ADVERTISEMENT

UK bans Ninja swords

They admire Europe, but Europe does not allow them to express displeasure so you will not see them posting here for fear of arrest.
 
Where are the resident libs. Specifically those in an uproar over how a
our allies may view America. This is an egregious overreach of power and in no way does it approach the real issue of why this is being done. I’d love to hear why citizens of first world country, historically one of the most powerful empires in the world can’t have a sword.
 
Why would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
 
Why would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
So it’s a ban to reduce crime and that’s ok. But it’s not ok to enforce laws on immigration that is a literal crime. What about kitchen knives or razor blades. Many more people are killed in the UK with kitchen knives. Those getting outlawed too??
 
So it’s a ban to reduce crime and that’s ok. But it’s not ok to enforce laws on immigration that is a literal crime. What about kitchen knives or razor blades. Many more people are killed in the UK with kitchen knives. Those getting outlawed too??
Idk man I’m not a UK lawmaker, nor do I really care what they do. This all just seems like something else for MAGA to get outraged about bc you guys live to feel persecuted.
 
Are ninja swords protected by the UK Constitution? If not, I don’t see the equivalence I am assuming y’all are trying to make
what relevance is that. Are you claiming that because there’s not an amendment in the UK constitution, as you put it, that swords are illegal and punishable by imprisonment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Idk man I’m not a UK lawmaker, nor do I really care what they do. This all just seems like something else for MAGA to get outraged about bc you guys live to feel persecuted.
Bro you are a buffoon. No one is is crying persecution. I’m simply showing you how stupid liberalism is and how dumb the leaders are. Outlaw swords not hordes of illegal migrant men that use swords. Dumb asses. If it was swords they would’ve been outlawed a century ago. Their culture and country were won with swords. Authoritarian psychos. You’ll defend anything even after getting embarrassed for having such nonsensical ideas. Deflect and diminish.
 
who’s trying to ban cars?
Why would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
They have had multiple car attacks running over and killing people.

Getting rid of cars will reduce crime.

You are ok with actions that they “think” will reduce crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
I got bad news UK citizens. No more knives. We need to reduce crime and that’s the only way to do it. No more steak for you.

In the UK, knives or other sharp objectsare the most common weapon used in homicides, accounting for 46% of such incidents in England and Wales in 2023/24.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
what relevance is that. Are you claiming that because there’s not an amendment in the UK constitution, as you put it, that swords are illegal and punishable by imprisonment?
No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.


Bro you are a buffoon. No one is is crying persecution. I’m simply showing you how stupid liberalism is and how dumb the leaders are. Outlaw swords not hordes of illegal migrant men that use swords. Dumb asses. If it was swords they would’ve been outlawed a century ago. Their culture and country were won with swords. Authoritarian psychos. You’ll defend anything even when you get even after getting embarrassed for having such nonsensical ideas. Deflect and diminish.
lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.
They have had multiple car attacks running over and killing people.

Getting rid of cars will reduce crime.

You are ok with actions that they “think” will reduce crime.
Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.
 
No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.



lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.

Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.
Interesting. In four minutes you went from
“It’s great it reduces crime, way to go!”

To

“Is it in there constitution”

To

“I don’t really care it’s just him being like Trump”

Yikes bro. Yall truly are the best.
 
Interesting. In four minutes you went from
“It’s great it reduces crime, way to go!”

To

“Is it in there constitution”

To

“I don’t really care it’s just him being like Trump”

Yikes bro.
If that’s how you interpreted everything it’s not a surprise to me why you’ve increasingly come across as an idiot as you’ve started posting more frequently here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73
If that’s how you interpreted everything it’s not a surprise to me why you’ve increasingly come across as an idiot as you’ve started posting more frequently here.
I’m sorry I can read your posts in this thread and summarize it. I know that’s upsetting. You’ll be ok. Most likely you will grow out of this.
 
No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.



lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.

Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar
By your own logic outlawing cars would reduce crime. For instance DUI, speeding, all kinds of stuff. Outlaw the cars please.
 
if you say so, hoss. Have a blessed day
I have also seen a theme of this when libs are put in an indefensible position. Your posts are right there, if I misrepresented it please show me. Deflect, deny, dismiss. May God bless you as well.
 
I have also seen a theme of this when libs are put in an indefensible position. Your posts are right there, if I misrepresented it please show me. Deflect, deny, dismiss. May God bless you as well.
Well, I never said it was great and way to go. So right off the bat you were wrong.

Never said it was him being like trump, either. I just suggested maybe he was blustering, as Trump is wont to do.

I did mention their constitution as I errantly assumed yall were going to eventually equate this to the lefts attempts at gun control in the US.

It’s important when trying to be snarky not to invent arguments - better luck next time.
 
You expect me to GAF about a bunch of british? Tell em to come get my guns. You guys don't care either, you just want me to care. I don't.
I couldn’t care less. But this board was full of liberal babies whining that the EU may look unfavorably on us because of certain policies. Clamoring that we must make ourselves more like our allies and not isolate. This is the ally, this is how they treat their natural born citizens. To attempt to undermine and dismiss what’s going on there when so many of you were up in arms when Starmer reprimanded us for not funding a never ending war in Ukraine. You’re hypocrites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
They yearn to get outraged about things and want anyone non-MAGA to justify whatever it is. It’s what happens when your entire ideology is predicated on being a troll
I’m not outraged. Starmer is the liberal leader. These are liberal policies. This is a politics message board. There are several on here that want to be more European. I’m also not maga, I align with him more than Kamala. I much prefer Rand Paul tho.
 
I couldn’t care less. But this board was full of liberal babies whining that the EU may look unfavorably on us because of certain policies. Clamoring that we must make ourselves more like our allies and not isolate. This is the ally, this is how they treat their natural born citizens. To attempt to undermine and dismiss what’s going on there when so many of you were up in arms when Starmer reprimanded us for not funding a never ending war in Ukraine. You’re hypocrites.
The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.

I think you just aren't comprehending the debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dpic73 and WapPride
No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.



lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.

Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.
Guns serve a utilitarian purpose.
 
The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.

I think you just aren't comprehending the debate.
I completely understood. I don’t understand how libs can champion EU acceptance and simultaneously disparage their political policies. You’re hypocrites. Meaning. Why are you concerned with an ally that is actively removing personal freedoms and liberties from their natural born citizens. This is most likely the reason you’re confused. Liberals tend to silo every issue. For instance they’ll champion a parent putting their child through a sex change but not champion someone that doesn’t want to vaccinate. These are personal decisions that you have no right in deciding, it doesn’t affect you as you say. For some reason liberals do not understand relationships between things. Same here. EU good. Need to protect them and give them money while they simultaneously strip their own citizens of rights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.

I think you just aren't comprehending the debate.
I had to add. How do you not see the blatant hypocrisy. Liberals want to put parents in jail for not vaccinating their kids. Why? It’s of no consequence to you or me. I am vaccinated what do I care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
****ing L O L. This may have been true 250 years ago, but today this is hilariously inaccurate.

This has actually been debated for quite some time now, but I doubt we will agree on this.
A well-armed citizenry acts as a major check on the ability of would-be tyrants, enabling the people to forcibly resist oppression. In the United States, our constitutional system is premised on the theory that, in a truly free society, ultimate power lies with the people and not with the government.
 
A well-armed citizenry acts as a major check on the ability of would-be tyrants, enabling the people to forcibly resist oppression. In the United States, our constitutional system is premised on the theory that, in a truly free society, ultimate power lies with the people and not with the government.
If you think citizens having firearms plays a major role in stopping our govt from converting to some authoritarian dictatorship then you are woefully naïve.
 
If you think citizens having firearms plays a major role in stopping our govt from converting to some authoritarian dictatorship then you are woefully naïve.
Let me guess. It’s the overlords benevolence that keeps us free right? How would you explain the stark difference in America where you can speak relatively freely and Europe where 100’s are in prison for tweets. Are our leaders just so much more kind and loving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT