ADVERTISEMENT

Libs are not smart

Triggered. :D :cool::p:);)
iu
 
You sure do post a bunch of BS but never a link, why is that? Are you concerned your sources might be shady? FYI - they are
lol - your sources are Sharp as a Tack and White Dudes for Harris.

We all hope she runs again, but we ALL know it will never happen. Because she is a terrible, terrible candidate. Totally unqualified. And stupid. All of which I told you when she was appointed as a candidate the first time.

Who do you think Obama should appoint t as the next candidate? Not that your opinion will matter. You will get who you are told and you will like it . That’s how it works over there I guess.
 
lol - your sources are Sharp as a Tack and White Dudes for Harris.

We all hope she runs again, but we ALL know it will never happen. Because she is a terrible, terrible candidate. Totally unqualified. And stupid. All of which I told you when she was appointed as a candidate the first time.

Who do you think Obama should appoint t as the next candidate? Not that your opinion will matter. You will get who you are told and you will like it . That’s how it works over there I guess.
Thanks for the link that proves this "BREAKING" news piglet
 

You will see the dems run from a lot of the nonsense they've supported the last 4 years. Look no further than Kamala pivoting bigly on many issues this summer once the dem think tanks told her what policies were most electable. Unfortunately, their previous positions are often on tape.

That's why they pretty much have to lean on new blood in 2028. They can't be tethered to the absolute dogshit policies that the current version of the dem party has supported. They will pivot and try to find someone new who hopefully hasn't supported their policies on camera.
 
You will see the dems run from a lot of the nonsense they've supported the last 4 years. Look no further than Kamala pivoting bigly on many issues this summer once the dem think tanks told her what policies were most electable. Unfortunately, their previous positions are often on tape.

That's why they pretty much have to lean on new blood in 2028. They can't be tethered to the absolute dogshit policies that the current version of the dem party has supported. They will pivot and try to find someone new who hopefully hasn't supported their policies on camera.
Is this similar to how the pubs all voted against/railed against infrastructure/healthcare initiatives passed by dems and then go out and champion those bills/funding to their constituents?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: SGTiger and dpic73
Apparently liberalism is some kind of mental disorder according to Arthur Brook's (professor at far left Harvard) interpretation of the data. Just need to follow the science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT