ADVERTISEMENT

Ms Luna on fire

Regardless of either free speech is protected by law. The issue is censoring . If someone is posting something that is directed toward a certain person that is totaled false then is is slanderous and should move onto a lawsuit. There's a reason Trump has filed a lawsuit against Clinton tied to the Russian lies.
They were addressing posts that violated Twitter's terms of service, meaning dangerous lies and unfortunately, the vast majority were coming from right-wing conspiracy theorists.

And laughing my ass off at Trump's frivolous lawsuit, with no basis in fact, that he lost his ass over. Why are you so damn gullible?

 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
Legal request for user information....🤣😅
And you know better because of a tweet from the NY Post and a repetition of that lie by less than credible Republican politicians?

Do you think it's weird for companies to charge for their services? If they spent hundreds or thousands of hours preparing these requests, you don't think it makes sense to be paid for their time?

Why are you so damn gullible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
They were addressing posts that violated Twitter's terms of service, meaning dangerous lies and unfortunately, the vast majority were coming from right-wing conspiracy theorists.

And laughing my ass off at Trump's frivolous lawsuit, with no basis in fact, that he lost his ass over. Why are you so damn gullible?


Who are you to judge someone ? So now it's the FBI job to determine if someone broke Twitter policy... Wake up there's a reason Musk has fired 2 dozen employees and 4400 contract employees
 
Who are you to judge someone ? So now it's the FBI job to determine if someone broke Twitter policy... Wake up there's a reason Musk has fired 2 dozen employees and 4400 contract employees
If you're going to come on here and make outrageous claims, with no basis in fact, you better have proof or I will call you out.

Why do you so readily trust Elon Musk, when you know he's a hard-right, partisan conspiracy theorist? You only think he's right because you share his political viewpoints. That does not make him right.
 
Jordan made a similar assertion in a Dec. 20 tweet, in which he quoted from a New York Post tweet that said the “FBI paid Twitter back more than $3M for doing its dirty work on users, email shows.” In its Dec. 19 story, the Post alleged that the “FBI paid Twitter nearly $3.5 million of taxpayer cash to ban accounts largely linked to conservative voices and target so-called ‘foreign influence’ operations.”

Yes the FBI denied it... 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
What do you think these last three posts have proven? We already know the truth about what happened but shady Republican politicians refuse to accept the facts and won't be satisfied until they can make Twitter responsible for Trump's loss LMAO. And you just accept their unproven allegations because you are dying to believe that Democrats control the world and are responsible for all it's ills .....even though for the umpteenth time, these things happened under Trump's administration. Wake the f up!
 
Jordan made a similar assertion in a Dec. 20 tweet, in which he quoted from a New York Post tweet that said the “FBI paid Twitter back more than $3M for doing its dirty work on users, email shows.” In its Dec. 19 story, the Post alleged that the “FBI paid Twitter nearly $3.5 million of taxpayer cash to ban accounts largely linked to conservative voices and target so-called ‘foreign influence’ operations.”

Yes the FBI denied it... 🤣
Are you just going to skim over the word "alleged?" We already know what happened under TRUMP'S ADMINISTRATION and we even have an email to prove it....but you believe the NY Post and Gym Sleazebag Jordan, just because they said so? Why are you so damn gullible?
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Clemson Goat
What do you think these last three posts have proven? We already know the truth about what happened but shady Republican politicians refuse to accept the facts and won't be satisfied until they can make Twitter responsible for Trump's loss LMAO. And you just accept their unproven allegations because you are dying to believe that Democrats control the world and are responsible for all it's ills .....even though for the umpteenth time, these things happened under Trump's administration. Wake the f up!

I never said when it happen. I am sure Trump had the FBI censoring his own voting rightwing group. Hell the left wing tried to impeach Trump before he stepped into the Whitehouse. Regardless when it happen everyone involved should be in jail. Just like Clinton and the cronies that were involved in the madeup Russian collusion.
 
I never said when it happen. I am sure Trump had the FBI censoring his own voting rightwing group. Hell the left wing tried to impeach Trump before he stepped into the Whitehouse. Regardless when it happen everyone involved should be in jail. Just like Clinton and the cronies that were involved in the madeup Russian collusion.
Now you're changing the subject?
Please explain to me how Clinton was responsible for the Russia collusion investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
Schiff is that you ?
No, please explain because I look forward to proving why your allegation is false. I guess the court throwing out Trump's lawsuit against Clinton and fining him a million dollars for his frivoulous, non-fact based claims didn't even make a dent in your belief?

And don't tell me you aren't MAGA because you've tried to defend his bullshit several times already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: flotiger
I am all in on all social programs. Free College , Free healthcare, Free drugs, Open boarders ( people think the democrats wants this for votes. I think it's the tax money that will come from it. jmo) I am at the age I no longer pay income taxes. I can't wait to see the NWO take over . 😞🖖🤔
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73
No, please explain because I look forward to proving why your allegation is false. I guess the court throwing out Trump's lawsuit against Clinton and fining him a million dollars for his frivoulous, non-fact based claims didn't even make a dent in your belief?

And don't tell me you aren't MAGA because you've tried to defend his bullshit several times already.
There you go again trying to read someone mind.
 
No, please explain because I look forward to proving why your allegation is false. I guess the court throwing out Trump's lawsuit against Clinton and fining him a million dollars for his frivoulous, non-fact based claims didn't even make a dent in your belief?

And don't tell me you aren't MAGA because you've tried to defend his bullshit several times already.

There you go again left wing , woke ... trying to label people
 
  • Like
Reactions: moradatiger70
This had nothing to do with the collusion investigation - nothing. Even Trey Gowdy admitted it was Papadopoulos' contacts with Russian intermediaries that kicked it off. An investigation, I might add, that was launched by Republican Rod Rosenstein and investigated by Republican Robert Mueller.

You also failed to note that the Durham investigation came up empty and actually uncovered a crime that Trump committed LOL.

"On June 19, 2016, Sam Clovis, as Trump national campaign co-chairman,encouraged Papadopoulos to fly to Russia to meet with agents of the Russian Foreign Ministry. This occurred after Papadopoulos had been told by Joseph Mifsud that Russia had "dirt" on Clinton in the form of thousands of emails that Russian wanted to share them with Trump's campaign,[60][54][61][62] but before there was public knowledge of the hack of Democratic National Committee and of John Podesta's emails, the latter two of which U.S. intelligence agencies believe were carried out by Russia.[63]

On July 26,[citation needed] after the hacking of the DNC server had become known, Australian officials told the FBI about Papadopoulos's comment, leading the Federal Bureau of Investigation to open a counterintelligence investigation into the Donald Trump presidential campaign on July 31, 2016.[46][64]"


_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

"But Ratcliffe is wrong to say the dossier “started all of this.” Competing memos from the Republicans and the Democrats on the House intelligence committee both say that information about George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, had prompted the FBI investigation in July 2016.

Papadopoulos had contacts with Russian intermediaries during the campaign, according to the Justice Department, and later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about those contacts. While he was a Trump campaign adviser, Papadopoulos met with a professor with connections to Russian government officials who told him “about the Russians possessing ‘dirt’ on then-candidate Hillary Clinton in the form of ‘thousands of emails,'” and he tried to arrange a meeting between the Russian government and the campaign, the DOJ’s statement of the offense said.

A memo released Feb. 2, 2018, by the Republicans on the House intelligence committee raised concerns about the use of the dossier in an application from the DOJ and FBI under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to conduct electronic surveillance on Carter Page, another Trump campaign foreign policy adviser. But it said the “Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016.

The Democrats on the House intelligence committee agreed with that, saying in a memo released Feb. 24, 2018, that the FBI investigation started
“more than seven weeks” before the FBI received Steele’s intelligence reporting in mid-September of that year."

 
There you go again Left wing 101. I didn't call you dumb only said it was a dumb post..

The FBI didn't pay Twitter 3.4 m (tax payers money) because they like them. If you believe the 3.4M was for services I got some Ocean front property in Clemson for sell.

Let me jump in here and say Clemson property is rocking in prices
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat
Now you're changing the subject?
Please explain to me how Clinton was responsible for the Russia collusion investigation.
You comparing what Trump may have complained about related to a personally directed derogatory tweet to the massive coordinated operation run by govt and Twitter is like comparing someone getting called a name to a murder.
 
You comparing what Trump may have complained about related to a personally directed derogatory tweet to the massive coordinated operation run by govt and Twitter is like comparing someone getting called a name to a murder.
Huh?
 
You know it. No need to reply to truth. Just go ahead with some more liberal propaganda.
I just realized what you were talking about but sure man, Saudi Don only made one request. They were using that as an example of tweets he asked to have removed, it wasn't intended to mean it was the ONLY one.

What's your explanation for why Saudi Don allowed HIS administration to "collude" with Twitter?

"As the hearing was still in session, Rolling Stone reported that Trump’s demand to take down Teigen’s tweet was “hardly an isolated incident.” According to former Trump officials and Twitter staffers, prominent Republicans and the ex-president routinely asked the company to remove posts—the same behavior they’re now insisting shows Democrats and Twitter conspired to silence conservatives and restrict their free speech.

For some reason, none of this has been revealed in the many editions of Musk’s “Twitter Files,” which have almost entirely concentrated on communications sent by Democrats and government agencies to Twitter."

"Both Roth and Gadde told Connolly they were “not aware” and “did not recall” any evidence of Biden having urged Twitter to remove content.
Baker, for his part, insisted he didn’t know the answer to that question."



There's a good reason why Chrissy Teigen called him a pussy ass bitch


"President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies on Thursday, days after Twitter called two of his tweets “potentially misleading.”

Speaking from the Oval Office ahead of signing the order, Trump said the move was to “defend free speech from one of the gravest dangers it has faced in American history.”

“A small handful of social media monopolies controls a vast portion of all public and private communications in the United States,” he claimed. “They’ve had unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter, virtually any form of communication between private citizens and large public audiences.”
 
Last edited:
I just realized what you were talking about but sure man, Saudi Don only made one request. They were using that as an example of tweets he asked to have removed, it wasn't intended to mean it was the ONLY one.

What's your explanation for why Saudi Don allowed HIS administration to "collude" with Twitter?

"As the hearing was still in session, Rolling Stone reported that Trump’s demand to take down Teigen’s tweet was “hardly an isolated incident.” According to former Trump officials and Twitter staffers, prominent Republicans and the ex-president routinely asked the company to remove posts—the same behavior they’re now insisting shows Democrats and Twitter conspired to silence conservatives and restrict their free speech.

For some reason, none of this has been revealed in the many editions of Musk’s “Twitter Files,” which have almost entirely concentrated on communications sent by Democrats and government agencies to Twitter."

"Both Roth and Gadde told Connolly they were “not aware” and “did not recall” any evidence of Biden having urged Twitter to remove content.
Baker, for his part, insisted he didn’t know the answer to that question."



There's a good reason why Chrissy Teigen called him a pussy ass bitch


"President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting social media companies on Thursday, days after Twitter called two of his tweets “potentially misleading.”

Speaking from the Oval Office ahead of signing the order, Trump said the move was to “defend free speech from one of the gravest dangers it has faced in American history.”

“A small handful of social media monopolies controls a vast portion of all public and private communications in the United States,” he claimed. “They’ve had unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter, virtually any form of communication between private citizens and large public audiences.”
Go ahead and give us some examples then and refer to examples that are 1/1000th of the impact of the Hunter laptop suppression along with the permanent suspension of Trump and countless others twitter accounts, the shadow banning and other under handed crap that occurred.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Clemson Goat
Go ahead and give us some examples then and refer to examples that are 1/1000th of the impact of the Hunter laptop suppression along with the permanent suspension of Trump and countless others twitter accounts, the shadow banning and other under handed crap that occurred.
We don't know the details of his requests because Musk has decided to ignore them so he could make anti-intellectual simpletons, like you, believe there was a dastardly deep state plot to hide Hunter's dick pics. And as we all know, if we could have seen them on Twitter, no way Biden would have won.

I'm still waiting on you to explain why Trump allowed HIS administration to collude with Twitter on this insidious conspiracy.
 
We don't know the details of his requests because Musk has decided to ignore them so he could make anti-intellectual simpletons, like you, believe there was a dastardly deep state plot to hide Hunter's dick pics. And as we all know, if we could have seen them on Twitter, no way Biden would have won.

I'm still waiting on you to explain why Trump allowed HIS administration to collude with Twitter on this insidious conspiracy.
I am smarter than you and dont forget it. LOL!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT