Last night proved Trump isn't without POWER. The GD POS Republicans owe Trump. And they'll have to pay.
It’s a BEAUTIFUL MORNING this morning...
- Thread starter nytigerfan
- Start date
Last night proved Trump isn't without POWER. The GD POS Republicans owe Trump. And they'll have to pay.
Ok. I won't tell you how your Trump/Russia collusion theory is about to hit the skids now that Sessions is gone. Hahahahaha...and the day after the mid-terms....lol...
So Rosenstein is not in charge of the declass anymore? I guess we'll all finally get to see all of the collusion docs!
Hey, you were right. It was a beautiful morning!! I have to admit, I did think this would happen before the mid-terms; not after.
Yes! Trump is going to fire the guy investigating him! I wonder what your thoughts woukd have been if Clinton did that.
But it’s al good, just remember what your supreme leader said yesterday. Any news you hear about him that is negative is fake news. The supreme leader is infallible.
hahaha. Trump is waaay too smart for that! Whitaker is not firing anyone. Whitaker, now in control of Rosenstein, will release all of the documents related to the Russia Investigation and then everyone will know the truth. Trump doesn't have to fire anyone! These people are stupid and he's backed them into a corner. How could anyone be opposed to knowing the truth? Will the release of the documents not show us once and for all what actually happened? Who could be opposed to that? If there is a group of people that are opposed to it; why?
As to your last statement, well, that is fake news. He didn't say that at all. You're not stupid, just blind.
The first thing the Dems need to do is find new House leadership. Bounce Pelosi (from the leadership, not the HoR of course) and get someone new as Speaker.
They need to do the same thing in the Senate too but I doubt that happens soon.
Is it weird how you like to start paragraphs with maniacal laughter, then launch into a monologue?
Ever wonder if you are actually the villain in the tale?
I didn't realize that I laughed so loud that you could hear me. I've been told that my laugh is infectious, never maniacal. I was laughing at the "supreme leader" comments from the guy who responded to me.
Isn't everything we type a monologue; when we're typing it?
I find it interesting that no one has responded to the points I made in the "monologue".
This is part of the Democrats' problem, and I alluded to it in my previous post.
When people think of the Democrats now they think of Booker, Pelosi, Harris, Waters, this new nitwit from NYC - the ones who are on the fringes who want open borders, the government to take care of their every need, and 37 genders. They see a "D" and that's where their mind goes.
I also suspect that the Democrats (and probably the Republicans) have a list of things that you HAVE to support if you want to be part of their party. Reading the website for the Democrat running for SC Governor, it looked like what I've read for every other democratic candidate, including the dreaded "common sense gun control.". And yet he had an A rating from the NRA?
Centrist Democrats - who believe in things like border security even if they don't want a physical wall (which I also think is probably wasteful), and who are not opposed to capitalism and the free market - are forgotten about.
In short they have an image problem at the very least.
This is why they need to bounce Pelosi and Schumer from leadership positions and find someone new. But they'll probably pick the aformentioned NYC nitwit.
I actually agree with this. I just can't point my finger to a single dem that fits your description except maybe Manchin? They kicked Joe Lieberman out of their party for not being liberal enough. One thing the dems are good at is holding their elected to voting the company line, saying the same things, etc. At least to me, there seems to be a much greater diversity of opinions and thought on the repub side.
I don't see JFK types in the dem party anymore.
Last edited:
Manchin is exactly who I was thinking of. Bill Richardson (former NM Governor) was another. I think the guy running for SC Governor may have been one.
I just keep hearing that they are out there. I suspect a lot of the dems just "go with the flow" of the party. I think the party makes them advocate certain things whether they want to or not.
I feel like that's grading on a curve. The GOP won the house vote by 6.8% in 2010 which is considered a wave election by everyone. The Democrats are expected to win by that or a little more by the time all the votes are counted. Public sentiment is in "blue wave" territory but it overlaps with an extremely unfavorable (for Democrats) Senate map and a House that's been gerrymandered (in addition to some natural population sorting). If you also consider the fact that the economy is doing well by most measures and the country hasn't faced any sort of major disaster recently, it's impressive that the Democrats did as well as they did.
That being said, I was hoping for Governor wins in FL and OH and not to lose those Senate seats.
Similar threads
