ADVERTISEMENT

Texas Politics

“Christian Nationalists”

K

200.gif
 
They’re trying to turn the US into a Christian theocracy…

But okay, I guess ignorance is bliss

Edit: it’s also not a “bullshit label.” https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/sh...it-raises-concerns-about-threats-to-democracy
These jackals are no different than those CAIR assholes.

Stop being so frickin alarmed by EVERYTHING! Just because some fringe ahole has some fringe idea doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. Not everything is a “threat to democracy”.
 
These jackals are no different than those CAIR assholes.

Stop being so frickin alarmed by EVERYTHING! Just because some fringe ahole has some fringe idea doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. Not everything is a “threat to democracy”.
lol? I posted an article about how 2 hyper evangelical billionaires have put the entire Texas political sphere in a stranglehold and they’re branching out to other states. They’re pushing out anyone conservative or liberal that doesn’t kowtow to their will. It also is something that quite literally affects me in Houston, so there’s that.

You’d know all that if you read the article instead of boohooing because it said “Christian nationalist.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
These jackals are no different than those CAIR assholes.

Stop being so frickin alarmed by EVERYTHING! Just because some fringe ahole has some fringe idea doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. Not everything is a “threat to democracy”.
I will also note that I feel that you’ve been around long enough to know that WAP isn’t running around being alarmed by everything
 
  • Like
Reactions: WapPride and dpic73
lol? I posted an article about how 2 hyper evangelical billionaires have put the entire Texas political sphere in a stranglehold and they’re branching out to other states. They’re pushing out anyone conservative or liberal that doesn’t kowtow to their will. It also is something that quite literally affects me in Houston, so there’s that.

You’d know all that if you read the article instead of boohooing because it said “Christian nationalist.”
Cool, well good luck with that.
 
lol? I posted an article about how 2 hyper evangelical billionaires have put the entire Texas political sphere in a stranglehold and they’re branching out to other states. They’re pushing out anyone conservative or liberal that doesn’t kowtow to their will. It also is something that quite literally affects me in Houston, so there’s that.

You’d know all that if you read the article instead of boohooing because it said “Christian nationalist.”
How does this jive with your positions on Unions.

They are essentially a two man union, no?
 
How does this jive with your positions on Unions.

They are essentially a two man union, no?
Jibe* - personal pet peeve of mine!

I don't really think that's an apples to apples comparison, but I'll answer the best I can. Unions, provide a collective service to their party members by fighting to make sure they're paid commiserate with what they perceive to be their market value. I don't agree that they should be allowed to donate large swaths of money to any party or candidate, but I believe that about any collective unit - churches, corporations, etc. These two gentlemen are trying to fundamentally change a key tenet of the US - the separation of church and state. I vehemently oppose any attempts at trying to blur those lines and incorporate religious doctrine/beliefs/dogma into the state apparatus.

If the Union leaders came out saying they want to do the exact thing that Wilks/Dunn are doing, then yeah i'd be right there with you. I mainly want to illustrate that my main issue with this whole fiasco - beyond the undeniable fact that money/wealth has way too much influence in politics - is the casual erosion of the separation of church and state.
 
Jibe* - personal pet peeve of mine!

I don't really think that's an apples to apples comparison, but I'll answer the best I can. Unions, provide a collective service to their party members by fighting to make sure they're paid commiserate with what they perceive to be their market value. I don't agree that they should be allowed to donate large swaths of money to any party or candidate, but I believe that about any collective unit - churches, corporations, etc. These two gentlemen are trying to fundamentally change a key tenet of the US - the separation of church and state. I vehemently oppose any attempts at trying to blur those lines and incorporate religious doctrine/beliefs/dogma into the state apparatus.

If the Union leaders came out saying they want to do the exact thing that Wilks/Dunn are doing, then yeah i'd be right there with you. I mainly want to illustrate that my main issue with this whole fiasco - beyond the undeniable fact that money/wealth has way too much influence in politics - is the casual erosion of the separation of church and state.
George Soros says hello
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73 and DW4_2016
Jibe* - personal pet peeve of mine!

I don't really think that's an apples to apples comparison, but I'll answer the best I can. Unions, provide a collective service to their party members by fighting to make sure they're paid commiserate with what they perceive to be their market value. I don't agree that they should be allowed to donate large swaths of money to any party or candidate, but I believe that about any collective unit - churches, corporations, etc. These two gentlemen are trying to fundamentally change a key tenet of the US - the separation of church and state. I vehemently oppose any attempts at trying to blur those lines and incorporate religious doctrine/beliefs/dogma into the state apparatus.

If the Union leaders came out saying they want to do the exact thing that Wilks/Dunn are doing, then yeah i'd be right there with you. I mainly want to illustrate that my main issue with this whole fiasco - beyond the undeniable fact that money/wealth has way too much influence in politics - is the casual erosion of the separation of church and state.
I agree 100% that the church and state need to be separated. If these two violate that line then they should be held accountable.


It's weird to me that people are scared of "Christian Nationalism" or "Christianity". Has there been any group that has lost more power than Christians over the last say 25 years?

The pure number of Christians has declined. Their influence on politics has declined. They are constantly under attack. It just seems weird to me that people are scared of them?


But i don't understand that money / wealth has too much influence in politics. They go hand in hand. Without money you don't have politics. Without politics you don't havea governed society. Don't think you can separate the two.

The separation of the church and state is literally written into the constituion. If that is broken, we no longer have a country.

We all get to pick what we worry about, but these guys don't make the top 10 on my list.

Im much more concerned a highly unqualified, unelected, communist, Kumala Harris gets in the White House.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT