No Kings

[TigerGrowls]

I'm sure you libs are proud even though your boys got their @$$ beat.

 

[dpic73]

I'm sure you libs are proud even though your boys got their @$$ beat.

View embedded media

Red state Idaho! Suck it!

 

[yoshi121374]

I am 100% ok with anything within the law that punishes them for abandoning their duty in favor of trying to produce a political outcome they desired.
Also, for you to sit there and say they didn't know when multiple people have come forward since then and said the opposite is just par for the course for you. Just make up ish when the truth doesn't suit you argument. Not surprising, it's just what you do.

I'm not trying to hide what I said. I know what I said and I know what I meant. I am 100% for anything that harms libs( you know, as a group), just like you are 100% for anything that harms pubs.

If you need a webster definition example the following is one where they use it: "the national interest … was gravely harmed by this attack"

This is exactly what I meant. Just replace national interest with libs. same context, actually.

Here is the thing. I don't want to "hurt" Republicans. I want what's best for us all. I know we don't agree on all points, but we agree on most things and if we can get our rhetoric under control, we could actually accomplish things. This sort of attitude is why nothing gets done in Washington.

We have got to stop with that crap.

 

[CUT93]

Here is the thing. I don't want to "hurt" Republicans. I want what's best for us all. I know we don't agree on all points, but we agree on most things and if we can get our rhetoric under control, we could actually accomplish things. This sort of attitude is why nothing gets done in Washington.

We have got to stop with that crap.

He fixated on one word even after I clearly stated it was not referring to actual people but, but the lib agenda. Ironically, he can be one of the more vulgar posters on the board. Me using the word harm should not even phase him. Particularly after I explained what I meant, even though I thought it was fairly obvious. Then you have tboon actually having the gall to critic one groups "decorum" while simultaneously using all the bolded descriptions and tell me to gfy.
Below are two recent posts by those on "your side" of this trump mess. I have yet to see you jump in and admonish or question them. I don't use any of that language, yet somehow you evidently think my language is the problem when theirs is much more egregious and must be perfectly ok. Does their language not bother you bc they largely agree with your viewpoint? What other explanation is there?

You don't think they were addressing Obama/Biden directly? What part of screaming "YOU LIE!!!" at the top of his lungs wasn't addressing the speaker of the damn SOTU directly? Those two brain dead bimbos your party has elevated screamed at Biden repeatedly and interrupted his speech. ****ing shameful at any other part of our history but of course MAGA has no concept of decorum which is why an ignorant pig who barely has a GED and is already a grandma in her 30s like whorebag Boebert can even get in the damn building in the first place.

You think anyone gives a shit about Botox Barbie Noem showing up at some random federal building in California compared to the POTUS standing in The Capitol delivering the SOTU address? GFY man seriously

Red state Idaho! Suck it!

 

[dpic73]

I am 100% ok with anything within the law that punishes them for abandoning their duty in favor of trying to produce a political outcome they desired.
Also, for you to sit there and say they didn't know when multiple people have come forward since then and said the opposite is just par for the course for you. Just make up ish when the truth doesn't suit you argument. Not surprising, it's just what you do.

I'm not trying to hide what I said. I know what I said and I know what I meant. I am 100% for anything that harms libs( you know, as a group), just like you are 100% for anything that harms pubs.

If you need a webster definition example the following is one where they use it: "the national interest … was gravely harmed by this attack"

This is exactly what I meant. Just replace national interest with libs. same context, actually.

I hear you loud and clear, you are 100% in favor of a Republican president abusing his power to corruptly destroy anyone on the left who pisses you off, no matter how outside the bounds of decency it is and no matter how bad of a precedent it sets for the future. Just fvck it all, destroy them while he can, consequences for the future be damned.

I will repeat, I have no desire to do anything to harm Republicans as a group, I'd much rather meet them in the middle so both sides get some of what they want. My ideal president would care just as much about your concerns as he cares about mine and he would do everything in his power to unite us. Enough with this ham-handed divisiveness from an immoral, egocentric asshole. Surely you've noticed, its not making this country a happy place.

 

[dpic73]

He fixated on one word even after I clearly stated it was not referring to actual people but, but the lib agenda. Ironically, he can be one of the more vulgar posters on the board. Me using the word harm should not even phase him. Particularly after I explained what I meant, even though I thought it was fairly obvious. Then you have tboon actually having the gall to critic one groups "decorum" while simultaneously using all the bolded descriptions and tell me to gfy.
Below are two recent posts by those on "your side" of this trump mess. I have yet to see you jump in and admonish or question them. I don't use any of that language, yet somehow you evidently think my language is the problem when theirs is much more egregious and must be perfectly ok. Does their language not bother you bc they largely agree with your viewpoint? What other explanation is there?

I cannot count how many times you've jumped into a thread over the years and immediately right at the jump called me stupid or an idiot, so I'm used to you being an inflammatory prick when you engage with me, which instantly sends my BP soaring. That's how I know you.

Maybe think about how you engage with people if you don't want the same treatment.

 

[CUT93]

I cannot count how many times you've jumped into a thread over the years and immediately right at the jump called me stupid or an idiot, so I'm used to you being an inflammatory prick when you engage with me, which instantly sends my BP soaring. That's how I know you.

Maybe think about how you engage with people if you don't want the same treatment.

I don't get offended. I don't really care what you say or how you say it bc you mean nothing to me and I don't value your opinion. You talking like a vulgar teenager (ironically, just like trump) does not phase me in the least. You do you.
My point was more to question why @yoshi121374 felt the need to address language I used while being seemingly unbothered by worse language being used by those who held the same political viewpoints.

 

[tboonpickens]

i always like when the dipshits try to equate random message board shitposting with the language a sitting president and various other elected officials use within the halls of DC when it comes to setting a climate of political violence 😂

hey geniuses...this just in...the leader of the free world has a different set of standards than you or me or anyone else on a sparsely attended Clemson message board.

 

[Dadar]

He fixated on one word even after I clearly stated it was not referring to actual people but, but the lib agenda. Ironically, he can be one of the more vulgar posters on the board. Me using the word harm should not even phase him. Particularly after I explained what I meant, even though I thought it was fairly obvious. Then you have tboon actually having the gall to critic one groups "decorum" while simultaneously using all the bolded descriptions and tell me to gfy.
Below are two recent posts by those on "your side" of this trump mess. I have yet to see you jump in and admonish or question them. I don't use any of that language, yet somehow you evidently think my language is the problem when theirs is much more egregious and must be perfectly ok. Does their language not bother you bc they largely agree with your viewpoint? What other explanation is there?

 

[CUT93]

View embedded media

Is there some reason you were replying to my post or do you just not understand how message boards work?

 

[tboonpickens]

 

[TigerGrowls]

 

[Dadar]

Gavin Newsom bringing the heat

 

[TigerGrowls]

Nokings had a lot of Trump supporters present. Sorry dpic.......not!!!

 

[dpic73]

Nokings had a lot of Trump supporters present. Sorry dpic.......not!!!

View embedded media

Eww scary, did the 10s of thousands of protestors run away when they saw those five guys?