MORON
rjohn, looks like you found one one of the flat-liners.....
MORON
I'll vote for her but take no joy in her victory. Anyone capable of surviving the GOP primary clown show and debate system will by definition believe some very stupid and dangerous things. Our government, economy and the world in general are all nuanced to the point a president must be able to see beyond the intellectually flat-lined dogma the far right professes.
Don't like her as a candidate. I've rarely voted Republican in my life, but if they present someone decent this year, I just may do it. Otherwise I may just sit this one out. Hilary is abrasive and shady, and I wonder about her ethics.
Read a book written by a Secret Service guy about different presidents he served under. They all liked Bubba as he would sit down and play cards with them and showed them respect. But Hilary was so condescending toward them it was sickening. Acted as if she was better than them, would walk right past them without even speaking, etc. I personally can't stand that type of person. Besides her attitude toward "the little guys", I just don't think she would be a good president.
By the way, the president that was most liked by the Secret Service guys was Bush '41. He and Barbara always showed respect toward those guys, asked about their families, would give them birthday gifts, etc. The one they liked least was Jimmy Carter. Treated them a lot like Hilary did.
pretty stupid post. Hillary Clinton has been a public figure for about 25 years, she's run for President before, etc. My strong opinions on the republican's are formed the same way i evaluate anyone i meet... usually in about 30 seconds i've decided if they are an idiot or someone worthwhile. I like Kasich, Biden, Christie, Paul, don't like Bush but would vote for him. Dislike Rubio, Walker, Cruz, Perry, & Trump.I am just curious how so many people have such a strong opinion on her and the Republican candidates so far. Has everyone been in Iowa and NH listening to them campaign? We haven't even had the first debate yet.
You can say that I know all I need to know about so and so, but this is politics, everybody puts on a different face according to their current office and tries to get to the next office with their actions. I want to wait and hear some of the candidate's ideas prior to making judgement on how they will handle the biggest office in the land. Then I am going to vote in my individual best interest. I don't have to make a decision for over a year. I am going to use that year to gather all of the information out there - what is the point in rushing to make a decision?
So, you didn't fully read the post or maybe I didn't explain well enough. If you are not changing your perception of yourself according to you roles and responsibilities, then you didn't get far enough to matter in politics/business/etc. She is running for president in 2016, her past experience is just experience - you still have to hold an interview. I have interviewed people that have applied for the same job 2 and 3 times and I hired a couple because on the second or third time they were finally ready and through different messaging (than their previous interviews) they illustrated they were ready. I also have interviewed people that I know will never be ready and I will never promote. The point is that you have to do your due diligence every time.pretty stupid post. Hillary Clinton has been a public figure for about 25 years, she's run for President before, etc. My strong opinions on the republican's are formed the same way i evaluate anyone i meet... usually in about 30 seconds i've decided if they are an idiot or someone worthwhile. I like Kasich, Biden, Christie, Paul, don't like Bush but would vote for him. Dislike Rubio, Walker, Cruz, Perry, & Trump.
i was out of line and over aggressive with my post, but when you are running for president your past 20 years is all 100% applicable to your current pitch. there is no amount of development or improvement that happens between the time someone is 52 and 72 that is going to prepare them.So, you didn't fully read the post or maybe I didn't explain well enough. If you are not changing your perception of yourself according to you roles and responsibilities, then you didn't get far enough to matter in politics/business/etc. She is running for president in 2016, her past experience is just experience - you still have to hold an interview. I have interviewed people that have applied for the same job 2 and 3 times and I hired a couple because on the second or third time they were finally ready and through different messaging (than their previous interviews) they illustrated they were ready. I also have interviewed people that I know will never be ready and I will never promote. The point is that you have to do your due diligence every time.
How many interviews have you been apart of that lasted 30 seconds? I understand this is hyperbole, but at the same time there is a real truth there. People vote for who they like/trust based on instinct. The problem is, what if their messaging and actions don't align with that feeling or go against your self-interest?
To this point nobody has been able to do their due diligence because the process hasn't played out enough yet. I may vote for somebody next year that I think is a waste of podium space this year....even Trump will get his interview.
For the beta males: "The RODham"?"The HillRod"
http://www.nationalreview.com/slideshows/cartoon-day#1For the beta males: "The RODham"?
For the bull dykes: "The Cliton"?