It's all made up piglet. You can stop now.The claim , so far, is that Tim Walztook a 14 year old boy to the indigo girls concert and then took him home, had sex with said 14 year old, and spent the night.
Specific dates, specific claims, with specific details. Much more than E Jean Carrol and I’m surprised this is nor getting more attention because all accusers must be believed according to democrats.
I actually believe this story.
My bet is that Harris Walz are forced to address it, we will see.
More drops this afternoon
The claim , so far, is that Tim Walztook a 14 year old boy to the indigo girls concert and then took him home, had sex with said 14 year old, and spent the night.
Specific dates, specific claims, with specific details. Much more than E Jean Carrol and I’m surprised this is nor getting more attention because all accusers must be believed according to democrats.
I actually believe this story.
My bet is that Harris Walz are forced to address it, we will see.
More drops this afternoon
No. If you are following along, he is adamant the emails are legit and he even took video's of the emails as proof.
No. If you are following along, he is adamant the emails are legit and he even took video's of the emails as proof.
One question is: Does Tim Walz have a scar on his chest?
If he does NOT have a scar on his chest then the story will be quickly put to rest. Otherwise, we will await more details.
But again, there is MORE evidence here than the lady who won $450mm. We have actual dates and actual times, of the accusations. And, according to democrats rules, we must believe all accusers.
So, i think we should wait patiently. More will drop this afternoon.
Wrong, E. Jean Carroll was a real person who used the court to adjudicate her claims and a jury of his peers found him guilty. She did not reach out to a random, anonymous clown on the internet to make her claim. Same clown that made up the ABC whistleblower, who they still haven't produced.No. If you are following along, he is adamant the emails are legit and he even took video's of the emails as proof.
One question is: Does Tim Walz have a scar on his chest?
If he does NOT have a scar on his chest then the story will be quickly put to rest. Otherwise, we will await more details.
But again, there is MORE evidence here than the lady who won $450mm. We have actual dates and actual times, of the accusations. And, according to democrats rules, we must believe all accusers.
So, i think we should wait patiently. More will drop this afternoon.
Some very specific claims here and the guy said he is seeking counsel. So it may yet reach the light of a courtroom.You are comparing evidence that was adjudicated in a court of law to evidence that is being presented on twitter from an anonymous source sharing it through another anonymous source. Even someone as dishonest as you has to see the difference, no?
No. If you are following along, he is adamant the emails are legit and he even took video's of the emails as proof.
One question is: Does Tim Walz have a scar on his chest?
If he does NOT have a scar on his chest then the story will be quickly put to rest. Otherwise, we will await more details.
But again, there is MORE evidence here than the lady who won $450mm. We have actual dates and actual times, of the accusations. And, according to democrats rules, we must believe all accusers.
So, i think we should wait patiently. More will drop this afternoon.
I thought it was democrat policy to believe all accusers?All I know is if I had a life altering pedo encounter as a teen and wanted to finally reveal my deepest secret to the world, after careful consideration, I’d find a highly credible social media user like black insurrectionist as my outlet.
Maybe he should reveal himself so that he's not anonymous and it would be more believable.I thought it was democrat policy to believe all accusers?
Also, what do you make of the physical descriptions like chest scar and thigh tattoo?
I thought it was democrat policy to believe all accusers?
Also, what do you make of the physical descriptions like chest scar and thigh tattoo?
I haven’t followed it closely, so I don’t make anything of it. It will either get verified or it won’t.
So we believe all accusers, except for when they implicate democrats. Got it.Just like the fake ABC executive who swore Kamala was given the debate questions in advance, no real person will ever come forward here.
But the magas will still believe it.
Do most accusers stay anonymous and only reach out to random maga clowns on the interwebz who have made false accusations before and even admit they make up shit sometimes? Can we believe any and everything said about Trump on the internet? If so, why isn't he in solitary confinement for life?So we believe all accusers, except for when they implicate democrats. Got it.
OK - I will remove the headline pending further information.Do most accusers stay anonymous and only reach out to random maga clowns on the interwebz who have made false accusations before and even admit they make up shit sometimes? Can we believe any and everything said about Trump on the internet? If so, why isn't he in solitary confinement for life?