ADVERTISEMENT

Our Healthcare in this country is an absolute

It's gonna get way worse.

In the mid 90's, physicians discovered that they were "health care professionals". A few years later, they were "health care providers". Most recently, they are now "teammates".

Many great docs are parachuting out as fast as they financially can, with way lowered lifestyle expectations, just to get out of this sh$# show.

Your healthcare in the future is gonna consist of interaction with PA's, NP,s, and computers. There are some positives with this. Some negatives, however, when you're sick enough to be hospitalized, or somebody has to hold a scalpel over your abdomen.
You are exactly right. I will be a PA in the near future and primary care physicians are going away. The future will be midlevels as a gateway to specialists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnhugh
We can all thank the recently deceased overly venerated, John McCain for that. He campaigned on replacing for 7 years and the night before, changed his mind.
If the clown in the White House hadn't insulted him he might have gotten his vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mauitiger#1
While I see what you are saying IF McCain did not vote because he got his feelings hurt then that shows exactly the type of person McCain was. Putting your personal feelings above the betterment of the people that voted you in.

How does ending someone's health insurance, who is sick, without any replacement "better" them?

If you listen to what McCain, who was dying of an illness, said at the time, I think his vote was predicted on the lack of any viable alternative being part of the repeal legislation.
 
While I see what you are saying IF McCain did not vote because he got his feelings hurt then that shows exactly the type of person McCain was. Putting your personal feelings above the betterment of the people that voted you in.
Murkowski and Collins, both GOP, voted against it as well so it isn't all on McCain
 
  • Like
Reactions: mauitiger#1
It's gonna get way worse.

In the mid 90's, physicians discovered that they were "health care professionals". A few years later, they were "health care providers". Most recently, they are now "teammates".

Many great docs are parachuting out as fast as they financially can, with way lowered lifestyle expectations, just to get out of this sh$# show.

Your healthcare in the future is gonna consist of interaction with PA's, NP,s, and computers. There are some positives with this. Some negatives, however, when you're sick enough to be hospitalized, or somebody has to hold a scalpel over your abdomen.

012154 is spot on.......Over my career our once honorable healing profession has devolved into a for-profit business enterprise run by corporate suits instead of mom and pop private practitioners. While not perfect it beats where we’re headed. Clearly a case of “the cure” being worse than “the disease”. The worst is yet to come.
 
I've been dealing with blood clots in my lungs for 2 years. I get the feeling that the bottom line is way more important than my health.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dackel
While I agree with your first point 100%, Obamacare actual limits what health insurance companies can make/profit. Part of the law says that if insurance companies don’t spend 85% of premiums on claims payment, then they must rebate the excess back to the members of the insurance policy. Very few industries in America have profit caps imposed on them by federal law. Not saying this makes insurance companies the victim, but the entire health care system is currently a mess. And it is on a unsustainable path for the end users.

Yep, and for 3 years in a row I got a "rebate" of my premium because my BC/BS provider didn't spend at least the 85% on claims (I think it's actually 80%)....so guess what? They raised my premiums a little more than my rebate the next month. Government doesn't understand how business works.
 
I had a close family member have to get Obamacare. She had numerous health issues and was getting older but she still worked a part time job. Her pre-Obamacare insurance was seemingly expensive at the time...450 a month, 1000 deductible but it covered most of her issues (lupus, chronic arthritis, two knee surgeries). Along came Obama and government to the rescue.

Her BEST option under the AFCA raised her monthly premium to 800 and the deductible was 5000. Yes, FIVE THOUSAND. Not only that, her doctor didn't accept her new insurance, so no, she couldn't keep her doctor of 20 years. Her arthritis med copay went from 10 bucks to 78.

But what about subsidies? Most people qualify for subsidies because Obama and government are looking out for the people. Well, she did qualify for a subsidy. So maybe it all balances out, right? Wrong...the subsidy counts towards your income and you have to pay income taxes on it. She hasn't received a tax refund since Obamacare.

So f**k Obamacare.
F**k Obama.
And f**k these lousy politicians.

And while we're at it, f**k Trump and his tariffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dackel
Murkowski and Collins, both GOP, voted against it as well so it isn't all on McCain

That's true, but they never were against it all that much. McCain made a big deal about repealing it for 8 years. The night before the vote, the votes were there to repeal it. McCain changed his stated intentions the next day.
 
That's true, but they never were against it all that much. McCain made a big deal about repealing it for 8 years. The night before the vote, the votes were there to repeal it. McCain changed his stated intentions the next day.
No matter how you rationalize it, they were against it enough to vote against it.
 
No matter how you rationalize it, they were against it enough to vote against it.

One last time...The point is not who was or wasn't for it or against it. The original thought was why it didn't get voted down. At midnight, the night before the vote, McCain was going to vote to repeal. At midnight, McConnell had the votes to repeal. The next morning, the ONLY VOTE that was different than at midnight, was McCain's vote.
 
That's true, but they never were against it all that much. McCain made a big deal about repealing it for 8 years. The night before the vote, the votes were there to repeal it. McCain changed his stated intentions the next day.
I believe McCain changed his vote only to stick it to Trump. He did not do it for citizens.
 
The more the government involvement, the higher the costs & the worse the product.
Always.

There is no clearer example than public schools vs private schools vs homeschools.
Public schools are the HIGHEST COST.
But standardized testing has the LOWEST scores.
Homeschooling has the LOWEST cost and the HIGHEST scores.

Medical is exactly thd same.

When I was a kid in the 60s and 70s, our family doctor only had ONE other person in the office; his wife, who was both nurse and receptionist.
A doctor visit was maybe $15 or so.
He made housecalls.
You got excellent, personalized service.
If you didn't have $15, you paid what you could, and paid the rest as you could.

Now,
-The price is $140 or so
-4 or 5 women, receptionist, fighting for $ from insurance companies plus nurses
- NO house calls

Decades of government regulation, insurance, and litigation worries; and there are those who want MORE government, MORE insurance???

They must be INSANE !!!

Look, the knowledge and technology of today are far better, no doubt.
EVERYTHING else is FAR worse!!!
We need to remove virtually every new regulation, totally limit litigation, and severely limit insurance!!!
Give us back the low cost, excellent customer service of 50 years ago !!!
 
I had a close family member have to get Obamacare. She had numerous health issues and was getting older but she still worked a part time job. Her pre-Obamacare insurance was seemingly expensive at the time...450 a month, 1000 deductible but it covered most of her issues (lupus, chronic arthritis, two knee surgeries). Along came Obama and government to the rescue.

Her BEST option under the AFCA raised her monthly premium to 800 and the deductible was 5000. Yes, FIVE THOUSAND. Not only that, her doctor didn't accept her new insurance, so no, she couldn't keep her doctor of 20 years. Her arthritis med copay went from 10 bucks to 78.

But what about subsidies? Most people qualify for subsidies because Obama and government are looking out for the people. Well, she did qualify for a subsidy. So maybe it all balances out, right? Wrong...the subsidy counts towards your income and you have to pay income taxes on it. She hasn't received a tax refund since Obamacare.

So f**k Obamacare.
F**k Obama.
And f**k these lousy politicians.

And while we're at it, f**k Trump and his tariffs.
The original Obamacare let you keep your doctor and lowered costs until GOP politicians got in and made sure to cover their insurance company lobbying friends
 
  • Like
Reactions: IMBlessed
Her BEST option under the AFCA raised her monthly premium to 800 and the deductible was 5000. Yes, FIVE THOUSAND. Not only that, her doctor didn't accept her new insurance, so no, she couldn't keep her doctor of 20 years. Her arthritis med copay went from 10 bucks to 78.

But what about subsidies? Most people qualify for subsidies because Obama and government are looking out for the people. Well, she did qualify for a subsidy. So maybe it all balances out, right? Wrong...the subsidy counts towards your income and you have to pay income taxes on it. She hasn't received a tax refund since Obamacare.

So f**k Obamacare.
F**k Obama.
And f**k these lousy politicians.

And while we're at it, f**k Trump and his tariffs.

I'm sorry your family member didn't find a plan she liked, but that's not true. Simply put, an Obamacare subsidy is not taxable income.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IMBlessed
Did anybody actually figure out what the OP is talking about before going on their rant?
 
The notion that our system of health care is only broken because of Obamacare is patently absurd .

Even Obamacare allows the insurance industry to run roughshod over our country.
Costs have essentially doubled since Barry's pet was approved an d care has never been worse.
 
Costs have essentially doubled since Barry's pet was approved an d care has never been worse.

healthcare spending/costs have essentially doubled every 10 years since the 1970s, its not Obamacare's fault.

https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...-spending-healthcare-changed-time/#item-start

I dont get the sense you are interested in objective discussion here though...

EDIT: there are even multiple charts in there that suggest that Obamacare might have slowed that growth.

Namely the per capita charts.

And, oh look, obamacare got administrative costs under control too.
 
The more the government involvement, the higher the costs & the worse the product.
Always.

There is no clearer example than public schools vs private schools vs homeschools.
Public schools are the HIGHEST COST.
But standardized testing has the LOWEST scores.
Homeschooling has the LOWEST cost and the HIGHEST scores.

Medical is exactly thd same.

When I was a kid in the 60s and 70s, our family doctor only had ONE other person in the office; his wife, who was both nurse and receptionist.
A doctor visit was maybe $15 or so.
He made housecalls.
You got excellent, personalized service.
If you didn't have $15, you paid what you could, and paid the rest as you could.

Now,
-The price is $140 or so
-4 or 5 women, receptionist, fighting for $ from insurance companies plus nurses
- NO house calls

Decades of government regulation, insurance, and litigation worries; and there are those who want MORE government, MORE insurance???

They must be INSANE !!!

Look, the knowledge and technology of today are far better, no doubt.
EVERYTHING else is FAR worse!!!
We need to remove virtually every new regulation, totally limit litigation, and severely limit insurance!!!
Give us back the low cost, excellent customer service of 50 years ago !!!

you know what I think is insane? Thinking that healthcare should be the same today as it was in the 1960s...
 
$1400 per year at my work just for being in the normal BMI range, in shape and not smoking.

agree with wellness incentives. asking that people remain within BMI "norms" is patently ridiculous. Better not lift any weights then...
 
BMI is pretty accurate.

lots of literature out there on BMI being inaccurate for weightlifters and athletes. at 5'9" 220 in high school with about 22% body fat I was in the "obese" category.

even ignoring the literature, a simple measure that only takes into account height and weight is obviously too simplistic.

EDIT:
Travis Etienne - 5' 10 201 = "overweight".
Austin Bryant - 6' 6" 280 = "obese"
Kendall Joseph - 6' 0" 236 = "Obese"
Tavien Feaster - 5' 11" 216 = "Obese"

you get the point
 
Last edited:
lots of literature out there on BMI being inaccurate for weightlifters and athletes. at 5'9" 220 in high school with about 22% body fat I was in the "obese" category.

even ignoring the literature, a simple measure that only takes into account height and weight is obviously too simplistic.

EDIT:
Travis Etienne - 5' 10 201 = "overweight".
Austin Bryant - 6' 6" 280 = "obese"
Kendall Joseph - 6' 0" 236 = "Obese"
Tavien Feaster - 5' 11" 216 = "Obese"

you get the point

22% BF? Dam. Get well soon.
 
Luckily the military killed him or Obama would’ve commuted his sentence
Military couldn't did it without Obama reversing Bush's decision and reallocating intelligence resources. President's dictate intelligence priorities (NIPF)...the military just follows the intelligence...Bush was more focused on Iraq...under Obama the AFPAK surge placed more emphasis on Afghanistan and Pakistan....where was OBL found?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT