ADVERTISEMENT

Indictment Coming for Clinton Lawyer? Involved with False Russia Hoax..

SconnyTiger25

The Mariana Trench
Gold Member
May 1, 2011
2,198
1,797
113
Here’s the story of the potential upcoming indictment. Remember Perkins Coie is the law firm representing Dominion and flying all over the country fighting against any election information coming to light. They sent an army of lawyers to Maricopa.

Michael Sussman is a partner of that law firm

Seems like Perkins Coie is right in the middle of all the DNC misguided corruption.

 
No, they didn't.

That fact check specifically states “over 70 lawyers”, I used the word army. I do not know specifically the number, but to me and most people more than 3 attorneys in Next Flight Out type battle readiness, would constitute and army of lawyers all making in excess of $500/hour.. and to do what exactly? Oh yeah that’s right, they do not want information public, information about our sacred voting rights. The DNC is literally spending millions of dollars to fight TRANSPARENCY and if you read the article which I’m sure you didn’t, you would see the partner of that same law firm is likely gonna be indicted for lying under oath.

i think the entire Perkins Coie law firm should be indicted but hey, maybe they will 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
That fact check specifically states “over 70 lawyers”, I used the word army. I do not know specifically the number, but to me and most people more than 3 attorneys in Next Flight Out type battle readiness, would constitute and army of lawyers all making in excess of $500/hour.. and to do what exactly? Oh yeah that’s right, they do not want information public, information about our sacred voting rights. The DNC is literally spending millions of dollars to fight TRANSPARENCY and if you read the article which I’m sure you didn’t, you would see the partner of that same law firm is likely gonna be indicted for lying under oath.

i think the entire Perkins Coie law firm should be indicted but hey, maybe they will 🤷🏻‍♂️

Please provide any evidence other than a social media post that that law firm was involved in the Maricopa situation on behalf of Dominion. Anything.
 
Please provide any evidence other than a social media post that that law firm was involved in the Maricopa situation on behalf of Dominion. Anything.
Try using multiple search engines including Duck Duck Go

Search for “Marc Elias, Perkins Coie AZ audit”

Do it in Google or Bing also you will get different results.

There are many articles, whether or not without getting the transcript and stated attorneys on the docket would actually convince you otherwise is another whole story in itself.

Fact: DNC is fighting election integrity and Perkins Coie, now Elias Law Firm, is at the front of this.
 
Try using multiple search engines including Duck Duck Go

Search for “Marc Elias, Perkins Coie AZ audit”

Do it in Google or Bing also you will get different results.

There are many articles, whether or not without getting the transcript and stated attorneys on the docket would actually convince you otherwise is another whole story in itself.

Fact: DNC is fighting election integrity and Perkins Coie, now Elias Law Firm, is at the front of this.

Nope. The onus is on you to prove that they were involved, as you claimed. I already provided a resource refuting it.
 
Nope. The onus is on you to prove that they were involved, as you claimed. I already provided a resource refuting it.
I can provide many, but the sources you trust are not representative in the way you want. So the onus is the truth, your fact check was based on the number 70. None of what I said was false I refuted that, and gave you the option to think for yourself. You are choosing to argue about fact checking like usual when you cannot open yourself up to logic. Pull the legal brief then, if you want to prove me wrong otherwise stfu. Honestly I get it words matter when you’re a journalist, I’m stating my opinions and was only showing that the same company that created the fake Steele dossier also sent an army of lawyers, which is true, to represent Dominion and keep information buried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
two times over, actually
Good I can at least respect you for that even though I will agree to disagree on your ability to debate and belittle people who you think are less intelligent.

Did you read the article? Yes or no?

Are you a journalist, lawyer, or medical doctor? Yes or No? If yes please state which of the above

Do you agree a partner in Perkins Coie, Michael Sussman, lied to Congress about the Steele Dossier and Alfa Bank? Yes or No?

Do you agree that Perkins Coie former partner Marc Elias flew to Maricopa County? Yes or No?

Did lawyers from 2 others law firms along with Marc’s team fly to AZ regarding the AZ audit? Yes or No?

Will you indulge me? A simple Y or N will suffice
 
I can provide many, but the sources you trust are not representative in the way you want. So the onus is the truth, your fact check was based on the number 70. None of what I said was false I refuted that, and gave you the option to think for yourself. You are choosing to argue about fact checking like usual when you cannot open yourself up to logic. Pull the legal brief then, if you want to prove me wrong otherwise stfu. Honestly I get it words matter when you’re a journalist, I’m stating my opinions and was only showing that the same company that created the fake Steele dossier also sent an army of lawyers, which is true, to represent Dominion and keep information buried.

LOL. What a sensitive little snowflake you are.

See, in the real world people who make outrageous claims must provide evidence to support them. You made a claim without any supporting evidence, I provided an article that said it was crap, and your response is to tell me that I am the one who should go search the internet for proof to back up your claim.

I'm done with you for today. Our time of reckoning is coming at the end of the year, and the clock is ticking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
LOL. What a sensitive little snowflake you are.

See, in the real world people who make outrageous claims must provide evidence to support them. You made a claim without any supporting evidence, I provided an article that said it was crap, and your response is to tell me that I am the one who should go search the internet for proof to back up your claim.

I'm done with you for today. Our time of reckoning is coming at the end of the year, and the clock is ticking.
Why yes it is, I made enough in Crrypto yesterday to cover it I’m good, although based on what happened in Cali it’s not looking good for me.
 
Why yes it is, I made enough in Crrypto yesterday to cover it I’m good, although based on what happened in Cali it’s not looking good for me.

In my experience, people who constantly talk about how much money they have (you have 15 Clemson tickets, right?) or how smart they are (please tell us again how much you read) are douchebag assholes.
 
LOL. What a sensitive little snowflake you are.

See, in the real world people who make outrageous claims must provide evidence to support them. You made a claim without any supporting evidence, I provided an article that said it was crap, and your response is to tell me that I am the one who should go search the internet for proof to back up your claim.

I'm done with you for today. Our time of reckoning is coming at the end of the year, and the clock is ticking.
Don't know if this is the same suit being referenced above but this one was filed on 12/9/2020 and Perkins Coie is representing Maricopa county with mentions of Dominion. Haven't read the entire thing to be fair so could be "fact checked" I reckon

 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
In my experience, people who constantly talk about how much money they have (you have 15 Clemson tickets, right?) or how smart they are (please tell us again how much you read) are douchebag assholes.
Could be, 14 tickets, but glad you pay attention. Seems like you more so don’t like me then, than the message.

What I’m saying is you tried to put a price on free thought to make a bet with me, albeit cause you think I’m a douchebag, which is fine, I will be judged, but not by you when I die.

The $5k to a charity is a good thing even if I lose, so for me it was a win win. You may even manage to teach me something, but it won’t be the money. I don’t think I will teach you anything just like Wap likely will not answer my questions, but I will honor the bet if I lose.

It was a stretch bet for me, likely know that even though he clearly is mentally unfit for some reason they just keep letting him take the slings and arrows. 3.5 months is a long way though when we see how badly his first 8 have gone.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Don't know if this is the same suit being referenced above but this one was filed on 12/9/2020 and Perkins Coie is representing Maricopa county with mentions of Dominion. Haven't read the entire thing to be fair so could be "fact checked" I reckon


Are they representing Dominion, or does it just mention Dominion? If they did I'll acknowledge it.

But again, it's not up to me to do the research on this.
 
wkvokf23tnn71.jpeg
 
Perkins Coie is a well traveled Dem choice for legal representation, especially for all things election related. Will be interesting to see what Durham is going after here.
Or which Durham is the other question. I do believe both have received special counsel status, and both are following their own leads.
 
I wonder if you all will start telling me federal indictments are also a hoax or conspiracy.

question:

If Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation fraudulently drove this Russian Hoax narrative, should she be executed for Treason to the United States? Yes or No?

 
I wonder if you all will start telling me federal indictments are also a hoax or conspiracy

Either that or they will just ignore it until it goes away. One or the other, it’s how they always react when they’re faced with reality.

They will never let themselves accept that they bought and then pushed absolute nonsense on the country for 4+ years. Hell they still walk around claiming Trump is a Russian asset

Useful idiots
 
Either that or they will just ignore it until it goes away. One or the other, it’s how they always react when they’re faced with reality.

They will never let themselves accept that they bought and then pushed absolute nonsense on the country for 4+ years. Hell they still walk around claiming Trump is a Russian asset

Useful idiots
Well if they did one thing... they pissed off a lot of really smart people who will not tolerate this BS anymore. For this country to remain free of tyranny we must have free elections and free media, and apparently free competitive internet. The dominoes are starting to fall and when no corrupt attorneys are left to defend them... then what?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Well if they did one thing... they pissed off a lot of really smart people who will not tolerate this BS anymore. For this country to remain free of tyranny we must have free elections and free media, and apparently free competitive internet. The dominoes are starting to fall and when no corrupt attorneys are left to defend them... then what?!
They will only go after the folks in the private sector, HC and co will be insulated given how much reach they seem to have in the DOJ and state department.

What will be interesting though is to see if Sussman flips under pressure and starts calling out names. Was listening to a podcast this AM and it sounds like a few private sector companies were involved as well as a university.
 
I wonder if you all will start telling me federal indictments are also a hoax or conspiracy.

question:

If Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation fraudulently drove this Russian Hoax narrative, should she be executed for Treason to the United States? Yes or No?


This indictment is not a hoax. He (allegedly) lied to the FBI, that is a serious crime. The same thing that Flynn was indicted for, admitted to and was later pardoned by Trump for doing.

Now yall are extrapolating a lot of conspiracy theories and nonsense from that one indictment. It was not an indictment of a person that was leading the investigation (what Durham was charged to do, "investigate the investigators") but instead someone who was giving evidence. None of the things that these right wing conspiracy websites are now alleging was mentioned at all in that indictment. These websites, podcasts and all the other echo chamber bullshit that you guys listen to and read are making so much money leading you rubes down a path that will never end.

And of course, you now are taking the speculation and accepting it as facts. It would be hilarious if it wasnt so ****ing sad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
These websites, podcasts and all the other echo chamber bullshit that you guys listen to and read are making so much money leading you rubes down a path that will never end.
Yeah, no shit. You mean kinda like CNN, WaPo, MSNBC? Or do those outlets not make money now?

BTW, you may want to do a little research into why Flynn “lied” to the feds. I’m sure you won’t though, because you don’t want to actually know the truth... Which is odd for a holy man such as yourself
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
This indictment is not a hoax. He (allegedly) lied to the FBI, that is a serious crime. The same thing that Flynn was indicted for, admitted to and was later pardoned by Trump for doing.

Now yall are extrapolating a lot of conspiracy theories and nonsense from that one indictment. It was not an indictment of a person that was leading the investigation (what Durham was charged to do, "investigate the investigators") but instead someone who was giving evidence. None of the things that these right wing conspiracy websites are now alleging was mentioned at all in that indictment. These websites, podcasts and all the other echo chamber bullshit that you guys listen to and read are making so much money leading you rubes down a path that will never end.

And of course, you now are taking the speculation and accepting it as facts. It would be hilarious if it wasnt so ****ing sad.
Wow you continue to amaze, really

Technofog is a lawyer and has been intimately following developments around this case and the Gislain Maxwell trial.

You reach for the stars to disprove everything that proves you’ve not been blind for the last 5 years.

So, if everything the media reported about this case was false, including the Flynn case, how do you literally keep the proverbial fire stoked in your brain?

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT