ADVERTISEMENT

Nancy Pelosi Paid Loads of Hush Money to Settle House Sexual Harassment Claims

PalmettoTiger1

The Jack Dunlap Club
Gold Member
Jan 25, 2009
9,703
9,294
113
So maybe her persecution

oops I mean prosecution should happen

Goose and Gander Fair

Or as Nancy said about proving innocence

OK Nancy as you stated prove your innocence you crooked lying criminal Chinese spy as you said that one has to prove their innocence

The Chinese spies you support enjoy the support your Democratic Party supplies to the CCP
 
So maybe her persecution

oops I mean prosecution should happen

Goose and Gander Fair

Or as Nancy said about proving innocence

OK Nancy as you stated prove your innocence you crooked lying criminal Chinese spy as you said that one has to prove their innocence

The Chinese spies you support enjoy the support your Democratic Party supplies to the CCP
Just to jog the boards memory, tax payers funded the settlement payments .......

 
Just to jog the boards memory, tax payers funded the settlement payments .......

This seems like a typical CNN article... long on speculation and short on facts. But I've NO PROBLEM with kicking out folks that break the law. It puzzles me how folks use the "The other side did it, so it must be OK" excuse. When two people break the law BOTH need to be punished, not one person excused b/c the other person didn't get charged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: firegiver
This seems like a typical CNN article... long on speculation and short on facts. But I've NO PROBLEM with kicking out folks that break the law. It puzzles me how folks use the "The other side did it, so it must be OK" excuse. When two people break the law BOTH need to be punished, not one person excused b/c the other person didn't get charged.
The point is the others weren’t prosecuted for it …..that’s it …..that’s the only point, not that it’s ok. It’s that one side seems to be able to avoid the justice system and one side doesn’t.
 
This seems like a typical CNN article... long on speculation and short on facts. But I've NO PROBLEM with kicking out folks that break the law. It puzzles me how folks use the "The other side did it, so it must be OK" excuse. When two people break the law BOTH need to be punished, not one person excused b/c the other person didn't get charged.

When one doesn’t get charged you lose the moral authority to make it a chargeable offense to someone else. I don’t have a problem holding people accountable. Don’t hold only some people accountable and let others slide by.

Unequal application of the law is no different than not having laws but a free for all.
 
Just to jog the boards memory, tax payers funded the settlement payments .......


Based on fair Treatment of paying hush money all the folks need to be
The point is the others weren’t prosecuted for it …..that’s it …..that’s the only point, not that it’s ok. It’s that one side seems to be able to avoid the justice system and one side doesn’t.

Thats my point

Trump guilty for paying

Nancy and her House friends make payoffs not a problem

Sad double standard

If one is being punished then both sides need to be punished
 
Based on fair Treatment of paying hush money all the folks need to be


Thats my point

Trump guilty for paying

Nancy and her House friends make payoffs not a problem

Sad double standard

If one is being punished then both sides need to be punished

well now that pandora's box has been opened there might be some inspired da's looking for their moment in the sun.
 
Funny how this story disappeared isn't it.
 
Please not that NOT a single Democrat will question Nancy the Hammer Pelosi on this

Or engage in this thread as they are ball less when faced with dealing with their hypocrisy

I am actually saying paying off someone to shut their mouth is OK

It's called a NDA and I personally have signed many of them

It's a part of life ane not a crime in any form
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
So maybe her persecution

oops I mean prosecution should happen

Goose and Gander Fair

Or as Nancy said about proving innocence

OK Nancy as you stated prove your innocence you crooked lying criminal Chinese spy as you said that one has to prove their innocence

The Chinese spies you support enjoy the support your Democratic Party supplies to the CCP
What does this have to do with only Nancy? I’m not a fan but represent the article fairly on what it exactly is……

A taxpayer funded slush fund hosted by the US Treasury that has paid out 17m+ from 1997-2017 for 268 cases of some agreed to form of harassment. That averages $63,500 per payment against Republicans and Democrats alike.

What’s truly disgusting is that the House Majority/Minority leaders who approve these payments DO NOT see who they are approving the payments for. That is the crime.

Talk about an investigation that needs MASSIVE #METOO.

(Interesting….. they passed a bill Dec 2018 putting the responsibility on the representative and no longer the taxpayer.)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the cnn article. It doesn't state a single thing about potential felonies. Sometimes I can't tell if everyone is this stupid or I'm being trolled. Why is anyone even attempting this false equivalency?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
If only this is Trump’s official defense:

“If only I was in Congress before becoming POTUS that Nancy Pelosi and Paul Ryan could have paid Stormy instead.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: firegiver
Thanks for the cnn article. It doesn't state a single thing about potential felonies. Sometimes I can't tell if everyone is this stupid or I'm being trolled. Why is anyone even attempting this false equivalency?
the whataboutisms are flying. wait till the next thing when they tell you that only libs do that shit. and then that libs are holier than thou. rules for thee not me type dribble. it's wild.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CUT93
What does this have to do with only Nancy? I’m not a fan but represent the article fairly on what it exactly is……

A taxpayer funded slush fund hosted by the US Treasury that has paid out 17m+ from 1997-2017 for 268 cases of some agreed to form of harassment. That averages $63,500 per payment against Republicans and Democrats alike.

What’s truly disgusting is that the House Majority/Minority leaders who approve these payments DO NOT see who they are approving the payments for. That is the crime.

Talk about an investigation that needs MASSIVE #METOO.

(Interesting….. they passed a bill Dec 2018 putting the responsibility on the representative and no longer the taxpayer.)

The reason I pick on Nancy is I give her credit for having an iron fist in the House Speaker position

Nothing could happen in the House unless Nancy said it could

Nothing Nancy was aware of every payment as her eyes are everywhere
 
The reason I pick on Nancy is I give her credit for having an iron fist in the House Speaker position

Nothing could happen in the House unless Nancy said it could

Nothing Nancy was aware of every payment as her eyes are everywhere
Sure…. But did you look at the bill? It starting paying out in 1997. Newt Gingrich was Speaker at the time.
Then…..
Hastert
Nancy
Boehner
Ryan
Nancy

ALL OF THEM ARE COMPLICIT
 
Sure…. But did you look at the bill? It starting paying out in 1997. Newt Gingrich was Speaker at the time.
Then…..
Hastert
Nancy
Boehner
Ryan
Nancy

ALL OF THEM ARE COMPLICIT

Totally in agreement

We have had terrible House leadership both sides of aisle
 
  • Like
Reactions: AugTig
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT