No mean tweets or swords. Punishable by prison. What a joke.They admire Europe, but Europe does not allow them to express displeasure so you will not see them posting here for fear of arrest.
They should eliminate cars because that would reduce crime too. Solid logicWhy would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
Are ninja swords protected by the UK Constitution? If not, I don’t see the equivalence I am assuming y’all are trying to makeThey should eliminate cars because that would reduce crime too. Solid logic
And he doesn’t see the issue! 😂🤡
Are cars protected by the constitution?Are ninja swords protected by the UK Constitution? If not, I don’t see the equivalence I am assuming y’all are trying to make
who’s trying to ban cars?Are cars protected by the constitution?
So it’s a ban to reduce crime and that’s ok. But it’s not ok to enforce laws on immigration that is a literal crime. What about kitchen knives or razor blades. Many more people are killed in the UK with kitchen knives. Those getting outlawed too??Why would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
Idk man I’m not a UK lawmaker, nor do I really care what they do. This all just seems like something else for MAGA to get outraged about bc you guys live to feel persecuted.So it’s a ban to reduce crime and that’s ok. But it’s not ok to enforce laws on immigration that is a literal crime. What about kitchen knives or razor blades. Many more people are killed in the UK with kitchen knives. Those getting outlawed too??
what relevance is that. Are you claiming that because there’s not an amendment in the UK constitution, as you put it, that swords are illegal and punishable by imprisonment?Are ninja swords protected by the UK Constitution? If not, I don’t see the equivalence I am assuming y’all are trying to make
Bro you are a buffoon. No one is is crying persecution. I’m simply showing you how stupid liberalism is and how dumb the leaders are. Outlaw swords not hordes of illegal migrant men that use swords. Dumb asses. If it was swords they would’ve been outlawed a century ago. Their culture and country were won with swords. Authoritarian psychos. You’ll defend anything even after getting embarrassed for having such nonsensical ideas. Deflect and diminish.Idk man I’m not a UK lawmaker, nor do I really care what they do. This all just seems like something else for MAGA to get outraged about bc you guys live to feel persecuted.
who’s trying to ban cars?
They have had multiple car attacks running over and killing people.Why would I care about this, im not a weaboo. If they think the ban will reduce crime then do it, I don’t see the issue.
No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.what relevance is that. Are you claiming that because there’s not an amendment in the UK constitution, as you put it, that swords are illegal and punishable by imprisonment?
lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.Bro you are a buffoon. No one is is crying persecution. I’m simply showing you how stupid liberalism is and how dumb the leaders are. Outlaw swords not hordes of illegal migrant men that use swords. Dumb asses. If it was swords they would’ve been outlawed a century ago. Their culture and country were won with swords. Authoritarian psychos. You’ll defend anything even when you get even after getting embarrassed for having such nonsensical ideas. Deflect and diminish.
Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.They have had multiple car attacks running over and killing people.
Getting rid of cars will reduce crime.
You are ok with actions that they “think” will reduce crime.
Interesting. In four minutes you went fromNo, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.
lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.
Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.
If that’s how you interpreted everything it’s not a surprise to me why you’ve increasingly come across as an idiot as you’ve started posting more frequently here.Interesting. In four minutes you went from
“It’s great it reduces crime, way to go!”
To
“Is it in there constitution”
To
“I don’t really care it’s just him being like Trump”
Yikes bro.
I’m sorry I can read your posts in this thread and summarize it. I know that’s upsetting. You’ll be ok. Most likely you will grow out of this.If that’s how you interpreted everything it’s not a surprise to me why you’ve increasingly come across as an idiot as you’ve started posting more frequently here.
if you say so, hoss. Have a blessed dayI’m sorry I can read your posts in this thread and summarize it. I know that’s upsetting. You’ll be ok. Most likely you will grow out of this.
By your own logic outlawing cars would reduce crime. For instance DUI, speeding, all kinds of stuff. Outlaw the cars please.No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.
lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.
Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar
I have also seen a theme of this when libs are put in an indefensible position. Your posts are right there, if I misrepresented it please show me. Deflect, deny, dismiss. May God bless you as well.if you say so, hoss. Have a blessed day
Well, I never said it was great and way to go. So right off the bat you were wrong.I have also seen a theme of this when libs are put in an indefensible position. Your posts are right there, if I misrepresented it please show me. Deflect, deny, dismiss. May God bless you as well.
They yearn to get outraged about things and want anyone non-MAGA to justify whatever it is. It’s what happens when your entire ideology is predicated on being a trollYou expect me to GAF about a bunch of british? Tell em to come get my guns. You guys don't care either, you just want me to care. I don't.
I couldn’t care less. But this board was full of liberal babies whining that the EU may look unfavorably on us because of certain policies. Clamoring that we must make ourselves more like our allies and not isolate. This is the ally, this is how they treat their natural born citizens. To attempt to undermine and dismiss what’s going on there when so many of you were up in arms when Starmer reprimanded us for not funding a never ending war in Ukraine. You’re hypocrites.You expect me to GAF about a bunch of british? Tell em to come get my guns. You guys don't care either, you just want me to care. I don't.
I’m not outraged. Starmer is the liberal leader. These are liberal policies. This is a politics message board. There are several on here that want to be more European. I’m also not maga, I align with him more than Kamala. I much prefer Rand Paul tho.They yearn to get outraged about things and want anyone non-MAGA to justify whatever it is. It’s what happens when your entire ideology is predicated on being a troll
The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.I couldn’t care less. But this board was full of liberal babies whining that the EU may look unfavorably on us because of certain policies. Clamoring that we must make ourselves more like our allies and not isolate. This is the ally, this is how they treat their natural born citizens. To attempt to undermine and dismiss what’s going on there when so many of you were up in arms when Starmer reprimanded us for not funding a never ending war in Ukraine. You’re hypocrites.
Guns serve a utilitarian purpose.No, I’m making the comparison to the 2nd amendment dipshits in the US which is where I assumed the argument was heading.
lol. I don’t know ****all about UK laws nor do I know what they’re doing to help curb violence in their country beyond this blurb from the PM about banning swords. As far as I know, this was all just bluster from the PM, similar to when Trump says something outlandish. Tag me when something gets put in a bill and passed.
Cars serve a utilitarian purpose in society. Ninja swords do not. These are not similar comparisons.
I completely understood. I don’t understand how libs can champion EU acceptance and simultaneously disparage their political policies. You’re hypocrites. Meaning. Why are you concerned with an ally that is actively removing personal freedoms and liberties from their natural born citizens. This is most likely the reason you’re confused. Liberals tend to silo every issue. For instance they’ll champion a parent putting their child through a sex change but not champion someone that doesn’t want to vaccinate. These are personal decisions that you have no right in deciding, it doesn’t affect you as you say. For some reason liberals do not understand relationships between things. Same here. EU good. Need to protect them and give them money while they simultaneously strip their own citizens of rights.The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.
I think you just aren't comprehending the debate.
Single handedly guns in private citizens hands have stymied any authoritarian government.Guns serve a utilitarian purpose.
I had to add. How do you not see the blatant hypocrisy. Liberals want to put parents in jail for not vaccinating their kids. Why? It’s of no consequence to you or me. I am vaccinated what do I care.The policies of the UK government as it pertains to their citizens rights are of no consequence to me or you. The treaties our government signs with foreign nations with national security in mind, that actually does matter. So conflating the Ukraine invasion with British personal liberty debates is a mess of an argument to make.
I think you just aren't comprehending the debate.
****ing L O L. This may have been true 250 years ago, but today this is hilariously inaccurate.Single handedly guns in private citizens hands have stymied any authoritarian government.
This has actually been debated for quite some time now, but I doubt we will agree on this.Guns serve a utilitarian purpose.
A well-armed citizenry acts as a major check on the ability of would-be tyrants, enabling the people to forcibly resist oppression. In the United States, our constitutional system is premised on the theory that, in a truly free society, ultimate power lies with the people and not with the government.****ing L O L. This may have been true 250 years ago, but today this is hilariously inaccurate.
This has actually been debated for quite some time now, but I doubt we will agree on this.
If you think citizens having firearms plays a major role in stopping our govt from converting to some authoritarian dictatorship then you are woefully naïve.A well-armed citizenry acts as a major check on the ability of would-be tyrants, enabling the people to forcibly resist oppression. In the United States, our constitutional system is premised on the theory that, in a truly free society, ultimate power lies with the people and not with the government.
Let me guess. It’s the overlords benevolence that keeps us free right? How would you explain the stark difference in America where you can speak relatively freely and Europe where 100’s are in prison for tweets. Are our leaders just so much more kind and loving.If you think citizens having firearms plays a major role in stopping our govt from converting to some authoritarian dictatorship then you are woefully naïve.
Guns are the great equalizer. A 90 year old grandma is equalized with a 25 year old male.****ing L O L. This may have been true 250 years ago, but today this is hilariously inaccurate.
This has actually been debated for quite some time now, but I doubt we will agree on this.