This post contains what I consider to be some helpful must-read links for those of you that are too lazy or dumb to use your Google machines and learn more about the proposed House v NCAA settlement, revenue sharing, and NIL. If anyone has additional links they find helpful then I may add them to this post. Feel free to ask questions but keep in mind that any follow-up questions that are clearly answered within these links will be met with derision. And remember, there are no stupid questions - only stupid people asking them.
NCAA Proposed Settlement Receives Preliminary Approval - A fantastic piece from a law firm in Boston that summarizes the proposed settlement, details next steps, and raises questions in regard to unsettled matters.
Graham Neff's November 2024 Letter
Frequently Asked Questions from Clemson - Linked within Graham Neff's letter, this is a FAQ page around NIL, revenue sharing, and the House settlement and how all of that impacts Clemson.
Supreme Court Ruling from 2021 - A summary of the landmark ruling from SCOTUS in mid-2021 that effectively ruled that the NCAA was not exempt from antitrust laws, thereby opening the door for the NCAA to settle each of the three pending cases. Take note of what this ruling pertains to - "educationally-linked benefits", i.e. not total compensation paid to an athlete.
With NCAA Revenue Sharing Emerges a New Antitrust Challenge - From Sports Illustrated, this article touches on anti-trust concerns arising from the House settlement.
NCAA Proposed Settlement Receives Preliminary Approval - A fantastic piece from a law firm in Boston that summarizes the proposed settlement, details next steps, and raises questions in regard to unsettled matters.
Graham Neff's November 2024 Letter
Frequently Asked Questions from Clemson - Linked within Graham Neff's letter, this is a FAQ page around NIL, revenue sharing, and the House settlement and how all of that impacts Clemson.
Supreme Court Ruling from 2021 - A summary of the landmark ruling from SCOTUS in mid-2021 that effectively ruled that the NCAA was not exempt from antitrust laws, thereby opening the door for the NCAA to settle each of the three pending cases. Take note of what this ruling pertains to - "educationally-linked benefits", i.e. not total compensation paid to an athlete.
With NCAA Revenue Sharing Emerges a New Antitrust Challenge - From Sports Illustrated, this article touches on anti-trust concerns arising from the House settlement.
Last edited:
