ADVERTISEMENT

Police in Memphis that beat black man to death are acquitted…

For some color on how and why I comment on things: My expertise is in sociology, ontology, and humanism. I will sometimes comment on economic stuff, but I don't have expertise there unless it depends on the other areas of study I mentioned (which it effects them, but I don't really know theory there, so I mostly sit them out).

My undergrad is in Political Science from Clemson University, but wouldn't call myself an expert in Politics either. I have a Masters from a conservative institution as well.

I'm sure you would still like for me to be blown up in a car, so you do you boo boo.

Hope this helps!
I’m not picking on you but this makes sense. Some of the positions you hold are elitist. How much practical, boots on the ground experience do you have in everyday life with these issues? Like personal experience where you’ve seen something like you’re describing. My sociology professors had great intentions but not so great ideas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I’m not picking on you but this makes sense. Some of the positions you hold are elitist. How much practical, boots on the ground experience do you have in everyday life with these issues? Like personal experience where you’ve seen something like you’re describing. My sociology professors had great intentions but not so great ideas.
Again, no need to post my creds(tho I posted my degree lol) or my profession or where I worked in those areas. But yes I worked intimately with poc for the entirety of my career before I switched to a different one a few years ago.
 
Again, no need to post my creds(tho I posted my degree lol) or my profession or where I worked in those areas. But yes I worked intimately with poc for the entirety of my career before I switched to a different one a few years ago.
Yes sir I understand that. I don’t mean in your professional life. I’m referring to an actual experience(s) in your life. Someone with your credentials is most likely dealing with the extremes of these situations. That will naturally skew the lens you look through. You’re a human and capable of bias.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Explain to me how lower and middle class whites contribute to the wealth disparity of lower and middle class blacks. Your war is with the rich, not the whites.
Oh you mean the glass ceiling that middle class black people face that white people don’t near as much?

The numbers are against your argument and there are more anecdotal evidence compared to your minute life experience.
 
Yes sir I understand that. I don’t mean in your professional life. I’m referring to an actual experience(s) in your life. Someone with your credentials is most likely dealing with the extremes of these situations. That will naturally skew the lens you look through. You’re a human and capable of bias.
I keep telling you it feels gross to do this and I won't- I promise I cover all the basis you're worried about, and the majority of my interaction with the community has been on a personal basis, though I have professional expertise as well.

But people of color are not objects to me and I won't objectify them, so I won't comment on it anymore. You're asking me to pull the "I have black friends" card because you have, and you work in athletics with them. Happy for ya there and I'm not negating your lived experience, but I just don't go there. It's objectifying imo, but no offense- we just have different ways of viewing this, which is fine with me. I'm not trying to change your mind, just offering a different viewpoint.

As I've said, you do you homie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheValley91
I keep telling you it feels gross to do this and I won't- I promise I cover all the basis you're worried about, and the majority of my interaction with the community has been on a personal basis, though I have professional expertise as well.

But people of color are not objects to me and I won't objectify them, so I won't comment on it anymore. You're asking me to pull the "I have black friends" card because you have, and you work in athletics with them. Happy for ya there and I'm not negating your lived experience, but I just don't go there. It's objectifying imo, but no offense- we just have different ways of viewing this, which is fine with me. I'm not trying to change your mind, just offering a different viewpoint.

As I've said, you do you homie.
Sounds good. I’m getting a little confused as to how real life experience is objectifying but I’m most likely a dumb poor white guy. I prefer to work on bringing all people up as opposed to lowering some people’s standards, that’s how’s athletics work. Frankly to do otherwise would be frowned upon in the sports I’m involved in. Unfortunately academia and social work do not. I’m ok with agreeing to disagree. I hope you understand that differing perspectives and experiences don’t make me a racist or a trumper. That way of treating people has benefited the most people for the most good in my life and it’s selfish not to share. I believe in equality.

Edit: to be clear I did not pull the black friends card. I clarified an accusation that I was speaking from a dogmatic position, when pressed further I gave specific relevant examples. That was not for a score board but for relevance to my personal experience.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tigres88
Oh you mean the glass ceiling that middle class black people face that white people don’t near as much?

The numbers are against your argument and there are more anecdotal evidence compared to your minute life experience.
Feel free to provide these examples of “glass ceilings” that whites don’t experience and make a case. I’m unaware of this data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Feel free to provide these examples of “glass ceilings” that whites don’t experience and make a case. I’m unaware of this data.
That’s not my job to do. Actually go online and research the data that is out there instead of going off your anecdotal experiences.

You started this thread btw. Actually make an effort to know what you are trying to talk about.
 
That’s not my job to do. Actually go online and research the data that is out there instead of going off your anecdotal experiences.

You started this thread btw. Actually make an effort to know what you are trying to talk about.
Yikes, not sure what the OP has to do with white poors holding the black man down but ok. Maybe read the post before popping off.
 
It has a problem with white people. Regardless of age or wealth.
I agree with you. I wonder if he has a problem with the fact that most professional athletes in America are poc. The NBA is 80% black. It’s always interesting to me to watch them fight for poc’s in spaces but not whites. Somehow if an industry or profession is dominated by poc it is fine, if an industry doesn’t have a proper mix however that industry or profession is racist. Furthermore that industry needs people like this guy to white knight them and rescue the marginalized group (their perspective). There’s just no consistency with these folks. Then they wonder why they can’t win an election or get consensus on their position. It’s because the left is obsessed with being in charge of choosing the winners and losers. They are obsessed with class warfare and racial politics. They are obsessed with the oppressor/oppresed model, that’s what CRT is. This line of thinking isn’t conducive for a society that is attempting to bring diverse cultures together for a commons goal. It’s so strange all these guys with degrees can’t seem to wrap their head around common sense. Their current model is to advocate for one group by tearing down another. And when that group has decided it’s not right, they’re now called racists, when in fact it’s self preservation. Oh well, like one of these guys said I’m just a poor, dumb white guy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I bet the positions by some posters itt on South Africa and that current regime and their actions are pretty fun to read.
 
This is literally the point though- you're so close but so far. People of color, specifically black people, have never been treated the same (and of course many minorities as well). From slavery, to jim crow, to many laws in general, they haven't been treated the same, and have been prejudiced by the American society, legislative, judicial and penal systems. They still aren't treated the same and the effects of those above things that set people of color far far back is still rampant.

Once again, these things have been litigated for so very long, and your rhetoric almost makes me wonder if you've ever considered a different viewpoint or just started commenting on these issues. The reason there is so much outcry from progressives is that conservatives have historically disagreed there is any issue, that black people (and other minorities) either are treated the same as everyone else, so they need to put up and shut up, or simply that they SHOULDN'T be treated equally. Which, to your point, is racism.
I have been thinking about this, whats the academia answer to the following question:

If poc as you state have NEVER been treated fairly in America (I would assume you mean white countries as well) why are pocs leaving countries with: majority population poc, leaders and government poc to come to America and Britain? If it’s so racist and unfair why are people willing to die to hop on a jon boat across the ocean? If it’s so racist here how’d the majority of all government benefits end up in the hands of poc? They’re not the majority but the get the majority of those free programs. I’m struggling to see this like you do. If I believed that another group hated me and wanted me to fail I’d stay away from them, not relocate my entire family to their backyard. Finally. Asians are poc too. Why don’t they seem to have these same issues at similar scale? They were put in internment camps less than 80 years ago. Much more relevant to today than say slavery. What’s the leftist perspective here? Hispanics are poc yet they voted in record numbers for hitler. What’s your answer to that?
 
Last edited:
I have been thinking about this, whats the academia answer to the following question:

If poc as you state have NEVER been treated fairly in America (I would assume you mean white countries as well) why are pocs leaving countries with: majority population poc, leaders and government poc to come to America and Britain? If it’s so racist and unfair why are people willing to die to hop on a jon boat across the ocean? If it’s so racist here how’d the majority of all government benefits end up in the hands of poc? They’re not the majority but the get the majority of those free programs. I’m struggling to see this like you do. If I believed that another group hated me and wanted me to fail I’d stay away from them, not relocate my entire family to their backyard. Finally. Asians are poc too. Why don’t they seem to have these same issues at similar scale? They were put in internment camps less than 80 years ago. Much more relevant to today than say slavery. What’s the leftist perspective here? Hispanics are poc yet they voted in record numbers for hitler. What’s your answer to that?
No, for the most part I'm talking about the states. Racism, oppression, issues, etc. abound other places, but they aren't really as much of interest to me, nor do I know much about it.

But to speak to your questions, the answer is not an easy one, and certainly one you don't want to hear- the answer is that its complicated and nuanced, and doesn't fit into tweets. And that's ok.

There's a difference between black people whose ancestors were brought over in slave galleys, whose ancestors were slave labor, whose parents and grandparents suffered from systemic injustice like segregation and Jim Crow (which only really ended recently), and other minorities or people who are immigrating here. When you start a few laps behind the rest of those you're running against, its ok imo to get some boosts.

There's a difference between a historically catholic and conservative population like latinos who align more with conservative ideology.

There's a difference between immigrants of color who want to come here, who didn't face that systemic injustice for hundreds of years here who decide to come to the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave to find new opportunity without the trauma of centuries of oppression in the place they are relocating to.

It's not binary. It's complicated. And I hear you about the oppressed vs. oppressor duality the left coopted. The term for that is actually not CRT (though CRT is based similarly), but rather intersectionality. Which I find problematic too- as well as identity politics. Its all flawed, but sometime these terms are helpful to understand nuance. And that's important to function in society as diverse as ours.

For being the group of people in America who have now coopted the "open minded" moniker, MAGA really doesn't like nuance. MAGA good, dems go to jail. Conservative good, Libs are evil. etc. (And ftr I critiqued just a few posts ago the way the Left did similarly the past 15 years).

Anyways, nuance is good. Life is complex. But these are people we are talking about- not ideas. And it shouldn't be scary if difference and diversity abounds; it should be what makes America great.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride
No, for the most part I'm talking about the states. Racism, oppression, issues, etc. abound other places, but they aren't really as much of interest to me, nor do I know much about it.

But to speak to your questions, the answer is not an easy one, and certainly one you don't want to hear- the answer is that its complicated and nuanced, and doesn't fit into tweets. And that's ok.

There's a difference between black people whose ancestors were brought over in slave galleys, whose ancestors were slave labor, whose parents and grandparents suffered from systemic injustice like segregation and Jim Crow (which only really ended recently), and other minorities or people who are immigrating here. When you start a few laps behind the rest of those you're running against, its ok imo to get some boosts.

There's a difference between a historically catholic and conservative population like latinos who align more with conservative ideology.

There's a difference between immigrants of color who want to come here, who didn't face that systemic injustice for hundreds of years here who decide to come to the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave to find new opportunity without the trauma of centuries of oppression in the place they are relocating to.

It's not binary. It's complicated. And I hear you about the oppressed vs. oppressor duality the left coopted. The term for that is actually not CRT (though CRT is based similarly), but rather intersectionality. Which I find problematic too- as well as identity politics. Its all flawed, but sometime these terms are helpful to understand nuance. And that's important to function in society as diverse as ours.

For being the group of people in America who have now coopted the "open minded" moniker, MAGA really doesn't like nuance. MAGA good, dems go to jail. Conservative good, Libs are evil. etc. (And ftr I critiqued just a few posts ago the way the Left did similarly the past 15 years).

Anyways, nuance is good. Life is complex. But these are people we are talking about- not ideas. And it shouldn't be scary if difference and diversity abounds; it should be what makes America great.
What’s your thoughts on this quick video? I think this is a fair and reasonable assessment of the current climate from black people themselves. They’re doing a much better job of verbalizing what this thread was initially started for. We need respect, responsibility and accountability evenly applied across the board regardless of race. It begs a great question though, how much does personal behavior factor in to this? It seems you’re excusing universally agreed upon bad personal behavior because of trauma from 200 years ago.
 
Last edited:
No, for the most part I'm talking about the states. Racism, oppression, issues, etc. abound other places, but they aren't really as much of interest to me, nor do I know much about it.

But to speak to your questions, the answer is not an easy one, and certainly one you don't want to hear- the answer is that its complicated and nuanced, and doesn't fit into tweets. And that's ok.

There's a difference between black people whose ancestors were brought over in slave galleys, whose ancestors were slave labor, whose parents and grandparents suffered from systemic injustice like segregation and Jim Crow (which only really ended recently), and other minorities or people who are immigrating here. When you start a few laps behind the rest of those you're running against, its ok imo to get some boosts.

There's a difference between a historically catholic and conservative population like latinos who align more with conservative ideology.

There's a difference between immigrants of color who want to come here, who didn't face that systemic injustice for hundreds of years here who decide to come to the Land of the Free, and the Home of the Brave to find new opportunity without the trauma of centuries of oppression in the place they are relocating to.

It's not binary. It's complicated. And I hear you about the oppressed vs. oppressor duality the left coopted. The term for that is actually not CRT (though CRT is based similarly), but rather intersectionality. Which I find problematic too- as well as identity politics. Its all flawed, but sometime these terms are helpful to understand nuance. And that's important to function in society as diverse as ours.

For being the group of people in America who have now coopted the "open minded" moniker, MAGA really doesn't like nuance. MAGA good, dems go to jail. Conservative good, Libs are evil. etc. (And ftr I critiqued just a few posts ago the way the Left did similarly the past 15 years).

Anyways, nuance is good. Life is complex. But these are people we are talking about- not ideas. And it shouldn't be scary if difference and diversity abounds; it should be what makes America great.
My thoughts on this are there’s a lack of a father or strong male influence in a lot of these instances. I think the government took the place of fathers in the black communities and this has been detrimental. You have aggressive young men being raised by hyper sensitive women that are triggered at the drop of a hat. Their children are seeing and amplifying that behavior. You also see virtually no accountability in those communities. A great example would be the school systems of Chicago Detroit and Baltimore. It was reported last month that less than 10% of the black HS students in Chicago were literate. It’s 2025, this is the greatest, wealthiest nation in the world and we have entire communities that cannot read and write at an elementary school level. Why has that community allowed the lack of accountability to degrade the lives of their very own children. These are their communities lead by their chosen leaders.
 
My thoughts on this are there’s a lack of a father or strong male influence in a lot of these instances. I think the government took the place of fathers in the black communities and this has been detrimental. You have aggressive young men being raised by hyper sensitive women that are triggered at the drop of a hat. Their children are seeing and amplifying that behavior. You also see virtually no accountability in those communities. A great example would be the school systems of Chicago Detroit and Baltimore. It was reported last month that less than 10% of the black HS students in Chicago were literate. It’s 2025, this is the greatest, wealthiest nation in the world and we have entire communities that cannot read and write at an elementary school level. Why has that community allowed the lack of accountability to degrade the lives of their very own children. These are their communities lead by their chosen leaders.
Again, this is a racist argument- You are essentially saying its inherent in black culture to not have black men as strong fathers. The implication is that white fathers are better and more present. If there are outlying factors as to why there aren't strong male influences in black culture, there must be a reason, if its not based on race or culture. If we treat all the same, what are the outlying factors?

It seems like you are saying "its the government" giving hand outs and "replacing men as father figures." But that's just lazy and untrue. That the government giving "handouts" and not holding these black communities to "accountability" is the reason there aren't "strong male influences or father figures" in the black community, is ultimately simply discrediting men in general. Unless, you potentially think black men are less than white men?

Idk man just seems like you're recounting talking points you've heard in the south since you were a kid, and maybe, just maybe, there are other factors that are holding those communities back.
 
Last edited:
Again, this is a racist argument- You are essentially saying its inherent in black culture to not have black men as strong fathers. The implication is that white fathers are better and more present. If there are outlying factors as to why there aren't strong male influences in black culture, there must be a reason, if its not based on race or culture. If we treat all the same, what are the outlying factors?

It seems like you are saying "its the government" giving hand outs and "replacing men as father figures." But that's just lazy and untrue. That the government giving "handouts" and not holding these black communities to "accountability" is the reason there aren't "strong male influences or father figures" in the black community, is ultimately simply discrediting men in general. Unless, you potentially think black men are less than white men?

Idk man just seems like you're recounting talking points you've heard in the south since you were a kid, and maybe, just maybe, there are other factors that are holding those communities back.
I’m not making any racist arguments, I’m telling you facts. White males are clearly more present. I gave my opinion on why, you said it was because of slavery. I guess we are at an impasse.

Black children are more likely to live in fatherless households compared to other racial groups in the US. In 2022, about 43% of Black children lived in two-parent households, while about 79% of White children lived in two-parent households, according to Statista. The difference in two-parent households is also significant when considering married parents, with 38% of Black children living in such households compared to 75% of White children, also according to Statista.
 
Again, this is a racist argument- You are essentially saying its inherent in black culture to not have black men as strong fathers. The implication is that white fathers are better and more present. If there are outlying factors as to why there aren't strong male influences in black culture, there must be a reason, if its not based on race or culture. If we treat all the same, what are the outlying factors?

It seems like you are saying "its the government" giving hand outs and "replacing men as father figures." But that's just lazy and untrue. That the government giving "handouts" and not holding these black communities to "accountability" is the reason there aren't "strong male influences or father figures" in the black community, is ultimately simply discrediting men in general. Unless, you potentially think black men are less than white men?

Idk man just seems like you're recounting talking points you've heard in the south since you were a kid, and maybe, just maybe, there are other factors that are holding those communities back.
Damn racist facts.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:
 
Again, this is a racist argument- You are essentially saying its inherent in black culture to not have black men as strong fathers. The implication is that white fathers are better and more present. If there are outlying factors as to why there aren't strong male influences in black culture, there must be a reason, if its not based on race or culture. If we treat all the same, what are the outlying factors?

It seems like you are saying "its the government" giving hand outs and "replacing men as father figures." But that's just lazy and untrue. That the government giving "handouts" and not holding these black communities to "accountability" is the reason there aren't "strong male influences or father figures" in the black community, is ultimately simply discrediting men in general. Unless, you potentially think black men are less than white men?

Idk man just seems like you're recounting talking points you've heard in the south since you were a kid, and maybe, just maybe, there are other factors that are holding those communities back.
Older racist facts from 2012:
  • 57.6% of black children, 31.2% of Hispanic children, and 20.7% of white children are living absent their biological fathers.
    Source: Family Structure and Children’s Living Arrangements 2012. Current Population Report. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.
Here’s more:

  • White children born in the 1950-1954 period spent only 8% of their childhood with just one parent; black children spent 22%. Of those born in 1980, by one estimate, white children can be expected to spend 31% of their childhood years with one parent, and black children 59%.
    Source: Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.
 
I’m not making any racist arguments, I’m telling you facts. White males are clearly more present. I gave my opinion on why, you said it was because of slavery. I guess we are at an impasse.

Black children are more likely to live in fatherless households compared to other racial groups in the US. In 2022, about 43% of Black children lived in two-parent households, while about 79% of White children lived in two-parent households, according to Statista. The difference in two-parent households is also significant when considering married parents, with 38% of Black children living in such households compared to 75% of White children, also according to Statista.
I'm not saying the data is wrong- I'm merely questioning what are the factors that got these communities there and the reason for the discrepancy. That's our massive gap, and I've offered my studied opinion, and you've offered yours.

I guess we are at an impasse.
In my defense, I did say this a few times a few pages ago, as I knew we'd end up here. Ultimately I think your argument ends on the black community being inferior, and you think your argument ends on government overreach and coddling.

These arguments have been happening for decades homie, I have long lost hope we can find common ground.
 
I'm not saying the data is wrong- I'm merely questioning what are the factors that got these communities there and the reason for the discrepancy. That's our massive gap, and I've offered my studied opinion, and you've offered yours.


In my defense, I did say this a few times a few pages ago, as I knew we'd end up here. Ultimately I think your argument ends on the black community being inferior, and you think your argument ends on government overreach and coddling.

These arguments have been happening for decades homie, I have long lost hope we can find common ground.
I could find 1000 videos of black people saying exactly what I’m saying right now. Are they wrong too? Do your studies outweigh their experiences? I literally posted one.
 
Older racist facts from 2012:
  • 57.6% of black children, 31.2% of Hispanic children, and 20.7% of white children are living absent their biological fathers.
    Source: Family Structure and Children’s Living Arrangements 2012. Current Population Report. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.
Here’s more:

  • White children born in the 1950-1954 period spent only 8% of their childhood with just one parent; black children spent 22%. Of those born in 1980, by one estimate, white children can be expected to spend 31% of their childhood years with one parent, and black children 59%.
    Source: Popenoe, David. Life Without Father (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996), 23.
Separating them by race is DEI so you should be using a combined percentage for all races since we are a colorblind society and we don't want to suggest that one group is better than another, because then whites might get priority in hiring or something like that.
 
I could find 1000 videos of black people saying exactly what I’m saying right now. Are they wrong too? Do your studies outweigh their experiences? I literally posted one.
We could all pick and choose anecdotal evidence. If that won the day, the democrats would've won this election according to the internet hive mind.

Ask those black men in those 1,000 videos if they are inferior to white men as fathers and potential to be leaders in their communities or their families. If they say they are, that's inherent racism. If you say they are, that's racism. Clear as day.

The debate should be that there is a myriad of factors that lead to the data you posted earlier. Hopefully, and I do hope, that its simply those factors that we disagree on. That's my only point.
 
We could all pick and choose anecdotal evidence. If that won the day, the democrats would've won this election according to the internet hive mind.

Ask those black men in those 1,000 videos if they are inferior to white men as fathers and potential to be leaders in their communities or their families. If they say they are, that's inherent racism. If you say they are, that's racism. Clear as day.

The debate should be that there is a myriad of factors that lead to the data you posted earlier. Hopefully, and I do hope, that it’s simply those factors that we disagree on. That's my only point.
Wtf is this? Why do they have to think they’re inferior to white people to have an opinion that fatherless homes are impacting their communities? Are you serious with that. What do white people have to do with that? It’s black men talking about other black men in the black community and you think the question should be are they inferior to whites? This is complete nonsense and I hope you received scholarships for your studies, if you’re in debt from that horse shit you should be embarrassed.
 
Wtf is this? Why do they have to think they’re inferior to white people to have an opinion that fatherless homes are impacting their communities? Are you serious with that. What do white people have to do with that? It’s black men talking about other black men in the black community and you think the question should be are they inferior to whites? This is complete nonsense and I hope you received scholarships for your studies, if you’re in debt from that horse shit you should be embarrassed.
I think you missed my point completely. No worries.

Have a good night big dog!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT