Georgia goes to hand counting ballots...

[fatpiggy]

Have you seen the independent polls. Kamala is winning

I’ve seen a lot of polls. If you average them up like Nate Silver does, Trump has a massive lead.

This is not surprising though, Kamala wasn’t even the parties choice. She was so unlikeable that she was the first candidate to drop out in 2020 despite having a huge bankroll. People just don’t like her, her personality, or her cackles. She is an embarrassing candidate and never would have won an open and contested primary. The people have no say so in the direction of the Democratic Party.

 

[firegiver]

I’ve seen a lot of polls. If you average them up like Nate Silver does, Trump has a massive lead.

This is not surprising though, Kamala wasn’t even the parties choice. She was so unlikeable that she was the first candidate to drop out in 2020 despite having a huge bankroll. People just don’t like her, her personality, or her cackles. She is an embarrassing candidate and never would have won an open and contested primary. The people have no say so in the direction of the Democratic Party.

Well thats factually inaccurate

FINAL Silver Bulletin 2024 presidential election forecast

All the numbers for Trump vs. Harris.

www.natesilver.net

 

[iceheart08]

Well thats factually inaccurate

FINAL Silver Bulletin 2024 presidential election forecast

All the numbers for Trump vs. Harris.

www.natesilver.net

These people are caricatures. Fatty here has made this claim before, and multiple folks have shared nates actual prediction.

He doesn't care that hes objectively saying wrong shit. It's what he believes.

These people aren't honest with themselves.

 

[yoshi121374]

I’ve seen a lot of polls. If you average them up like Nate Silver does, Trump has a massive lead.

This is not surprising though, Kamala wasn’t even the parties choice. She was so unlikeable that she was the first candidate to drop out in 2020 despite having a huge bankroll. People just don’t like her, her personality, or her cackles. She is an embarrassing candidate and never would have won an open and contested primary. The people have no say so in the direction of the Democratic Party.

Do you just have that second paragraph copied so you can drop it in to every post?

 

[TigerGrowls]

No doubt.

 

[TigerGrowls]

The libs are losing their minds.



ELECTION INTEGRITY: It’s truly something that Senator Raphael Warnock is more concerned about the accuracy of a hand count than the results churned out by Dominion Voting Machines. His fear? That a hand count could show Trump won Georgia, while the Dominion machines show Kamala Harris as the victor, leading to the state refusing to certify Harris's win. This isn’t just a hypothetical concern—Warnock is suggesting that hand counts could reveal discrepancies, and apparently, that’s a problem. But shouldn’t the goal be to ensure the candidate who gets the most votes actually wins, regardless of the method?

Let’s break this down. Each precinct in Georgia is responsible for hand-counting around 1,900 ballots within a five-hour window. That’s hardly an insurmountable task. It’s actually a highly manageable one that ensures the vote tallies reported by Dominion machines are accurate. If these machines are as flawless as their defenders claim, then what’s the harm in double-checking? A hand count would only serve to confirm the machines’ accuracy, wouldn’t it?

Warnock seems to believe that a hand count showing a different outcome would cause chaos. But here’s the solution: if discrepancies are found that could alter the election outcome, those ballots can—and should—be hand-counted again, as many times as needed, to ensure the most accurate results. That's how you ensure that the true will of the voters is reflected, not through blind trust in machines but through verification when needed.

So, why the resistance to hand counts? If the machines and hand counts match up, great—everyone wins. But if they don't, it’s democracy doing its job—catching errors and correcting course. The real question here is: why is Senator Warnock so worried about verifying the results? Could it be that some are afraid the hand count might not align with the narrative they’re pushing?

 

[iceheart08]

We've agreed, as a society, almost universally, that machines are better at repetitive tasks than humans.

This is true pretty much in any industry and application. If it's a repetitive time intensive task, a machine will do it better. The machine will be faster AND more accurate.

For some reason, even though we agree on that generally, when it comes to counting votes, a repetitive and time intensive process, you ****ing morons have lost the ability to use your brains.

If a bunch of humans count the election results in Georgia 100 times. The result will be different almost 100 times. Humans are slow and make mistakes. Especially when it comes to boring repetitive tasks.

That's why this is bad. It's not only not actually helpful in ascertaining fraud, it's actual detrimental to the administration of elections. you idiots can't be trusted with the nuance.

 

[iceheart08]

The libs are losing their minds.

View embedded media

ELECTION INTEGRITY: It’s truly something that Senator Raphael Warnock is more concerned about the accuracy of a hand count than the results churned out by Dominion Voting Machines. His fear? That a hand count could show Trump won Georgia, while the Dominion machines show Kamala Harris as the victor, leading to the state refusing to certify Harris's win. This isn’t just a hypothetical concern—Warnock is suggesting that hand counts could reveal discrepancies, and apparently, that’s a problem. But shouldn’t the goal be to ensure the candidate who gets the most votes actually wins, regardless of the method?

Let’s break this down. Each precinct in Georgia is responsible for hand-counting around 1,900 ballots within a five-hour window. That’s hardly an insurmountable task. It’s actually a highly manageable one that ensures the vote tallies reported by Dominion machines are accurate. If these machines are as flawless as their defenders claim, then what’s the harm in double-checking? A hand count would only serve to confirm the machines’ accuracy, wouldn’t it?

Warnock seems to believe that a hand count showing a different outcome would cause chaos. But here’s the solution: if discrepancies are found that could alter the election outcome, those ballots can—and should—be hand-counted again, as many times as needed, to ensure the most accurate results. That's how you ensure that the true will of the voters is reflected, not through blind trust in machines but through verification when needed.

So, why the resistance to hand counts? If the machines and hand counts match up, great—everyone wins. But if they don't, it’s democracy doing its job—catching errors and correcting course. The real question here is: why is Senator Warnock so worried about verifying the results? Could it be that some are afraid the hand count might not align with the narrative they’re pushing?

Lololol

You ****ing lunatics aren't looking for the most accurate result. You are looking for the results you think are appropriate. The most accurate counting method is machines. This is objectively true. You are actively seeking to use the least accurate method.

So, seriously, gfy with the accuracy bullshit. Just say it. Youd rather have more control and don't really know what the **** you are talking about.

 

[TigerGrowls]

Lololol

You ****ing lunatics aren't looking for the most accurate result. You are looking for the results you think are appropriate. The most accurate counting method is machines. This is objectively true. You are actively seeking to use the least accurate method.

So, seriously, gfy with the accuracy bullshit. Just say it. Youd rather have more control and don't really know what the **** you are talking about.

We want to remove the opportunity for fraud to occur. It's that simple.

 

[civil007]

Check out SC Safe Elections website. Not sure how we can trust the machines. Cyber security experts have pointed out machine vulnerabilities in court and are documented on this site. Good read if looking at objectively.