ADVERTISEMENT

Well, my concern over tax increases is being elevated to fear

LoL bruh, nobody here believes this is going to impact you in any way. Stop being such a poser.

But, it's about fvcking time the actual wealthy people started paying their fair share.
Serious question. What is your problem? Are you a poor who thinks it's not your fault that you're poor and the world owes you something? Serious question: WHAT is your deal?
 
This. On brand, Biden talked about CEO compensation and the fact that the top 650 BILLIONAIRES increased their net worth by $4 Trillion during the pandemic.

Okay, interesting fact, but what exactly does that have to do with people making $400K or cap gains on people making $1M? Those are rounding errors to the richest 650 in the US. Those thresholds have nothing to do with billionaires.

If you want people to pay their fair share as you say over and over and over again, maybe actually focus on those not paying their fair share. Because it's not "normal" high earners that will be impacted by these policies.

They used the super rich to justify their prison shower raping of people who do well. All you had to do was hear what Chris Wallace said last night. He essentially said great speech, will appeal to Americans. Corporations and people making $400k will pay for this and most people watching will not. As if that somehow makes it OK to confiscate wealth from people who have earned it. As if higher prices will be a regressive effect on the middle class and poor from this kind of insanely bad economics. If Americans really are this stupid then they can just have the ruin that will come from this.

It's a long way back but we need to go back to the early 1900's in terms of what the government does. FDR destroyed the country and we've just kept on the path since. None of this was intended. We've always been an imperfect (and in some ways just bad) country but we've always endeavored to be better. More government isn't better. The promise of freedom and liberty being extended to everyone that lives here should be the goal. All citizens should have the same freedoms to achieve.

The middle class isn't some set group of people. It is always evolving. But people like Biden just can't help making it some monolithic group which it isn't. I started off poor and moved to the middle and now I'm trying to move up again. That's how it's supposed to work.
 
This. On brand, Biden talked about CEO compensation and the fact that the top 650 BILLIONAIRES increased their net worth by $4 Trillion during the pandemic.

Okay, interesting fact, but what exactly does that have to do with people making $400K or cap gains on people making $1M? Those are rounding errors to the richest 650 in the US. Those thresholds have nothing to do with billionaires.

If you want people to pay their fair share as you say over and over and over again, maybe actually focus on those not paying their fair share. Because it's not "normal" high earners that will be impacted by these policies.

Uncle Joe has heard you Scotchtiger. He has earned your vote in 2024.


President Biden, looking to pay for his ambitious economic agenda and shift more of the nation’s tax burden to the wealthy, will propose giving the Internal Revenue Service an extra $80 billion and more authority over the next 10 years to help crack down on tax evasion by high-earners and large corporations.
 
This. On brand, Biden talked about CEO compensation and the fact that the top 650 BILLIONAIRES increased their net worth by $4 Trillion during the pandemic.

Okay, interesting fact, but what exactly does that have to do with people making $400K or cap gains on people making $1M? Those are rounding errors to the richest 650 in the US. Those thresholds have nothing to do with billionaires.

If you want people to pay their fair share as you say over and over and over again, maybe actually focus on those not paying their fair share. Because it's not "normal" high earners that will be impacted by these policies.
Rounding error is a very accurate description.

I can't recall the stat but something like 40 or 50% of America doesn't pay any taxes and in some cases are in negative tax deficit meaning they have no burden and get a refund somehow. Those numbers almost surely rise this year and next due to stimmys.

The ultra wealthy use shell .Llc's which are insolvent on purpose and then write off almost everything against them until they get to a reasonable tax burden. Anyone with a B in the bank probably has multiple. After a year or two, you kill that .LLC writing the losses off and you start another with similar attributes. All of that is legal
 
Uncle Joe has heard you Scotchtiger. He has earned your vote in 2024.


President Biden, looking to pay for his ambitious economic agenda and shift more of the nation’s tax burden to the wealthy, will propose giving the Internal Revenue Service an extra $80 billion and more authority over the next 10 years to help crack down on tax evasion by high-earners and large corporations.

He still defines high earners as those making $400K+. It just means the IRS may have more bandwidth to audit me for not collecting taxes for my nanny, or for writing off two annual company parties for my real estate investment LLC. F that.

Edit: Hypothetically, of course.

If the president is successful, individuals who earn more than $400,000 a year would face a higher likelihood of a tax audit, regardless of how much income they report on their tax forms, a person familiar with the plan said.
 
Last edited:
He still defines high earners as those making $400K+. It just means the IRS may have more bandwidth to audit me for not collecting taxes for my nanny, or for writing off two annual company parties for my real estate investment LLC. F that.

Edit: Hypothetically, of course.

If the president is successful, individuals who earn more than $400,000 a year would face a higher likelihood of a tax audit, regardless of how much income they report on their tax forms, a person familiar with the plan said.
He’s going to put $80b into the IRS as part of his “infrastructure” funding and weaponize it like Obama did. Anyone else remember when Obama told the IRS not to approve any conservative not-for-profits? Yikes

I’d expect audits will double if that makes it through
 
He’s going to put $80b into the IRS as part of his “infrastructure” funding and weaponize it like Obama did. Anyone else remember when Obama told the IRS not to approve any conservative not-for-profits? Yikes

I’d expect audits will double if that makes it through

Are your referring to the Obama IRS scandal that the a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) said never happens after an extensive investigation? Damn dude, you really are tigergrowls.
 
They used the super rich to justify their prison shower raping of people who do well. All you had to do was hear what Chris Wallace said last night. He essentially said great speech, will appeal to Americans. Corporations and people making $400k will pay for this and most people watching will not. As if that somehow makes it OK to confiscate wealth from people who have earned it. As if higher prices will be a regressive effect on the middle class and poor from this kind of insanely bad economics. If Americans really are this stupid then they can just have the ruin that will come from this.

It's a long way back but we need to go back to the early 1900's in terms of what the government does. FDR destroyed the country and we've just kept on the path since. None of this was intended. We've always been an imperfect (and in some ways just bad) country but we've always endeavored to be better. More government isn't better. The promise of freedom and liberty being extended to everyone that lives here should be the goal. All citizens should have the same freedoms to achieve.

The middle class isn't some set group of people. It is always evolving. But people like Biden just can't help making it some monolithic group which it isn't. I started off poor and moved to the middle and now I'm trying to move up again. That's how it's supposed to work.

THIS. Democrats and their accomplices in the media push this concept of filthy rich as if being well off is filthy and something abhorrent. And they create a wealth envy in this country that powers losers to the Democratic Party. It is obscene what a big lie it all is but people fall for it every time.
 
Are your referring to the Obama IRS scandal that the a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) said never happens after an extensive investigation? Damn dude, you really are tigergrowls.
You’re conveniently leaving out the part where the DOJ paid out millions in settlement money to conservative companies to avoid federal charges but .....no, nothing to see here.
 
You’re conveniently leaving out the part where the DOJ paid out millions in settlement money to conservative companies to avoid federal charges but .....no, nothing to see here.

Shocking! Trump’s DOJ agreed to pay settlements for bogus lawsuits filed by conservative groups. I wonder how much of a kickback Ivanka got?
 
Just curious what percentage of the last dollar you make will be too much for people/companies to scale back business. I mean people need some incentive to expand business or just work more in some cases. If a self employed single proprietor in SC shows even a modest income of $55K after expenses and takes the standard deduction that brings his taxable income down to just over $42K. At that point, the government takes over 44% of every dollar he makes. That is not the super rich. That is no better than middle/lower middle class. What incentive does that guy have to work harder or possibly expand his business? The answer is very little.
 
Just curious what percentage of the last dollar you make will be too much for people/companies to scale back business. I mean people need some incentive to expand business or just work more in some cases. If a self employed single proprietor in SC shows even a modest income of $55K after expenses and takes the standard deduction that brings his taxable income down to just over $42K. At that point, the government takes over 44% of every dollar he makes. That is not the super rich. That is no better than middle/lower middle class. What incentive does that guy have to work harder or possibly expand his business? The answer is very little.
I hate taxes as much as anyone, but you may want to check you math. And $42K for a family isn’t even middles class. I could send my two boys out mowing lawns fulltime and they’d make more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tallulahtiger30319
I mean the hits are coming from all sides. This is ridiculous.

Some of you may be unfamiliar with capital gains taxes, but if this is implemented with a "cliff" approach, it's completely punitive. Today, if you make a basic income, you pay 15% on your long-term investment income. Once you earn over a certain amount, you pay 20%. It's a cliff, so once you earn a dollar over that ordinary income threshold, all of your long term investment income is hit at the higher rate. It's dumb.

I could actually stomach an adjustment to capital gains. But linking ordinary income and capital gains rates isn't the right or equitable approach. There should simply be a tiered structure applied to long-term gains, just like ordinary income.

For example: Your first $500K of long-term gains is taxed at 15%, next $500K taxed at 20%, the rest ($1M+) taxed at 25%. My proposal would be to make those rates inclusive of the 3.8% ACA surcharge.

Here are some of the tax increases coming. And they will affect millions of hard-working, productive people - not just the billionaires and super rich. This is on top of an increase to the corporate tax rate.

Raising income taxes on the rich
Biden wants to reverse a key plank of the Republicans' 2017 tax cuts by returning the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6%, up from 37%. It would apply only to those in the top 1%.

Raising the capital gains tax rate
The proposal would require households earning more than $1 million annually to pay higher taxes on capital gains, which typically make up the largest share of income for the wealthy.
The long-term capital gains of these taxpayers would be subject to the top marginal rate for income -- currently 37%, but rising to 39.6% under Biden's plan.
Right now, investments held for at least one year are subject to a top federal capital gains rate of 20%. Individuals earning $200,000 a year and married couples making $250,000 a year pay an additional 3.8% tax on their capital gains to help fund the Affordable Care Act.

Ending breaks for real estate investors
Also, he wants to end a tax break that allows real estate investors to defer taxation when they exchange property for gains greater than $500,000.

Yes this sucks for sure
 
I hate taxes as much as anyone, but you may want to check you math. And $42K for a family isn’t even middles class. I could send my two boys out mowing lawns fulltime and they’d make more.
At $42k taxable income you are paying 22% federal, 7% state and 15.3% self employment tax(SS/Medc) for every additional dollar you make. 22+7+15=44% Where is the math wrong? This is for a single filer - no family. I may have made a mistake, I just don't see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tallulahtiger30319
Shocking! Trump’s DOJ agreed to pay settlements for bogus lawsuits filed by conservative groups. I wonder how much of a kickback Ivanka got?
Probably close to the same kickback that Biden got from Hunters “entirely legit” overseas business dealings. You know.....the ones he didn’t have any knowledge of but knew his son was smoking crack and sleeping with his dead brother’s widow. Seems like out of those three things, you’d probably only want your Dad to know about one of them.

Sure, this was all Trumps fault. I guess he helped wipe the blackberries and military grade shred the hard drives despite a legal order not to remove evidence. Hillary playbook 101
 
Probably close to the same kickback that Biden got from Hunters “entirely legit” overseas business dealings. You know.....the ones he didn’t have any knowledge of but knew his son was smoking crack and sleeping with his dead brother’s widow. Seems like out of those three things, you’d probably only want your Dad to know about one of them.

Sure, this was all Trumps fault. I guess he helped wipe the blackberries and military grade shred the hard drives despite a legal order not to remove evidence. Hillary playbook 101

giphy.gif


You can throw all the bullshit about wiping servers and blackberries against the wall that you want. At least Hilary had the balls to show up for her congressional subpoenas, nobody in the Trump admin bothered to. Let's call it Trump playbook 101.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12
At $42k taxable income you are paying 22% federal, 7% state and 15.3% self employment tax(SS/Medc) for every additional dollar you make. 22+7+15=44% Where is the math wrong? This is for a single filer - no family. I may have made a mistake, I just don't see it.

Got it. Wasn't reading it as marginal rate, but rather effective rate. So yes, after that, the gubment is taking nearly half of your income.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CUT93
I think we can all agree, this who needs to be paying more taxes...

66% of U.S. households worth more than $25 million inherited their wealth.
https://trib.al/6xfyfxu?fbclid=IwAR2B__bd6oqGpnmOW6AoI_zVRRUK_iEwoP6CJsmSVItc_FjzEJ0NJkUqR4M

Interesting that the percentage tripled in 14 years. I haven’t inherited anything, but don’t like the idea of taxing people when they earn it, taxing it as the invest it and taxing it when they die. Numbers aside, that doesn’t seem right.
 
I think we can all agree, this who needs to be paying more taxes...

66% of U.S. households worth more than $25 million inherited their wealth.
https://trib.al/6xfyfxu?fbclid=IwAR2B__bd6oqGpnmOW6AoI_zVRRUK_iEwoP6CJsmSVItc_FjzEJ0NJkUqR4M
If some one inherited $25M, the govt has already taken a large share of that $$$ in most cases. First, that $$ was taxed when it was earned. Second, if some one got $25M in from an estate, the estate was likely $35M to start with and the govt already took ~ $10M more from the estate before that $25M was passed down. Chances are good the govt has already taken at least half of it before it is was inherited. That doesn't even account for someone living in your state of NY where the state would take an additional 16%.
What we need to do is quit rewarding people for making bad life choices, particularly repeatedly doing so. We have a huge problem with entitlement programs. FDR started social security, which is obviously the largest. It's time for congress to get back closer to FDR's intent for the program, and those like it. SS was never meant to be a permanent source of income, it was supposed to be temporary. This should be true for all entitlement programs. They should be programs to bridge gaps in times of unexpected events or hardship, not lifelong means of support. There are some fairly easy ways to push the curve on entitlements down long term. This is what we should be doing instead of trying to find new ways for the govt to take more $$ from the minority of people who pay taxes.
 
I agree with you on enforcement of the ultra wealthy. These policies really have nothing to do with them. That's a much bigger problem than someone making $400K not paying enough, but nothing is being done there.

The top bracket increase isn't as big of a deal as capital gains IMO. Capital gains can come in big swaths and depending on circumstances, the timing can be somewhat out of your control. Real estate sales, business divestiture, company stock gains, etc. This policy change could result in some serious damage to a single instance of gains that have taken years of work to build toward.

Many don't understand how it all works. They just see the numbers and think, oh yea, screw those rich people. It doesn't always work that way. You and posters like @iceheart08 always advocate for understanding the nuance in policy - I'm pointing out that this could erode the life's work of people by lumping them in with the ultra wealthy simply because of one year's income level.
Many just repeat partisan talking points like “fair share” when discussing tax policy. Those are the low information voters/citizens that the left preys and relies on. Don’t waste your time.
 
giphy.gif


You can throw all the bullshit about wiping servers and blackberries against the wall that you want. At least Hilary had the balls to show up for her congressional subpoenas, nobody in the Trump admin bothered to. Let's call it Trump playbook 101.
Why wouldn’t she show up after ensuring there was no proof and knowing she had the state department making sure she didn’t get ambushed? Did you read any of the declassified docs?

The Clinton’s are total scumbags. If you want me to say Trump is a scumbag, fine but you folks that won’t admit the Clintons are shitty people just tell me you’re either stupid or dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls
Many just repeat partisan talking points like “fair share” when discussing tax policy. Those are the low information voters/citizens that the left preys and relies on. Don’t waste your time.

The notion that it's just the left that "preys and relies" on "low information voters" is absolutely ****ing stupid. The right, objectively, does as well.

If you disagree that this is definitely a both sides, kinda thing, maybe you are one of those voters...
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12
Why wouldn’t she show up after ensuring there was no proof and knowing she had the state department making sure she didn’t get ambushed? Did you read any of the declassified docs?

The Clinton’s are total scumbags. If you want me to say Trump is a scumbag, fine but you folks that won’t admit the Clintons are shitty people just tell me you’re either stupid or dumb.
you'd be hardpressed to find someone on TI that doesn't think the clintons are scumbags. even the left on here (which are mostly just former pubs who didn't like trump) think both hilary and bill are shit heels
 
  • Like
Reactions: fcctiger12
you'd be hardpressed to find someone on TI that doesn't think the clintons are scumbags. even the left on here (which are mostly just former pubs who didn't like trump) think both hilary and bill are shit heels

You'll need to be a little more clear about your definition of scumbags. Do I think Bill and Hilary are scumbags? Sure. But keep in mind that @jakefest and others in this thread believe that the Clintons are satanic cult pedophiles who rape kids in the non-existent basement of a Washington DC pizzeria.
 
You'll need to be a little more clear about your definition of scumbags. Do I think Bill and Hilary are scumbags? Sure. But keep in mind that @jakefest and others in this thread believe that the Clintons are satanic cult pedophiles who rape kids in the non-existent basement of a Washington DC pizzeria.
well in their defense, i haven't seen any evidence that they AREN'T raping kids in non-existent basements of washington dc pizzerias

check mate, lib
 
  • Like
Reactions: jakefest
You'll need to be a little more clear about your definition of scumbags. Do I think Bill and Hilary are scumbags? Sure. But keep in mind that @jakefest and others in this thread believe that the Clintons are satanic cult pedophiles who rape kids in the non-existent basement of a Washington DC pizzeria.
Yeah, I never said anything like that. What they are though is an example of corrupt political lifers that cheat the system and never get taken to task for it. Money laundering, insider trading, foreign interest/influence donations and a fake shell of a 5013c that pads their wallets.

Don’t get me started on Russia, Benghazi etc.

And I’m sure Bill has some experience with 17 year olds on island Epstein. Even you think that you just won’t say it.
 
You'll need to be a little more clear about your definition of scumbags. Do I think Bill and Hilary are scumbags? Sure. But keep in mind that @jakefest and others in this thread believe that the Clintons are satanic cult pedophiles who rape kids in the non-existent basement of a Washington DC pizzeria.

Well stuff is happening that most would never guess. Just saying and this is far from the only example.

 
Well stuff is happening that most would never guess. Just saying and this is far from the only example.


Oh man a state lawmaker in Oregon was arrested? The Clintons must be involved, I mean how could they not be?

And of course Trump is involved in this case. It has his fingerprints all over it.


sub-buzz-1363-1563381905-2.jpg
 
Somewhat of a reprieve here ($400K to $509K), but the limit should still be higher. And the anti-equality marriage penalty is still evident unfortunately. Perhaps in the spirit of equal work/equal pay, joint tax brackets should always be double individual brackets...

President Joe Biden’s proposed income tax increases for the wealthy would hit individuals earning more than $452,700 in 2022 and married couples making at least $509,300, according to a White House official.

 
I also read in one of the articles that Biden wants people making more than $400K to also starting paying SS taxes again at that threshold. Which is of course absolutely absurd. It’s a safety net program and you have more than satisfied your contribution after you’ve reached the cap.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT