It certainly fit a narrative for many. Either way, it's really sad.
Not to get into that debate but there were deaths directly related to the vaccine. Blood clots were a real thing for the JNJ vaccine. I'm sure there are others, but i do agree it was weird they put that in there.
Just a clarification of all the conspiracy theories out there, I'm sure. This interview was on CBS News, so probably best to get it all out there in that context.
That’s the beauty of science. Even though his condition is a listed side effect of the vaccine, we already know without a doubt that it wasn’t the vaccine because it’s 100% safe and effective at preventing covid. This science has already been settled.
You would think this new Twitter info coming out would put a rest to most of these conspiracy theories, but I digress.
His wife is on the task force man. She has to say this. It may not have even been related to the shot, but she has to say this because of how many people are dying that have taken this shot.
AA listed as side effect of a vaccine?!???
Yeah I'm gonna have to wait until my Facebook friends from elementary school do their own research before I buy into this ascending aortic aneurysm (how elitist is that term?) theory...
At a previous home, we had a young couple next door to us: 2 kids and one on the way. Wife and husband had celebrated St Patty's day the day before. Husband felt hung over so the wife took the kids and ran to Walmart to get out of the house. When they came home, he was in bed unresponsive. He was in a coma for a couple of days before they had to make the hard decision.
I’m sure you also thought the covid vaccine was to prevent infection. Heck, before 2020 I bet you thought something that reduces severity would be a therapeutic, not a vaccine…. But here we are, a safe covid vaccine that does nothing to prevent you from getting covid.
Why do you persist in posting something that just makes you look silly?
silly is still trusting the “experts” that have lied since day one.
How does expertise have anything to do with the asinine argument that a vaccine isn't a vaccine because you wrongly think that something can only be a "vaccine" if it's 100% effective at preventing disease? By that definition, there aren't any vaccines.
I didn’t say it needs to be 100%. Prior to covid, many flu vaccines have been in the teens for efficacy.
The more people that put him on ignore……the better the board will be
Yeah, but you can hang out in their bar and drink beers for grocery store prices.
1. No, they didn't.
This is somewhat true. Some times it was low 30% for efficacy depending on if they guess the correct strain.
Yes, but that guy is trying to say that somehow COVID vaccines aren't vaccines because they didn't 100% prevent people from getting COVID, which led the CDC to "change their definition of vaccine," while at the same time apparently not changing how they considered every other vaccine. It makes no sense, and is one of the dumbest objections to the COVID vaccine stuff, but it just keeps getting repeated.
Best hack ever. Hell, you can even buy a bottle of liquor, mix drinks, then buy a steak in the meat section and they will cook it for you. I’m shocked that the pub in my local Whole Foods isn’t packed every day.
If I have pretty much every vaccine but the covid vaccine am I really anti vax or am I anti covid vaccine?
You do understand his brother suggested this right? Is he a conspiracy theorist? A mouth breather?
It is not an “experimental drug.” You can say you’re not anti-vax, but you’re using the exact same arguments that other anti-vax people use.
