ADVERTISEMENT

The GOP may never win another presidency at this rate

In your opinion it's not real (my opinion too). However, our opinions are meaningless and you can not scientifically disprove the existence of a god. We could easily be wrong and there could be a God.

On the flip side, we can say with scientific certainty, that men cannot birth children. We can also say with scientific certainty that men cannot switch their sex from male to female and vice versa.

You conflate opinion with fact.
Literally no one is saying that men and women can change their biological sex. Zero. It’s not happening anywhere. Either you know this and are making an argument in bad faith or you actually believe this and are making an argument from ignorance. Either way, your point isn’t valid.

But, if you want to go down that road… you can’t scientifically disprove that a biological man can switch their biological sex and become a biological woman. It happens in other species. What you mean to say is that there is no evidence that a biological man can become a biological woman, just like there is no evidence that any god exists. So if it’s acceptable to tech religion despite there being no evidence just because it cannot be scientifically disproven, can’t we really just teach anything?
 
sorry your incredibly useful post was ignored.

Season 3 Reaction GIF by American Gods
Just as well - when the only arrow in your quiver is whining about a tiny fraction of the population, it's understandable why you'd want to ignore me.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: treetiger
People like you are why I’m grateful for he second amendment.
2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I believe in that too. And I believe it shall be used against an oppressive government and terrorist (communists within this nation trying to destroy these very amendments). As I said before, when I entered and swore into the US Army, I raised my right hand and swore to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. The enemy back then were mainly foreign communists. The enemy today are not just communists abroad, but are communists within this country. These people (citizens) who are domestic enemies include the communists trying to undermine this nation now), who are trying remove the Constitution and the Amendment. I will raise my weapon against them as well. But I also served to allow citizens of this nation the right to free speech (1st Amendment). That means I allow them to be a communists if they so choose, but when they try to undermine the Constitution, they become the enemy. So, as I said, those enemies should be arrested, given a fair trial, and if found guilty, be sent to prison. And either rot there, be sentenced as traitors and subject the the fulness of the penalties of that, or have their citizenship revoked and be sent elsewhere. Those people are the worst of enemies in my opinion.

So I have no clue what problem you have with that unless you disapprove of these domestic enemies (communists) being punished for their crimes? And I will do any and every thing within my power and weapons that I may possess to defend this great nation. So, if you don't like me (or another patriot who loves this nation) getting in your way from trying of turn this nation into a WOKE communist dictatorship, then you might be in my crosshairs...
 
2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I believe in that too. And I believe it shall be used against an oppressive government and terrorist (communists within this nation trying to destroy these very amendments). As I said before, when I entered and swore into the US Army, I raised my right hand and swore to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. The enemy back then were mainly foreign communists. The enemy today are not just communists abroad, but are communists within this country. These people (citizens) who are domestic enemies include the communists trying to undermine this nation now), who are trying remove the Constitution and the Amendment. I will raise my weapon against them as well. But I also served to allow citizens of this nation the right to free speech (1st Amendment). That means I allow them to be a communists if they so choose, but when they try to undermine the Constitution, they become the enemy. So, as I said, those enemies should be arrested, given a fair trial, and if found guilty, be sent to prison. And either rot there, be sentenced as traitors and subject the the fulness of the penalties of that, or have their citizenship revoked and be sent elsewhere. Those people are the worst of enemies in my opinion.

So I have no clue what problem you have with that unless you disapprove of these domestic enemies (communists) being punished for their crimes? And I will do any and every thing within my power and weapons that I may possess to defend this great nation. So, if you don't like me (or another patriot who loves this nation) getting in your way from trying of turn this nation into a WOKE communist dictatorship, then you might be in my crosshairs...
You’re the one posting that your political enemies should be thrown in prison. I can’t comprehend how high on your own supply you’ve got to be to simultaneously hold any reverence for the constitution in parallel with that view.

Which statute specifically does “trying to undermine the constitution” violate? What are the sentencing guidelines? I’ll save you the time: there are none. That’s because the “crime” you’re talking about is ambiguous and totally open to interpretation by lipstick fascists such as yourself. The constitution doesn’t exist to protect the government from the people or to protect people from other people in the absence of government. It exists to keep people like yourself from using the force apparatus of the state to impose their will on unwilling others.

And stop with this “you might be in my crosshairs stuff” old man. If things ever pop off, you won’t do shit. None of you will. You’ll run back to your safe neighborhood and post more microwave brain garbage on the internet just like all of the other lead poisoning victims with heir pathological grievance and violent ideations
 
Accurately define even one of these words. You can’t.
Dumbass, can you tell me what a woman is, or the difference between a woman. I doubt it. You could even do that by looking in the mirror. You probably have a special pronoun!!! You stupid ass fvckers are unbelievable. But go look in the mirror. You see that ugly ass reflection of a person? That is someone who is WOKE and a communist. Here are two other communists and dictators and people you probably lust after...

Kozyrev-photo-scaled-e1653584325596.jpg


and...

2758.jpg


…now you know, and have pictures. So go back in your hole...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
You’re the one posting that your political enemies should be thrown in prison. I can’t comprehend how high on your own supply you’ve got to be to simultaneously hold any reverence for the constitution in parallel with that view.

Which statute specifically does “trying to undermine the constitution” violate? What are the sentencing guidelines? I’ll save you the time: there are none. That’s because the “crime” you’re talking about is ambiguous and totally open to interpretation by lipstick fascists such as yourself. The constitution doesn’t exist to protect the government from the people or to protect people from other people in the absence of government. It exists to keep people like yourself from using the force apparatus of the state to impose their will on unwilling others.

And stop with this “you might be in my crosshairs stuff” old man. If things ever pop off, you won’t do shit. None of you will. You’ll run back to your safe neighborhood and post more microwave brain garbage on the internet just like all of the other lead poisoning victims with heir pathological grievance and violent ideations
Damn you are stupid. Your side wants to catch and release for illegal immigrants, and also have no bond release for criminals. I would think you would view someone treasonous who hates this country and are trying to undermine it that you would not support such actions. You are the type of person that is drunk on self-indulgence and the communist Kool-aid. You care little about others around you including your family. You care more about wanting destroying this nation with racist ideology, sick immoral teaching to our children, even kindergarten children. I would not be surprised if you signed the OK document (consent form) to teach your children (or grandchildren) LBGT-Q crap and how they need to choose who or what they think they might be, and CRT racist teachings, telling them (if they are white) that they are systemically racist, born racist, and will always be racist. You probably helped them choose their pronoun? This is why you people will not win. You are in a group of sick, immoral and racist people, but I believe you are still in the minority.
 
Last edited:
nope. this study just implies that a large number of kids who think they are trans really just have mothers who are crazy
And…. You presumably want to do something about that? Or you’re just saying it to hear the echo? Naturally, to combat the crazy women making their kids trans we must have a test. Pass the test keep your kids type thing. But we should also have a trans hotline just in case someone can fool the test.
 
And…. You presumably want to do something about that? Or you’re just saying it to hear the echo? Naturally, to combat the crazy women making their kids trans we must have a test. Pass the test keep your kids type thing. But we should also have a trans hotline just in case someone can fool the test.
trying to save some gonads from being lopped off because mothers/parents are mentally ill---but you carry on not caring about child mutilation
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DW4_2016
trying to save some gonads from being lopped off because mothers/parents are mentally ill---but you carry on not caring about child mutilation
so you want to find mentally ill mothers and take their rights away?

you're almost there buddy, just one more jump and you'll have it figured out.
 
Are we comparing an oped from an unelected official to statements made by current republican members of congress?

Even further, an oped that nobody actually took seriously, considered enacting, and certainly didn't recruit,and sign up and bring to Washington a secret group of fraudulent electors?

Sure. Totally the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and WapPride
Even further, an oped that nobody actually took seriously, considered enacting, and certainly didn't recruit,and sign up and bring to Washington a secret group of fraudulent electors?

Sure. Totally the same thing.
Lolz, sure buddy. Basically, you're fine with what they did because you supported the cause........at this point, I don't know why ya'll don't just say it out loud.
 
Lolz, sure buddy. Basically, you're fine with what they did because you supported the cause........at this point, I don't know why ya'll don't just say it out loud.

So the Clinton campaign did gather together "alternative electors" and send them to Washington in 2016? Weird that it wasn't publicized more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
So the Clinton campaign did gather together "alternative electors" and send them to Washington in 2016? Weird that it wasn't publicized more.

No, they didn't. But they did hold counsel with the movement to overturn the election through the electoral college electors. They never endorsed the movement nor did the DNC. But they also didn't condemn it because it was obvious they would be happy to let it run its course and perhaps overturn the election. One really notable difference though is Clinton won the popular vote because of a massive margin in California. Trump has never gotten close to winning a popular vote. Seven electors broke with the results of the election that year. That's the most ever.
 
It won't let me read this without paying soooo
Two Politico articles detailing the ask for the Intelligence briefing (all dems btw) and the letter Pelosi wrote stating her intentions.

Seems like challenging elections isn't just a right wing initiative huh?



 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

Since we know you only post lies, misinformation or half-truths and won't verify anything before you submit it to outrage the magaloons, I wanted to bring it to your attention that this was a BI-PARTISAN exercise. OOPS!

"This may sound far-fetched. But in June, an organization called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a group of more than 100 bipartisan experts to simulate what might happen the day after Election Day — running a kind of political “war game” where veteran Democrats role-played as the Biden campaign and veteran Republicans acted as the Trump team.

They simulated four scenarios: a big Biden victory, a narrow Biden win, an indeterminate result à la the 2000 election, and a narrow Trump victory. In every scenario but a massive Biden blowout, things went south.

“We anticipate lawsuits, divergent media narratives, attempts to stop the counting of ballots, and protests drawing people from both sides,” TIP writes in a post-exercise report summarizing their findings. “The potential for violent conflict is high, particularly since Trump encourages his supporters to take up arms.”

 
so send them to jail too? they're all pieces of shit who should watch their children burn to death. i always thought you guys were better than that dirty liberal whataboutism bullshit.
A bit extreme on watching their children burn to death but you do you I guess.
 
Since we know you only post lies, misinformation or half-truths and won't verify anything before you submit it to outrage the magaloons, I wanted to bring it to your attention that this was a BI-PARTISAN exercise. OOPS!

"This may sound far-fetched. But in June, an organization called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) convened a group of more than 100 bipartisan experts to simulate what might happen the day after Election Day — running a kind of political “war game” where veteran Democrats role-played as the Biden campaign and veteran Republicans acted as the Trump team.

They simulated four scenarios: a big Biden victory, a narrow Biden win, an indeterminate result à la the 2000 election, and a narrow Trump victory. In every scenario but a massive Biden blowout, things went south.

“We anticipate lawsuits, divergent media narratives, attempts to stop the counting of ballots, and protests drawing people from both sides,” TIP writes in a post-exercise report summarizing their findings. “The potential for violent conflict is high, particularly since Trump encourages his supporters to take up arms.”

Ah yes, the old "misinformation" tag........you'll die fighting this but the tin foil hatters are up 48-0 late in the 4th quarter at this point. Facts could take a huge dump on your face and you'd find a way to suggest it wasn't sh*t.

Bipartisan? In today's America? TIP wasn't remotely bipartisan, John Podesta wouldn't allow anyone not far left to sit next to him on a plane, much less collaborate on a "how to insert a president" exercise. The overlap with EIP (Election Integrity Project) is also a bit concerning. The best part though, is this wasn't exclusive to 2020....... I mean, it's so odd that there was a letter to the National Intelligence director asking for a briefing regarding russiagate in 2016 from politicians that knew it was a hoax, then a suite of dems suggesting they wouldn't fulfill their electoral duties, videos of celebs/ceo's saying not to fulfill electoral duties ........then TIP and EIP in 2020. Anyone who remotely said there were irregularities in 2020 were basically wiped from society but totally ok when the left does it. Crazy how feckless liberals are.

Trump encouraged people to take up arms? When did he do that? I've only seen left wing politicians and left controlled media suggesting violence on other Americans, cities, institutions or even Trump himself. Surely you can produce a clip or two for us of Trump telling the country to take up arms against other Americans?
 
Ah yes, the old "misinformation" tag........you'll die fighting this but the tin foil hatters are up 48-0 late in the 4th quarter at this point. Facts could take a huge dump on your face and you'd find a way to suggest it wasn't sh*t.

Bipartisan? In today's America? TIP wasn't remotely bipartisan, John Podesta wouldn't allow anyone not far left to sit next to him on a plane, much less collaborate on a "how to insert a president" exercise. The overlap with EIP (Election Integrity Project) is also a bit concerning. The best part though, is this wasn't exclusive to 2020....... I mean, it's so odd that there was a letter to the National Intelligence director asking for a briefing regarding russiagate in 2016 from politicians that knew it was a hoax, then a suite of dems suggesting they wouldn't fulfill their electoral duties, videos of celebs/ceo's saying not to fulfill electoral duties ........then TIP and EIP in 2020. Anyone who remotely said there were irregularities in 2020 were basically wiped from society but totally ok when the left does it. Crazy how feckless liberals are.

Trump encouraged people to take up arms? When did he do that? I've only seen left wing politicians and left controlled media suggesting violence on other Americans, cities, institutions or even Trump himself. Surely you can produce a clip or two for us of Trump telling the country to take up arms against other Americans?
You're posting a tweet suggesting Podesta was actively plotting a fake elector scheme without pointing out that it was a bi-partisan effort to war plan worst case scenarios - of course they didn't imagine it would get as bad as it did. He was also only a participant, he was not the organizer. Your post is an obvious attempt to misinform.

Then you added another shitlist of accusations to muddy the waters. Stop trying to be Trump's waterboy - you know... the guy you don't like.
 
Interesting considering woke as a term was defined in the 70s when talking about institutional racism. Essentially what people are attacking, is any sensitivity levied towards oppressed people. Because, again, they are fragile children adults who cannot process the trauma America caused towards marginalized people and instead vest all their emotions in discounting the history surrounding it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
No, that's what you dumbasses have decided it means. It's not historically what it means.

It's a simple word for simple people who are easy to anger.
OK, then pick another word for virtue signaling idiots. Woke seems to work just fine though.
 
teaching children that men can birth babies (do YOU believe that men can birth babies?)

normalizing weird sexual proclivities

desensitizing children to freakish behaviors and telling them to keep secrets from their parents (I'm sure you want to equate this to priests or other child molesters---let them all burn in hell....this is not a few hundred molesters in secret, this is tens of thousands of authority figures trying to radically change cultural norms in public)

gaslighting anyone who calls out these behaviors

teaching that they should not be proud of their country or their family. teaching them they are not worthy of anything good

it is a form of brainwashing---I don't know the exact end game...maybe to make them more susceptible for future brainwashing. to make enough of them think down is up and up is down that they will believe anything they are told.

teaching them to believe in group-think and not giving them the education/tools to think on their own.

generally i think it is people who are jealous of happiness or ashamed of their weaknesses or perversion and want everyone to be as miserable as they are

i could go on.
Exactly! I would add allowing boys to compete with girls in high school sports, allowing high school boys to use girl locker rooms...and calling ok...simply unbelievable! All supported by the left/democrats. Only a few dems will call this wrong behavior b/c of wokeness.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT