video in Fulton County showing the dirty dems stuffing the box and counting hidden fake ballots multiple times after they evicted everyone from the facility shortly after midnight on election night and do not give me that weak BS from Fulton County that its debunked. That would be like John Wilkes Booth telling the crowd that he didnt shoot Abe Lincoln.
You mean the van that delivered LEGAL ballots that took hours to collect after the polls closed? Why do you only believe the most ridiculous, implausible explanations instead of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary? It's not because you have any proof, it's only because you WANT TO.
 
You mean the van that delivered LEGAL ballots that took hours to collect after the polls closed? Why do you only believe the most ridiculous, implausible explanations instead of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary? It's not because you have any proof, it's only because you WANT TO.
Calling BS on lib talking points.
 
Because of the level of accuracy available. The range is accurate within a few meters at best. So using the data to indicate that a defendant was in the area of the capitol on the day in question is quite different than using it to say that they walked through a particular door of the building (or that they put something in a box inside the building, simply based on the cell phone data).

You've always struck me as a bright guy, so I'm pretty sure you get this.
Have you watched 2000 Mules?
 
Last edited:
You only read what you want to read. You only believe what you want to believe. No amount of evidence will EVER change your mind.

No, you only hear what you want to hear. When in a court of law, where there are repercussions for lying, they always change their tune. They will claim fraud, cheating, etc. in front of a mic. But in front of a judge. Nope.

On Nov. 7, the day most media outlets called the race for Joe Biden, Rudy Giuliani stood outside a landscaping business in Philadelphia, making false claims about widespread election malfeasance.

“This is a gross miscarriage of the process that would assure that these ballots are not fraudulent,” he said. “It’s a fraud, an absolute fraud.”

Under questioning from a federal judge in Pennsylvania on Tuesday, Mr. Giuliani made a different admission: “This is not a fraud case,” he said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Have you watched 2000 Mules?
you paid a convicted con man $30 to tell you a story. if it's true the same information will be in the court documents when they go to the judge and show this same evidence. if it's false you just got taken bigly by another con man.

200.gif
 

Fox News Is Headed For Disaster​

Dinesh D'Souza just exposed the treachery of the corporate media "conservatives"​


Fox News has been on a collision course with its own audience since the stolen 2020 election — and you can almost feel the impact coming. The network has made so many dumb bets lately that it’s like watching a busload of trailer park residents get offloaded to play the nickel slots in Reno. All you can do is shake your head as you think: I know they’re all going bankrupt, and they’re already bankrupt. It’s been perfectly obvious for years now that Rupert Murdoch and his feckless sons turned against President Trump and actually helped Joe Biden — which is not just unforgivable. It’s unsustainable.
Why? Because it requires the silence of other prominent conservatives, and the short term memories of GOP voters, to allow Fox News to continue pretending that it’s a conservative news network. Guess what: GOP voters have not forgotten about Fox News calling Arizona early — and prominent conservatives are no longer interested in ignoring Fox’s treachery.
Case in point: Dinesh D’Souza dropped several bombshells on Twitter recently that illustrate that Fox News has nowhere left to hide.

This sort of thing would be unthinkable just a few years ago. D’Souza’s tweet virtually guarantees that he will never appear on any Fox News program again. He will be black-listed — a common practice at Fox (just ask Rudy Giuliani and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Peter Navarro). Dinesh knew all of this and did it anyway — and that should tell you something. (He even tagged a Fox producer on Tucker’s team to name and shame him.) Fox has lost its monopoly power on the Right, and it’s no longer immune from criticism by the conservative community.
That hasn’t stopped Fox News from trying to cut D’Souza out of his own documentary in order to present the work as its own. Just watch this explosive video.

Fox News might as well be Helen Keller right now: it can’t see or hear anything about the stolen election. So it cannot allow Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary “2000 Mules” to be mentioned on their shows because Fox News told its audience for the last 18 months that election fraud was a myth pushed by conspiracy theorists.
You do remember that, don’t you?

The real reason that “2000 Mules” is being ignored by the conservative corporate media and the liberal corporate media is because it’s true. The stolen 2020 election was the largest political interference operation ever conducted in America. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s charity spent more than $400 million to create a private election system in swing states — and he was hardly alone. It took massive coordination from both political parties and the corporate media and federal law enforcement and left-wing NGO’s to thwart the will of the American people in 2020.
The problem for both political parties and the corporate media and federal law enforcement and left-wing NGO’s is that they pulled it off but they got caught doing it. The fraud was much too pervasive and public to be kept secret. That’s why “2000 Mules” is creating such an awkward moment at Fox News. Our corrupt institutions have no idea what to do next. They can't admit to the fraud — but they also can't dismiss the evidence. (They tried for the last 18 months and it didn’t work.) They have to pretend now that nothing is happening and they have to keep pretending until 2024.
It’s one thing for the FBI to gaslight the American people. (That’s their specialty.) It’s a whole different matter for Fox News to spit in the face of its own audience for the next three years and call it rain. Fox executives are not going to allow Trump’s rallies to be aired on their channel; they’re not going to apologize for pushing Biden’s vaccine mandates; and they’re not going to allow election fraud to be discussed.
Add it all together: it’s a losing hand.

Fox News can bully GOP politicians and conservative influencers into silence because it threaten to blacklist them — but social media now makes that sort of “top down” control irrelevant. It’s easy to shut down Lou Dobbs — he’s under contract. How do you shut down Catturd? Or Rising Serpent? There’s too many people to bully now.

And the truth can break out from anywhere — even from the comments section of a tweet from an anonymous account.

Fox News doesn’t want to cover election fraud because the GOP establishment doesn’t want to find election fraud when it involves cheating to defeat Donald Trump. Fox News is the voice of the GOP establishment. (That’s why Rupert Murdoch has secret meetings with Bill Barr rather than Trump at his home during the Trump Administration.) Fox News is the voice of Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham and Mike Pence and Bill Barr and a bunch of other unpopular politicians who want rid of President Trump permanently.
In other words, Fox News is the voice of the uniparty regime in Washington.
That regime doesn’t have any GOP voters left. Look at McConnell’s poll numbers. Look at Pence’s poll numbers. Trump just endorsed a bunch of primary candidates and they just swept through the GOP establishment’s picks like Hunter Biden at a strip club. The GOP establishment has the voting machines, but it doesn’t have any voters.
Fox News is not on the side of the GOP voters — but they do rely on them. So they’re caught, and everybody knows it. That’s why Fox wants to strong-arm conservative influencers like D’Souza into letting it appropriate his content on voter fraud — they need to pretend to care for the sake of the audience. Just watch D’Souza’s podcast video again, and listen to what he tells you: Fox News knows that they “can crucify him” and so he has to “stay on the reservation” or he will be banned. Tucker’s executive producer (D’Souza claims) responded to D’Souza’s declining their strong-arm “offer” by telling D’Souza that “he was finished” and that Fox would “teach him a lesson.”
That’s a threat that had teeth before 2020. Now it just sounds like hollow threats from gutless people. The world has changed. The people who are going to get taught a lesson in the next few years are at Fox News.

I Need Your Support!​

Who held the Biden Administration to account for its corruption every day like me?
Independent and fearless journalists need your support like never before.
I need your support like never before.

The corporate media is completely corrupt. Just go down the list of their fake stories: Russiagate, the stolen 2020 election, the harmful COVID vaccines. The corporate media is actively trying to hide the truth from the American people on a daily basis.
If we are going to survive the current regime then we must stand together.
I’ve got your back.
Do you have mine?
Get 20% off for 1 year
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cocks are Number 1

Fox News Is Headed For Disaster​

Dinesh D'Souza just exposed the treachery of the corporate media "conservatives"​


Fox News has been on a collision course with its own audience since the stolen 2020 election — and you can almost feel the impact coming. The network has made so many dumb bets lately that it’s like watching a busload of trailer park residents get offloaded to play the nickel slots in Reno. All you can do is shake your head as you think: I know they’re all going bankrupt, and they’re already bankrupt. It’s been perfectly obvious for years now that Rupert Murdoch and his feckless sons turned against President Trump and actually helped Joe Biden — which is not just unforgivable. It’s unsustainable.
Why? Because it requires the silence of other prominent conservatives, and the short term memories of GOP voters, to allow Fox News to continue pretending that it’s a conservative news network. Guess what: GOP voters have not forgotten about Fox News calling Arizona early — and prominent conservatives are no longer interested in ignoring Fox’s treachery.
Case in point: Dinesh D’Souza dropped several bombshells on Twitter recently that illustrate that Fox News has nowhere left to hide.

This sort of thing would be unthinkable just a few years ago. D’Souza’s tweet virtually guarantees that he will never appear on any Fox News program again. He will be black-listed — a common practice at Fox (just ask Rudy Giuliani and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Peter Navarro). Dinesh knew all of this and did it anyway — and that should tell you something. (He even tagged a Fox producer on Tucker’s team to name and shame him.) Fox has lost its monopoly power on the Right, and it’s no longer immune from criticism by the conservative community.
That hasn’t stopped Fox News from trying to cut D’Souza out of his own documentary in order to present the work as its own. Just watch this explosive video.

