Similar to a Proud Boy right?A good Muslim and a typical Antifa are two separate types of people.
Similar to a Proud Boy right?A good Muslim and a typical Antifa are two separate types of people.
Similar to a Proud Boy right?
Maybe the best point that the President made during the debates was that there is, for all practical purposes, no such thing as a political moderate. You have two choices and that’s it. If you vote for Biden then you are voting for the entirety of the Democratic platform and if you vote for him then you’re voting for the entirety of the Republican platform. So at the end of the day, even if you’re a “moderate” you can only fall in one of two camps.For the record, since I purposely avoid most discussion on this topic here, I consider myself a political moderate; typically more conservative on fiscal/economic issues and more liberal with social issues.
Given my interest in the law, I am curious for those voting primarily or exclusively Democrat: do you support expanding the Supreme Court if the votes are there to do so?
If attempted, I feel this would stand as the most politically charged fiasco in recent US history and would be a gravely erroneous action.
I understand the disagreement with Barrett's nomination being pushed through but that response is not nearly warranted by it, IMO. Frankly the only improperly handled nomination to the Court in the last 10 years was Merrick Garland - that was patently wrong. Altering the number of seats on the Court should still not be a political issue as I see it.
Understand your point of view here, but to me, it's standing for a country in which God is the foundation, vs one in which has a God-less foundation. The latter is who the far left are, and in saying such... many good Godly democrats exist.
Great post. And the point about being a moderate is correct; doubtless why voting for Federal level offices doesn't leave me feeling "good" about doing my civic duty - to do it I have to turn my back on issues that are important but not primarily important. That being the case I follow my wallet's best interest as best I can.Maybe the best point that the President made during the debates was that there is, for all practical purposes, no such thing as a political moderate. You have two choices and that’s it. If you vote for Biden then you are voting for the entirety of the Democratic platform and if you vote for him then you’re voting for the entirety of the Republican platform. So at the end of the day, even if you’re a “moderate” you can only fall in one of two camps.
The second best point the President made was that “elections have consequences” and that his Presidency doesn’t end on 11/3/20. Personally I felt that the President was right to nominate a justice - he won the election in 2016 and his Presidency and the authority it gives him doesn’t end just because an election is close. Imagine if there was a terrorist attack and we said “wait, the President shouldn’t respond to that until after the election.” It doesn’t make sense.
I would not support packing the Supreme Court and I don’t think many Americans would. The last time (to my knowledge) it was tried was when FDR was President and even then it was wildly unpopular.
The far left and right are jokes. Only the loonies live out on the edges. But they are really two sides of the same coin. It reminds me of the U.S. and Russia, in that these two super powers are worlds apart in so many ways, but are actually so close that someone could swim between the two nations.
As we know, most of us reside somewhere in the middle. But the problem with having only two options is everyone must fit into one bucket or the other. So you are forced to accept the crazy extremes that align themselves with your side.
If there was a third option, say for a middle-of-the-road school of thought, it would do great. But the one thing that unites our two parties currently is the desire to hold fast to their power, and never cede any of it to others.
So until that changes, you can keep saying "I could never support that side because it's the party of _____________". But they are both filled with questionable people and mindsets.
I'm in favor of chucking both and starting over. Dabo for President!
For the record, since I purposely avoid most discussion on this topic here, I consider myself a political moderate; typically more conservative on fiscal/economic issues and more liberal with social issues.
Given my interest in the law, I am curious for those voting primarily or exclusively Democrat: do you support expanding the Supreme Court if the votes are there to do so?
If attempted, I feel this would stand as the most politically charged fiasco in recent US history and would be a gravely erroneous action.
I understand the disagreement with Barrett's nomination being pushed through but that response is not nearly warranted by it, IMO. Frankly the only improperly handled nomination to the Court in the last 10 years was Merrick Garland - that was patently wrong. Altering the number of seats on the Court should still not be a political issue as I see it.
At some point..... I hope the United States of America wins. Everyone believes a political party is the answer and that’s tearing this country apart.
One of the real issues is that the moderates aren't very invested in politics or the news cycle. That leaves the echo chamber open to the craziest on both sides. What we really.need is a candidate who is very likeable,but isn't an asshole,who wants common sense. I have no idea who that actually is,but we badly need someone with some positivity. I think most of us are just exhausted by all of this.
Interesting choice of words since, ironically, when it comes to the law, precedent should provide stability. Not saying departure from it is never appropriate but it should be reliable in a broad sense so that we all know where we stand. *standard disclaimer since this is a political thread: I'm not disagreeing with you at all, simply continuing the thought*Also a moderate here. I find changing the balance of the supreme court to be concerning. I don't think extreme measures should ever be taken. This includes not allowing Obama to appoint Garland, pushing through Barrett for what seems to be last ditch political shift, and adding justices.
Precedent is a dangerous thing...
Due to my Christian values I can’t vote for any democrat. I’m Trump all the way! With that being said, I think it’s too close to call right now.
Interesting choice of words since, ironically, when it comes to the law, precedent should provide stability. Not saying departure from it is never appropriate but it should be reliable in a broad sense so that we all know where we stand. *standard disclaimer since this is a political thread: I'm not disagreeing with you at all, simply continuing the thought*
Due to my Christian values I can’t vote for any democrat. I’m Trump all the way! With that being said, I think it’s too close to call right now.
Without getting into who I voted for and why, I do think Biden wins. The second wave of Covid could not be hitting at a worse time for Trump, and I just think in general people in the middle are getting Trump fatigue.
I know the 3 am tweet storms fire up his base, but over time I think they wear down and turn off the more marginally conservative voters.
Great post. And the point about being a moderate is correct; doubtless why voting for Federal level offices doesn't leave me feeling "good" about doing my civic duty - to do it I have to turn my back on issues that are important but not primarily important. That being the case I follow my wallet's best interest as best I can.
I'm not a democrat, but know many who are. Curious why you think Christianity would keep you from voting that way?
Precedent is a dangerous thing...
And herein lies the problem...... the actual thing that needs fixing is the people that control these TWO MEGACORPORATIONS called political parties have no interest to do so. They have ZERO incentive to address it because it limits themselves.we need term limits. That diminishes the power of the DNC and the RNC to force people to vote with the party instead of their conscious out of fear of losing campaign funds.
also, whoever is president is not allowed to use social media.
all that said, Biden wins.
Some truth here too particularly in regard to Trump's direction. As with most things (everything?) there are (many) more angles than one from which to view. I read @dbjork6317's post to say that the current political landscape forces people "in the middle" to one side or the other whether they like it or not and thus eliminates the middle ground in a de facto sense.I'm not sure I could agree less with that post. The Trump presidency left many of the traditional republican values out in the cold. He took the party in a whole different direction, which is far from what the Reagan republicans wanted to see.
By this logic would it not mean that there would be no difference between a Biden and Sanders presidency? I just don't buy it.
I’m no saint by any means and am no bible thumper, but I do believe that if you are a Christian you can’t support a party who supports gay marriage, abortions/planned parenthood, or who want to remove god from schools. Basically it’s the separation of Church and State. That’s just my opinion.I'm not a democrat, but know many who are. Curious why you think Christianity would keep you from voting that way?
Second wave of Covid? Lol. If you didn’t see that coming and being reported just days before the election, then you haven‘t been paying attention. The Left will do and say anything ( and censor anything) to steal this election.
First off, I respect your opinion as it’s transparent. How refreshing for once!!!Due to my Christian values I can’t vote for any democrat. I’m Trump all the way! With that being said, I think it’s too close to call right now.
This is my #1 concern about Trump.
No POTUS should EVER say, "I can do whatever I want as President." Because it's not true.
All of these Trump fans better be willing to give President AOC carte blanche if/when that time arrives (God forbid). Because they have embraced and supported the tearing down of checks and balances.
And herein lies the problem...... the actual thing that needs fixing is the people that control these TWO MEGACORPORATIONS called political parties have no interest to do so. They have ZERO incentive to address it because it limits themselves.
I about threw up when I heard $14BILLION has been spent on campaign advertising a few days ago. Regardless of your political dealings, you have billions upon billions going to elected officials to try and bypass the election process. That’s fraud in itself. The amount of trash EXPENSIVE political mailings I’ve received in the past 3 weeks is disgusting.
Im not a huge fan personally but Carly and I are Americans 100%. Just this statement alone and I have profound respect for her as a LEADER.
CARLY FIORINA: Well, you know, the conversations honestly are kind of all over the map. And every single one of the alternatives that you just laid out is being discussed by various people in the party. I also think, however, that that conversation hasn't really happened to the extent it needs to. Because in the Trump Republican Party, it's all about loyalty to Trump. That is the definition of a loyal Republican now is loyalty to Trump.
And in fact, one of the things that I have said publicly and said to many of my colleagues is we are not asked as citizens of this country to pledge allegiance to a party. And we're certainly not asked to pledge allegiance to a president, any president. We're asked instead as citizens to pledge allegiance to a flag one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all and to pledge loyalty to a Constitution.
And so I say all that to say this. One of the things that I think we would be well advised to get rid of a little bit is this feeling that we either have to be always loyal to one team or another. George Washington many, many years ago, 1789 to be exact, said the trouble with political parties is they will come to care only about winning. And I think we've seen that. And so I just start from the point of view that becoming a loyal party member is not necessarily our highest order objective as citizens or as business people in this country.
full interview. And actual honest dialogue for once.
Carly Fiorina on the Republican Party, the business community and why she's supporting Biden
Former Hewlett-Packard CEO and presidential candidate Carly Fiorina joins Yahoo Finance's All Markets Summit to discuss the Republican Party and why she is supporting Joe Biden.finance.yahoo.com
And herein lies the problem...... the actual thing that needs fixing is the people that control these TWO MEGACORPORATIONS called political parties have no interest to do so. They have ZERO incentive to address it because it limits themselves.
I about threw up when I heard $14BILLION has been spent on campaign advertising a few days ago. Regardless of your political dealings, you have billions upon billions going to elected officials to try and bypass the election process. That’s fraud in itself. The amount of trash EXPENSIVE political mailings I’ve received in the past 3 weeks is disgusting.
Im not a huge fan personally but Carly and I are Americans 100%. Just this statement alone and I have profound respect for her as a LEADER.
CARLY FIORINA: Well, you know, the conversations honestly are kind of all over the map. And every single one of the alternatives that you just laid out is being discussed by various people in the party. I also think, however, that that conversation hasn't really happened to the extent it needs to. Because in the Trump Republican Party, it's all about loyalty to Trump. That is the definition of a loyal Republican now is loyalty to Trump.
And in fact, one of the things that I have said publicly and said to many of my colleagues is we are not asked as citizens of this country to pledge allegiance to a party. And we're certainly not asked to pledge allegiance to a president, any president. We're asked instead as citizens to pledge allegiance to a flag one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all and to pledge loyalty to a Constitution.
And so I say all that to say this. One of the things that I think we would be well advised to get rid of a little bit is this feeling that we either have to be always loyal to one team or another. George Washington many, many years ago, 1789 to be exact, said the trouble with political parties is they will come to care only about winning. And I think we've seen that. And so I just start from the point of view that becoming a loyal party member is not necessarily our highest order objective as citizens or as business people in this country.
full interview. And actual honest dialogue for once.
Carly Fiorina on the Republican Party, the business community and why she's supporting Biden
Former Hewlett-Packard CEO and presidential candidate Carly Fiorina joins Yahoo Finance's All Markets Summit to discuss the Republican Party and why she is supporting Joe Biden.finance.yahoo.com
This! Power of the executive order is out of control. We need to go back to where both sides were forced to work together to get something done. Not with the stroke of a pen (or sharpie)This is my #1 concern about Trump.
No POTUS should EVER say, "I can do whatever I want as President." Because it's not true.
All of these Trump fans better be willing to give President AOC carte blanche if/when that time arrives (God forbid). Because they have embraced and supported the tearing down of checks and balances.
I would assume murdering babies would be up there.
This is one of those divisive topics they play way heavily in politics and shouldn't. No party wants more abortions. In plane fact, both want less. Democrats just believe that they should be available if needed because of the harsh truth of what happens when they aren't. This does not answer how being a Christian keeps you from voting democrat. This is only an example of how both sides manipulate core human emotions to lure your blind support.
Disagee. The abortion issue is definitely something that many Christians on the right ask how can you be a Christian and support a party who some are in favor of aborting full term babies. I’m not talking about the mother‘s life being in danger... that would be an exception. I have heard liberal women bragging about having multiple abortions. Bragging! And it’s disgusting. Be responsible.
Trump is going to lose, badly. But the real winners tomorrow will be America and decency. It's time for the Trump worshipping rats to crawl back into the sewer where they belong.
Decency? You’re one of the most indecent, name calling, and disrespectful posters on this board. Such hypocrisy.
Have fun tomorrow night, sewer rat. You gonna be able to watch or do you have a bunch of brain surgeries to perform?