ADVERTISEMENT

Judicial Coup



🚨BREAKING: In a sweeping new ruling, the U.S. Court of International Trade has just blocked President Trump's Liberation Day tariffs, saying that authority is with Congress.

With activist judges, what is even the point of having a president?!

FACT CHECK: While the Constitution grants Congress the power to impose tariffs, Congress delegated much of that power to the Executive Branch in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows for adjustments to tariff rates without needing Congressional action. Courts have given the executive branch broad authority to negotiate trade, that is until now.

You do realize this is exactly how our court system is supposed to work.

Maybe if the Republican Congress could accomplish a law the constant barrage of illegal Executive Orders wouldn't be needed.

The reality is that the Republicans don't want to be tied to the MAGA movement that they hope will die once Trump is gone. They know this Budget Bill is a disaster for them politically. Literally every economist, except those working in the White House say that it will add trillions to the debt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
You do realize this is exactly how our court system is supposed to work.

Maybe if the Republican Congress could accomplish a law the constant barrage of illegal Executive Orders wouldn't be needed.

The reality is that the Republicans don't want to be tied to the MAGA movement that they hope will die once Trump is gone. They know this Budget Bill is a disaster for them politically. Literally every economist, except those working in the White House say that it will add trillions to the debt.
every economist

Why don't you name them then. The floor is yours.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374


We are witnessing a judicial insurrection in the United States, where rogue Democrat-aligned radical judges are asserting unprecedented power, acting as if they hold more authority than the President.

Federal judges have blocked executive orders on issues like immigration and energy policy, citing broad interpretations of their judicial mandate, even when the President’s actions fall within constitutional bounds.

There is a deliberate effort to undermine the elected executive, with judges behaving as political activists rather than impartial arbiters. Their actions, such as issuing nationwide injunctions as if they were freaking lollipops from district courts, disrupt governance and elevate the judiciary above the democratic will, creating a dangerous precedent where the balance of power tilts toward an unaccountable elite.

This judicial overreach is eroding the separation of powers and public trust in institutions. When judges act as de facto policymakers, they disenfranchise voters who elected the President to execute a specific agenda.

Historical parallels, like the Warren Court’s expansive rulings in the mid-20th century, pale in comparison to today’s brazen judicial activism, which mirrors authoritarian tactics seen in countries like Brazil, where courts have suppressed political opponents under the guise of protecting democracy.

We are being held hostage under a juristocracy where unelected judges dictate national policy, paralyzing the executive and legislature branches. And it’s only getting worse.

We are barreling towards a constitutional crisis. One that will undermine 250 years of jurisprudence in America.

If the SCOTUS decision doesn’t reign in these outrageous judges, Congress better get prepared to act because once we cross a certain point there will be no going back.
 
What a gullible dipshit you are and so is Hambone who likes every made up story you post.

"No credible evidence supports the claim that George Soros gifted Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson a house. The allegation, specifically about a $2.1 million Italian vacation home as a bribe, originated from the Dunning-Kruger Times, a satirical website that explicitly labels its content as fiction. Fact-checks by Lead Stories and Newsbreak, published on May 23, 2025, confirm the story is false, noting it included fabricated quotes from a fake persona, "Joe Barron." Posts on X repeating the claim have been debunked as stemming from this satirical source."

 
What a gullible dipshit you are and so is Hambone who likes every made up story you post.

"No credible evidence supports the claim that George Soros gifted Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson a house. The allegation, specifically about a $2.1 million Italian vacation home as a bribe, originated from the Dunning-Kruger Times, a satirical website that explicitly labels its content as fiction. Fact-checks by Lead Stories and Newsbreak, published on May 23, 2025, confirm the story is false, noting it included fabricated quotes from a fake persona, "Joe Barron." Posts on X repeating the claim have been debunked as stemming from this satirical source."


Prove it chicken leg.
 



SCOTUS HANDS TRUMP FULL CONTROL OF FEDERAL AGENCIES — LAWFARE ERA IS OVER

The Supreme Court just detonated the Deep State’s last defense line. In a historic ruling, President Donald J. Trump has been granted full constitutional authority to remove the heads of all so-called “independent” federal agencies — without cause, delay, or interference.

The age of bureaucratic sabotage is over. The President is now back in full command.

This isn’t just a legal victory. It’s the collapse of an empire built in the shadows — the unelected regime of agency heads, Obama-era loyalists, and lawfare architects who thought they could rule from the back rooms while pretending Trump was just a figurehead.

Now he holds the sword. And the purge begins.

The Court’s decision confirms Trump can immediately terminate entrenched operatives like Gwynne Wilcox (NLRB) and Cathy Harris (Merit Systems Protection Board), along with anyone else weaponizing federal authority against the people. No hearings. No negotiations. Just direct executive power — as defined in Article II of the Constitution.

The implications are seismic.

