That’s good! I’d rather hear that it helped more people . Maybe it’s still too early.I should’ve said “middle class tax cut hoax”. It was a great corporate tax cut.
I’m not a corporation and it’s great for me too.
That’s good! I’d rather hear that it helped more people . Maybe it’s still too early.I should’ve said “middle class tax cut hoax”. It was a great corporate tax cut.
I’m not a corporation and it’s great for me too.
I’m saying people got peanuts on the front end to provide cover for what was really a corporate tax cut. And they sound like they are finding out that they are paying for it on the back end. Time will tell if that’s the case. Seems like we blew up the deficit for Corp stock buy backs.
I guess I’m saying it sounds like the effective rate for the majority of folks did not decrease. Or if it did , it was minimal and used to pacify people while congress passed a major Corporate tax cut that the American people will pay for. I don’t claim to be a tax expert , if I’m wrong , I’ll listen.I’m saying people got peanuts on the front end to provide cover for what was really a corporate tax cut. And they sound like they are finding out that they are paying for it on the back end. Time will tell if that’s the case. Seems like we blew up the deficit for Corp stock buy backs.
I don’t understand what you are saying. Either that or I don’t think you know how income taxes work
Who cares? It was only crumbs. Right?I’ll say it, Maga folks sounding real sensitive about this post. Could they just now be realizing the tax cut hoax ?
I guess I’m saying it sounds like the effective rate for the majority of folks did not decrease. Or if it did , it was minimal and used to pacify people while congress passed a major Corporate tax cut that the American people will pay for. I don’t claim to be a tax expert , if I’m wrong , I’ll listen.
I guess I’m saying it sounds like the effective rate for the majority of folks did not decrease. Or if it did , it was minimal and used to pacify people while congress passed a major Corporate tax cut that the American people will pay for. I don’t claim to be a tax expert , if I’m wrong , I’ll listen.
No they eliminated those deductions entirely. Unless you qualify by being a government employee...
You guys make fair points. It’s probably too early to know the answer and the disconnect could be that people aren’t thinking about their effective tax rate. I do think it was a mistake to legislate large corporate tax cuts that were largely used for buy backs. I’m a republican, I just thought we were more worried about the deficit.I guess I’m saying it sounds like the effective rate for the majority of folks did not decrease. Or if it did , it was minimal and used to pacify people while congress passed a major Corporate tax cut that the American people will pay for. I don’t claim to be a tax expert , if I’m wrong , I’ll listen.
I’m really not sure either. Ive only seen a few people talk about their effective tax rate in this thread. I thought the majority of taxpayers would see their effective tax rate decrease (the numbers will show it either way). I Support a lower Corp tax rate and simplified code. The USA had one of the highest corp tax rates in the world. Glad we had some common sense. I didn’t vote for Trump
Could be the case .I guess I’m saying it sounds like the effective rate for the majority of folks did not decrease. Or if it did , it was minimal and used to pacify people while congress passed a major Corporate tax cut that the American people will pay for. I don’t claim to be a tax expert , if I’m wrong , I’ll listen.
The effective rate decreased for the vast majority of people who pay taxes. Hard for it to decrease “much” for people paying no taxes or people already paying very low rates. We’re seeing some people complain about lower refunds, but they generally do not understand how taxes work. They probably saw higher take home during the year or some other factor impacted their return.
The effective rate decreased for the vast majority of people who pay taxes. Hard for it to decrease “much” for people paying no taxes or people already paying very low rates. We’re seeing some people complain about lower refunds, but they generally do not understand how taxes work. They probably saw higher take home during the year or some other factor impacted their return.
24k is much smaller than what I was able to write off last year and they took away many deductionsI thought the standard deduction doubled, so the items you listed are still deductible, but only relevant if the sum of itemized deductions is greater than the standard deduction.
The last two lines are, unfortunately, 100% true.The effective rate decreased for the vast majority of people who pay taxes. Hard for it to decrease “much” for people paying no taxes or people already paying very low rates. We’re seeing some people complain about lower refunds, but they generally do not understand how taxes work. They probably saw higher take home during the year or some other factor impacted their return.
Curious if you have seen the polls, even the fox news poll, that says the big majority of people now want a tax increase on the rich? With the large portion now in favor, assuming it holds, I think that will be a way the country gets infrastructure renewal - tax the rich. I speaking of the next administration, of course. I also find it funny hearing all the GOPs no longer caring about the deficit. They gave Obama hell every time he raised the debt ceiling and now it is crickets.
Curious if you have seen the polls, even the fox news poll, that says the big majority of people now want a tax increase on the rich? With the large portion now in favor, assuming it holds, I think that will be a way the country gets infrastructure renewal - tax the rich. I speaking of the next administration, of course. I also find it funny hearing all the GOPs no longer caring about the deficit. They gave Obama hell every time he raised the debt ceiling and now it is crickets.
Curious if you have seen the polls, even the fox news poll, that says the big majority of people now want a tax increase on the rich? With the large portion now in favor, assuming it holds, I think that will be a way the country gets infrastructure renewal - tax the rich. I speaking of the next administration, of course. I also find it funny hearing all the GOPs no longer caring about the deficit. They gave Obama hell every time he raised the debt ceiling and now it is crickets.
Don't worry bro
For ****s sakes dude. Just tell us how much you make a year! Youve been hinting about it for 5 years. Let me give you a hint. Nobody ****ing cares[/QUOTE
But he has a boat and lives in Charleston.
I should’ve said “middle class tax cut hoax”. It was a great corporate tax cut.
You can still claim it for state deduction but not federal unless you are militatry, a teacher or a disaster relief industry.The disallowance of those deductions must be more narrowly defined now. I was still able to deduct mileage, but I’m not in sales.
Please report back. My wife and I both went up in income, but the few friends I talked to had no changes in income, made around $10 more each pay period (bi-monthly), and their refund was significantly less.I’m curious for sure. My salary didn’t change from previous year and I haven’t noticed a difference in my direct deposit take home amounts. So we’ll see about the tax outcome when we do those soon.
define richCurious if you have seen the polls, even the fox news poll, that says the big majority of people now want a tax increase on the rich? With the large portion now in favor, assuming it holds, I think that will be a way the country gets infrastructure renewal - tax the rich. I speaking of the next administration, of course. I also find it funny hearing all the GOPs no longer caring about the deficit. They gave Obama hell every time he raised the debt ceiling and now it is crickets.
What percent did you effective tax rate increase?
This would be the concern. The scenario with your friends.Please report back. My wife and I both went up in income, but the few friends I talked to had no changes in income, made around $10 more each pay period (bi-monthly), and their refund was significantly less.I’m curious for sure. My salary didn’t change from previous year and I haven’t noticed a difference in my direct deposit take home amounts. So we’ll see about the tax outcome when we do those soon.
Though I am not one of them, the "majority" did get a tax cut. But the bottom line is that many American's are now saying that it was so insignificant that they hardly noticed the $8 increase they saw in their pay check over the course of the year. They are realizing that in exchange for the significant impact in deficit spending and trillions passed to the wealthiest and corporate CEOs, they got something that didnt even noticebly impact their lives. It was not worth it. It was a bad deal for America and will get worse.The effective rate decreased for the vast majority of people who pay taxes. Hard for it to decrease “much” for people paying no taxes or people already paying very low rates. We’re seeing some people complain about lower refunds, but they generally do not understand how taxes work. They probably saw higher take home during the year or some other factor impacted their return.
And I agree with your point on the deficit. I’ve posted many suggestions on here before about ways to address. It’s unfortunate that neither side is willing to seriously address our spending problem.
@FLaw47 @1Clemzunfan and others. Thought of this while sitting at the Hampton inn waiting for my two year old to wake up...
If the deficit is roughly $1B and there are $325M people in the US, everyone could contribute an extra $3 and close the gap. That’s three American dollars. 12 quarters. The cost of a cup of coffee.
Seems easy enough to add a $5 flat fee to all Americans’ tax bill, regardless or age, income, whatever. Family of four pays $20.
All of a sudden we are running a $600M surplus and we can pay down the debt. Everyone pitches in. Problem solved.
Add in some of the cost containment ideas ITT and we’re reallly in business.
What am I missing?
I don’t like a tax increase, but will happily pay $15 per year for my family of 3 to solve the problem.
You suggested that all we needed to do is charge every American an extra $3 (three dollars) and the budget deficit issues would be solved. You even offered to throw in an extra $15 a year for your family to create a budget surplus...
3% effective tax rate increase
Most people don’t get their taxes exactly right because you would have to change every year with new laws. But I will agree to disagree if you think most people rich or poor would rather be even than get something back.I disagree, you shouldnt want a refund or want to pay either (smart people rich or poor).
I guess people without self control would want a refund
Most people don’t get their taxes exactly right because you would have to change every year with new laws. But I will agree to disagree if you think most people rich or poor would rather be even than get something back.
You were insulting others in this thread for not understanding basic taxes and throwing shade on people for making less and paying less than you. I think you are better than that, no? My post was just a reminder to you that none of us is all knowing with all of the answers. Nothing more.Already admitted the math error. Was on my phone. You’re better than that.
Well I’m sure the Dems want an an increase on the rich. Dems want socialism. They want to bring everyone down. Funny, you say the GOP doesn’t care about the deficit. Kind of like the Dems care about spending and don’t won’t to fund the wall. Dems have never met a spending package they didn’t like.Curious if you have seen the polls, even the fox news poll, that says the big majority of people now want a tax increase on the rich? With the large portion now in favor, assuming it holds, I think that will be a way the country gets infrastructure renewal - tax the rich. I speaking of the next administration, of course. I also find it funny hearing all the GOPs no longer caring about the deficit. They gave Obama hell every time he raised the debt ceiling and now it is crickets.
You were insulting others in this thread for not understanding basic taxes and throwing shade on people for making less and paying less than you. I think you are better than that, no? My post was just a reminder to you that none of us is all knowing with all of the answers. Nothing more.
Or a mountain of non-reimbursed work expenses to write off, like I have.LOL SO POOR
I may not be the smartest person on the board but for the life of me I don’t think I could figure out how to break even. I don’t mind paying taxes at all but unless you pay quarterly it’s hard to know how to break even.I said most smart people rich or poor. You don’t get something back. It was always yours and you just gave an interest free loan
I may not be the smartest person on the board but for the life of me I don’t think I could figure out how to break even. I don’t mind paying taxes at all but unless you pay quarterly it’s hard to know how to break even.
If I calculated $3 as all it took from everyone to balance the budget, I would instantly redo the math. I wouldn't be typing out a thesis for elimination of the debt using that number because I would instantly know it was nowhere close.Lol. Comparing an iPhone math error because the calculator doesn’t accomodate the required number to people complaining about taxes who legitimately don’t contribute their “fair share”...
If I calculated $3 being all it took from everyone to balance the budget, I would instantly redo the math. I wouldn't be typing out a thesis for elimination of the debt using that number because I would instantly know it was nowhere close.
It would be like going to buy a new car and the salesman tells you the car will cost twenty and you pulling out a $20 bill from your wallet without a clue and asking for the keys.
You went all in on the idea that our debt problem could be solved with only $3 a person without giving that number a second thought. That's not just a math error, it's called no concept of what kind of numbers and debt problem we're dealing with to begin with.
Meanwhile you chastise hard working people in this thread, who you assume "don't pay their fair share", for being ignorant as to how taxes work. Again, not trying to be a dick here. Just pointing out the irony.
You can still claim it for state deduction but not federal unless you are militatry, a teacher or a disaster relief industry.
That's my understanding I could certainly be wrong.
I’m saying people got peanuts on the front end to provide cover for what was really a corporate tax cut. And they sound like they are finding out that they are paying for it on the back end. Time will tell if that’s the case. Seems like we blew up the deficit for Corp stock buy backs.
I could still claim mileage and the home office, and Im not any of those you listed
The lower tax on pass thru really helped me this year as well
Looking at the year by year comparison- we made slightly more last year AND taxes went down
Tax cuts were good for our specific situation