Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Black guy, prob racially motivated and incited by the media’s bullshit coverage of the Rittenhouse trial. Has the MSM talked about the perp yet? It was covered by all conservative outlets this morning, but the classic media was doing their best to skirt around the guy’s description
Why are you assuming leftism???He is a career criminal who belongs in jail forever. This never should have happened. Leftism fails Americans again.
You're sniffing up the wrong tree dingnob. This didn't have a damn thing to do with the Rittenhouse trial, but you immediately made the leap that it was racially motivated. I bet you and the rest of the mayonnaise militia were halfway to Waukesha when you heard the news.Black guy, prob racially motivated and incited by the media’s bullshit coverage of the Rittenhouse trial. Has the MSM talked about the perp yet? It was covered by all conservative outlets this morning, but the classic media was doing their best to skirt around the guy’s description
You just made the same supposed leap assuming it wasn’t racially motivated. Truth be told whatever it is you think you know is almost assuredly a lie coming from whichever propaganda outlet you subscribeYou're sniffing up the wrong tree dingnob. This didn't have a damn thing to do with the Rittenhouse trial, but you immediately made the leap that it was racially motivated. I bet you and the rest of the mayonnaise militia were halfway to Waukesha when you heard the news.
Says the guy who under his old handle advocated for a Civil war so he could kill libs with impunity. My "propaganda" doesn't lead me to want to slaughter people I don't like, so I'll stick with my outlets, thanks.You just made the same supposed leap assuming it wasn’t racially motivated. Truth be told whatever it is you think you know is almost assuredly a lie coming from whichever propaganda outlet you subscribe
One look at the guys social media posts and track record and there is plenty of reasons to assume this was racially motivated
Says the guy who under his old handle advocated for a Civil war so he could kill libs with impunity. My "propaganda" doesn't lead me to want to slaughter people I don't like, so I'll stick with my outlets, thanks.
Why are you assuming leftism???
By showing YOUR posts? That's RICH! LMAOLololololololololol
You are quite the fool
It was a joke you absolute imbecile. This gonna be another example of leftist bullshit where you take an obvious tongue-in-cheek comment and try to act like it was said in 100% sincerity? You people do it all the time, just like Trump wishing Ghislaine wellBy showing YOUR posts? That's RICH! LMAO
Or more like Trump saying his idea about disinfectant was "sarcastic?" 😂 Let's just say you've shown enough of your true colors over the years to make the post seem absolutely believable. Hatred of others oozes from your pores. Your outlets and your tribe have radicalized you and you don't even see it. SadIt was a joke you absolute imbecile. This gonna be another example of leftist bullshit where you take an obvious tongue-in-cheek comment and try to act like it was said in 100% sincerity? You people do it all the time, just like Trump wishing Ghislaine well
So so so so absolutely stupid and pathetic
Hatred of the radical left, and the usual suspects on this board? Yeah, you're right 100%.Or more like Trump saying his idea about disinfectant was "sarcastic?" 😂 Let's just say you've shown enough of your true colors over the years to make the post seem absolutely believable. Hatred of others oozes from your pores. Your outlets and your tribe have radicalized you and you don't even see it. Sad
Dude you are disturbed, but I'm not going to waste any more energy on your nonsense, so back to your regularly scheduled profiling.Hatred of the radical left, and the usual suspects on this board? Yeah, you're right 100%.
Make no mistake, the hatred hasn't come from the radicalization of the right, it's from the radicalization of you and your ilk. Hatred of the country, constantly trying to undermine the constitution, sexualization of children, pushing socialism, etc etc. And were the ones who've been radicalized? LMAO
You're so insanely lost and manipulatable it's pathetic.
you're wasting your time engaging about 99% of the round table regulars. just complete lost causesDude you are disturbed, but I'm not going to waste any more energy on your nonsense, so back to your regularly scheduled profiling.
Enjoy your Thanksgiving
Why don’t you explain how anything about my OP is a disaster other than a felon who should have been locked up forever after killing innocent Americans is a disaster. You have an answer for everything bro. This guy is a barbarian who was out on $1,000 bail. The system failed and now innocent Americans are dead and families destroyed. Only a weak liberal pvssy would stick up for the driver of the SUV or the system that had him out on $1,000 bail.this thread is a ****ing disaster. yikes.
Why don’t you explain how anything about my OP is a disaster other than a felon who should have been locked up forever after killing innocent Americans is a disaster. You have an answer for everything bro. This guy is a barbarian who was out on $1,000 bail. The system failed and now innocent Americans are dead and families destroyed. Only a weak liberal pvssy would stick up for the driver of the SUV or the system that had him out on $1,000 bail.
You think by calling the knuckledraggers itt a disaster that I'm somehow "sticking up for the driver of the SUV..."?
Come on man. That's quite a leap.
And, I wasn't even talking about your OP. But, read just the 2nd post...
The thread is obviously a ****ing disaster.
When will you stop lying to yourself? Open your eyes and get off your partisan throne. This is on your president.You think by calling the knuckledraggers itt a disaster that I'm somehow "sticking up for the driver of the SUV..."?
Come on man. That's quite a leap.
And, I wasn't even talking about your OP. But, read just the 2nd post...
The thread is obviously a ****ing disaster.
It's almost like this tragedy never happened if you're browsing the various media channels.......not one single mention this morning on CNN, MSNBC, etc websites.
A man intentionally ran people over at a parade, has social media receipts to prove he was a racist activist and yet the the media hasn't called him a domestic terrorist and you have to search conservative media to find any information about it.
MSNBC must mention white conservatives, white supremacy, Trump, kyle rittenhouse verdict, GOP failure etc about 20 times on the home page but nothing on Darrel Brooks Jr.......
Even Reuters, who I typically find to be relatively neutral has nothing on Darrell but I can read about how Lululemon is suing Peloton over bras.......
Terrible stuff
I haven't weighed in on any of the three cases but this one has one element that's distinctively different than the others. The Rittenhouse and Arbery cases involved trials that had the potential to find the defendants innocent. This one is pretty cut and dry - a deranged, career criminal mowed down random people at a parade and we all saw it on camera. He'll be thrown under the jail and he will deserve it and we ALL agree on that. His actual motive is still unknown but almost immaterial because he should fry regardless. I'm pretty sure that everyone, regardless of party, feels the same way about this one, so what kind of reporting would satisfy you? Maybe his motive was racist but in a town that's 89% white, if you're going to mow down people in a Waukesha parade, it's almost guaranteed those people will be white, even if he didn't specifically target them. So I understand you want blood over the media's treatment of this POS, but what should they be focusing on that's worth repeatedly reporting on? Are we supposed to believe he had a deep seated hatred of dancing grannies and this will lead to a rash of octogenarian murders? Again, you don't know what his motive was but he's a giant piece of excrement regardless of his motive. So what do you want from the media exactly??It's almost like this tragedy never happened if you're browsing the various media channels.......not one single mention this morning on CNN, MSNBC, etc websites.
A man intentionally ran people over at a parade, has social media receipts to prove he was a racist activist and yet the the media hasn't called him a domestic terrorist and you have to search conservative media to find any information about it.
MSNBC must mention white conservatives, white supremacy, Trump, kyle rittenhouse verdict, GOP failure etc about 20 times on the home page but nothing on Darrel Brooks Jr.......
Even Reuters, who I typically find to be relatively neutral has nothing on Darrell but I can read about how Lululemon is suing Peloton over bras.......
Terrible stuff
I haven't weighed in on any of the three cases but this one has one element that's distinctively different than the others. The Rittenhouse and Arbery cases involved trials that had the potential to find the defendants innocent. This one is pretty cut and dry - a deranged, career criminal mowed down random people at a parade and we all saw it on camera. He'll be thrown under the jail and he will deserve it and we ALL agree on that. His actual motive is still unknown but almost immaterial because he should fry regardless. I'm pretty sure that everyone, regardless of party, feels the same way about this one, so what kind of reporting would satisfy you? Maybe his motive was racist but in a town that's 89% white, if you're going to mow down people in a Waukesha parade, it's almost guaranteed those people will be white, even if he didn't specifically target them. So I understand you want blood over the media's treatment of this POS, but what should they be focusing on that's worth repeatedly reporting on? Are we supposed to believe he had a deep seated hatred of dancing grannies and this will lead to a rash of octogenarian murders? Again, you don't know what his motive was but he's a giant piece of excrement regardless of his motive. So what do you want from the media exactly??
The media refuse to call this what it is because it doesn't point a finger at a white domestic terrorist, racist or white supremacist so there is no reporting on it. The media is still calling Rittenhouse a racist post trial, despite shooting 3 white people along with his proven innocence and even though there was a guilty verdict in the Arbery case, we are still hearing about how the justice system is broken and racist and they will likely be retried a second time under the hate crime charge. In both cases, the right verdict was delivered but yet both are still getting more coverage.
Totally agree with you, both parties should want to understand why this man was out on $1000 bail despite being arrested a slew of times for pretty aggressive crimes and why he chose to drive his car into a bunch of innocent people that oddly happened to be white when his social media clearly states he doesn't like white people. Most importantly around motive, I would like to understand if it is indeed part of a wider movement of BLM supporters targeting people that aren't black and I'd love to understand if that movement is being funded by the org that hasn't seemingly given money back to any black communities or families of victims they used to raise capital through donations. So perhaps the media, regardless of bias could do their jobs and execute on some investigative journalism so we can understand why.
Just a quick point to make......the left and media on the left seem to be enraged when a mixed race mother speaks out against critical race theory at a school board going as far as to investigate her background but this gets swept under a rug. No media bias though, right?
Here is a great example, if you read this as is......it sounds like the car drove itself. Fails to leave out the angry non-white male driving it. Why would the media do that?
It’s actually not stupid…….it’s very feasible giving that many of the BLM leadership have openly called for it.Yes. These are stupid headlines.
But also, you being worried about a blm plot to attack non blacks is also awfully stupid.
Got it, the media are only interested in murders that point at white supremacists. The reason the Rittenhouse and Arbery trials got so much attention is because both reflected what looked to be vigilante justice by people who were not part of law enforcement. That POS in Waukesha wasn't trying to enforce any laws and just wantonly murdered people. I get it that you're trying to apply a double standard here, but how much media coverage should you give to a criminal acting on his own? You're trying to ascribe some kind of leftist plot here that doesn't appear to exist. In a town that's only 3.5% black, it's plenty unlikely you're going to run over a black person in a parade if you tried. But carry on with your imagined conspiracy.The media refuse to call this what it is because it doesn't point a finger at a white domestic terrorist, racist or white supremacist so there is no reporting on it. The media is still calling Rittenhouse a racist post trial, despite shooting 3 white people along with his proven innocence and even though there was a guilty verdict in the Arbery case, we are still hearing about how the justice system is broken and racist and they will likely be retried a second time under the hate crime charge. In both cases, the right verdict was delivered but yet both are still getting more coverage.
Totally agree with you, both parties should want to understand why this man was out on $1000 bail despite being arrested a slew of times for pretty aggressive crimes and why he chose to drive his car into a bunch of innocent people that oddly happened to be white when his social media clearly states he doesn't like white people. Most importantly around motive, I would like to understand if it is indeed part of a wider movement of BLM supporters targeting people that aren't black and I'd love to understand if that movement is being funded by the org that hasn't seemingly given money back to any black communities or families of victims they used to raise capital through donations. So perhaps the media, regardless of bias could do their jobs and execute on some investigative journalism so we can understand why.
Just a quick point to make......the left and media on the left seem to be enraged when a mixed race mother speaks out against critical race theory at a school board going as far as to investigate her background but this gets swept under a rug. No media bias though, right?
Just can’t make this shit upGot it, the media are only interested in murders that point at white supremacists. The reason the Rittenhouse and Arbery trials got so much attention is because both reflected what looked to be vigilante justice by people who were not part of law enforcement. That POS in Waukesha wasn't trying to enforce any laws and just wantonly murdered people. I get it that you're trying to apply a double standard here, but how much media coverage should you give to a criminal acting on his own? You're trying to ascribe some kind of leftist plot here that doesn't appear to exist. In a town that's only 3.5% black, it's plenty unlikely you're going to run over a black person in a parade if you tried. But carry on with your imagined conspiracy.
Yes. These are stupid headlines.
But also, you being worried about a blm plot to attack non blacks is also awfully stupid.