He's already approached the TI consortium for financing. What, you aren't in the group?Doesn't have financing. Wonder what his motives are.
He's already approached the TI consortium for financing. What, you aren't in the group?Doesn't have financing. Wonder what his motives are.
Yep. Elon playing chess.They wont have a choice after the price plummets. The Board will be under tons of pressure at that point. Watch and learn. Buy on the massive dip if they don't accept this offer.
If this actually happens, do you consider his takeover as good thing or bad thing?it's 100% hostile. The board doesn't want him controlling the company and has made that clear. Also, if he had approached the board with a soft bear hug letter or something like that, it almost assuredly would have come out
I agree. As a conservative, I sure hope that he's a savior, but I am also not holding my breath. At the very least, I get to watch left wingers lose their shit for a few days. Also, enjoying the parade of blue checks outing themselves proving that they hate dissenting opinion and live in an echo chamber.I see a hostile takeover in the works. Whatever he does, he's still going to be a capitalist and make money, he just has plenty of it to play with and can take a long view.
But, I don't know that I would say that Elon Musk is the savior here that conservatives may make him out to be.
It's by design. It's another thing that used to make you think you're in the minority.Twitter as a whole is a cancer and so out of touch with reality. It’s not real world. Basically a bunch of paid liberal bots.
Because they have a legal obligation to do so. Twitter is a publicly traded company, it's not like selling a car. Elon has Twitter by the balls, or at least he would if the libtards that ran it had any. But they're also too stupid to even realize it yet.If they don’t take this offer then why would they take the lower one? The stock will Recover.
Twitter will eventually be turned into a public utility with all the regulation that implies.I think it’s sad that we’ve gotten to a point that people think “free speech” is defined by who can post on a social media platform. Twitter (and FB) are private companies that can determine the bounds of who uses their platforms.
Not a single American has lost their right to free speech - just a bunch of ones that lost their megaphones because they violated the terms of a company’s policy. While I realize that reduces their audience, that is not by definition “free speech” as protected by the Constitution. The ones bitching about it the most, still make daily appearances on “news” programs that reach millions of viewers, and routinely speak out against our government. That is by definition free speech.
When your basis for disinformation is liberal factcheckers, everything from that point on is moot. See years of claiming Russia collusion was not disinformation and hunter biden laptop was fake/disinformation.Good thread
If I'm a shareholder? A tremendous thingIf this actually happens, do you consider his takeover as good thing or bad thing?
We won’t know until he defeats the joker.Dude is either a real life Bruce Wayne or a Bond Villain. Im not sure which but I love him.
They do not have a legal obligation to do so, you don't know what you're talking aboutBecause they have a legal obligation to do so. Twitter is a publicly traded company, it's not like selling a car. Elon has Twitter by the balls, or at least he would if the libtards that ran it had any. But they're also too stupid to even realize it yet.
This is going to be fascinating watching this play out.
So explain this to me. How is it you've been a member all this time, and this is the first time I've ever seen your username?Once again, they are not restricting speech, just access. Don’t confuse the two.
When Cris bans someone from TI, he didn’t take their speech, he exercised his right as the company owner to determine who posts on his platform.
So twitter will go on as is, and Musk just wants to make money?If I'm a shareholder? A tremendous thing
I think the whole "he is fighting for free speech" thing is completely overblown. He wants to make money
So explain this to me. How is it you've been a member all this time, and this is the first time I've ever seen your username?
He doesn't post a lot, but I've seen him around before.So explain this to me. How is it you've been a member all this time, and this is the first time I've ever seen your username?
So explain this to me. How is it you've been a member all this time, and this is the first time I've ever seen your username?
Ted Kaczynski warned about the power and control that technology would have over us all. Now I obviously do not agree with his bombing of people but he was correct in how much we have all become dependent upon technologyAll social media
TK looks like a prophet in retrospect, but ruined it all by becoming a terrorist. Is he still alive? I’m not even sure he realized the extent this has happened, and the way this movement would try and push the populous.Ted Kaczynski warned about the power and control that technology would have over us all. Now I obviously do not agree with his bombing of people but he was correct in how much we have all become dependent upon technology
Out at fact checkers. That guy wasted a shit load of time.Good thread
Can someone explain why the stock would plummet? Musk not buying Twitter or selling his shares (within a week of buying them) changes nothing about the fundamentals of Twitter’s business, it changes nothing in terms of their revenue or cash flow, it does nothing in terms of their daily users.Twitter as we know it now is done. If Musk walks away the stock will plummet to unheard of lows. Then he will begin buying on the cheap. They take his offer he cleans house. He will own Twitter, he will change the company for the better and get rid of all the marxists.
They will be regulated soon, even though they are a private company they squash any competition through buyouts or by their buddies at Google, ms, and Apple not giving competition a viable platform . These 4 ideologically aligned companies work together to make sure there is no real platform for any real competition to get a foothold. So Google and Twitter are now run by marxist Indians? Yea that’s about to end.
He was such a genius that he crossed that line. But yes his thoughts from then are now so easy to see.TK looks like a prophet in retrospect, but ruined it all by becoming a terrorist. Is he still alive? I’m not even sure he realized the extent this has happened, and the way this movement would try and push the populous.
Did you see their last earnings report? Bleeding subscribers, significantly lowered guidance. The stock has jumped 25-35% because Elon bought in. If he dumps the residual downward pressure will be compounded. Knowing Musk he may begin shorting the stock at that point., or aligning himself with other who will so he gets either a cheap price or the last laugh. Elon is giving shareholders the golden ticket, but to cash it huge changes will be implemented. Late today Twitter board floated the idea of maasssive dilution to dissuade Elon from a hostile takeover, but that destroys the share price, destroys it. In effect they will try to sell out their shareholders and screw themselves to preserve their anti free speech woke ideolog. When Musk finally has full control that place will be a mess to clean up, a complete gutting will happen.Can someone explain why the stock would plummet? Musk not buying Twitter or selling his shares (within a week of buying them) changes nothing about the fundamentals of Twitter’s business, it changes nothing in terms of their revenue or cash flow, it does nothing in terms of their daily users.
A sell off? A dip? Sure. But it’ll recover and probably fairly quickly. If the stock was worth buying before Musk bought his shares a few days ago then it will be worth buying if Musk sells.
He's already approached the TI consortium for financing. What, you aren't in the group?
Beautifully said.Pretty sure you're right that there's a bit of a meltdown. Twitter fears free speech. Musk embraces free speech and refused to censor the satellite over Ukraine from Russian messaging.
If your platform is unregulated by the FCC, then I agree with Musk's approach. Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and Instagram are unregulated because it is a platform exchange. When/if they selectively edit content, they pass from an agnostic social media exchange to more of a media content platform that should be regulated. Shouldn't be able to have it hoth ways.
I love free speech and have an intolerance for whiners who only embrace the concept if the messaging echos their own views and values.
I’m confused by this as well. Seems like wishful thinking to me. Although I do hope it’s true, I need help connecting some dots here.Can someone explain why the stock would plummet? Musk not buying Twitter or selling his shares (within a week of buying them) changes nothing about the fundamentals of Twitter’s business, it changes nothing in terms of their revenue or cash flow, it does nothing in terms of their daily users.
A sell off? A dip? Sure. But it’ll recover and probably fairly quickly. If the stock was worth buying before Musk bought his shares a few days ago then it will be worth buying if Musk sells.
Twitter as we know it now is done. If Musk walks away the stock will plummet to unheard of lows. Then he will begin buying on the cheap. They take his offer he cleans house. He will own Twitter, he will change the company for the better and get rid of all the marxists.
They will be regulated soon, even though they are a private company they squash any competition through buyouts or by their buddies at Google, ms, and Apple not giving competition a viable platform . These 4 ideologically aligned companies work together to make sure there is no real platform for any real competition to get a foothold. So Google and Twitter are now run by marxist Indians? Yea that’s about to end.
He’s not a “savior” to anyone but what he is doing is great if you believe in free speech. Once he owns it, I hope he fires every single one of those liberal lunatics there.I see a hostile takeover in the works. Whatever he does, he's still going to be a capitalist and make money, he just has plenty of it to play with and can take a long view.
But, I don't know that I would say that Elon Musk is the savior here that conservatives may make him out to be.
YikesI think it’s sad that we’ve gotten to a point that people think “free speech” is defined by who can post on a social media platform. Twitter (and FB) are private companies that can determine the bounds of who uses their platforms.
Not a single American has lost their right to free speech - just a bunch of ones that lost their megaphones because they violated the terms of a company’s policy. While I realize that reduces their audience, that is not by definition “free speech” as protected by the Constitution. The ones bitching about it the most, still make daily appearances on “news” programs that reach millions of viewers, and routinely speak out against our government. That is by definition free speech.
Least surprising thing ever is the “fact checkers are fake news bc they don’t align w the news I get from OAN, YouTube videos, and random substacks” responses to the data provided in that thread
There are quite a few tactics that are labeled as poison pills, and you mentioned one of them. The reason why they work as a defense to a hostile takeover, is because they damage the company, making it less attractive to the acqusitioner.yes. They likely have the "poison pill" or can enact it
Poison pill means existing shareholders (other than Musk) can buy 2 shares for every 1 that they own, which they would all do because it's half off. This would shift value back to existing shareholders and away from Musk. It's such a good defense mechanism that it almost never actually gets used, just the threat of it is enough
In order to successfully launch a hostile takeover now, you have to get control of the board
If they reject Musk's offer, and the stock tanks, which it will, the odds of a lawsuit against twitter are near 100%.They do not have a legal obligation to do so, you don't know what you're talking about
Look up Revlon Delaware 1986 case
That's not going to happen. Most people aren't going to try to prove to themselves that they are wrong.The "fact checkers" are just idealogues who promulgate their truth, not THE truth. It's fine if you're too ignorant to see that. I don't get news from any of those sources. Do a little research on the folks who comprise the fact checking teams and you'll understand how biased and unreliable they are.
Since it's required now a days, I've been an independent for decades.
I think it’s sad that we’ve gotten to a point that people think “free speech” is defined by who can post on a social media platform. Twitter (and FB) are private companies that can determine the bounds of who uses their platforms.
Not a single American has lost their right to free speech - just a bunch of ones that lost their megaphones because they violated the terms of a company’s policy. While I realize that reduces their audience, that is not by definition “free speech” as protected by the Constitution. The ones bitching about it the most, still make daily appearances on “news” programs that reach millions of viewers, and routinely speak out against our government. That is by definition free speech.