ADVERTISEMENT

GA Poll Watcher, IT Expert, Non-Trump Supporter Affidavit: Sudden Surge of 20,000 Mail-In-Votes For Biden In Early Hours On Nov 5

Ok, so this guy says Trump suppressed/depressed his vote when he received the most votes in history for an incumbent President and still has an over 50% approval rating today. 73millions votes is not voter suppression/depression. The million MAGA march is not a clue for a depressed base.

Do you really think there were a million people at that maga march? Yikes.
 
Again, I’m letting things unfold. I’ll form my opinion when the case is made.

I do believe massive fraud occurred, and I’m far from alone in that.

things are unfolding, the trump campaign is trying to make the case. but case after case is being tossed because the trump campaign has no (or is paradoxically refusing to share) evidence. Rudy made an absolute fool of himself in court in PA today.

 
  • Like
Reactions: nytigerfan
things are unfolding, the trump campaign is trying to make the case. but case after case is being tossed because the trump campaign has no (or is paradoxically refusing to share) evidence. Rudy made an absolute fool of himself in court in PA today.


Wow, wild speculation with no evidence whatsoever. After reading that, I am convinced this is just a cash grab. Rudy is charging the campaign $20k per day for that BS????? Its almost worth it to know that rubes like @TigerGrowls and @Cocks are Number 1 are donating money to the Election Defense Fund so it can right into Trump and Rudy's pockets. We are witnessing the greatest con job in history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigTig1983
Things are getting very interesting. Several very reputable folks claiming overwhelming evidence of fraud, and are putting the case together.

This election is not over.

FYNzPt.jpg
 
lol

My life is grand. Just watching the river flow...
If you are watching the river flow and commenting on it, then why are youre takes such horse shit? You are so biased and want an outcome that will never come. Just wake up and move on. I'm reconsidering supporting the year ban.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
Ok, so this guy says Trump suppressed/depressed his vote when he received the most votes in history for an incumbent President and still has an over 50% approval rating today. 73millions votes is not voter suppression/depression. The million MAGA march is not a clue for a depressed base.

Trump does NOT have a 50% approval rating. Only in your mind...
 
But, I'm actually a bit relieved that there are some small things out there. You can't have 150 million people do something and someone not fark it up somewhere. If things were perfect, I'd be a hell of a lot more worried. Like the Secretary of State in Ga said. There's going to be some illegal voting... but it's going to be in the low hundreds.

But I'll tell you what... If I had the power and wanted to rig the election I'd make Biden win by more than the .5% in Ga, so that there'd be no recount AND I'd have made it so that Biden had a lead the whole time... not a come from behind win. You'd think that these evil geniuses would think of stuff like this.
 
Old news....they reversed course already. Because they are stupid

Yep.....stupid and racist according to the article below. Fake news? Or is that something that we've heard before coming from the left?

 
Yep.....stupid and racist according to the article below. Fake news? Or is that something that we've heard before coming from the left?


Just in case the Fox news article is deemed "fake" :)

 
  • Wow
Reactions: TigerGrowls
If you are watching the river flow and commenting on it, then why are youre takes such horse shit? You are so biased and want an outcome that will never come. Just wake up and move on. I'm reconsidering supporting the year ban.

You guys are quite sensitive to this subject.

Afraid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Yep.....stupid and racist according to the article below. Fake news? Or is that something that we've heard before coming from the left?


Not sure what their motivation was but I present this without comment
FYQy6g.jpg
 
Not sure what their motivation was but I present this without comment
FYQy6g.jpg

From that post, it appears to me that she's simply asking why there isn't more air cover on what's happened in mainland China under Mao. There are hundreds of Chinese protesters in front of the Chinese embassy daily in Manhattan for the same reasons. I don't take her message as a suggestion that the Nazi's did nothing wrong.

Or is the issue that she's wearing a Trump mask and hat?
 

DUDE! Try SOMETHING that's not right biased. Rasmussen isn't trash, but but they have a right lean to them for sure... Gallop has him at 43%. Note that I'm not quoting CNN, MSNBC, or any of the other left leaning services.

Gallop:

LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate Gallup Least Biased based on a consistent track record as a pollster and reporting news with minimal bias. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to using only statistics driven information without opinions.
 
DUDE! Try SOMETHING that's not right biased. Rasmussen isn't trash, but but they have a right lean to them for sure... Gallop has him at 43%. Note that I'm not quoting CNN, MSNBC, or any of the other left leaning services.

Gallop:

LEAST BIASED
These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

  • Overall, we rate Gallup Least Biased based on a consistent track record as a pollster and reporting news with minimal bias. We also rate them Very-High for factual reporting due to using only statistics driven information without opinions.

You are correct, Rasmussen has been accused of leaning to the right.


But...given the usual sources cited by @TigerGrowls, I'll give this one a pass. It's at least a poll of enough reputation to be included in the 538 averages, which I follow. Those, incidentally, have Trump consistently below 50% approval rating. That is in-line with most national polls.
 
From that post, it appears to me that she's simply asking why there isn't more air cover on what's happened in mainland China under Mao. There are hundreds of Chinese protesters in front of the Chinese embassy daily in Manhattan for the same reasons. I don't take her message as a suggestion that the Nazi's did nothing wrong.

Or is the issue that she's wearing a Trump mask and hat?

There are two canvassers that voted to withhold certification - the female on the left and the man in the tweet. They both seem like completely reasonable, middle of the road types. Just sayin
 
My media check is pretty straight up... Check CNN, MSNBC and a host of other sites and it will show you just as many left wing extremist sites that are full of crap. The reason that you don't see them is b/c I don't site crappy sources. The gatewaypundit is an inaccurate, extremest site that publishes the nonsense crap that is contunually excreted from that hole that Trump calls a mouth. I bet that you LONG for the days when you could actually quote FoxNew at us. Biased though they are, at LEAST they are usually right on the facts. But EVEN FoxNews is using the term President Elect Biden. So every time you quote the gatewaypundit's latest drivel, I'll be there to point out their lack of credibility. Just because you want to belive something doesn't make it so. And just because you don't want to believe something doesn't make it "left wing justifiers"
We went from making a huge mistake and creating 24 hours news stations to, "if you don't like the news, create your own 24 hours news network." And then we combined those with an already dangerous social media structure. And now we are even taking that a step forward. If we don't like people calling out blatantly false statements on your twitter or facebook, then lets create a NEW social media platform where there aren't even opposing views to keep us honest. Scary times.
 
There are two canvassers that voted to withhold certification - the female on the left and the man in the tweet. They both seem like completely reasonable, middle of the road types. Just sayin

Come on dpic73.....the people voting for and against are split by party, you know that. You don't think there are die hard Biden lovers voting opposite?

My note isn't suggesting I agree or support their position, what I'm saying is that it's not ok to accuse people of being racist or to threaten them just simply because they don't agree or follow the crowd. If we are going to allow fear tactics to suppress opinions, stances or free speech, then this country is heading to a really bad place.
 
Come on dpic73.....the people voting for and against are split by party, you know that. You don't think there are die hard Biden lovers voting opposite?

My note isn't suggesting I agree or support their position, what I'm saying is that it's not ok to accuse people of being racist or to threaten them just simply because they don't agree or follow the crowd. If we are going to allow fear tactics to suppress opinions, stances or free speech, then this country is heading to a really bad place.

Wassup my man. I didn't call them racist but you've got to admit it looks fishy that they were only interested in blocking the certification in a county that's 78% black. In addition, the irregularities were much worse in 2016 but they didn't try to block it then. Wonder why?
 
Wassup my man. I didn't call them racist but you've got to admit it looks fishy that they were only interested in blocking the certification in a county that's 78% black. In addition, the irregularities were much worse in 2016 but they didn't try to block it then. Wonder why?

I don't think they are targeting that county because it's 78% black, it's not like you'd find a great deal of Trump votes there to flip even if they did get legal results. It's more likely that's where they saw the biggest opportunity to indicate wrong doing or maybe where there was concrete evidence (alleged of course).

Fair point on 2016

Personally, I hope they don't overturn the election for one big reason.......I don't believe the country could take it if it actually happened. Cities would burn, stores would be destroyed and innocent people likely hurt or threatened. I've seen enough. Would rather reset and just win it all in 2024
 
I don't think they are targeting that county because it's 78% black, it's not like you'd find a great deal of Trump votes there to flip even if they did get legal results. It's more likely that's where they saw the biggest opportunity to indicate wrong doing or maybe where there was concrete evidence (alleged of course).

Fair point on 2016

Personally, I hope they don't overturn the election for one big reason.......I don't believe the country could take it if it actually happened. Cities would burn, stores would be destroyed and innocent people likely hurt or threatened. I've seen enough. Would rather reset and just win it all in 2024

Whether or not it was targeted because it was mostly black, you could easily imagine it was targeted because it mostly votes Democratic (94% I believe I read). They didn't expect to flip votes, they hoped to throw out all the votes for that county, which would have handed Trump the win. It was a total longshot crapshoot and don't think they weren't getting pressure to pull that dirty trick.

If they overturned it based on the flimsy evidence they've presented to this point, the country would burn, you're right. And even though I wouldn't like it, I would completely understand it.

The Republican party would be much better off in the long run if they dropped this charade and regrouped for 2024 - unless Trump decides to run again. I don't think the country can stomach the thought of four years of Trump rallies between now and then.
 
Last edited:
I don't think they are targeting that county because it's 78% black, it's not like you'd find a great deal of Trump votes there to flip even if they did get legal results. It's more likely that's where they saw the biggest opportunity to indicate wrong doing or maybe where there was concrete evidence (alleged of course).

Fair point on 2016

Personally, I hope they don't overturn the election for one big reason.......I don't believe the country could take it if it actually happened. Cities would burn, stores would be destroyed and innocent people likely hurt or threatened. I've seen enough. Would rather reset and just win it all in 2024

Win it all in 2024? I thought you were an independent?
 
Win it all in 2024? I thought you were an independent?

I am indeed but my interactions with you have pushed me right......... :)

I won't vote for Biden, simply won't do it. Would have voted for Bloomberg......have said that a dozen times on here. So in 2024, I'm voting republican again.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT