Why are you so dead set on consuming objectively shitty media? Is it because you’re an old white?
Im older but not white my little oreo. You should ask yourself why you listen to propaganda media. They tell lies all the time and sheep like you fall for it every single time...Why are you so dead set on consuming objectively shitty media? Is it because you’re an old white?
What propaganda media do you imagine I consume? BBC and Al Jazeera try to minimize shit stories you’d usually get on American networks.Im older but not white my little oreo. You should ask yourself why you listen to propaganda media. They tell lies all the time and sheep like you fall for it every single time...
Yes sources that took millions of our tax dollars from USAID to report stories to hurt conservatives and cover for the left...What propaganda media do you imagine I consume? BBC and Al Jazeera try to minimize shit stories you’d usually get on American networks.
WAAAAA! WAAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAA! Leftist years are so delicious! Come on cry! You gonna cry for me? Cry!Why are you so dead set on consuming objectively shitty media? Is it because you’re an old white?
How many times do I have to remind you that your sources are shit propaganda mouthpieces who aren't trying to inform you?Yes sources that took millions of our tax dollars from USAID to report stories to hurt conservatives and cover for the left...
You need mental help.WAAAAA! WAAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAA! Leftist years are so delicious! Come on cry! You gonna cry for me? Cry!
No? Is this a trick?Yes sources that took millions of our tax dollars from USAID to report stories to hurt conservatives and cover for the left...
doesnt make it not a fact. But their "USAID" own website shows the payments...No? Is this a trick?
Because Elon says it does not make it fact. If that were true we’d have had full self driving ~10 years ago by now
How many times do we have to tell you that you and your sources are shit? Nobody believes your azz anymore. You have been so wrong so many times that people not buying into your bs now...How many times do I have to remind you that your sources are shit propaganda mouthpieces who aren't trying to inform you?
"Politico in a statement, opens new tab Thursday said the organization had never received U.S. government funding but that some government agencies subscribe to Politico Pro, a policy intelligence news platform. Politico did not disclose the amount its government customers spent on subscriptions.
"Government agencies that subscribe do so through standard public procurement processes—just like any other tool they buy to work smarter and be more efficient,” the statement said.
A spokesperson for the Associated Press, which also faced accusations from pro-Trump online accounts that it was funded by the aid agency, said it had not received any money from USAID.
“Our business is providing factual, nonpartisan news and information to customers worldwide,” the spokesperson said.
“The U.S. government has long been an AP customer – through both Democratic and Republican administrations."
A New York Times spokesperson on Friday told Reuters that USAID did not provide funding to the company. A day earlier the newspaper in a statement, opens new tab said, "Federal funds received by The Times are payments for subscriptions that government offices and agencies have purchased to better understand the world." It added that no federal grants were made to the news outlet.
The BBC’s finances came under scrutiny in early February after Musk shared a post that said USAID funds the broadcaster. Its charity wing BBC Media Action, which received funds from USAID and other donors, is independently funded and editorially separate from BBC News, a BBC Media Action spokesperson told Reuters.
A spokesperson for BBC News said it did not receive any funding from USAID and that it is editorially independent from BBC Media Action.
Reuters, which also faced online accusations it was funded by government agencies, said it didn’t have a contractual relationship with USAID. “As with all news agency customers, governments pay a fee for Reuters news services. No payments from any client, including any government entity, influence our news coverage, which is governed by the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles ensuring independence, accuracy and freedom from bias in all we do,” a spokesperson said.
The spokesperson added that Thomson Reuters Special Services, a separate legal entity operating independently from Reuters News, has provided software and information services to government agencies “across successive administrations for decades.“
My source above is using quotes from the very news sources you believe are being funded by USAID. You believe Catturd over direct quotes so remind me again who buys into bs?How many times do we have to tell you that you and your sources are shit? Nobody believes your azz anymore. You have been so wrong so many times that people not buying into your bs now...
More like the USAID site itself...My source above is using quotes from the very news sources you believe are being funded by USAID. You believe Catturd over direct quotes so remind me again who buys into bs?