For years, Trump’s presidency was bogged down not by political opposition — but by a lawless administrative state. Obscure boards, rogue departments, and legal “watchdogs” became the enforcement arm of the globalist agenda. Their mission: delay, derail, and destroy Trump’s America First policies from within.

Now, the illusion of “independence” is gone.
Every federal action now flows through the President.

No more slow-walking directives. No more unsigned memos sabotaging the border. No more internal resistance using legal tricks to override elected leadership. With this ruling, Trump can fire, replace, and restructure every agency blocking the will of the people.

And he will.

The lawfare machine is collapsing.

This decision strikes directly at the administrative state — the fourth, unelected branch of government that has operated unchecked for decades. Trump can now do what he was elected to do: clean house. Permanently.

Expect mass terminations. Expect loyalty reviews. Expect restructuring on a scale this country has never seen.

This is not about two agency heads.
This is about destroying the system that protected them.

“This was never about Wilcox or Harris,” said one insider.
“It was about removing the Deep State’s last defense. And it’s gone.”

Under Trump’s restored authority, the bureaucratic strongholds that enabled censorship, open borders, economic sabotage, and globalist control are now wide open. And the people who’ve been hiding behind policy walls and HR protections are finally exposed.

The Deep State lost its shield. Now it faces the sword.

This ruling isn’t policy reform — it’s a reset of executive power. It’s the return of the Republic. And it’s the beginning of the greatest political purge in modern American history.

The President now commands the government.
The war on lawfare is over. And Trump just won!!!!'
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerRagRob
An injunction on transgender surgery. WTF??



In one of the most twisted opinions I've read, Judge Royce Lamberth (Reagan)--who eagerly threw J6ers including Jake Chansley and Rachel Powell in prison for years--has halted the president's exec order denying treatment for federal inmates suffering from "gender dysphoria."

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are "transgenders" who use new names to represent their chosen gender--but also to conceal the convictions that led to their lengthy incarceration in federal prison.

Meet the criminals Judge Lamberth claims are being denied constitutional rights and harmed by the Trump administration.

"Alishea Kingdom" according to court docs "is a transgender woman who was diagnosed with gender dysphoria in 2016, prescribed hormone therapy injections, and approved to receive social accommodations including women’s undergarments and cosmetics." After the president's order, "she" was denied those treatments and accommodations.

"Ms. Kingdom states that the discontinuation of her hormone therapy caused her to experience anxiety, hopelessness, panic attacks, and suicidal ideation," Lamberth wrote.

Except Kingdom's real name is Joshua Mueller.

In 2014, at the age of 23, Mueller was sentenced to 15 1/2 years in prison for armed robbery in Milwaukee where he shot a store employee. He is currently incarcerated at Fairton FCI.

ttps://www.justice.gov/usao-edwi/pr/two-men-sentenced-15-12-years-and-8-years-prison-armed-robbery-milwaukee-grocery-store
 
Also, is there the same outrage about this "activism", or does it not matter because you agree with the result?

2001: Texas passes bill to grant undocumented Texas HS grads in-state tuition
May 26, 2025: Texas Senate fails to pass bill to repeal 2001 law
June 4: Federal government sues Texas alleging 2001 law is unconstitutional. Files in the location where they are guaranteed to get Reed O'Connor as a judge

Within six hours - i.e. before anyone who might actually stand up for the law could intervene - Texas (Ken Paxton) asked the court to rule the 2001 law unconstitutional and O'Connor ruled that it was indeed unconstitutional.
 
Also, is there the same outrage about this "activism", or does it not matter because you agree with the result?

2001: Texas passes bill to grant undocumented Texas HS grads in-state tuition
May 26, 2025: Texas Senate fails to pass bill to repeal 2001 law
June 4: Federal government sues Texas alleging 2001 law is unconstitutional. Files in the location where they are guaranteed to get Reed O'Connor as a judge

Within six hours - i.e. before anyone who might actually stand up for the law could intervene - Texas (Ken Paxton) asked the court to rule the 2001 law unconstitutional and O'Connor ruled that it was indeed unconstitutional.
Reminds me of the judicial coup of the overwhelming mandate Biden had when he forgave student debt
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
If you guys can't see that this is judicial obstruction and basically a coup in progress then I can't help you.
 
Sums it up well.



Dear Federal Judges:

We The People are the sovereign.

The cornerstone of sovereignty is control of our border.

We lend the federal government limited, specific, enumerated, and divided powers.

Congress may create due-process rights for the expulsion of illegal aliens, if it chooses.

But we never gave you that power.

Not at our founding.

Not after the Civil War.

Not in any subsequent Congress.

Certainly not after the last election.

You allowed Biden to illegally mass-import over 10,000,000 illegal aliens, including terrorists.

Now you’re illegally stopping Trump from expelling the worst terrorists and their enablers.

You are violating one of our most important sovereign rights.

You are destroying your legitimacy with a large swath of Americans.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT