OT: Who is/are the "Fake Media"?
- Thread starter clemsonu0219
- Start date
They're all so biased now, it seems they are all fake to some extent.
Are you talking sports? If so, fanboys.
Have you read their predictions and recruiting analysis
Plenty of Fake News along with Noise Networks
Screaming out loud incorrect information and failing to do due diligence is the problem
The main networks I actually turn to and watch when I want to be doing the guilty pleasure thing as the
I think I am watching CCTV of an INSANE ASYLUM LOL
SCREAMING AND LYING OF MANY OF THE NETWORKS IS SHOCKING
Screaming out loud incorrect information and failing to do due diligence is the problem
The main networks I actually turn to and watch when I want to be doing the guilty pleasure thing as the
I think I am watching CCTV of an INSANE ASYLUM LOL
SCREAMING AND LYING OF MANY OF THE NETWORKS IS SHOCKING
I see your point here...
However the answer to your specific question is No.
Which would then bring me back to the OP...it (FGF) is essentially "Fake"...which means I wouldn't ever pay any attention to what they do.
Its probably why you are a member of Ti my friend.
The answer is any news that sheds Trump in a bad light even while reporting the truth. At least according to the man himself.
"Fake News" is the new "Echo Chamber". Its a subjective term that is correlated to political leanings. PEW has probably done the most work on its demography and impact, but there is a Stanford study that categorized the spread of news stories that were actually fake and tried to gage their impact.
These 3 @$$wipes report fake news daily
Used to be that fake news was FW: FW: FW: emails that were easily debunked by cursory research.
Now, it's pretty much anything that goes against the narrative you want to push.
Now, it's pretty much anything that goes against the narrative you want to push.
Anything thats not fox news... and especially CNN and ESPN
Last edited:
This is just the same ploy Trump has utilized all his life. Say something enough, the public will believe it. Doesn't matter if it's true or not.
You must not be on Facebook. There you will find the "fake media" in droves. Most of it seems to come from conservative bloggers. They will say almost anything to get a click on their blog,- true or not. And many conservatives read this stuff, and off it goes into the net. They never bother to check to see if it is true because it agrees with what they already think anyway. There are liberal bloggers who do the same thing, but the ratio must be 100 to 1. I do not believe that major media outlets, TV, newspapers, major magazines, etc, are "fake." Some may be slanted though.
CNN headline the other day..."Trump gets 2 scoops of ice cream, everyone else 1"
I shit you not
I shit you not
Because all news media has some level of power or influence, they all will put their spin on a news event to further their influence. As such, no one has a 100% fully truthful reporting of news events. So, to get toward the truth, you have to hear all sides of the story, much like a judge in a courtroom.
CNN also said Trump gave the staff water while he had a coke... lol that network is a chit stain on society
No. I'm not on Facebook. Am I missing out on this extravaganza of pejorative linguistic rhetoric?
FIFY ^^^
CNN, NYTimes, Washington Post, MSNBC, are some of the worst offenders.
Seriously though, you can generally read an article and the title is just an opinion, normally created with clear bias, or interpretation of the facts. We all need to read for the real facts, not supposition.
N---
Damn ya'll weren't kidding..haha
That is absurd....the news has become unbearable along with our recent candidates for the Presidency.
I'm the best at explaining things. No one explains things better than I do. Believe me.
That was not a breaking news "headline". It was a banner recap. As they are interviewing people for anything, they post small recap snipets of what is being said by the interviewee in the banner as the interview progresses.
A group of press were allowed back in the private dining room and they were talking about what they saw. Time Magazine had a very detailed and very interesting recap. They were just discussing the scene.
I imagine the people making it into something that it wasn't, pulled that banner quote and the narrative off of Facebook or some alt right blog as if CNN was blasting the President for having 2 scoops of ice cream. Not so.
During the interview I saw, the CNN reporter said, "Trump is the President of the USA and if he wants 2 scoops he is entitled to two scoops". It was just a light hearted discussion. No big deal was made about it. They were just providing a behind the scene glimpse into the life of the President. It was just an observation from the Time Magazine reporter that wrote the story.
This is an example of how a false narrative gets generated.
You forgot the biggest and most slanted offender FOX News.
I believe Fox "News" first reported that Comey had resigned from the FBI
Next time, tag me. You should know how since you're a mod. There article is still up if you'd like to read it:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/trump-time-magazine-ice-cream/
Btw, like I've said on here before, I voted for Johnson so please don't stereotype me into a role because I think CNN is as full of shit as FoxNews is.
remember when hannity went on a five minute rant because obama asked for dijon mustard on a burger
That may be what happens when you offer ridiculous takes and opinions constantly blasting one side of the aisle and seemingly make it your goals and ambition to get a President fairly elected impeached.
Similar threads
