ADVERTISEMENT

Nikki Haley named to Clemson BOT…

Haley has done a lot of behind the scenes fundraising for Clemson the last two years and was crucial in getting Clemson to the $1b endowment level .
I hope this is the case. Board members need to embrace their role as fundraisers and ambassadors for the University. I'm curious to know which relationships she helped advance or which gifts she helped close. Did the admin get to dangle an audience with her as a perk of a giving at certain level? My (somewhat educated) guess is that Clemson's endowment reaching that arbitrary milestone has more to do with sustained success focus on fundraising over the last decade- especially planned giving(estate gifts, charitable remainder trusts, etc) + extremely favorable markets during the same time period.

Clemson's last two Presidents have been good fundraisers and have positioned the university for long term success while the in-state rival shines as a cautionary tale. Soda City University won't ever rise above mediocrity because of the utter lack of vision and leadership.

I hope that Haley emulates David Wilkens- who, much like Dabo & Co on the recruiting trail- does his work quietly- behind the scenes. Several posters above mentioned Wilkens- but he hasn't gotten enough credit for Clemson's success.
 
Not particularly. McMaster has a hand in what the BofT at SC does. As governor of SC, I think he has that by law. Supposedly he also had a hand in Casslin and in Darla Moore being ousted.

Haley doesn't have that power. It is kind of apples-to-oranges. I'm not saying that she isn't a politician but Clemson doesn't have some of the BS that SC has.
So I read the State's account to that and that's where my reaction stems from. McMaster did have some political favors being played with Caslen becoming president. Darla Moore and all her money wasn't ousted......she left because of the incompetency of SC leadership.

Thinking Haley doesn't swing the political big D is a BIG assumption and probably false.
 
Not particularly. McMaster has a hand in what the BofT at SC does. As governor of SC, I think he has that by law. Supposedly he also had a hand in Casslin and in Darla Moore being ousted.

Haley doesn't have that power. It is kind of apples-to-oranges. I'm not saying that she isn't a politician but Clemson doesn't have some of the BS that SC has.
This. She is a ember of the BOT. Not THE member. She is a very intelligent lady. I think we will be just fine. Having Jim Clements long term ad the President is the most important thing in my book
 
I don't think you can use that word here given her Indian heritage

Doesn't matter that she's not Native American. Too close

P3J_3h.gif
 
An alumna, highly respected, known on a world stage with a unique perspective in regards to succeeding in America.

The knocks against her are the letter beside her last name, and the fact that she held a position in the last administration. (an administration she openly criticized)

Judge her by her character and accomplishments and it is an easy choice for her to join the BOT.

While I agree the BOT shouldn't be made up of politicians, she is but one voice and one that would bring a diverse and passionate (Pro Clemson) thought process to the BOT.

Heck even the Senate approved her nomination 96-4. That's pretty bi-partisan.
 
Last edited:
So I read the State's account to that and that's where my reaction stems from. McMaster did have some political favors being played with Caslen becoming president. Darla Moore and all her money wasn't ousted......she left because of the incompetency of SC leadership.

Thinking Haley doesn't swing the political big D is a BIG assumption and probably false.
I thought there was something weird. I think I got a few different occurrences mixed up.

Moore was removed from the UofSC Board of Trustees in 2011 by Governor Nikki Haley.

The plot thickens.....

The more recent spat had something to do with USuCk not acknowledging the death of her husband I think.

Honestly if another spot were to open I wouldn't be opposed to Darla Moore on Clemson's BoT.
 
I hope this is the case. Board members need to embrace their role as fundraisers and ambassadors for the University. I'm curious to know which relationships she helped advance or which gifts she helped close. Did the admin get to dangle an audience with her as a perk of a giving at certain level? My (somewhat educated) guess is that Clemson's endowment reaching that arbitrary milestone has more to do with sustained success focus on fundraising over the last decade- especially planned giving(estate gifts, charitable remainder trusts, etc) + extremely favorable markets during the same time period.

Clemson's last two Presidents have been good fundraisers and have positioned the university for long term success while the in-state rival shines as a cautionary tale. Soda City University won't ever rise above mediocrity because of the utter lack of vision and leadership.

I hope that Haley emulates David Wilkens- who, much like Dabo & Co on the recruiting trail- does his work quietly- behind the scenes. Several posters above mentioned Wilkens- but he hasn't gotten enough credit for Clemson's success.

Not sure where you get that Wilkins doesn't get enough credit. He is about as highly regarded as you can get by the people that matter and know what he's brought to Clemson over the last decade or so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard's Jock
Excellent choice and her blood definitely runs orange. I had the fortune and opportunity to chat with her at the team hotel in Cali before the game for about 15m. She is very gracious, charming and sharp. Asked her about running for POTUS, and at that time she said she was just looking forward to some time off and the Tigers beating Bama.

She seems to be making moves towards running and I hope that she does.
If I were planning to run, I would not be adding responsibilities like BOT appointments to my plate. 2024 is a long way off, though.
 
My immediate reaction is not me jumping for joy over this. What has differentiated our BOT is that it’s makeup lacked politicians with political motives. Solid business leaders for the most part who make good business decisions.

UofSC has experienced issues because the makeup of its BOT is the opposite.

Not triggered…but not a huge fan of this move either. Politicians should stay in their lane. Just my humble opinion.

Difference is, she isn’t in office right now and the university isn’t in Columbia.
 
Not sure where you get that Wilkins doesn't get enough credit. He is about as highly regarded as you can get by the people that matter and know what he's brought to Clemson over the last decade or so.
I don’t disagree. Whatever credit he has gotten, isn’t enough. I’ve worked on enough college campuses to see what happens without the kind of quiet visionary leadership Wilkins brings to the table.
 
I thought there was something weird. I think I got a few different occurrences mixed up.

Moore was removed from the UofSC Board of Trustees in 2011 by Governor Nikki Haley.

The plot thickens.....

The more recent spat had something to do with USuCk not acknowledging the death of her husband I think.

Honestly if another spot were to open I wouldn't be opposed to Darla Moore on Clemson's BoT.
Close, it was the death of her mother. To rub salt in the wound, Clemson reached out to Darla and her family to express sympathy. Uof looked even worse, after that, if that’s even possible.
 
Is she gonna kill football money? Otherwise...

I couldn't tell you who else is on the BOT and I truly don't care. I can guess that most of them are far more conservative than gov. Haley. Regardless, I'm certainly not a Clemson fan because of the universitys politics...
Well said
 
  • Like
Reactions: cemtiger
Difference is, she isn’t in office right now and the university isn’t in Columbia.

Her not being in office doesn’t make her any less of a politician. And location of your university makes little difference. Hell….our BOT meets in Columbia as frequently as in Clemson.
 
Can you further explain what your misgivings are about having someone with her background beyond "she's too political"?
I made myself pretty clear already. And I never said I was against her serving. Just that I wasn’t exactly overjoyed at the news.

End of the day, I just don’t have a lot of confidence that a politician has anything positive to contribute in today’s world….Clemson University included
 
Last edited:
Pretty cool. My only reservation is that she doesn't need to be running for president while doing this. But I haven't heard much buzz for her lately.
If the next president is a R, it won’t be anyone who has gotten much buzz to this point.
 
The governor is the chairman of the board of trustees of uofsc. All of their trustees are elected by the state legislature. Clemson has a 13-person board. Six members of Clemson's board are elected by the legislature. Seven of the board of trustees are lifetime trustees and are voted on by the Clemson board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard's Jock
Not particularly. McMaster has a hand in what the BofT at SC does. As governor of SC, I think he has that by law. Supposedly he also had a hand in Casslin and in Darla Moore being ousted.

Haley doesn't have that power. It is kind of apples-to-oranges. I'm not saying that she isn't a politician but Clemson doesn't have some of the BS that SC has.
I'll say ... we should be learning from Scar's failures. Objectively will her contributions outweigh the partisanship she brings? You all are football fans.. not educators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClemsonGentleman
Like Trump lol?

But seriously I hope that she does become the nominee for the Republican party in 2024 ... really anyone other than Donald.
Right, wrong or indifferent, Trump has made himself unelectable. He is a polarizing figure and will only carry the extreme right. Nowdays you have to be able to pull some from the middle and Trump has driven that part away. If someone around him was brave enough to tell him to keep this mouth (twitter) shut he wouldn't have a lot of the problems he has. Also ridiculing and making fun of people like an immature 8th grader hurt is cause also.
 
She would have to ask Trump for permission to run for POTUS in 2024. She will run only if he lets her
 
  • Like
Reactions: cemtiger

I'd like to read what fitsnews has to say about this, given their history together. But that bastard charges subscriptions to his website now. https://www.fitsnews.com/2021/10/12/nikki-haley-gets-seat-on-clemson-university-board/

Everyone knows that Haley slept her way to the top. Well really, nobody knows that. But since people on here say that about Kamala all the time without any evidence, I just thought I would throw that out there.

I think it is a good appointment. Not a fan of her inconsistency though. She was yuuuge Trump critic, then a Trump lapdog, then a Trump critic again. I am sure when he asks her to run with him in 2024 she will go right back to loving him again and embracing his crazy. At that point she will need to resign. I know you guys think all Clemson people are hard right, but there are plenty of wealthy donors who vote dem and may not support the school if she is out there talking crazy during a campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: firegiver
My immediate reaction is not me jumping for joy over this. What has differentiated our BOT is that it’s makeup lacked politicians with political motives. Solid business leaders for the most part who make good business decisions.

UofSC has experienced issues because the makeup of its BOT is the opposite.

Not triggered…but not a huge fan of this move either. Politicians should stay in their lane. Just my humble opinion.
I am a huge Nikki fan, but I can respect that. There is some decent reasoning to your position.
 
Saw her at the game with her husband Saturday. Was pretty cool seeing someone with the potential to be the most powerful person on earth just hanging out. No security. Just watching her tigers play.


This dem would absolutely vote for her

Would love to see her team up with Tim Scott...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT