not so sure about that....a lot more confidence than hillary or bernie.
not so sure about that....a lot more confidence than hillary or bernie.
Goggle One American News and watch it since your clueless.lol. guy presents actual facts of the syrian civil war, which you clearly have little to no understanding of, and this is your response? you don't know what you're talking about and neither does this loony 'friend' of yours
Like I said believe what you want to.and you can invent stuff you want to be true and throw it on a message board and get pats on the back from folks who have no interest in objective truth.
Syria had a peak population of 21M in 2010 before the war started, and had 7% christians at that time. So is it your claim that 66% of all Christians in Syria have been killed? And this was somehow executed by a rebel group that controls 20% of the country, that was receiving its funding from a primarily Christian country?
not so sure about that....
its mind numbing the number of people willing to double, triple, and quadruple down on their belief that the administration will get it right...there is absolutely zero evidence of that so far
If you think the news outlets knows everything that's going on your badly mistaken.So by your logic since I live here in the US and since my family lives here in the US and since I have family members have served and died in the military, you should believe whatever bullshit I tell you without question?
i voted for Trump, but carry onYou're an idiot. But hey, only 3 more years until you can vote again. Hang in there.
i voted for Trump, but carry on
If you think the news outlets knows everything that's going on your badly mistaken.
I'm talking all news period doesn't matter which one.But OAN is one of those "news outlets." I'm not suggesting you start reading all sorts of leftists sites or watching news outlets that obviously lean left. But you can't cite OAN and then suggest that they're separate from other news outlets and are not more than some thinly veiled, right wing media machine that pumps out news stories to fit their narrative.
had money in there for a while, not that it matters until you sell...if they cant get anything done, and at this rate they wont, the rally will fall apart...im honestly pulling for him as i do any president but i dont see it..maybe Kelly will be a much needed step in the right directionGood job. There's hope. Did you put money into the market before or right after the election?
had money in there for a while, not that it matters until you sell...if they cant get anything done, and at this rate they wont, the rally will fall apart...im honestly pulling for him as i do any president but i dont see it..maybe Kelly will be a much needed step in the right direction
im sure im not doing as well as you chiefYou clearly aren't doing it right chief. Can't get anything done or are you referring to just healthcare? A lot has been done and a lot of doors have been opened for people who are strategic to make money. In all honesty, glad you voted for Trump though.
i've googled and goggled one american news and searched for an article about the deaths of christians in syria. was not able to find anything like what you are referencing, will be glad to read and discuss if you can provide a link.Goggle One American News and watch it since your clueless.
Goggle One American News and watch it since your clueless.
I watched it at his house earlier today when I get off work I'll see if I can find the link.i've googled and goggled one american news and searched for an article about the deaths of christians in syria. was not able to find anything like what you are referencing, will be glad to read and discuss if you can provide a link.
Good job. There's hope. Did you put money into the market before or right after the election?
the market was humming by the end of obama's term too. most analysts feel that the "trump bump" is incredibly overstated. he's done nothing but act like a goddamn fool for six months, and even voters who defended him are wising up to it.
Lol. This is comical. You're not an investor or in business are you?
Also, the link you provided, how did they do in predicting the outcome of the presidential election? Nate Silver!!! Hah.
Lol. This is comical. You're not an investor or in business are you?
Also, the link you provided, how did they do in predicting the outcome of the presidential election? Nate Silver!!! Hah.
okay you're clearly not intelligent enough to have this conversation, which makes it no shock whatsoever that you're a trump supporter.
Can't stand Trump or Hilary ! This big old country and those are the best two we came up with.
ranked voting primaries... Rubio or Kasich would be president right now with them...Can't stand Trump or Hilary ! This big old country and those are the best two we came up with.
nafta's been good for me, would have loved TPP to pass... would much rather be in a deal with china that we participated in then have China taking advantage of our stragic allies in the Pacific without us having a seat at the table.Kasich would have also allowed TPP to pass. This would have been another disaster long term for our economy. But hey, we've suffered through NAFTA, why not double down?
nafta's been good for me, would have loved TPP to pass... would much rather be in a deal with china that we participated in then have China taking advantage of our stragic allies in the Pacific without us having a seat at the table.
just an engineer / PM for a global contractor... a constantly evolving economy is good for us.Bill is that you?
Bill is that you?
I'm sure for some NAFTA was good, but you can't be serious and say NAFTA was good for a majority of America and it's workers.
I'm a supporter of making money. Don't blame me or others because you don't get it.
But seriously, how did Nate Silver fair on his prediction?
nafta was objectively good for most business owners and wealthy people and objectively bad for workers. Thats the argument trump (and bernie, and elizabeth warren, and unions) made, that its bad for the american working class. you arguing against the TPP because nafta was bad, and citing the rebound in the stock market as a good thing (again, which benefits primarily wealthy people, like NAFTA) makes no real sense.
silver was actually one of the more bullish on trump's chances. for someone who purports to "make a lot of money," you at the same time don't seem to have a great grasp of data or statistics. virtually all the top polling sites went based off of the data they had, which showed hillary as having a better chance at winning than trump. even the Trump campaign itself put their candidate’s chances at 30 percent, right about where FiveThirtyEight had him. it's completely asinine to dismiss all of 538's writing simply because they were one of many places to not correctly predict a wildly inconsistent and shocking election.
He like others, were wrong. Very wrong. Agree?
Silver caught a lot of flak for having Trump's odds as high as he did.
yes, and so was virtually every pollster imaginable, including trump's own internal team. what's your point?
Negative !! Not a Clinton type either !ranked voting primaries... Rubio or Kasich would be president right now with them...
... always pegged you as a trump type.