Judicial Corruption
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
BREAKING: Judge John McConnell, the crook who ordered the Trump administration to unfreeze Inflation Reduction Act funds, disclosed that he owns $250,000 stock in a company that received $75 million from the Act.
This is the most egregious conflict of interest ever.
This judge should be IMPEACHED and kicked from overseeing any future cases related to this administration.
Source: @MatthewFoldi
I think so. Just like Merchan in NY presiding over the Trump case while his daughter was taking in millions in payola.
This would be checks and balances.
BREAKING: President Trump just filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court asking them to overturn the lower court judge who reinstated Hampton Dellinger as head of the Office of Special Counsel.
“Until now, as far as we are aware, no court in American history has wielded an injunction to force the president to retain an agency head."
It's high time SCOTUS stepped in and halted all the corrupt lower courts from playing politics from their benches.
Trump tells three judge panel basically to F*CK OFF, filing an emergency appeal with SCOTUS tonight after an Obama-appointed judge reinstated Hampton Dellinger, a Biden-era bureaucrat, as head of the Office of Special Counsel.
The rogue judge went even further (Judge Amy Berman Jackson) saying that Trump “must allow Dellinger to continue to have access” to the agency’s resources and forbidding the administration from recognizing any replacement Trump had in mind.
The case is not expected to be docketed until Tuesday at the earliest.
🚨 🇺🇸 ACTIVIST JUDGE WHO BLOCKED TRUMP'S SPENDING FREEZE HAS HIDDEN MONEY TIES
Federal Judge John McConnell failed to disclose his role at Crossroads Rhode Island while ruling against Trump's spending freeze.
His non-profit received $128M in government funding during his 18-year board tenure, including $42M from 2020-2023.
Rhode Island, a plaintiff in the case, already sent his organization $2.9M in 2025.
The judge ordered federal funds to keep flowing to states—and coincidentally, to his own non-profit.
Federal law requires judges to recuse themselves when their impartiality might be questioned.
Wonder why he didn't.
Source: @America1stLegal
Can he be prosecuted and/or disbarred? He should be. Someone has to be made an example of or it will never ever stop.
I'm with you. Are judges above reproach? There needs to be some accountability.
FAFO!!!
BREAKING: Pam Bondi just declared that restrictions shielding administrative law judges from removal are unconstitutional and will no longer defend them in court.
This allows President Trump to fire those who have been secretly perverting the Constitution.
I would also like to add that last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the SEC's use of in-house judges to decide enforcement action was unconstitutional. So, the crooked deep-state judges have lost all their legal support.
BREAKING: Pam Bondi just declared that restrictions shielding administrative law judges from removal are unconstitutional and will no longer defend them in court.
This allows President Trump to fire those who have been secretly perverting the Constitution.
I would also like to add that last year, the Supreme Court ruled that the SEC's use of in-house judges to decide enforcement action was unconstitutional. So, the crooked deep-state judges have lost all their legal support.
It's going to end this way.
Today three activist judges blocked the democratic will of the people on three of Trump’s core campaign promises.
Judge shopping for rubber stamped national injunctions must be reined in ASAP.
Time to force the issue at SCOTUS.
In the 2018 Trump v. Hawaii case (the “Travel Ban” case) Clarence Thomas wrote:
“These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this court must address their legality.”
Today three activist judges blocked the democratic will of the people on three of Trump’s core campaign promises.
Judge shopping for rubber stamped national injunctions must be reined in ASAP.
Time to force the issue at SCOTUS.
In the 2018 Trump v. Hawaii case (the “Travel Ban” case) Clarence Thomas wrote:
“These injunctions did not emerge until a century and a half after the founding. And they appear to be inconsistent with longstanding limits on equitable relief and the power of Article III courts. If their popularity continues, this court must address their legality.”
President of El Salvador Nayib Bukele: “We had to remove corrupt judges and corrupt attorneys and prosecutors”
Nayib Bukele said today: “If you don’t impeach the corrupt judges, you CANNOT fix the country. They will form a cartel (a judicial dictatorship) and block all reforms, protecting the systemic corruption that put them in their seats”
We, the people, had an election. We, the people, chose our leader. We, the people, chose him to do precisely what he is trying to do, but we, the people, are being told no by democrat judges who have no right to stop the will of the people.
If judges are going to be the deciders of policy, what do we have elections for?
Justice Alito is right.
The (liberal) district judge has no authority to order @POTUS Trump to send billions of dollars overseas.
The Supreme Court missed a huge opportunity to put a stop to rogue district courts interfering with executive branch operations.
Now, this decision gives a green light to every “resistance” judge to throw sand in the gears of the President’s Article II authority.
ICYMI:
Five justices on the Supreme Court are letting this foreign citizen order the President of the United States to mindlessly spend $2,000,000,000 in foreign aid over the President's order to pause the aid for the President's national-security review.
Absolutely unacceptable.
The Constitution is Clear – The Executive Power is Vested in the President, NOT the Courts! 🚨
🔥 @RepHageman drops the truth bomb the Left doesn't want to hear.
Article II of the U.S. Constitution is crystal clear: The executive power is vested in the President of the United States.
👉 That means:
✔ The President defines the executive branch—not the courts.
✔ No judge has the right to limit, redefine, or interfere with the duties of executive officials.
✔ The separation of powers is real, and the judiciary doesn’t get to rewrite the Constitution to target political opponents.
But here’s the real issue—lawfare is being used as a weapon against @POTUS Trump. Since 2017, we’ve seen the courts politicized and manipulated to try to take him down.
🔹 They’ve used phony cases.
🔹 They’ve abused the system to interfere in elections.
🔹 They’ve set a dangerous precedent that threatens all future presidents.
💥 THE FIGHT FOR EXECUTIVE POWER IS THE FIGHT FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE.
🔥 Hageman DESTROYS the Left’s argument:
📢 “The President defines the scope and duties of his office—not the courts!”
📢 “If we don’t protect the Executive Branch, the courts will make the President powerless.”
📢 “This is about stopping the weaponization of the law for political revenge.”
⚠️ IF THEY CAN DO THIS TO @POTUS TRUMP, THEY CAN DO IT TO ANY PRESIDENT. ⚠️
🚨 WHAT DO YOU THINK?
🔁 REPOST if you stand with Rep. Hageman on protecting executive power!
💬 Comment below—should courts have the power to limit the President’s authority?
Similar threads
