J6
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
What pisses me off is that the people like in this video should have been the ones prosecuted.
This is going to be GLORIOUS!
Wait, so an FBI agent was waving a confederate flag and inciting violence?
That’s entrapment.
Dude, you're trolling right? So this J6 criminal posts a video from a random lady on the internet, who is trying to convince you that the guy carrying the Confederate flag and Ofc. Fanone are the same person LOLOL. Sad the extremes you people will go to in order to make the victims, the perpetrators. Don't ever pretend like you back the blue.
There is no "new" truth for him to tell - he's just appealing to your gullible stupidity to make you believe the good people are the bad ones and vice versa. Weird how he claims they lied when almost every damn witness was a Republican connected to the Trump administration.
Will you ever put country before Trump or will you live in your cracked out version of reality til the day you die?
Will you be so kind as to tell any of us how you have helped this country? Did you serve the poor at the soup kitchen? Did you donate to the Salvation Army? Did you serve in the military? Are you a politician? You don't need to give specifics, just tell us how you are a benefit to this country, and not a detriment.
Look at you trying to change the subject. This is not about me but I do quite a few charitable things in deed and with money. But what I won't do is add to the avalanche of misinformation that has infected this country that make people believe things that are not true. It's destructive and leads to people attacking the Capitol to hang Mike Pence over a figment in a lunatic's imagination. It's not sustainable so please do us all a favor and try using reputable sources for your information instead of a bunch of a bunch of propaganda tweets from maga trolls. You're helping to destroy this country by accepting these falsehoods as truth.
You don't do sh!t! You just proved it. WTF said anything about Pence?
You changed this to be about J6.
DAMN you are one stupid MF'er.
I can/can't believe you wasted so much time to post this BS.
The rats are running for cover.
I for one fully endorse these former J6 prosecutors going public. There is no better way to demonstrate their arrogance and partisanship and dishonesty better than watching them run their mouths on MSNBC.
Here again is Ashley Akers, who handled many J6 prosecutions--which included the unlawful use of 1512c2, obstruction of an official proceeding.
Ashley, like others, are very offended that new DC US attorney Ed Martin is conducting an internal inquiry as to why prosecutors brought that post-Enron statute for the first time against political protesters--at least 300 were indicted on the felony count.
She calls Martin's inquiry a "wild goose chase," mocks the idea that a preliminary report can be finished this Friday, and notes backup documents related to 1512c2 charging decisions could consist of tens of thousands of pages.
She also downplays the Supreme Court ruling (6-3) that concluded the DOJ--including herself--misapplied the statute which requires proof of evidence/document tampering.
Keep talking, Ashley:
Ashley, like all J6 prosecutors, is a skilled liar.
The Supreme Court said "nothing about the impropriety of using this statute to charge defendants" Ashley says.
Of course they did.
Chief Justice Roberts in Fischer: "[The government's] novel interpretation would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison. Nothing in the text or statutory history suggests that subsection (c)(2) is designed to impose up to 20 years' imprisonment on essentially all defendants who commit obstruction of justice in any way and who might be subject to lesser penalties under more specific obstruction statutes."
Further, after Fischer, the DOJ MOVED TO DISMISS 1512c2 PENDING INDICTMENTS. And at the same time, the DC circuit also vacated 1512c2 convictions based on the Fischer opinion.
Now why is that, Ashley? If there was nothing improper about it, why did the SCOTUS ruling effectively unravel the felony heart of the Jan 6 prosecution?
One DOJ official just told the Washington Post why prosecutors went with 1512c2 for the first time against protesters who disrupted a government function.
"We want prosecutors to be aggressive and entrepreneurial—to think of all options on behalf of the American people—and now we want to make them subject to investigation because the Supreme Court reversed course after lower courts had blessed the use of the statute? You want a way to deflate morale, make people cautious and make people scared? I can’t think of a better way to do it.”
I am so sorry, anon DOJ official, that the Supreme Court did what it is supposed to do: rein in reckless prosecutors and lower court judges--keep in mind, Jude Flo Pan, the appellate court judge married to Dem activist Max Stier who also concocted the stupid "Seal Team Six" hypothetical during immunity arguments, authored both DC circuit opinions that barely upheld 1512c2 before she was reversed by SCOTUS--without regard to the "morale" of those responsible.
I for one fully endorse these former J6 prosecutors going public. There is no better way to demonstrate their arrogance and partisanship and dishonesty better than watching them run their mouths on MSNBC.
Here again is Ashley Akers, who handled many J6 prosecutions--which included the unlawful use of 1512c2, obstruction of an official proceeding.
Ashley, like others, are very offended that new DC US attorney Ed Martin is conducting an internal inquiry as to why prosecutors brought that post-Enron statute for the first time against political protesters--at least 300 were indicted on the felony count.
She calls Martin's inquiry a "wild goose chase," mocks the idea that a preliminary report can be finished this Friday, and notes backup documents related to 1512c2 charging decisions could consist of tens of thousands of pages.
She also downplays the Supreme Court ruling (6-3) that concluded the DOJ--including herself--misapplied the statute which requires proof of evidence/document tampering.
Keep talking, Ashley:
Ashley, like all J6 prosecutors, is a skilled liar.
The Supreme Court said "nothing about the impropriety of using this statute to charge defendants" Ashley says.
Of course they did.
Chief Justice Roberts in Fischer: "[The government's] novel interpretation would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison. Nothing in the text or statutory history suggests that subsection (c)(2) is designed to impose up to 20 years' imprisonment on essentially all defendants who commit obstruction of justice in any way and who might be subject to lesser penalties under more specific obstruction statutes."
Further, after Fischer, the DOJ MOVED TO DISMISS 1512c2 PENDING INDICTMENTS. And at the same time, the DC circuit also vacated 1512c2 convictions based on the Fischer opinion.
Now why is that, Ashley? If there was nothing improper about it, why did the SCOTUS ruling effectively unravel the felony heart of the Jan 6 prosecution?
One DOJ official just told the Washington Post why prosecutors went with 1512c2 for the first time against protesters who disrupted a government function.
"We want prosecutors to be aggressive and entrepreneurial—to think of all options on behalf of the American people—and now we want to make them subject to investigation because the Supreme Court reversed course after lower courts had blessed the use of the statute? You want a way to deflate morale, make people cautious and make people scared? I can’t think of a better way to do it.”
I am so sorry, anon DOJ official, that the Supreme Court did what it is supposed to do: rein in reckless prosecutors and lower court judges--keep in mind, Jude Flo Pan, the appellate court judge married to Dem activist Max Stier who also concocted the stupid "Seal Team Six" hypothetical during immunity arguments, authored both DC circuit opinions that barely upheld 1512c2 before she was reversed by SCOTUS--without regard to the "morale" of those responsible.
More karma
"A Seattle doctor whose medical license was suspended after she participated in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was shot and killed after pointing a gun at two people delivering paperwork at her West Seattle home on Tuesday.
A 40-year-old man whom police have not identified shot Tamara Towers Parry, 57, multiple times in the torso outside her Southwest Hudson Street home around 1 p.m., according to the Seattle Police Department and the King County Medical Examiner’s Office. Police have not arrested anyone and are not looking for suspects, spokesperson Detective Brian Pritchard said Wednesday.
Members of Towers Parry’s family did not immediately respond to inquiries Wednesday.
Towers Parry, who was in the midst of eviction proceedings, came out of her house and pointed a shotgun at the two men before the 40-year-old, armed with a handgun, opened fire. In a phone call Wednesday, Pritchard said the men did not work in law enforcement and were not there to evict Towers, but he would not describe the paperwork they were delivering."
"The couple finalized their divorce in October 2019, records show. About 15 months later, video shared online appeared to show Towers Parry participating in the Jan. 6 rally in Washington, D.C., wearing a coat and carrying a flag both festooned with a large letter “Q.”
“Hi patriots, it’s Dr. Tammy,” she says in the video while standing in front of the U.S. Capitol building. “We just stormed the Congress and I’m going to tell you right now: It was wild.”
In the video, Towers Parry describes entering the government building and being pepper-sprayed and tear-gassed.
“Compared to what our Founding Fathers did, it’s the least we could do,” she says in the video. “Joe Biden did not win. He’s hopefully going to prison.”
Poor Tammy
www.seattletimes.com
"A Seattle doctor whose medical license was suspended after she participated in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was shot and killed after pointing a gun at two people delivering paperwork at her West Seattle home on Tuesday.
A 40-year-old man whom police have not identified shot Tamara Towers Parry, 57, multiple times in the torso outside her Southwest Hudson Street home around 1 p.m., according to the Seattle Police Department and the King County Medical Examiner’s Office. Police have not arrested anyone and are not looking for suspects, spokesperson Detective Brian Pritchard said Wednesday.
Members of Towers Parry’s family did not immediately respond to inquiries Wednesday.
Towers Parry, who was in the midst of eviction proceedings, came out of her house and pointed a shotgun at the two men before the 40-year-old, armed with a handgun, opened fire. In a phone call Wednesday, Pritchard said the men did not work in law enforcement and were not there to evict Towers, but he would not describe the paperwork they were delivering."
"The couple finalized their divorce in October 2019, records show. About 15 months later, video shared online appeared to show Towers Parry participating in the Jan. 6 rally in Washington, D.C., wearing a coat and carrying a flag both festooned with a large letter “Q.”
“Hi patriots, it’s Dr. Tammy,” she says in the video while standing in front of the U.S. Capitol building. “We just stormed the Congress and I’m going to tell you right now: It was wild.”
In the video, Towers Parry describes entering the government building and being pepper-sprayed and tear-gassed.
“Compared to what our Founding Fathers did, it’s the least we could do,” she says in the video. “Joe Biden did not win. He’s hopefully going to prison.”
Poor Tammy
Former doctor who participated in Jan. 6 attack killed in shooting at West Seattle home
The woman was shot and killed after she pointed a shotgun at two men delivering paperwork at her West Seattle home, police say. No one has been arrested.
www.seattletimes.com
