Weird how you can find all that destroyed evidence with a 2 second internet search. Even someone as pathetic as you could find it.
J6
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
Do you even know what that term means? It doesn't seem like it because it doesn't apply.
But why do you never consider the victims, only the the criminals? If you have discomfort looking at these photos, that is cognitive dissonance. If you don't, you're just a psychopath
Do you even know what that term means? It doesn't seem like it because it doesn't apply.
But why do you never consider the victims, only the the criminals? If you have discomfort looking at these photos, that is cognitive dissonance. If you don't, you're just a psychopath
Face the truth dpic. This is sad.
You heard him say he went to the S@A on 1/6 right? You're telling me that even though he asked at the last minute to send the request "up the chain" that makes Pelosi responsible for lying to and inviting thousands of angry rednecks to the Capitol? You want to talk about Sad???
From May to June of 2020 BLM and ANTIFA attacked the White House with Donald Trump still in it. Barricades were taken down. They set a historic church on fire and the President of the United States of America has to be moved into a bunker for safety reasons.
Almost all of the charges for these insurrectionists who walked the streets chanting no justice, no peace and demanding a revolution were dropped.
Even those these people violently injured police and secret service members they sued and the Biden Department of Justice handed them millions and millions of YOUR tax dollars.
On J6, most of the people who were charged with “violence” were charged under 18 USC 111. That section has the following subsections: assault, resist, oppose, impede, intimidate or interferes with. Those who were convicted under that statute, did they oppose, impede, resist or assault?
Richard Barnett was arrested and convicted under that section for asking to go back and get his flag. He was charged and convicted under 18 USC 111.
The DOJ, the state run media and even many republicans say dumb things like there were many violent people based on a statute which doesn’t require an assault to convict. The media will pick 6 of the most egregious cases and only talk about them.
Well the the remaining 500 plus were convicted under 18 USC 111 for breaking a window, touching a bike rack, protecting themselves from riot shields or protecting other people from being kicked by capital police.
Video doesnt lie. That’s why we have not had all of it released to this very day.
Does that sound like equal justice to you? It doesn’t sound like it to me.