Fox News might as well be Helen Keller right now: it can’t see or hear anything about the stolen election. So it cannot allow Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary “2000 Mules” to be mentioned on their shows because Fox News told its audience for the last 18 months that election fraud was a myth pushed by conspiracy theorists.
You do remember that, don’t you?

The real reason that “2000 Mules” is being ignored by the conservative corporate media and the liberal corporate media is because it’s true. The stolen 2020 election was the largest political interference operation ever conducted in America. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s charity spent more than $400 million to create a private election system in swing states — and he was hardly alone. It took massive coordination from both political parties and the corporate media and federal law enforcement and left-wing NGO’s to thwart the will of the American people in 2020.
The problem for both political parties and the corporate media and federal law enforcement and left-wing NGO’s is that they pulled it off but they got caught doing it. The fraud was much too pervasive and public to be kept secret. That’s why “2000 Mules” is creating such an awkward moment at Fox News. Our corrupt institutions have no idea what to do next. They can't admit to the fraud — but they also can't dismiss the evidence. (They tried for the last 18 months and it didn’t work.) They have to pretend now that nothing is happening and they have to keep pretending until 2024.
It’s one thing for the FBI to gaslight the American people. (That’s their specialty.) It’s a whole different matter for Fox News to spit in the face of its own audience for the next three years and call it rain. Fox executives are not going to allow Trump’s rallies to be aired on their channel; they’re not going to apologize for pushing Biden’s vaccine mandates; and they’re not going to allow election fraud to be discussed.
Add it all together: it’s a losing hand.

Fox News can bully GOP politicians and conservative influencers into silence because it threaten to blacklist them — but social media now makes that sort of “top down” control irrelevant. It’s easy to shut down Lou Dobbs — he’s under contract. How do you shut down Catturd? Or Rising Serpent? There’s too many people to bully now.

And the truth can break out from anywhere — even from the comments section of a tweet from an anonymous account.

Fox News doesn’t want to cover election fraud because the GOP establishment doesn’t want to find election fraud when it involves cheating to defeat Donald Trump. Fox News is the voice of the GOP establishment. (That’s why Rupert Murdoch has secret meetings with Bill Barr rather than Trump at his home during the Trump Administration.) Fox News is the voice of Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham and Mike Pence and Bill Barr and a bunch of other unpopular politicians who want rid of President Trump permanently.
In other words, Fox News is the voice of the uniparty regime in Washington.
That regime doesn’t have any GOP voters left. Look at McConnell’s poll numbers. Look at Pence’s poll numbers. Trump just endorsed a bunch of primary candidates and they just swept through the GOP establishment’s picks like Hunter Biden at a strip club. The GOP establishment has the voting machines, but it doesn’t have any voters.
Fox News is not on the side of the GOP voters — but they do rely on them. So they’re caught, and everybody knows it. That’s why Fox wants to strong-arm conservative influencers like D’Souza into letting it appropriate his content on voter fraud — they need to pretend to care for the sake of the audience. Just watch D’Souza’s podcast video again, and listen to what he tells you: Fox News knows that they “can crucify him” and so he has to “stay on the reservation” or he will be banned. Tucker’s executive producer (D’Souza claims) responded to D’Souza’s declining their strong-arm “offer” by telling D’Souza that “he was finished” and that Fox would “teach him a lesson.”
That’s a threat that had teeth before 2020. Now it just sounds like hollow threats from gutless people. The world has changed. The people who are going to get taught a lesson in the next few years are at Fox News.

I Need Your Support!​

Who held the Biden Administration to account for its corruption every day like me?
Independent and fearless journalists need your support like never before.
I need your support like never before.

The corporate media is completely corrupt. Just go down the list of their fake stories: Russiagate, the stolen 2020 election, the harmful COVID vaccines. The corporate media is actively trying to hide the truth from the American people on a daily basis.
If we are going to survive the current regime then we must stand together.
I’ve got your back.
Do you have mine?
Get 20% off for 1 year
can you tell me more about what cat turd has to say on the matter? you wonder why everyone thinks you're a moron and then you post that shit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
can you tell me more about what cat turd has to say on the matter? you wonder why everyone thinks you're a moron and then you post that shit.
Well the cat turd person has a much greater social media following than you. Quit getting all mad due to your utopian lib dreams crashing in historic fashion.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT