Vaccines for children

Dr. Robert Malone is a medical doctor and biochemist known for his early work on mRNA technology. While he was involved in some early research related to mRNA vaccines, his role in their creation has been described as minimal.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone became a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines and promoted misinformation about their safety and efficacy. He made numerous false and misleading claims about the vaccines and public health measures, including:
  • Claiming that COVID-19 vaccines cause a form of AIDS.
  • Suggesting that the public had been "hypnotized" into following government COVID guidelines.
  • Making a false equivalence between the vaccine and Nazi medical experiments.
  • Claiming that those vaccinated after having COVID-19 are at greater risk of harmful side effects.
  • Promoting the use of unproven treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.
His claims drew criticism from medical professionals, who have debunked many of them. In response to his spread of misinformation, Twitter temporarily suspended his account for violating their policies. Malone has also been accused of harassing a physician who reported his actions to a medical board.

Malone's views on COVID-19 vaccines and public health policy have been controversial, leading to significant debate and discussion within the scientific community. He is closely aligned with the "Make America Healthy Again" movement.

It is important to note that credible sources, such as the Science Feedback website and the Washington Post, have thoroughly debunked Malone's claims about COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.
 
Dr. Robert Malone is a medical doctor and biochemist known for his early work on mRNA technology. While he was involved in some early research related to mRNA vaccines, his role in their creation has been described as minimal.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone became a vocal critic of mRNA vaccines and promoted misinformation about their safety and efficacy. He made numerous false and misleading claims about the vaccines and public health measures, including:
  • Claiming that COVID-19 vaccines cause a form of AIDS.
  • Suggesting that the public had been "hypnotized" into following government COVID guidelines.
  • Making a false equivalence between the vaccine and Nazi medical experiments.
  • Claiming that those vaccinated after having COVID-19 are at greater risk of harmful side effects.
  • Promoting the use of unproven treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.
His claims drew criticism from medical professionals, who have debunked many of them. In response to his spread of misinformation, Twitter temporarily suspended his account for violating their policies. Malone has also been accused of harassing a physician who reported his actions to a medical board.

Malone's views on COVID-19 vaccines and public health policy have been controversial, leading to significant debate and discussion within the scientific community. He is closely aligned with the "Make America Healthy Again" movement.

It is important to note that credible sources, such as the Science Feedback website and the Washington Post, have thoroughly debunked Malone's claims about COVID-19 vaccines and treatments.

Malone is THE INVENTOR of the stuff coursing through your veins.
 


KABOOM! 💥 💥💣💣

🚨 #BREAKING: RFK Jr. Freezes All US Funding to GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance Group Co-founded by Bill Gates

- Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, has received significant funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, totaling $4.1 billion since its inception in 2000, with additional commitments of $1.55 billion for 2016–2025 and $1.6 billion for 2021–2025.

- He criticizes Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, for prioritizing public relations over patient health when addressing vaccine safety issues.

- He accuses Gavi of collaborating with the World Health Organization during the COVID-19 pandemic to recommend that social media companies silence dissenting views and stifle free speech and legitimate questions.

- Kennedy calls on Gavi to consider the best available science, even when it contradicts established paradigms, and to redefine success not just by the number of vaccines delivered but by their rigorously measured overall impacts.

- He emphasizes the need for Gavi to re-earn public trust and justify the $8 billion in funding provided by the U.S. since 2001.

- Kennedy states that until Gavi changes its approach, proves it can be safe and trustworthy again, the United States WILL NOT contribute one more dime to the organization
 
  • Angry
Reactions: dpic73
RFK Jr blows the fake news to h3ll!!!



In conformance with the pharma-financed mainstream media’s mantric ritual of dutifully parroting the propaganda tropes spoon-fed them by vaccine makers and their captive regulators, @guardian on Friday pronounced thimerosal, the ethylmercury-based vaccine preservative, “safe.” Opining under the headline, “CDC vaccine panel to review ingredient RFK Jr has targeted for removal,” The Guardian authoritatively assures: “The preservative has been deemed safe.” The Guardian did not bother to cite any peer-reviewed study.

Journalists don’t seem to read those anymore. Instead, it referenced a fact check website operated by the Pharma-funded American Academy of Pediatrics. @AmerAcadPeds likewise cites no peer-reviewed study to support this claim or its equally terse assertion that “Thimerosal has been removed from all routine childhood vaccines.”

This is another treadworn lie of the vaccine industry. There are high bolus doses of mercury in flu shots, which CDC recommends to pregnant women in any trimester of pregnancy and as a routine vaccine for children at six months and in every year of life. Between conception and age 18, a compliant American child today could get a cumulative load of as much as 500 mcg of ethylmercury from multidose flu shots—nearly double of what they were once getting from all the childhood vaccines put together.

Now let’s look at The Guardian claim that thimerosal is safe.

A quick search at the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed and PubChem websites nets thousands of studies on search terms such as: mercury neurotoxicity,[1],[2] mercury and development,[3],[4] and mercury and brain,[5],[6] and hundreds that identify thimerosal as a potent neurotoxin, carcinogen, mutagen, and endocrine disruptor. There has never been a study that proves thimerosal safe.

In early 2001, Director of the FDA Office of Vaccine Research and Review, the late William Egan, admitted under oath before Congress that thimerosal’s safety had never been studied in human beings.[7],[8] I leave it to the reader to speculate as to why CDC has not performed such studies in the intervening 24 years as it dosed hundreds of millions of American children and pregnant moms with mercury-laden flu shots. Furthermore, CDC has no existing guidelines for safe exposure to ethylmercury.[9]

But let’s put all that peer-reviewed science aside and just look at what the government and the vaccine industry say about thimerosal. Thimerosal’s label advises against its use during pregnancy, pointing out that thimerosal has never been shown to be safe and that it causes mutations in mammals.[10],[11] Thimerosal’s material safety data sheet (MSDS) acknowledges that thimerosal is “toxic,” has “Nervous System and Reproductive Effects,” and is “mutagenic in mammalian cells,” and that exposure to mercury in thimerosal “in utero and in children can cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment.”[12]

The MSDS lists a grim inventory of dozens of other devastating injuries from thimerosal exposure.[13]
In 2001, the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) revised its thimerosal toxicity statement, warning that thimerosal is “toxic by ingestion and inhalation.”[14]

The California EPA recognizes thimerosal as a reproductive toxicant in the clearest possible language: “Thimerosal dissociates in the body to ethyl mercury. The evidence for its reproductive toxicity includes severe mental retardation or malformations in human offspring who were poisoned when their mothers were exposed to ethyl mercury or thimerosal while pregnant, studies in animals demonstrating developmental toxicity after exposure to either ethyl mercury or thimerosal, and data showing interconversion to other forms of mercury that also clearly cause reproductive toxicity.

The US EPA, the authoritative body relied on when mercury and mercury compounds were listed under California’s Proposition 65, currently identifies mercury and mercury compounds as causing reproductive toxicity.” The amount of ethylmercury in a flu shot is 25,000 times EPA’s safety level for drinking water.[15],[16]

Federal and state laws provide that whenever expired thimerosal vaccines are disposed of, they constitute a hazardous waste.

In 1998, FDA banned thimerosal in all over-the-counter products, ending its use in creams, eye medicine, and disinfectants like mercurochrome. It’s ironic that CDC still recommends its injection into babies.

A 2000 study by the National Research Council found that prenatal and infant mercury exposures cause multiple impacts to basic brain development by disrupting the division and migration of neuronal cells.[17],[18],[19]

According to a National Toxicology Program PowerPoint presentation entitled “Comparative Toxicity of Ethyl and Methyl Mercury”: “Ethylmercury is a neurotoxin. Infants may be more susceptible than adults. Ethylmercury exposure from vaccines (added to dietary exposures to methylmercury) probably caused neurotoxic responses (likely subtle) in some children.”[20]

A 2005 NIH study commissioned by FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) and performed by the National Toxicity Program (NTP) obliterated the industry claim that the ethylmercury in vaccines is less toxic than the heavily regulated methylmercury in fish, finding that the ethylmercury in thimerosal crosses the blood-brain barrier, lodges in the brain, and metabolizes into the most toxic form of mercury at double the rate of methylmercury.[21] A subsequent study found that this highly toxic mercury remains in the brain for over 27 years.[22]

A 2000 study in Neurotoxicology by Dr. William Slikker Jr., former head of the FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research, directly foretold the results of a 2005 NIH-funded study, reporting that “Thimerosal (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate) crosses the blood-brain and placental barriers and results in appreciable mercury content in tissues including brain.”[23]

A 2017 NIH/CDC study links miscarriage to flu vaccines, particularly in the first trimester. Pregnant women vaccinated in the 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 flu seasons had two times greater odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days of receiving the vaccine. [24]

In women who had received the H1N1 vaccine in the previous flu season, the odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days were 7.7 times greater than in women who did not receive a flu shot during their pregnancy. These results are all the more significant when considering the fact that 7 of the 13 authors on the study had potential conflicts of interest such as having received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Novavax, and other Big Pharma companies. One author, Frank DeStefano, was head of CDC’s immunization Safety Branch.

It’s noteworthy that these authors chose not to differentiate outcomes between thimerosal-containing flu shots and those that did not contain thimerosal. Around half the flu shots available at that time contained thimerosal.

On October 1, 2001, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences Immunization Safety Review Committee (ISR) issued a report concluding that the link between thimerosal and the rise of neurological injuries in children, including autism, is “biologically plausible,”[25] and recommended the termination of all thimerosal-preserved vaccines.

An entire bibliography of pharmacokinetic studies by independent scientists, prestigious universities, and prominent research institutes published in high-gravitas journals, attest to thimerosal’s powerful neurotoxicity, and show that mercury tends to accumulate (and remain for considerable periods of time, years to decades) in the brains of primates and other animals after injection of thimerosal-containing vaccines.[26]

It’s worth noting just one of these, a well-known Russian study from 1977 led by Dr. N.D. Mukhtarova, found that the majority of adults exposed to much lower concentrations of ethylmercury than those currently given to American children in vaccines were still suffering neurological injury and neuropathology several years after the exposure. These symptoms included decreased vision, hearing, memory, vertigo, and pain and numbness in the hands and feet.[27],[28]

The Guardian is blind and scientifically baseless repetition of empty industry assurances about thimerosal safety is yet another proof that journalists, and particularly science journalists, have now devolved into obsequious stenographers for Big Pharma.
 


In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, @gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety. When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, it has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, GAVI partnered with the World Health Organization to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and to stifle free speech and legitimate questions during that period.

GAVI should consider the best science available, even when that science contradicts established paradigms. It should define success not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.

I call on GAVI to re-earn the public trust and to justify the $8 billion dollars that America has provided in funding since 2001. Until that happens the United States won’t contribute more to GAVI. Business as usual is over.
 


In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, @gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety. When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, it has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, GAVI partnered with the World Health Organization to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and to stifle free speech and legitimate questions during that period.

GAVI should consider the best science available, even when that science contradicts established paradigms. It should define success not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.

I call on GAVI to re-earn the public trust and to justify the $8 billion dollars that America has provided in funding since 2001. Until that happens the United States won’t contribute more to GAVI. Business as usual is over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374
She hasnt seen it and that is a good thing. Doesn’t mean we should stop looking at them as a cause. Look at everything as a cause until we get the answer. Everything is under the umbrella of possibility until we have answers.

 
Informative thread to drill down into.



Meet Chris Exely known by his colleagues as Mr Aluminium for his prolific work on the impacts of this known toxin.

After decades of study he concluded that if there was no aluminium in brain tissue there would be no Alzheimer’s.

But it was only when he started investigating the link between Aluminium and autism that his life was destroyed.

His findings threaten the entire vaccine industry.

And Scott Gottlieb’s recent statement shows they are in panic mode!

Thread 🧵
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy
First I’ll say that our kids got all the required vaccines and within the recommended time parameters.

That said, I think there is room for nuance here. Perhaps getting 6 vaccines at once is too much for some immune systems. We chose to spread ours out to minimize risk.

There are two reasons vaccines are rushed so early. First to protect the baby as quickly as possible. Second to protect the “herd” as quickly as possible. Not all kids are the same. The risk profile for hep B for my infant is quite different that one in the projects with needles and drug use around. One size fits all doesn’t always apply when circumstances and risk profiles are wildly different. I understand why the “herd” policy needs to be what it is, but individual decisions are okay too.

And of course we weren’t stupid enough to subject our healthy children to the Covid vaccine. In fact we pulled our youngest out of a well-regarded private school when we were asked to sign a form that would allow them to mandate the Covid vaccine for him as a 2 year old.

Good for you

I am a supporter of vaccines but well researched and tested vaccines

The Covid mess to me was a huge government SNAFU that resulted in a lot of deaths due to government being the culprit with Fauci at the epicenter

But as to vaccinating anything that moves under the age of 6 is not a good idea
 
You're ridiculously gullible. When will you learn not to trust quacks and random twitter bots?
Let me re-phrase that....when will you care that you're spreading lies?

There is no credible evidence that the CDC concealed a study linking the hepatitis B vaccine to autism. Claims of this nature often arise from misinterpretations or distortions of scientific data, particularly related to a 2004 CDC study by Verstraeten et al., published in Pediatrics. This study examined thimerosal-containing vaccines, including hepatitis B, and found no consistent association with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A preliminary analysis in the study noted a possible correlation in a specific subgroup (African-American boys), but this was not statistically significant and was likely influenced by confounding factors, such as preschool vaccination requirements.

The final study concluded no causal link. Allegations of a cover-up, frequently cited in anti-vaccine circles and some X posts, often misrepresent this study or reference debunked claims, such as Andrew Wakefield’s retracted 1998 study.
A 2025 PRWeb article and similar sources have claimed a "1135% increased risk" or "10,000% risk" of autism, but these figures are not supported by peer-reviewed research and are considered misleading.

The CDC, World Health Organization, and Institute of Medicine (2004 report) have consistently found no link between the hepatitis B vaccine or thimerosal and autism. Thimerosal was removed from most childhood vaccines in the U.S. by 2001 as a precaution, despite no evidence of harm. No verifiable study linking hepatitis B vaccine to autism has been suppressed by the CDC. The vaccine’s safety is backed by extensive global data, with serious adverse events occurring in less than one in a million doses.