You are damn right I’m going to whataboutism.
I didn't try to put him in jail. He did crimes and got convicted of them. What the literal **** does that have to do with me personally you absolute weirdo goon?
Pretty laughable read of the situation, but you do you TG.
There’s probably 5 posts on this board with that insinuated verbiage. Literally verbatim saying stuff like that tweet. Right here on this stupid board. How’s it laughable? Are you saying that it’s laughable that liberals are whining about actual real asylum seekers from SA because if so I’ll agree. But I don’t think that’s what you’re doing here.
Plenty of people are fleeing to the US from violence and oppression in South America. Republicans just don’t seem to care about them. They do seem to give a shit about these white farmers, though.
Can you share someone on this board being PRO-MS-13? Not pro due process and making sure they actually aren't here legally and are criminals prior to deporting. But pro-MS-13? Because the argument that tweet is making just isn't a thing.
If you’re not going to agree they need to be vetted then we will never agree.
Possibly, I’m just asking for a specific example of one that’s comparable to the 50 genocide race fueled hate videos from SA. Just one. Libs don’t give a shit about real persecution because of race. Open the door for 10 million unvetted but slam it on 60 people that actually have an asylum claim.
My issue has always been there hasn't been vetting. So not sure where you're getting that.
Okay. The below is based on data collected between 1 October 2024 and 31 January 2025 across nine countries in Latin America: Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
Okay. The below is based on data collected between 1 October 2024 and 31 January 2025 across nine countries in Latin America: Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, and Venezuela.
The quantitative data includes survey results from over 20 locations within these countries, encompassing 3,611 households and representing 11,172 people in total. The qualitative data is derived from 138 key informant interviews, focus groups and direct observation reports. The data was collected by NRC, the Danish Refugee Council (DRC), Encuentros SJM, Alianza Vencer and Corporación Colectiva Justicia Mujer.
None of that is relevant. Why can’t you guys just say, hey an entire stadium full of people screaming to execute all the white people is wrong. A government promoting that in its version of congress is wrong. You can’t even do something so basic as to recognize this as what it is, pure hatred. Instead you are trying to pivot to a completely unrelated issue of why? Who cares why trumps doing anything. This is wrong. Full stop. I can’t take you guys seriously bc you are not consistent. I can’t imagine the outrage if this was a video of a soccer stadium full of white people in Germany screaming to execute the browns. You promote hate.
No I don’t. I have no problem with giving them asylum. It’s obvious they qualify. This is a very specific example. To try and relate this to 10-15 million unvetted people is dumb.
It literally is the same for many of those who have been deported.
I'm not sure how many times we've illustrated the bolded is inaccurate, but your continued insistence to peddle in misinformation to try and make a point makes it seem like you don't have any interest in good faith discussions.
I’ll just use millions from now on. The fact that you’ll take data from our government as gospel troubles me. We know they lie about everything. There’s zero benefit to the previous administration to inflate the numbers and they are coming up with 6-8 million. Again it’s semantics to dismiss my point.
Wrong. These people are apparently going through the steps to make this happen albeit possibly with some help. The folks flooding the border illegally and wreaking havoc all over the country are not. Just do it the right way. Same rules for everyone. I would be pissed if there was a government in Central America was attempting to genocide an entire race and we didn’t step in. That’s what we should be doing.
Its clearly wrong. No one disputes that.
Sheep, who forgot how to think for yourself…you realize your attention is the commodity that’s being bought and sold?
That's what you believe. The bill would have allowed 5,000 extra illegals per day before the gates were shut.
Just piss poor governing from Democrats.
NO you wouldn't. Right now they're only going after the worst of the worst, and your party doesn't want that either. They're fighting against in tooth, and nail.
But like, I would though. I am not against deporting illegals through the legal process to remove them. Been pretty consistent about that. I know it's easier to argue against the most extreme position of the opposing party though.
You've proven to be moderate in your views (I'll give you that), but the party you support is not.
