Correction. They are coming for your job.
I dont know the laws of Arizona, but even in "Stand your Ground" states, you cant just shoot someone on your propertyAmericans being denied right to self defense against illegal aliens!
73-Year-Old Arizona Rancher Charged with First-Degree Murder For Fatally Shooting Illegal Alien on His Property - Held on $1 Million Bond | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila
Kino Springs, AZ – A 73-year-old Arizona rancher was arrested and charged with first-degree murder for fatally shooting a Mexican migrant (likely an illegal alien) on his ranch.www.thegatewaypundit.com
There was no weapon found on or near the victim, whose body was discovered 100 to 150 yards from Kelly’s home with one visible gunshot wound, he said.
We will see some more details I am sure.I dont know the laws of Arizona, but even in "Stand your Ground" states, you cant just shoot someone on your property
This sentence right here
Guy was 100+ yards from the home soooooo "castle doctrine" wouldnt apply, and there was no weapon found near the "victim"? Sooooo how is that self defense?
I found this. Will post the entire article below.I dont know the laws of Arizona, but even in "Stand your Ground" states, you cant just shoot someone on your property
This sentence right here
Guy was 100+ yards from the home soooooo "castle doctrine" wouldnt apply, and there was no weapon found near the "victim"? Sooooo how is that self defense?
Lazy journalism, or purposefully vague journalism by the GWP.I found this. Will post the entire article below.
Under Arizona law, a property owner can use deadly force if he or she believes it “immediately necessary” to prevent trespassing, according to the Mail. Arizona also has “stand your ground” laws that allow homeowners to use deadly force.
13-407. Justification; use of physical force in defense of premises
A. A person or his agent in lawful possession or control of premises is justified in threatening to use deadly physical force or in threatening or using physical force against another when and to the extent that a reasonable person would believe it immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of a criminal trespass by the other person in or upon the premises.
B. A person may use deadly physical force under subsection A only in the defense of himself or third persons as described in sections 13-405 and 13-406.
C. In this section, "premises" means any real property and any structure, movable or immovable, permanent or temporary, adapted for both human residence and lodging whether occupied or not.
13-405. Justification; use of deadly physical force
A. A person is justified in threatening or using deadly physical force against another:
1. If such person would be justified in threatening or using physical force against the other under section 13-404, and
2. When and to the degree a reasonable person would believe that deadly physical force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use of unlawful deadly physical force.
B. A person has no duty to retreat before threatening or using deadly physical force pursuant to this section if the person is in a place where the person may legally be and is not engaged in an unlawful act.
More info.Lazy journalism, or purposefully vague journalism by the GWP.
Below is the "law" that the GWP references
section 13-405 is the stand your ground law
The question really comes down to what were the circumstances of these two interaction? Did the victim attack the old man? or did the old man, just shoot the guy for being on his property? and that we do not know .... and I dont think we will ever know. I dont think there are other witnesses, so forensic evidence will be incredibly important. Position of the old man (shooter) relative to the victim? Where was he shot? chest? back? .... going to be an expensive case to try with no witnesses and what is the probability of conviction? I would assume that the "jury" here will be made up of mostly other ranchers and people from that jurisdiction? I dunno .... Im babbling now
Points are
- No, you cant just shoot somebody on your property in Arizona
- If youre seeking asylum or seeking entrance into the US, do it through a legal point of entry.
but I agree
- a property owner has every right to defend themselves on their property if they are being attacked.
- a million dollar bond on a 73 year old, who doesnt appear to have a criminal record, under these circumstances, is utterly ridiculous and shameful
The report by Times reporter Hannah Dreier is gut-wrenching. Excerpts via Yahoo:We are on pace to encounter more individuals on the southwest border than we have in the last 20 years. We are expelling most single adults and families. We are not expelling unaccompanied children.
…We are encountering many unaccompanied children at our southwest border every day. A child who is under the age of 18 and not accompanied by their parent or legal guardian is considered under the law to be an unaccompanied child. We are encountering six- and seven-year-old children, for example, arriving at our border without an adult. They are vulnerable children and we have ended the prior administration’s practice of expelling them.
…I came to this country as an infant, brought by parents who understood the hope and promise of America. Today, young children are arriving at our border with that same hope. We can do this.
This is a long, detailed report. Please read the rest of it at Yahoo and pass it on to Biden voters.….These workers are part of a new economy of exploitation: Migrant children, who have been coming into the United States without their parents in record numbers, are ending up in some of the most punishing jobs in the country, a New York Times investigation found. This shadow workforce extends across industries in every state, flouting child labor laws that have been in place for nearly a century. Twelve-year-old roofers in Florida and Tennessee. Underage slaughterhouse workers in Delaware, Mississippi and North Carolina. Children sawing planks of wood on overnight shifts in South Dakota.
Largely from Central America, the children are driven by economic desperation that was worsened by the pandemic. This labor force has been slowly growing for almost a decade, but it has exploded since 2021, while the systems meant to protect children have broken down.
…The number of unaccompanied minors entering the United States climbed to a high of 130,000 last year — three times what it was five years earlier — and this summer is expected to bring another wave.
…While HHS checks on all minors by calling them a month after they begin living with their sponsors, data obtained by the Times showed that over the past two years, the agency could not reach more than 85,000 children. Overall, the agency lost immediate contact with one-third of migrant children.
…Adolescents are twice as likely as adults to be seriously injured at work, yet recently arrived preteens and teenagers are running industrial dough mixers, driving massive earthmovers and burning their hands on hot tar as they lay down roofing shingles, the Times found.
Unaccompanied minors have had their legs torn off in factories and their spines shattered on construction sites, but most of these injuries go uncounted. The Labor Department tracks the deaths of foreign-born child workers but no longer makes them public. Reviewing state and federal safety records and public reports, the Times found a dozen cases of young migrant workers killed since 2017, the last year the Labor Department reported any.
The deaths include a 14-year-old food delivery worker who was hit by a car while on his bike at a New York City intersection; a 16-year-old who was crushed under a 35-ton tractor-scraper outside Atlanta; and a 15-year-old who fell 50 feet from a roof in Alabama where he was laying down shingles.
That's a lot of future voters who will need government assistance to make ends meet. Wonder who they will vote for someday.
They'll be voting for their leaders in Central America, that's who.That's a lot of future voters who will need government assistance to make ends meet. Wonder who they will vote for someday.
That's a lot of future voters who will need government assistance to make ends meet. Wonder who they will vote for someday.
Oh noes, I bet he skeert. I would be. I thought y'all were anti-drag queen?Mayorkas is violating his oath of office.
Not a big deal at all according to the loony brainwashed dem supporters. This is tragic. We are at war now.
I do know that and it has no bearing on my statement. We will never stop all drugs short of a biblical level reversal on the way drugs are policed, but everything that was getting over during the Trump term has been increased 20 fold in the Biden term imo.You do know that these two people overdosed during trump’s term right?
I do know that and it has no bearing on my statement. We will never stop all drugs short of a biblical level reversal on the way drugs are policed, but everything that was getting over during the Trump term has been increased 20 fold in the Biden term imo.
I do know that and it has no bearing on my statement. We will never stop all drugs short of a biblical level reversal on the way drugs are policed, but everything that was getting over during the Trump term has been increased 20 fold in the Biden term imo.