ADVERTISEMENT

Tucker... oooffff

LoL nobody is biting on this one.
dollar gotcha GIF
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
All of you….. are part of the problem. And for some of you, might not be your fault.

Anyone who has the responsibility to LEAD and quite frankly everyone admitting your actions are no longer your own but succumbing to ideology. Making decisions and making choices that no longer are your own but by the power of 3rd parties.

All of us should be bound to preserve protect and defend the Constitution of the US. But all I see are Libs and Pubs cherry-picking what they like and don’t like and supporting the frauds and ideologies that go against it. W. T. F. is wrong with people.

  • Leo F. Drummond : I may not be 100 percent today, but I'm here in spirit
    [All laugh but Rudy]
    Rudy Baylor : I'm curious.
    Leo F. Drummond : About what?
    Rudy Baylor : I'm just wonderin'... do you even remember when you first sold out?
    Leo F. Drummond : [the room goes silent] Now you're an arrogant little piss-ant, aren't you? I advise you to mind your manners. You're in the big world now.
    Rudy Baylor : Mind my manners? I come up here from Memphis, to depose four people... two of them are not here. And you tell me to mind MY manners?

  • Most people today want to act like Leo Drummond to “get theirs”. Go fvck yourself. That’s how you destroy a country. Have/Get some principles. For those that claim to be Christian, attempt to honor the 10 Commandments you violate daily.
Just stop it. You know who is equally as big a problem as the fringes? The “aww shucks” people who have stood by for years throwing their hands up and saying to hell with it all while this cancer grew. You don’t get to all the sudden stand up one day and declare yourself the arbiter of righteousness because you fancy yourself above the trenches. That’s not how this is going to work. But I’ve noticed your self-righteous, indignant bullshit becoming more and more vocal by the day while you have been completely non existent up until this point

This entire holier than thou, centrist in the name of diplomacy fluff is complete dogshit
 
  • Like
Reactions: OleFastball
Your point is well taken and the quote from OP is unfair, BUT your response is not quite right either. The first part of the paragraph describes how he REALLY feels... wanting the guy dead. Your quote shows that he has the self awareness to realize that what he is feeling is not right... he is becoming something he didn't want to be. That doesn't change the fact that he DID like what he saw... just that he realizes that what he was feeling is wrong.

So to one extent, this shows that he is who his critics thought he was... a racist who enjoyed watching 3 white guys beat the crap out of a black guy. BUT it also shows that he doesn't like who he is and is becoming.

"I shouldn't gloat over his suffering. I should be bothered by it. I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed."

And he right... , but the fact remains that he DID. He did gloat over the kid's suffering. I suppose it's good that he actually IS bothered by that gloating.
If you are going to take him at his word in the first part of the paragraph, you have to do that throughout. He was not enjoying the guy getting beat up bc he was black, but because of his politics(antifa). He said this specifically at the end.
 
Your point is well taken and the quote from OP is unfair, BUT your response is not quite right either. The first part of the paragraph describes how he REALLY feels... wanting the guy dead. Your quote shows that he has the self awareness to realize that what he is feeling is not right... he is becoming something he didn't want to be. That doesn't change the fact that he DID like what he saw... just that he realizes that what he was feeling is wrong.

So to one extent, this shows that he is who his critics thought he was... a racist who enjoyed watching 3 white guys beat the crap out of a black guy. BUT it also shows that he doesn't like who he is and is becoming.

"I shouldn't gloat over his suffering. I should be bothered by it. I should remember that somewhere somebody probably loves this kid, and would be crushed if he was killed."

And he right... , but the fact remains that he DID. He did gloat over the kid's suffering. I suppose it's good that he actually IS bothered by that gloating.

where does it say anything about the kid being black? you ever seen antifa? its a bunch of angry, white, unemployed 20 somethings who spend their days looking for reasons to be mad so they can feel justified unleashing their anger at the world. he was almost definitely white.

people just love lobbing racist around nowadays. anyone saying this proves tucker is racist is just saying what they already thought, because it's certainly not present in what he said nor is race remotely relevant to the message. it's probably such a foreign concept at this point people are entirely blind to it, but this is someone looking in a mirror and willing to be critical of themselves. apparently nobody here has ever had an imperfect thought or action and found themselves in the wrong in their life. this is hilarious to make this a story about racism when there's nothing racist in it. the entire stream of thought is about noticing a reaction in themselves that they didn't like and recognizing they'd been mentally pulled into a place they didn't want to be taken.

it's good you took into account what was left out. but you still fall into labeling him a racist why? you assumed the guy is black why? because that's where the article leads you, and the article leads there because of one irrelevant piece of a message that has nothing to do with race. "that's not how white people fight" is the only part that has a racial connotation. is that what led you to assuming he was black? are you assuming he said that with a negative racial connotation? because you simply do not know that, and in the context of his message, is a completely innocuous line. it reads as an irreverent observation. the worst it could be taken to mean is "as opposed to," which, while you may find insensitive, is far short of racist. maybe we can save labeling people racist for people who express actual racism. this ain't it.
 
a racist! There you go. Didn't take long.

Racism is no longer the card you all think it is. We know when y'all bring the race card up you are full of Schiff. Racism is the little boy that cried wolf.

Do you ever have any thoughts that go through your head that you don't like? Maybe you have one of those puritan brains that has only pure thoughts.

When the low iq crowd lacks the ability to use reason and logic they play the race card. We all laugh at you now.
We? You're implying that you're not part of the low IQ crowd? Lol. Speaking of a lack of awareness....
 
Just stop it. You know who is equally as big a problem as the fringes? The “aww shucks” people who have stood by for years throwing their hands up and saying to hell with it all while this cancer grew. You don’t get to all the sudden stand up one day and declare yourself the arbiter of righteousness because you fancy yourself above the trenches. That’s not how this is going to work. But I’ve noticed your self-righteous, indignant bullshit becoming more and more vocal by the day while you have been completely non existent up until this point

This entire holier than thou, centrist in the name of diplomacy fluff is complete dogshit
Hahaah…. I’ve had my avatar alone for over 6-7 years. Been posting on the Mainboard much longer than that with the same perspective. Ask anyone on the TWZ since 2006.

This particular forum?? Yes. Cause I never bothered to look at it as it was a shitty free Clemson board forever. I never bothered to look here until recently.
 
We? You're implying that you're not part of the low IQ crowd? Lol. Speaking of a lack of awareness....
Man that was time well spent making that post. You really drove home a point. 🤡

Now tell us how its racist, can't wait for the explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueRidgedf
where does it say anything about the kid being black? you ever seen antifa? its a bunch of angry, white, unemployed 20 somethings who spend their days looking for reasons to be mad so they can feel justified unleashing their anger at the world. he was almost definitely white.

people just love lobbing racist around nowadays. anyone saying this proves tucker is racist is just saying what they already thought, because it's certainly not present in what he said nor is race remotely relevant to the message. it's probably such a foreign concept at this point people are entirely blind to it, but this is someone looking in a mirror and willing to be critical of themselves. apparently nobody here has ever had an imperfect thought or action and found themselves in the wrong in their life. this is hilarious to make this a story about racism when there's nothing racist in it. the entire stream of thought is about noticing a reaction in themselves that they didn't like and recognizing they'd been mentally pulled into a place they didn't want to be taken.

it's good you took into account what was left out. but you still fall into labeling him a racist why? you assumed the guy is black why? because that's where the article leads you, and the article leads there because of one irrelevant piece of a message that has nothing to do with race. "that's not how white people fight" is the only part that has a racial connotation. is that what led you to assuming he was black? are you assuming he said that with a negative racial connotation? because you simply do not know that, and in the context of his message, is a completely innocuous line. it reads as an irreverent observation. the worst it could be taken to mean is "as opposed to," which, while you may find insensitive, is far short of racist. maybe we can save labeling people racist for people who express actual racism. this ain't it.
None so blind as those that won't see. I'm sure you watch a hell of a lot more Tucker than I do, but I've been listening to him on and off for a lot of years. He had a writer/producer type for years that ended up getting fired b/c they were a member of a White Supremist website. He said that Mexican immigrants made him feel dirty. His great replacement theory where white folks are being "replaced with brown folks".

So you have to ask yourself... what's the difference between a racist asshole and someone who's just a plain asshole? In a single case? Nothing. Because it could just be an asshole being an asshole. The only way you can prove racism is a pattern of behavior over time. So, taken by itself, the above statement doesn't PROVE anything. Given his body of work over the years, it becomes pretty clear.
 
If you are going to take him at his word in the first part of the paragraph, you have to do that throughout. He was not enjoying the guy getting beat up bc he was black, but because of his politics(antifa). He said this specifically at the end.
NO... and that's the problem... the first part was what he was actually feeling... the 2nd part was the realization that what he was feeling was wrong... thus the SHOULD BE. Like I said... props for the self reflection that he shouldn't be feeling those things, but the bottom line was that he was.
 
Just stop it. You know who is equally as big a problem as the fringes? The “aww shucks” people who have stood by for years throwing their hands up and saying to hell with it all while this cancer grew. You don’t get to all the sudden stand up one day and declare yourself the arbiter of righteousness because you fancy yourself above the trenches. That’s not how this is going to work. But I’ve noticed your self-righteous, indignant bullshit becoming more and more vocal by the day while you have been completely non existent up until this point

This entire holier than thou, centrist in the name of diplomacy fluff is complete dogshit

Yea! If you have not been hate posting political beliefs as an anonymous message board poster on a sports website, then you are not doing your part!

Get a life, loser. You will be much happier when you do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
None so blind as those that won't see. I'm sure you watch a hell of a lot more Tucker than I do, but I've been listening to him on and off for a lot of years. He had a writer/producer type for years that ended up getting fired b/c they were a member of a White Supremist website. He said that Mexican immigrants made him feel dirty. His great replacement theory where white folks are being "replaced with brown folks".

So you have to ask yourself... what's the difference between a racist asshole and someone who's just a plain asshole? In a single case? Nothing. Because it could just be an asshole being an asshole. The only way you can prove racism is a pattern of behavior over time. So, taken by itself, the above statement doesn't PROVE anything. Given his body of work over the years, it becomes pretty clear.

So now, having someone on your staff who was once a member of a white supremacist website (whom he fired when he found it out) makes you racist.

Sound logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueRidgedf
So now, having someone on your staff who was once a member of a white supremacist website (whom he fired when he found it out) makes you racist.

Sound logic.
Uh, no. The fact that the staffer was a member became public knowledge, THEN he got fired. Not before.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT